The Autumn Tour. Rally in Yekaterinburg


Young man,
young man,
please.
They have
they need that angle. You're near them
try to get through there, because those
who don't have accreditation, they're there
they have it
I didn't prepare.
Just like that, right?
If you want to ask a question,
that's a loss of garbage.
If you want to ask a question, you can
raise
Ah, friends, a request to those who have already passed through
the metal detectors, who are outside, please have
German patience and understanding. We cannot
affect the speed of the screening and
the work of the police officers. We will wait
for everyone so that everyone gets through. All right. Thank you.
I understand,
I already went through.
Why will it take another half hour?
Navalny is here
Please explain how we're making
the corridor exactly, who stands where
and how
right here, just ask all the people from here
to move now
my Instagram
we're generally going to need this space now
The guy is filming
same from this side, or do we just
move everyone forward from here.
We just need to stand along the barriers and
that's it
there.
But why are we moving so strangely?
It's fine. What's good to film? Come on,
however you want. [ __ ] how they fell.
I don't know. Let's just somehow, it seems to me,
we need to.
I don't really understand what I'm starting with right now.
Meet.
I'm going to the meeting.
Oh,
came from there. What the hell? What's this deception?
Go over to the people.
Organizer, let them through. Thank you very much.
Thank you very much. Organizer.
Well, thank you very much. Write to me.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
Keep moving, keep moving, keep moving.
with a camera. The man went somewhere.
organizer
meet,
so that here it could somehow be calmer,
well, to control
the corridor.
Well, if he was going there.
Right.
This is
wait, wait, wait. All right, friends,
please step behind the barrier.
Please move, please, behind
the barrier.
What, what about them? Well, those are guys from
the administration, so there's basically nothing we can
do about them.
Well, I couldn't exactly
you can write
This is still only an organizational
announcement. I was asked once again
to make it. And while everyone is coming through, I'll
remind you once again: this is a meeting, we are without
slogans and banners. Please treat this with
understanding, and this will avoid delaying
people's entry. If you have any
I don't know, homemade signs,
the police officers will ask you at the entrance
to hand them over. That's the arrangement we made with them.
Thank you very much.
Second,
if
something goes wrong,
someone is behaving badly, provoking people, uh,
trying to start a crush or something, I don't know,
or something like that. It happens.
We'd like it to happen less often, but sometimes it does.
Please, don't
go hitting anyone yourselves or anything. You need
to report it to the nearest police officers.
They will carefully escort the person out. We need
to follow safety rules, because
we have a lot of people here, and if
someone suddenly runs somewhere, that crush
could simply be dangerous. Therefore,
please, let's keep everything orderly and civilized
here, and our wonderful square
of Defense will remain just as beautiful and
clean after our meeting. And we will
begin soon. Well, once everyone has
come in as much as possible
thank you very much. And I really copied it down.
I understand. Well, it's a rally—what else
can you do?
Where? Here. The rally participants are here.
Sorry, there's no room there in the pen. Stand
nearby.
Thank you very much.
Oh.
For now
I can [take] my place.
So, are we going to stand here?
No, let's move over there somewhere,
so you can't see a damn thing.
Oh, that live
TV again
let's go to
let's get together later.
My money is piling up there. Piling up.
So, can we get through or not?
Can we?
No, no. organizers
Hey, brother. People
wrote about you.
No, I was looking for this congress guy.
was ranting,
basically,
I don't want to
watch
was the first one.
saw it.
2 sec
Can you
Hi,
friends. Can those by the metal detectors hear us? There are
several thousand people there.
Raise your hands if you can hear.
Great.
So there are several times more of us here
than there were yesterday in Murmansk, and
we thought that was a lot.
Friends, our rally is open. Hooray!
I'd like to give the floor to the head of Alexei Navalny's campaign headquarters
Leonid Volkov.
Hello, Yekaterinburg.
So, can those behind the barriers hear us?
I can speak louder, in principle.
You should.
Good evening, Yekaterinburg.
It's been four years since I left my hometown,
where I lived my whole life, and now I'm only there
for brief visits.
But on the other hand, my entire social media feed is
all Yekaterinburg,
and most of my friends are from
Yekaterinburg too. So it creates
this kind of dual situation. On the one hand, I'm
immersed in the life of the city, and on the other
hand, I also look at it a little bit
from the outside.
And that probably helps me see
certain things, how they change
over the course of several years.
Well, for example, inspired by this morning,
this morning
just three years ago, probably, or four years
ago
we didn't have a Ministry of Public
Security,
and now we don't have public
security.
But we do have a ministry. Oh,
it's somehow
strange to read about our city in the
news and see that someone drove into a movie theater,
uh, in a UAZ vehicle loaded with barrels. And you
realize that no ministries
are going to help here; probably the issue is
something else. And of course, you'd like to read
different kinds of news about Yekaterinburg.
After all, our city has always been the most
free, the smartest, and the most
forward-looking. In many ways, you want the
news to reflect that.
So. But today there was a rally on Labor Square
where students were invited for 1,000 rubles
to stand there in support of your governor
candidate. Well, the students stood there; they'll buy
themselves something with it, not bad either.
But we remember why they can
gather on Labor Square.
Because back in the day, we defended it together with
you in 2010, if anyone remembers.
Back then we gathered there, but now
things are a little different.
In 2011, sorry for the historical
digression,
if anyone remembers,
Alexei Navalny spoke in Yekaterinburg for the first time
right here,
in this very spot,
on Defenders' Square.
Back then
Yekaterinburg was still a city where
you could win in court when you were
unfairly removed from an election.
Now that no longer works either.
All in all, if you look from the outside
at these past several years,
there are things that have changed in a
direction we never wanted them
to change, things that don't suit our city
because that's not what it's like, because
there is one thing that has not
changed. I can see it perfectly with my own
eyes.
It's the people, the wonderful, remarkable
people of Yekaterinburg,
who are just as free, just as
proud, just as smart, and who also want
to live calmly, normally, and well.
So the people are the same, but life
has changed in the wrong direction.
Well then, we need to turn it around.
And I want to hope that this
turn,
will finally begin
this year, with this campaign, with this
meeting here again on Defenders' Square,
because we have something to offer
the city and the country
in order to
make life at least normal again,
and then try to make it better,
so that the city becomes prosperous, so that
local self-government gets its
rights back, so that money returns
to the city budget, so that people can
gather wherever they want, win
court cases against the authorities, express their views,
decide for themselves what will be built
in their city and what will not, so that people
are heard again.
It seems to me that when I see so many people
here today on Defenders' Square, I really
believe that this is the turn
we are beginning together today.
Thank you so much, Yekaterinburg, for coming.
I'm incredibly glad to see everyone, both familiar
faces and new ones. But of course I won't
stay on this stage for long,
because the main event is still ahead of us.
Friends, raise your hand if you were at
our headquarters at 13 Vaynera Street?
That's not all,
friends. For those who don't know, our headquarters is located
at 13 Vaynera Street, and I'd like to ask
the volunteers of our campaign, who
work their hearts out for this campaign and devote all their
free time
to this cause.
Well done.
And now, friends, I'd like to give the floor
to the candidate for President of the Russian
Federation, Alexei Anatolyevich
Navalny.
Thank you, Ruslan. Hello, capital of the Urals.
Uh.
Hello, Yekaterinburg. A beautiful,
wonderful city that I adore,
and often visit. Guys, I am genuinely
happy to see so many people here. And
I can already imagine the pleasure I'll have tomorrow
or even this evening,
when I read your police reports and
your local news saying that
no one came to Navalny's rally
again. Once again, no one came. Uh,
he stood
before a half-empty square. But why are you
laughing? Yesterday we spoke in
Murmansk.
One percent of the population came to the rally. It was the
largest rally in the city's history.
