Text version
0:21
Of course, I am satisfied with the verdict right now, and
0:26
I believe the victory is ours, and this is
0:29
a precedent that will have far-reaching
0:32
consequences in the future.
0:35
What
0:37
will you be filing?
0:42
It’s just that there are people here too.
0:48
It has not yet entered into legal force; it will
0:51
be appealed, and accordingly it cannot
0:53
serve as grounds, logically, for
0:55
choosing or changing a preventive measure.
0:57
I would like to say to my family
0:59
exclusively through my lawyers, because
1:01
I am only allowed to communicate with them, which
1:03
it is clear that today’s decision is very
1:05
strange, and this United Russia (the ruling political party) junkie
1:08
is costing all of us suspiciously dearly.
1:10
But it is absolutely clear to me that this is simply
1:13
yet another step aimed at
1:15
trying to drive us into some corner. This
1:17
is forbidden, that is forbidden—they put me under house
1:20
arrest, but recordings still keep appearing,
1:22
there are fines over recordings at night, and so on.
1:24
So I would like to tell you, and through
1:26
you tell everyone, that if someone thinks
1:28
that this United Russia junkie, or anyone else,
1:32
can make the Anti-Corruption Foundation or me or us
1:34
stop publishing investigations,
1:36
that is not going to happen. In the near future we
1:39
will, incidentally, publish a couple more
1:41
investigations. We will not stop our work,
1:43
and we will not stay silent about
1:46
anything; among other things, we will not
1:48
stay silent about what was done to Oleg today.
1:50
Today we have already published documents that
1:52
clearly show that this case
1:54
is completely fabricated. The company Yves
1:57
Rocher itself stated that there was no damage,
1:59
no claims whatsoever. Nevertheless, the case
2:02
continues, even after this statement
2:05
by Yves Rocher. I have nothing more to say to the judges
2:07
for now, but still, I think we will
2:09
say something. That is essentially all I
2:11
wanted to tell you, my dear lawyers.
2:13
Thank you very much to everyone who supports me.
2:15
Please pass on my great thanks
2:16
to everyone who supports me, of course.
2:19
We will definitely appeal all of these
2:21
decisions, because after the victory
2:23
of the forces of good, we will overturn all these decisions, and
2:25
we will punish all the judges. Thank you.
2:30
Anyone who is involved in the kind of work
2:34
that I and my colleagues at the Anti-Corruption Foundation
2:36
are engaged in—they
2:38
must unfortunately, in the conditions of
2:40
Russia, be prepared for the fact that they may
2:43
end up in custody. There is nothing
2:45
unusual about that; it is not some amusing part of our
2:47
work.
2:48
But nevertheless,
2:52
this verdict records the fact that he
2:55
went online on March 5, and
2:57
theoretically they can ask to change
2:58
the preventive measure; the grounds and basis of an already entered-into-force
3:00
verdict can be used to change the preventive measure
3:02
within the framework of the Yves Rocher case and the Kirovles case.
3:05
A review in the Kirovles case cannot be
3:07
carried out, but the inspectorate can file
3:10
a motion to replace a suspended sentence with a real one,
3:13
that is, there the punishment is in the Kirovles case, while
3:15
here it is a preventive measure.