Today, officers from the Federal Penitentiary Service (FSIN) delivered this to my home:

This is the same Rudensky as here:

http://www.duma.gov.ru/structure/deputies/131170/

And also here:

http://dacha.fbk.info/#rudenskiy

As you might guess, United Russia party member Rudensky’s “dacha,” the size of 79 tennis courts, is not located in Penza Region, whose voters he represents in the State Duma.

Well, off to court again. And once again they’ll tell us (just like in the Neverov case): a commission of State Duma deputies checked everything and found that State Duma deputies are violating nothing.

This is all in reference to yesterday’s post about why doing “dacha investigations” is the right and useful thing to do. Deputy Rudensky will have to prove his case not to a judge at the Lyublino District Court, but to the public. And not with some “document from a Duma commission,” but with a photograph of his enormous palace, including undeclared land. You can see everything perfectly clearly in it.

By the way, I forgot to post the video from the dacha investigation yesterday.

YouTube video

http://youtu.be/1LPnX0H9if8

At 3:30 there’s a magnificent moment: a police officer explains very clearly and plainly why the dacha cooperative “Sosny” (“Pines”) means so much to us.

Original