Two hours later I read that the
criminal opposition figure
stood before a pathetic little handful of people.
And only a few passersby
looked at him with contempt. And then went on,
apparently in neat rows,
to vote for United Russia.
I read in the news—tell me, is it true
or not? Did you see the report
that your children's ombudsman released
special guidelines titled
"How to Keep Schoolchildren Away from Navalny's Rallies".
"
Yes, that happened.
Yes.
I'm just curious, are there any
schoolchildren here? Raise your hand. And
they failed to keep schoolchildren away from
Navalny's rallies. Now I'm going to teach you bad things.
Now I'm going to teach you extremism,
because it's a simple thing. And our campaign
is precisely about this simple thing that they
are so terribly afraid of. That's why they
shake with fear, hate us, and don't
want either schoolchildren or pensioners
to come to rallies. They are afraid of
one simple thing:
the truth
one truthful word. And it throws all of them
into a fever and a panic. Because this entire
system of power is built simply on
endless lies. They sit in those lies
like in a swamp, and they want to drag us
down into it too. Schoolkid, do you want to climb out of there?
No—they grab you by the pant leg and pull you
back down. Stay here with us in this lying, in
this endless falsehood, in this hypocrisy. Be
like us. It doesn't matter whether you're a schoolchild,
a pensioner, a member of the technical
intelligentsia, or a worker. Be like
us. Lie constantly, be hypocritical constantly.
But our campaign is about the fact that quite
a lot of people in Russia
refuse to live by those rules.
Right?
We refuse to live by those rules.
We have the right not to lie endlessly
to ourselves.
And if telling the truth in Russia has become
extremism, fine, then I am an
extremist. But I will not give up
this right to call things by their
proper names. Last weekend you had—what should we call it?
How do you even call it?
I'll be fined if I say what it
really ought to be called.
A lottery is probably the right word. But tell me,
raise your hands, those of you who boycotted
these, well, "elections."
Good for you.
And raise your hand if you still went
to vote.
I see some people. Now tell me, guys,
you went because, well,
it really does feel like a civic duty,
which probably makes sense. After all, we do want
people to go to the polls—but it should be
a decent process.
But it was disgusting. I'm not a resident
of your city. It's not as if I'm trying
to feed you a line here either,
as someone standing here before you. I live
in another city, but I know that
Yekaterinburg is, as your mayor rightly says,
a city of thinking people. I
know that Yekaterinburg is the city, the capital
of the technical intelligentsia.
I don't understand why your governor here
is a man without a higher education degree.
Is that normal at all, or not?
How can that even happen? They're
all laughing at us, mocking us.
It's an insult.
And it's happening, and what do they expect from us—
that we just accept it?
No, that's not going to fly.
Even if no one had come to this square,
I'd probably still be pacing this stage
saying all this here by myself. But there are
so many of you,
and I believe, I se
Even this broke down from my anger at
a man without a higher education degree.
Oh,
I understand,
how many of us there are. Listen, today I
arrived today, uh, and as we were driving past
at Labor Square; that’s also where the governor’s
rally was,
Really?
How much were they paying people to take part?
1,000
1,000 rubles for taking part in the rally.
People are saying 300. They published 1,000, but
that means they cheated them again.
I really don’t want to, guys. Honestly,
I just don’t get it. My mind is
blown. How is this even possible? They’re taking
cash from the budget somehow.
Where did they get that cash from?
How did they get their hands on that cash,
that cash? Officials brought money in a briefcase,
and handed it out to people in exchange for
attending a rally in order to
justify their fraud, to justify
the election of these idiots. And that’s why,
maybe they’ll call me an extremist. Maybe
the police won’t like it. They
asked people not to chant too many slogans
today, but I want
to say honestly and directly that I see
this government, sitting there in your
main government building, as a government of crooks.
That’s what they are; there’s no other way
to describe them.
And the people sitting in the Kremlin are
also a government of crooks and thieves. We understand everything about
them.
Raise your hand if you’ve seen the film *He
Is Not Dimon to You*.
YouTube works. Thanks a lot.
So, do you believe these facts?
Well, if you have doubts, then, well,
you probably think these facts
at least need to be investigated, right?
So here we are, me and the Anti-Corruption Foundation (ACF), we
all did everything we could. We
already photographed everything, filmed all those yachts,
attached the documents. So here you have
proof that the country’s prime minister is
the biggest corrupt official. It’s proven that in a
poor country—one that in places is truly destitute—
one man received money through charitable foundations,
80 billion rubles, and spent it on palaces and
yachts. And what do they do? They simply
turn away and pretend that nothing
is happening.
As if it’s just nonsense. Total gibberish.
Yes, I want to say: it’s you who are talking
complete gibberish.
What else can we do? How else
can we prove it? What other documents
do we need to bring for the fight against
corruption to begin? For there to be at least
a basic investigation.
Here I am,
running in these elections that they don’t
want to let me into, but I
want to be a candidate, and I want to be your
representative.
And I’m saying here, on this stage in
Yekaterinburg,
that, guys, when I come to power, everything
will be different. I will put all these people on the
defendants’ bench. We will
really put them all in prison. They deserve
it.
Yes,
But are we really going to keep endlessly
watching them loot our
country?
No,
this isn’t just corruption, it’s, well, it’s
hopelessness.
Look,
Yekaterinburg is a city of technical
intelligentsia. You have universities that
graduate people who are, well,
truly highly advanced
programmers; they work successfully abroad
and so on. So, everything
seems great, but tell me,
please answer this question. If you
graduated from Yekaterinburg’s best university,
what salary can you realistically get?
20. What was that? 40. No, wait a second.
You graduated from the best university, in an in-demand
specialty. What kind of
salary can you get?
30–40, I hear.
40 is the ceiling.
Well, don’t exaggerate. Don’t
play along with me. Honestly, tell me, what
is the maximum salary? 19, 20?
What do you mean, 25? Excuse me, your
official average salary is 47.
Yes, of course,
I looked at the statistics today,
the official statistics.
Well, that’s exactly the point, folks,
that corruption is a government that
has been sitting there for so many years. It’s not just about
a palace or a dacha. It’s about the fact that no one has
any prospects. And if there’s no
prospect of a decent salary for
someone who graduated from the best university here,
then who could possibly have one?
In
countries that are far more backward
than Russia, the average salary is
70,000 rubles. The average salary in a country like
Estonia, for example.
Does Estonia have oil?
No.
Does Estonia have gas?
No.
Does Estonia have Uralvagonzavod and all
your other factories?
No. There’s nothing there. What they do have is simply
a change of power. But this is genuinely
humiliating, awful, and, well, it simply
really, once again, deprives us of any
prospects. You graduate brilliantly from university and
you can get a job for 40,000 rubles a month,
a salary of less than $1,000. For
For that kind of salary, in more or less developed
countries, people wouldn’t even sweep the streets.
But we think—we’ve somehow sort of accepted
that, well, that’s just how it’s supposed to be. We
somehow seem to think we deserve this kind of life,
but that’s not true. And why does it have to be
this way? My election campaign—you can
call me
a populist for it too, because, well, people say
it’s a primitive approach. You keep
talking about wages all the time.
But I believe that first and foremost we need to
talk about wages in real terms.
I’m running in this election so that everyone
can have higher wages, because I
believe that in modern Russia, at
its current stage of development, people can and
should live much, much
better.
And using your region as an example, we can see
that people in a city of the same size, with
the same level of education, earn, when
converted into rubles, no less than
90,000 rubles.
Someone who becomes a programmer
in America will immediately earn, in
rubles, no less than 6 million rubles
a year. Is it possible here to honestly earn
that kind of money?
Well, why not? I’m not talking about
some kind of, you know, crystal castles.
We’re not even talking about crystal castles anymore.
Not that long ago, we were laughing at China,
right? We said there were millions of
poor people in China, that China had such
bad-quality products. In China, pensions weren’t paid
until quite recently. Now the average
wage in Russia is lower than in China.
How could that have happened? What is it
they know how to do that we don’t? Work.
And the answer is simple. There, there is even
corruption there. But there is turnover of
power. Yes. Yes.
Those leaders of the Chinese
Communist Party—they change
every 10 years.
But here, these people have dug in—Putin has already been
in power for 18 years. How much longer can this go on? I’m
going to quote one person now,
who said the following. You can look it up
online later: after 10 years in
power, any person goes mad. Who
said that?
Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin.
And according to his formula, who is now sitting
in the Kremlin?
A madman.
A madman. Well, there really is a madman
sitting there. They’ve gone crazy over all this
money, this wealth, all of
it. They don’t care about the country. They don’t
care about development. Putin has been
in power longer than Brezhnev (the long-serving Soviet leader) was.
That’s why we are so poor. That’s why
we laughed at China, but it has overtaken us.
All our lives, we thought Kazakhstan was
some kind of, well, underdeveloped republic
compared with us. But in Kazakhstan
the average wage is now higher than in
Russia.
Is that really how it should be?
No.
Are we really doomed to permanent
poverty, to constant scraping by,
to mere survival? Are we really doomed to have, in
the most technologically advanced city,
wages of 20,000 to 40,000 rubles?
No, I know we are not. And I see the
amount of oil and gas that
is extracted in this country. It is still
enough to solve the basic
fundamental problems of the population, to
at least improve healthcare a little
bit. Tell me—I ask this question in every
city, and I’ll ask it here
too. I just see quite a lot of
older people here.
There are queues at the clinics.
Here’s a little experiment. You go to a clinic
and say: "I want to get an ultrasound quickly and
for free." How long do you have to wait?
A week.
20 minutes
and 1,000 rubles.
Two hours.
Four days.
10
A month. And if you come in and say: "I want
to get an MRI?"
Are you kidding? Are you kidding, guys? We’re in the
21st century, in a developed country that
launched satellites and rockets, that
possesses nuclear weapons, that, I don’t
know, has Rosnano, Skolkovo, Medvedev
with an iPhone, and we ourselves laugh when answering
the question: "Can you even get an MRI?" Well,
that’s exactly why
living in Russia is practically impossible.
Male life expectancy here is 65
years.
When someone dies at 60 or 65, everyone
says, "Well, he lived a full life."
How can that be in Russia? What is 65 years old?
Like an old man, a very old man, died?
In any more or less normal developed
country, that’s still a relatively young person
who will live at least another 15 to 20
years, but here all of this has fallen apart.
Why, your city shocked all of Russia quite recently
when it emerged that here there was
an HIV epidemic.
It’s monstrous. And right now it has simply
come to light in Yekaterinburg. It turned out that
in terms of the number of HIV cases
we are ahead of almost all African countries.
So the question is: what the hell, then? Who is all this
oil for? Who is all this gas for, if
we can’t even solve such elementary things
we can't, if we're somewhere down there
at the bottom of this ladder
of developed countries,
I don't want us to be here.
I live in Russia, and my children live here too. I
hope they won't leave anywhere. I don't
want them to leave. I know
for certain that we can change everything,
that Russia can live differently. I
know how to defeat corruption. I keep
being told, oh my God,
it's so difficult. It's almost
impossible to prove anything when fighting,
when you're combating corruption.
To hold people accountable.
I become president. I introduce a law
on combating illicit enrichment. And
Governor Kuivashev. Kuivashev.
Kuivashev
comes in and starts explaining
where his wife gets an income of 10 million rubles
Can you imagine where she gets an income of
10 million rubles a year?
No.
No.
Per year.
We take his property, we take his
income, and compare them. And if the
official can't explain where he got this
country house worth 100 million rubles on a salary of 3 million,
a criminal case is automatically opened against him.
No need to prove anything
else. This works in all
countries, and it will work in Russia too.
Thank you.
When people tell me it's hard to fight
corruption, I answer very, very simply.
Let's create an institution of independent
prosecutors who will be able to open
a criminal case even against the president.
Yes, I want to become the president who
creates a special prosecutor's office that will be able to
investigate even himself,
because that's the only way to win.
Because this government, as you can see,
does nothing but create for itself
immunity. Do you remember what Putin's first
presidential decree
was
about guarantees and immunity for President
Yeltsin? That's what they want endlessly—this
arrangement where they grant immunity to their
family, to themselves, to their friends, and
so on and so forth. But we will become
the government that refuses this
immunity and says: well, we're the
same as everyone else. This is a basic condition for fighting
corruption. Once we apply at least these two
measures, we'll see how much
more money is freed up in the budget.
Every year, in public procurement alone and
in state corporation procurement, 7 trillion
rubles are stolen. That's not my estimate. It's the estimate of the
Accounts Chamber. Seven trillion. You could build a new
country with that; you could send all of you
to the Canary Islands. As you may remember, there was that line in a
film: while workers from Central Asia
fix up Russia, the entire population
gets sent to the Canary Islands.
We have a sea of money. There is still an enormous
amount of money in the country. But what
does that money turn into?
Into country houses,
into yachts
and into the Forbes list. When Putin came to
power in 2000, how many
billionaires were there in Russia?
Six.
Four. And how many are there now?
More than 100.
The question is: how did they make their money?
What exactly did they create from 2000 to
2018 that made them all billionaires?
So where are they? Show me where these
new enterprises appeared—what exactly happened?
This is an industrial region here.
Please name for me the new
enterprises that have been created over
the past few years. New, powerful, impressive
enterprises.
There aren't any. Krasnoye & Beloye.
Krasnoye & Beloye—what's that?
Judging by the name, it sounds like a wine
store. And that's exactly what it is. I guessed right.
That's not much, is it? Really not
much. But let's remember,
guys.
During the Brezhnev years, oil prices were high too,
and Brezhnev's petrodollars,
basically, built everything
we see from the 1970s. All of this
industry came from Brezhnev's
petrodollars. And where are Putin's
petrodollars?
In Syria,
With Roldugin, the Rotenbergs, and Timchenko.
By now all the judo coaches, the neighbors from the
dacha, former colleagues—everyone is a billionaire in the
literal sense of the word. The most
unpleasant thing is that I'm not even exaggerating
when I say this.
In the literal sense of the word, they are all
billionaires, and they are trying to
convince us that this is how it should be.
But is that really how it should be?
No.
Are we going to put up with it?
No. I know for certain that on these issues
it's not they who have 86% support, but us—86%
support.
Everyone, the whole country,
young and old alike, whoever you like—nobody
likes this. It infuriates everyone. And people will
follow us.
The whole country.
Whether they know me or not?
Whether they're savvy and watch YouTube or
less savvy and watch Dmitry Kiselyov.
They understand that something is wrong
with our law enforcement
system, right?
But we already spend more than a third of the budget on
these security forces.
And yet, in terms of the number of
premeditated murders per capita in the
world, we are at the level of African countries. But
is that normal or not? No.
And why is this happening? We rank
second in the world in the number of police officers
per capita. And in murders, we are also among the leaders.
And that's because what does the police
actually do?
Look in the bushes.
Look in the bushes.
What's more,
I'm sure
that every police officer right now—I,
guys, I'm talking to you—is standing there thinking:
"My God, what idiocy. Why are we
standing here? Why are we spending this
Saturday evening just
standing around guarding people who simply
came to talk and then go home?"
Just think how much money this
costs. And there stand these police officers, with
helmets put on them, as you can see. They're
hot. They're going out of their minds and thinking:
"Damn, it would be better if they
just gave us a raise." Yes,
higher,
guys. President Navalny will raise
your salaries.
And he won't force you to do
this nonsense.
You'll work properly and be paid
properly. Our budget for
law enforcement is such that
you really could give everyone apartments.
They just need to stop stealing endlessly.
Please, everyone, look. I can see
police officers over there nodding.
The investigation into how the Interior Ministry bought buses.
Billions were stolen—billions.
And this is happening right before
all our eyes.
Tell me, please, who
here has ever—there are a lot of people here, a lot.
You can't see it, but I assure you, there are
really a lot of people. Who here has ever taken out
a consumer loan? Bought
a washing machine, I don't know, or just
a car.
So, what interest rate were you able to get
from the bank on that loan?
16
28
25, I hear
16
24
Listen, this is interesting, right? So it turns out
you borrow money from a bank at 24% interest.
And that bank, in turn, gets money from the Central Bank. But
there's something strange here. For example, Putin's son-in-law
somehow managed to get a billion
dollars at 0% annual interest.
How on earth did that happen?
And now it has come out that Otkritie Bank
has a hole in its finances, and that hole
is being plugged. There's a hole because billions were stolen.
And those billions are being covered
with our own money by printing more. And then
it lends again at what rate?
0% interest.
So here's what I don't understand.
I want to become president because of this. It all comes down
to money. Even they have felt it
deeply, because it's completely unclear why the hell
the hell
some people can get loans at 0%, while others
have to pay 24%.
I am going,
I am running for election with a simple idea. If
inflation in the country is 4%,
then with a small subsidy we
can and will provide our citizens with
mortgages at 2%. Would you
turn down a 2% mortgage? And everywhere
in the world this works—in any
European country it's 1.5–2%.
In Denmark, they even give loans at negative
interest rates, because people need housing.
In Russia, people live with their parents until they're 40,
because buying housing is impossible.
And I know that I will bring all of this down. I
will scrap a huge share of
construction permits, to hell with them. That way
I will lower housing prices.
Business is developing in Russia.
And why isn't it developing?
It's being strangled, because the moment someone starts
to grow, the moment they earn something,
the fire inspectors come, then some other agency comes, then
the local cop comes, everyone descends on him. Then someone
comes to him
and says: "Come on, make a contribution for the holiday." Then another one comes
and then another comes,
all with their hands out.
By the way, let's congratulate Evgeny
on his fiftieth anniversary
Zhenya, you'll watch this clip later
of the video. People support you in your
city.
In Russia, there are 2 million
inspections every year.
What?
What is there even to inspect in a hair salon?
From this platform
I raise my hand and promise you. Once again,
you understand, I consider these inspections
altogether,
because all the taxes from small business
amount to 0.5%
of GDP. They are completely insignificant.
Administering them
costs more
than any revenue they bring in.
Thank you, my dear, for earning
something that brightens someone's day. It's
very easy to do. Very easy. I
did it on the first day.
You know,
we often joke that right now, here in
2017, we joke about how
North Korea is closing in, some kind of dystopia
gets compared to it, but we sort of understand that it's unlikely
that North Korea, of course, will really happen. But
then I have a question for everyone. Could
we have imagined
in 2011 that in Russia, every day,
there would be criminal cases over likes
on VKontakte,
over reposts,
reposts, reposts,
people
post pictures from cartoons about
war, and somewhere in them there's a swastika, and against
them criminal cases are opened, they are thrown into
prison. It's insane, it's nonsense. And standing at
this podium, I am telling you that I will repeal
Article 282. In Russia, people will not be
persecuted for their beliefs.
Standing here, I am telling you that
I may even come personally and
shut down Roskomnadzor (Russia's state media and internet censor) once and for all
— a harmful, disgusting organization,
that raves at us, that pushes us around,
that steals from us. We will do
all of it. There are many simple, obvious,
elementary things that can be done and must
be done in Russia. And we will do them.
Guys, here's something important. In a moment, in a moment, I
will start answering questions. And for anyone
who says to me, listen, this all sounds great, but
you do understand that
there's no way through, you understand that anyway
you can't break through this wall.
Well, I want you
to know what I feel, and to feel it
with me. We will be able to break through
it. Today, the politically active part of the population
is on our side in such numbers
that it is plain to see.
United Russia can only gather people,
Putin can only gather people.
Medvedev can gather people.
All change
is made by the politically active part
of the population.
And within that politically active part
of the population, we are the majority.
We must feel our own
strength, our own capabilities. There are so many of us
for us
the people standing in this square
can win over the entire city of
Yekaterinburg and the whole Sverdlovsk Region
in two days. If you spend 20 minutes
telling people about this rally,
telling them that you were here, that
you were here in the square, that
if you spend just 15 minutes on
campaigning across the city,
then after all, back in 2013 you already
elected what was effectively an opposition
mayor here. Right? So it can be done,
because they understood they could lose,
yeah, damn it, there were speakers right nearby
and they would lose — and they did lose.
And they will lose to us, because on our
side is the truth, because we do not pay anyone
to attend rallies. Because
in reality, everyone is with us, even
officials and police officers. First they bring
papers saying what a terrible person you
are, and then later they say, "Well,
all right then, hang in there."
But every time the police detain me,
drag me into a police van,
lock me in that thing. Then all the police officers come over
and say, "All right, now we'll tell you
about our lives."
Am I their boss or something? Am I a police
general? No, but they tell me
how terribly everything is set up, how
awful it all is, how hopeless it is, the miserable
salary, no chance of getting an apartment, and all
the rest of it. We simply have to be active, we
have to work every day, we must
create such public opinion
that they understand: it is impossible not to let us into
the election.
They cannot bar us from the election, because
this is not just some Navalny.
Navalny is just a function. A person
temporarily standing on this stage. Who is going into
the election?
You, us. We are going into the election. And they cannot keep
us out of this election. Right?
Yes.
Guys, I believe in you.
I promise I won't let you down. So please,
you help too. Get involved in the work.
This government is not a monolith.
It's a lump of butter — and rancid butter at that.
We will go in there and take as much power
as we want, if we believe in
ourselves and keep working. I believe in you. Do you
believe in me? Yes.
Then we will win and achieve the Beautiful Russia
of the Future. Thank you. I am ready to answer
questions. As promised,
easy ones, uncomfortable ones. Aren't you tired yet
after about an hour here? Not too cold, not too hot?
Ready to stay a little longer?
Yes.
Hey, just like at a rock concert. Thank you
very much.
Ah, Ruslan, help me out, please. If anyone
has questions, come up, I'm ready to
answer them.
Alexei, I'm here. A question from this side.
Go ahead.
And the question is: what should be done with the Ministry of
Culture?
No, then everyone will think I’m answering
pre-prepared questions.
No, no. Who asked the question about peace?
Then let him ask it himself. And what about what to do with
the Ministry of Culture?
I wanted to ask what you are going to do with
the Ministry of Culture and the obscurantism
around the state film fund.
To be honest, I don’t really understand
why the Ministry of Culture is needed at all. At
least in its current form, it consists of strange
people who have nothing whatsoever
to do with culture. Who heads our Ministry of
Culture? Medinsky,
a man with a stolen dissertation,
a man with three of them.
And
here’s what I would do. Right now the situation with
the Ministry of Culture is interesting. There we
have one set of crazies—Medinsky—who is
fighting another set of crazies—Poklonskaya.
And first I would help Medinsky defeat
Poklonskaya, and then I would fire him and get rid of
all of them.
I believe officials should not regulate this.
Officials should not
run the film fund. Fine, suppose I become
president—do you really want to trust me
to decide which film
gets funding and which one does not? I
don’t think so. I’m not an expert in this. I
don’t claim to be. I don’t think
some people sitting in offices, even if they are
good, honest officials, should
be making those choices. The film fund, which we
will finance, should be run by
people from the industry who actually understand
films, as is done in
France, for example, and then all of this
will start working. The Ministry of Culture, instead of being
a giant, incomprehensible bureaucratic
system, will become a compact
ministry that distributes
state grants among
cultural institutions. That’s all.
Next question.
Hello, Alexei. I have a question.
Do you think Russia needs
reform of the housing and utilities sector
(housing and communal services)? If so, what kind? Thank you.
Let me ask you: does Russia need
housing and utilities reform? Yes.
I’d say not just yes, but absolutely yes.
Because—well, let’s look at
utility rates. We were just discussing how
the official average salary there is 47,000
rubles. But what is the real average salary in
the region?
25,000 to 30,000 at most. How much do you have to pay
for utilities for a two-room apartment here in
the city?
10,000. 10,000. You’re probably exaggerating,
5,000. 5,000.
That’s what people here pay.
And that’s exactly the point. A person earns
25,000, and for a two-room apartment they
have to pay 5,000. And are utility rates
going up or down?
How did it happen that when
state monopolies were privatized, we were
told that this was being done to create
competition so that utility prices would fall?
Did that happen?
No. Instead, a giant state monopoly was created in
everything. So the main reform that the
housing and utilities sector needs is ending
the monopoly. In fact, there is nothing
super complicated about this. Humanity has been using
pipes
for hundreds of years. Humanity has been cleaning roads
for hundreds of years, and supplying hot water
to homes for the last hundred years. In every
country this is done. This can and
should be handled by small businesses. And
electricity is generated everywhere. This is not
rocket science, not nuclear physics.
So the housing and utilities sector needs demonopolization
and, once again, an end to theft.
Because I have said, and I keep saying, that
a significant—the biggest—part of my
economic program is the fight against
corruption. You know that in the housing and utilities sector, in
Russia, unimaginable sums of money are simply being stolen.
And it’s impossible to track any of it.
We pay for our apartments, and we pay for
various charges, things like cleaning
the garbage chute.
Washing
the windows in apartment building hallways. Have you ever once seen
the windows in a hallway actually being washed? No.
No one has ever seen that. In my building
they’ve never been washed. At least, I
live in a prefab apartment block. So
demonopolization, fighting corruption,
and relying on small business in the utilities sector, the way it
works all over the world. Then everything here
will start working too. Let’s take a question from this
side. Ruslan, a question from this side. And
the youth
the youth,
Hello. How are you planning to make
more state-funded university places and scholarships
can’t even formulate the question properly?
He’s just an ordinary mortal.
Do we need more state-funded places,
what do you think?
And make them all free.
And when I say this—and it is written into
our program—I’m not saying it
just to say something popular
so that teachers or
students or anyone else will like me. This is global
practice. My reasoning here is simple and rational.
These students whom we
educate for free, without spending
that much money on them, will tomorrow become people
who work and pay taxes. The
better the education a person receives, the more
in taxes he will pay into the budget of his
city, his region, his country. That is how
developed countries work. Money and brains
generate profits in the modern world.
Yesterday marked the anniversary of the founding of a company
that is now worth more than
Gazprom, Rosneft, and all the others put together.
It was created by our former
compatriot. What is the name of the
company?
Google.
They built it with their brains
without oil, without gas, without any of that. So,
of course, yes,
education needs investment. We
will raise education spending
to the level of the countries of the Organisation for Economic
Development, that is, by about one and a half to two
times. This will allow us to increase
the number of state-funded university places today, and
tomorrow profit from those students,
who earn more and pay more
taxes. Question.
Will we finally have a secular
state, where the church will not
interfere in the affairs of the people, as we
see today in the example of our city with the
church on the water?
You just can't see who is asking this
question. As I understand it, you are
a clergyman.
A graduate of the theological seminary
in Yekaterinburg, Viktor Nor
a graduate of the theological seminary. You see,
they have pushed things so far that
a seminary graduate is asking
when this obscurantism will end and what we
are going to do about all of it. Exactly.
And it is the right person asking the question, because
what is happening now, well, it is
not faith at all, it is not
Christianity at all. Are we seriously
supposed to believe that all these people, former members of the
Communist Party of the Soviet
Union, former members of the Leninist
Komsomol (Soviet youth organization), have now become the most devout
people, the most conservative
Christians? Of course not. It is just brazen,
hypocritical crooks,
who stand in churches, bowing and crossing themselves,
They have never read the Bible in their lives,
never even held the Gospel in their hands, yet
they try to teach us how to live and try to teach
us faith. So, I believe there must
be freedom for religious organizations.
The Russian Orthodox Church is a fine, respected organization.
They raise money for themselves and
spend it on themselves. They have their own charter, their own
monastery, they operate independently. But
we will not allow the church to put people in
prison.
We will not allow the church,
you understand, to simply seize plots of land from
cities and regions, to simply say: "Well,
we want a church right here." And basically
not give a damn about you, about anyone. We
want to take this pond for ourselves, fill it in,
and build a church here. No, that is not how
it should work. There are believers, and they
have their own opinion. There are people who do not
want to see this church there; they want
the pond to remain,
they want this church to be in another
place.
Both sides have the right to their own
voice. That is how it should work.
So, they should go to a referendum.
Whoever gets more votes than the other,
wins. That is how it should work,
right?
The democratic majority wins
for me. I am a believer. But I do not want
to watch the church start ordering around
the Investigative Committee. I do not want
to watch people, hiding behind faith,
actually trying to burn things down here. I mean,
across the country they write that it was a movie theater. But this is
not a movie theater you have here, right? Kosmos.
It is a huge concert hall in the center of the
city. If he had driven into it instead of
crashing into a chair, he would have burned everything down.
It really was an attempted terrorist attack.
Yakone
look,
neither the police, nor the FSB, nor your authorities
call this by the word it should
be called. They are afraid of the word terrorism, they
are shaking. But if we see that a person
for political motives and motives of faith
prepared for it, bought a car, bought two barrels of
gasoline, bought gas cylinders,
crashed, and set it all on fire, what is that?
That is a terrorist attack, right?
And we will call it what it is: a terrorist attack.
And I say that the FSB officers missed
this terrorist attack, and Poklonskaya inspired
this terrorist attack. These crazy people
inspired this terrorist attack, and because of them
people could have died, and they must
be held accountable for it. Therefore, we
respect the church, we support
the church, it is separate from the state and
cannot command the state.
Question.
Question.
Chechnya—Kadyrov.
So, Chechnya, Kadyrov.
I can say
completely honestly and without fear,
that I believe Ramzan Kadyrov
was the person who ordered the murder of Boris
Nemtsov.
All the case materials point to that.
It appears he is involved in other
murders as well. Therefore,
there should be this kind of investigation
conducted into Ramzan Kadyrov.
an investigation into his involvement in
contract killings, torture, and so on.
I will become president. It will happen. And
there's no need to listen to tales that
war will immediately break out, there will be explosions and
clashes—nothing of the sort will happen. Remember,
there was once a mayor of Makhachkala, Said Amirov, about whom
people also said that he had seized
power so completely that he controlled everyone. Removing him
was impossible. He killed people. Everyone
knew he was killing people, but there was
nothing anyone could do about him. Then they decided to act,
that group arrived, arrested him,
took him to Moscow, and that was it. And nothing
happened. And the same thing will happen in Chechnya.
And Chechnya, like any other republic,
needs something simple. What people really need
is wages and income. Billions are
allocated there, but they never actually reach
ordinary people. Salaries there are even
lower than here. People there earn around 8,000
rubles. So what Chechnya needs is a functioning
judicial system, a fight against corruption, and
proper regional governance. That's
all. Next question.
What will we do with the NKVD and KGB archives?
The one-word answer: open them.
The NKVD and KGB archives—we will open them, because
well, because this is our history.
Look, we still have documents from
1920.
Documents from the 1930s are still classified.
Why are they classified? Who are these
secrets being kept from? This has nothing to do with
active intelligence officers or
operational work. It's just nonsense.
So we will declassify all of it and provide
more funding to our historians so that
they can study it and publish it. Next question.
Ruslan, a question.
Yes, Alexei, there's a question from this side. We
haven't been over there yet, and they're asking to hand it over. Can we
pass it along? I'll read it out.
All right, the microphone is gone. We—will we get it back? Yes,
yes, I'll definitely bring it back. Will
same-sex coupl—same-sex couples get the right
to register a marriage and take children into guardianship
and adopt them?
All right, we've reached the question of gay marriage.
Listen, please, just don't
ask me in a city where Roizman is
the mayor about legalizing drugs, or I'll
end up in a very awkward position.
So, I believe that when it comes to
same-sex marriage, we should follow
the path that the United
States took. We should hold
regional referendums
and put the question there. If the residents of that
territory—for example, St. Petersburg—
are ready, they will legalize it. The residents of
Makhachkala are unlikely to be ready, and
so legalization there will probably happen
later. So I think we need to move
in that direction and allow people
to hold referendums. Of course, this is
a major issue, but they are partners, they are
couples, and they cannot formalize their relationship,
they can't even grant each other powers of attorney,
and all the rest of it. So yes, of course, this is
a problem; it needs to be discussed, it needs to be
put to referendums and voted on.
Obviously, it will vary greatly
from region to region. Ruslan,
develop business.
What
how will you devel—develop
just about
How will I develop small business? As I
already said, small business does not need
any special development. Nothing special needs to be done
for it. It just needs to be left
alone. We will abolish taxes on small
business. And most importantly, we will abolish
reporting requirements.
All small businesses are drowning in endless paperwork.
Four times a year you have to
file reports—what is even the point of that?
When I become president, it will work
simply. You want to become a small
business owner, a businessman. You write to
your city administration: Hello,
Yevgeny Roizman. Starting tomorrow, I,
Petya Ivanov, will be a businessman. Roizman
sends you back a little token that says
"Petya Ivanov,
businessman." That's it. That's it. Then a year later he
meets with you and gives you a certificate of honor
for doing it.
No other kind of relationship with small
business is needed. Let's leave it alone.
It will develop on its own. And how about answering
about big business?
Alexei,
Ruslan, where are you? Where? Who has the microphone?
Yes.
Yes. What do you think about the situation in
the Barnaul campaign office?
As for the situation in the Barnaul campaign office, I
think there is a conflict in the Barnaul office,
obviously, as there is in many
public organizations, in all kinds of
campaign offices, and in any election
campaigns. And, as I understand it,
Leonid Volkov, the head of my campaign, he
simply removed from their positions all
the participants in that conflict.
Question.
Yes, friends,
ask the pensioner.
Alexei Anatolyevich, you say
wonderful things, but how will you avoid
a situation similar to October 1993
when the president is new, but
the parliament is fundamentally old?
Excellent question. Thank you very much.
Let's think about that.
We have a parliament now, right?
I'm not exactly hearing a confident answer, am I?
Well, let’s put it this way—let me rephrase.
So then. There are some people who
call themselves a parliament,
and get paid 450,000 rubles a month (about 450,000 RUB),
per month,
ride around in official cars,
and it doesn’t look like we elected them, right?
And it certainly doesn’t look like they
represent our interests. But they do represent your
interests.
But they represent—why, they don’t even represent the interests
of the communists. They represent no one’s
interests except their own.
So let’s, well,
imagine this is a popular plebiscite.
I’ll act according to how you vote.
I’m putting the question to a vote. Who is in favor of
President Navalny dissolving this
parliament and calling new elections?
Everyone.
Who’s against?
Abstentions?
None.
Passed by an overwhelming majority.
We are dissolving parliament. Those
powers exist. We are calling new
elections in which everyone will be able to participate.
Everyone. Left-wingers, right-wingers, nationalists,
liberals, pro-gay marriage, anti-gay marriage,
for legalization, against legalization.
Anyone will be able to create their own parties through
a simple notification procedure, go out and win
their share of the vote, whether large or small. I’m sure
that in such an election I’ll be able to assemble
a majority and govern the country,
relying on a parliament that can
investigate me,
that passes laws, that
is independent, that can create
parliamentary commissions, and where there is room
for political debate. Next
question.
Well done, Lyosha.
Alexei.
And I’m not
I’m here. Maybe me—here, here, here,
how many? Ah, all right, I know.
Hello.
Hi.
I’d like to ask you: are you afraid of
criticism? And when you become president,
do you want to restore freedom of speech?
Am I afraid of criticism? Turn on the TV and
see what they say about me.
Open the internet and look at what they say
about me there. I think many
Kremlin political pundits probably just
hang my portraits in their homes because
I’ve been feeding them for years.
All they do is write
some nonsense about me. Well, I’m a normal
person. When people praise me,
it feels good. When they criticize me, it feels less
good. But I’ve adopted the following,
so to speak, formula. People criticize me. I
try to understand: are they criticizing me
fairly? If so, I’ll try to improve.
Why? Because I want to be
president for four years, and then, if I manage
it, for the next four years as well. But in order
to be re-elected, I need
to listen to criticism. I want to be
president, and I promise you that I will be
the kind of president who, after four years
in office, will come back here to this
stage again and will stand before you
to report back,
will speak before you.
without any preparation and without any
censorship. How many other
candidates are there like that? Who else would come here to you?
There was that Stanisyuganov standing there,
Yevlinsky,
Zhirik
was here.
He was good,
Putin.
In a normal country—the kind we will turn
Russia into—candidates will be
obliged to do this, because public
opinion will be such that, man, if you
didn’t come, didn’t speak, and didn’t answer
questions—pleasant or unpleasant—you
can never win, anywhere. Right?
If you didn’t take part in debates, then
goodbye. You shouldn’t be involved in
politics at all if you’re afraid of debate.
What business do you have getting into it?
Find another job if you’re afraid.
I’m not afraid, I do this work, and
that’s why I will always seek your
support and will always listen
to your criticism. Question:
what will relations be like in for-
eign policy? Will there be a thaw with
the West?
Foreign policy.
First, we will stop all wars, overt and
covert.
We don’t need them. Uh,
they’re expensive,
they make us poorer.
Second, we will be on friendly terms with everyone,
because that brings in money. Third, and
most importantly, you could say this is
Alexei Navalny’s foreign-policy creed.
I will stop forgiving debts.
I will stop
financing all this Aleppo, all this
Palmyra. I love them all. But listen,
today I read the news that President
Putin said that Russia, through Gazprom,
will invest 100 billion rubles in gas infrastructure
in Kyrgyzstan.
Forty percent of Russia has no gas infrastructure.
Here, your rate of gas access is lower
than the national average. Why are we spending
money for Kyrgyzstan?
Who here has a dacha, raise your hands.
Well, your parents—tell me, please,
is it easy to get a dacha connected to gas?
Impossible. And how much does it cost?
About how much does it cost?
A lot.
rubles.
And you have to wait, too,
let's just say, an insane amount of money. It costs
more than anyone has.
It's impossible. Entire settlements aren't even
connected to gas. Look, we're allocating 40
100 billion rubles to Kyrgyzstan. And three weeks ago
the governor of Tomsk Region ceremonially opened a
street standpipe
for water.
Great. Just great. We gave money to
Venezuela, we gave it to Mozambique, we
gave it to Cuba, and then we take a bucket, go
to that standpipe, fill it with water, and
carry it home.
That will not happen under President
Navalny. So we will be on good terms with all
countries, we will trade with them, we
will work with them, but this is our money, this is
our citizens' money. So,
please return it, and we will not give any more
because we simply cannot afford it.
Next question.
Let's take this one
the question from the very edge.
What should we do as voters
to at least get you registered?
Do you understand?
Excellent question.
For you to get me
registered, you as voters
need to say:
"We demand the registration of Alexei
Navalny." You need to say this to yourselves, you
need to write it on social media, you
need to say it to friends, acquaintances,
relatives. This is not a naive approach.
It's not some kind of nonsense. It's not like
nothing depends on me.
This government is afraid of public opinion.
No matter how much they puff themselves up, in essence,
they always follow the polling. Here they
checked here, in Svetlovsk Region, and
realized that if we mess around with the election,
well, everyone will be unhappy. Ten percent
of people will boycott it, but overall
it'll pass.
And it worked. So we need to make it so
that in the very next poll they
conduct, they understand: it won't work. No one
will go to these elections. Guys,
we don't have television, we don't have big newspapers.
But you have something far more
powerful. Every single person, therefore, is a
super-unit of campaigning. We must create
such a mood in society that they
understand: he has to be registered. Yes, there will
be problems, yes, he will demand airtime in
debates, yes, he will expose
corrupt deals, yes, he will be the kind of
candidate who is not afraid to come on
and make it personal, but he still must be
registered, because otherwise it will
be worse. I'll tell you honestly,
I don't have some cunning plan, I don't have a Plan B, I don't have
any grand concept. Basically, all
I have is your support. You
are financing this campaign, and you have also
come here. I have acted, and I act, head-on.
I travel from city to city,
gather people, and say: "Guys, let's
demand my registration."
If I can travel to enough places,
if I can convince enough of you to spend
your time on this, then we will achieve
what we need, and then we will also
win." Next question.
Cryptocurrency.
Cryptocurrency.
Cryptocurrency. Do you have a position on it? Go ahead.
Cryptocurrency. An interesting thing. Well, it existed
—cryptocurrency existed, and that was that. And then suddenly our
authorities got all concerned about it.
It needs to be regulated, it needs to be
banned, it needs to be allowed, it needs to
be licensed. My position on
cryptocurrency: leave it alone. Don't
stick your nose in. The state should not
be involved there at all. The state has
an ordinary currency called the Russian
ruble. It should be dealing with that
currency and not wasting time on nonsense like
regulating cryptocurrency. It is a
complex market, and for many people an incomprehensible one,
but it definitely does not need any kind of
regulation. Now
let's take a question from over here next.
Good evening.
We're very glad to see you. At the very
beginning of your speech today, you mentioned
that the region ranks first
in some negative indicator. And right now
there is no adequate treatment in Russia.
That is, we are being treated
with some kind of third-generation
drugs. Tell me, can this issue
be solved at all?
We conducted an investigation specifically into
the medications that are given
to HIV-positive people in order to
prolong their lives. As you know, for now
they cannot be cured, but in the West these
people live for decades.
In fact, anyone in Russia
is living amid what is effectively an AIDS and HIV epidemic. Therefore,
anyone could become infected tomorrow at a
dentist's office, somewhere else,
or through ordinary sexual contact. This
is truly a problem for everyone. African-level
rates. So, we conducted
an investigation and found that
Government agencies buy these
medicines at three times their actual
cost. So once again we return to the
issue of corruption. These medicines
exist, and they are used effectively in all
Western countries. All we need
to do now is establish basic
oversight so that people stop stealing.
And there will be enough of these medicines
to, well, provide them at low cost
to everyone infected,
which is, essentially,
the only currently available
program for humanity. There was a question about pensions.
A question.
Please tell me, do pensions
in any way match the subsistence minimum?
Not at all. And do you know what our government proposed yesterday
to solve
this problem? Look,
the problem is that
the consumer basket, its cost,
is rising, while pensions are not. And yesterday our
clever, crafty government came up with
a way to deal with it. It said: "We
are freezing the cost of the consumer
basket".
Well, prices are rising, but we will not pay
attention to that. We will freeze it, and it will
look as though pensions are adequate. So,
first.
I will stop lying and saying that this
poverty-level amount that is called
the consumer basket is real; we
will set a proper subsistence
minimum. Second, I will make
all these
wonderful Gazproms of ours finance the pension fund.
Rosneft, Norilsk Nickel, and all
the rest. They do not pay dividends,
despite being state-owned companies. They
do not pay proper taxes.
Look at the taxation of
American oil companies and ours.
They pay nothing. There are calculations, and
our program includes calculations showing that
when we make state corporations pay
proper dividends and taxes, we will
have enough money
to raise pensions to the real
subsistence minimum. And we will definitely do
that. The money exists. And our
government is simply lying when
it tells us to hang in there while taking the money
for itself. Question. Alexei, sit with
us, a question.
Alexei, what will you do about
the inefficiency of the Russian army,
defense spending, and mandatory
conscription? Thank you.
Conscription?
For many people this is a pressing issue.
So, on conscription my position
is simple.
Conscription is harmful. It should be abolished.
Conscription.
Conscription in Russia has turned into a tax on
the poor. Because which regions do not
send people to serve in the army? The North
Caucasus and Moscow. Because everyone there has the money
to buy their way out. People do not go
from wealthy cities. From villages, from
small towns, low-income people
are swept into the army. And these people and their families
lose even more income. We now have,
and in fact have had since 2005,
calculations showing that since 2005, in
the Russian budget, taking commodity prices into account,
there has been enough money
to abolish conscription and move to a
professional army. A professional
army is always better. They receive proper
salaries, they can properly
use complex weapons systems. And we do not
need to draft these
poor, awkward schoolboys right after graduation,
who get beaten there, forced to build
summer houses, and pulled out of normal life for a year.
There is no point in that. So we will abolish
conscription.
Question.
Alexei.
Please tell us, how do you
envision the process of changing the elites in
the country? Will the current ones leave peacefully?
How
Of course they do not want to leave peacefully,
but on the other hand, you understand,
just imagine,
do you really think officials will literally
—
come running at you here with weapons in their hands
to fight everyone?
Of course not. If there is
political will, these elites will be
replaced. It is not such a difficult task. In fact, not
that many people actually need to be
removed from power. The main tool
through which we will sift the entire
bureaucratic apparatus and its leadership, is
illicit enrichment. As I said, we compare
your income with your property. If it does not
match, welcome
to the investigator. The door is open
for a search warrant.
That is all. That is how we will run everything through
this sieve and filter out most of the brazen crooks
in the country. The second sieve is the people
who made unlawful decisions. Those
judges who had people arrested for
coming to a rally. Those judges
who put someone on trial for likes or
posts will themselves go on trial.
Officials who made those
decisions will end up in the dock. There is
really not much to think about here.
They violated current
law. And therefore
under the law, we will confidently put them in prison.
We’ll jail them, send them where they belong. And in this way
through these two filters
the state apparatus, its upper ranks,
will be changed by 80%. And in our country
there are enough people who
are ready to take part in public administration
properly. After all, officials’ salaries, as
you know, are quite high, right?
Back in the 1990s, we used to say:
"Well, officials are so poor, they always
take bribes." Now officials aren’t poor,
they have high salaries, and they can
work honestly for those high salaries,
if we make them do so, if from the
top there is such an instruction. Next question.
Hello, Alexei Andvich. So, you
have repeatedly spoken today about when we
and how we will get off the oil-and-gas needle.
When and how will we get off the oil-and-gas
needle? That’s a very good question, because
our government, every year,
has been saying for 18 years in a row that the goal for
the next year is to get off the oil-and-gas
needle.
All that needs to be done for this
is to actually start doing it.
First, free all other business
from endless regulation,
reduce payroll taxes, because
they crush any business. It’s practically impossible to make money from anything
other than oil and gas
in real terms. It’s hard, because you hire
a person, pay them a salary, and then you
still have to pay another 43% on top in taxes.
No one can sustain that. No business in
the country can develop under those conditions. Therefore
we must remove excessive regulation
from all business, give it freedom,
and get rid of these endless inspections. We
must invest in human
capital, as I already said,
healthcare and education. And this is
a standard, normal path, nothing unique
about it. All countries that
diversified their economies did it
this way. Ruslan, pass the question over here. That person
has been holding up a backpack, their arms are probably
about to fall off. Yes, thank you very much,
Alexei. Two short questions. One
There are a lot of people waiting. Pick the main one.
All right, fine. In 2005, in Ukraine
the Orange Revolution took place, when against a backdrop of
similar democratic
protests there was also a popular candidate for
president, Viktor Yushchenko, who
relied on the people, on democracy, on
liberalism. And the people elected him, came out
against the corrupt regime. But then
the president spent five years in power and left with 5%
support. Why did that happen, and could
the same happen to you?
Well done.
Excellent question.
The Ukrainian revolution—the first, second,
third, however many they’ve had—
was ruined by oliga-
oligarchs, who controlled politicians,
who bought politicians, who
corrupted them. New people come in, and they
still buy them all off. They buy up
newspapers, buy up television, and
manipulate everything. Our program contains
clear measures that will make it possible to
avoid this.
First.
We will introduce a compensatory tax on the results of
privatization. Do you consider privatization
fair?
It is obviously unfair. We cannot
nationalize everything overnight,
but we will impose a serious tax on
those who privatized things like
Norilsk Nickel
and various other Ural enterprises. They will
have to pay the difference between the real
market price and the price at which they
bought them. Second, we will ban oligarchs
from owning mass media outlets,
because they manipulate public
opinion.
Third.
Most importantly, as I already said,
we will introduce the institution of independent
prosecutors who will be able to investigate
me. We will introduce a procedure under which,
if I become bad, corrupt,
right now it seems to me, well, I mean,
I know myself, I’m a great guy, I will be
an honest president. Well, it seems that way,
right? But maybe not. Power corrupts
any person. Therefore there must be
a main restraint. If you become bad,
you can be easily removed from power. If you become
bad, right? Protests take place across the country.
Your party loses. In the
next term, goodbye. You are
impeached. You end up in the defendant’s
dock. You go to prison.
You have no immunity. The main thing
that must be done so that there is no
usurpation of power, so that there is no
failure of government like in
Ukraine, is to create such a system
of checks and balances. If I become
bad, then you remove me from power.
That’s how it will work. Next
question. I want to ask you a question—please answer
it. There is no answer here now. Will you stop the mass
closure of rural schools across the country?
Excellent question.
An excellent question and a huge, monstrous
problem. As you know, look at the
chart of school closures—not only rural schools,
but also in small towns. They are simply
closing by the dozens, by the hundreds
every day. In my view, as I have already
said, and I will repeat, this is
is foolish, because today it costs
a kopeck, and tomorrow it will bring in a ruble.
Education
for me is not an expense item in the budget.
It is the part of the budget on which we
make money. Once again, because we
closed the school in this village, a person could not
even complete eight grades, and he
could not get a decent job.
He earns a lower salary, he pays
less in taxes. This is my deep
conviction, and the experience of every country shows it. Investing
in education
is more profitable than investing in any other sector.
You just need to look ahead not 2
years,
but 22 years. If we are thinking about the future
of our children, then of course we need to continue
funding education. And the money for
that exists.
A question.
A question about the law on responsible
treatment of animals. They still cannot
pass it today. When you become
president, will you help ensure the passage
of this law? Thank you.
Thank you.
A question about the law on animal cruelty.
I honestly do not understand what the problem with it is.
I really do not understand why
for years we have been unable to pass it. We
can see that public opinion is entirely
on the side of this law. Every time
we see some monstrous footage
of animal abusers torturing animals, the entire
internet rises to defend them. Right? And
without a doubt, 95%
of Russians demand this law, yet it
is obvious. We need a law protecting the rights
of animals. It has been drafted many times, and it
will be passed immediately, because it
has public support. I do not understand why it has not
been adopted yet. There is no
rational explanation for it.
Hello, a question.
Yes, what do you think—these Rotenbergs and all
the others moved huge amounts of money abroad; how do we
get it back into the country so that it
works here, so that it is ours again?
Excellent question, probably a good one
to end our meeting on, otherwise
the police are probably already getting nervous. We
have run over time.
How will we make the Rotenbergs and all
the other Timchenkos,
Sechins, Roldugins, all these hundreds
of billions of dollars bring it back?
We have reached the point where
a month ago Western economists and
Western experts told us that,
dear Russians, 80% of your GDP
is sitting offshore. Will you do
something about it? The Russian government
pretends not to notice any of this.
Can we bring this money back? I am sure
and I know that we can. Many countries
have done it.
Switzerland, France, and all the others—they
have returned, for example, the money of African
dictators that had been taken out of
their countries. But how does it work in our case now?
I myself sent requests to the Swiss
prosecutor's office regarding money that
was moved abroad by the sons of Prosecutor General Chaika.
We write to them, and the Swiss reply:
"Guys, we would be glad to start
an investigation and return the money, but for
that we need the consent of your prosecutor's office."
"It has to recognize this as a crime." And
your prosecutor's office, where by some
amazing coincidence the prosecutor general
has the same last name as the person
who stole the money, says: "No,
no, no, no, no, no, no." Artyom
Chaika, Igor Chaika, are the most honest people, and
they stole nothing, so there is nothing
to return. I will become president
and to all these countries—Liechtenstein,
Luxembourg,
Panama, Cyprus, Switzerland—we will send not just
requests, we will send our own people,
who under international
law will obtain these banking
documents, and we will bring back to Russia
a significant amount of the money that
was stolen from us. It can be done. We
will do it. When they tell us that this is
impossible,
that is a complete lie—it is the job of the Russian
authorities to return to Russia what was stolen.
Right.
Are you setting me that task?
Yes.
Then Alexei Navalny will carry it out
when he becomes president. I will do it.
I will adopt all those obvious, simple,
quite straightforward laws that need to be adopted.
Look, today we discussed
many different things. But did I really
tell you anything fundamentally new? Probably not,
because it is all plain to see.
Russia simply needs a normal,
conscientious president who does not
promise miracles and will not perform miracles, but
will simply do his job properly,
do his job honestly.
Surely at some point in
Russia's history there must be a normal, honest
president.
I want to be that kind of president.
That is my political ambition. I want
to become that person. I promise I will not let you down.
Do you want someone like that? Yes.
I will be that person. And if I stop being
honest, you will remove me from office.
Promise me that you will remove me from
office when I stop being that way.
I will be afraid of you, and I will remain honest.
Thank you very much, dear friends.
Thank you very much.
Great meeting, absolutely amazing. Thank you
so much. You’re the best. I’m leaving
here for Omsk, realizing how many of us there are and
that we can defeat all these crooks
and thieves. Russia will be free.
Thank you, guys.
hold on,
over here.
They’re asking questions over there for now.
Lyokha, don’t get too lost.
Who took a photo? Step back.
They’re asking questions over there, over there. All my
statements
the opposite
very understandable, условно кото
disagreements
the main thing
preparation, let’s proceed to the questions.
Let’s get ready.
He’s leaving.
Just hold on to me, that’s all.
Thank you very much.
Hello.
I think, right now
Vova,
Vova, you’re an unfair person.
Vladimir,
Vova, hi, Vov.
Vova,
would you like to? Yuri from the Chelyabinsk headquarters. From
Chelyabinsk
Hi. What don’t you like?
You’d have taken a place in the sun.
You would’ve been a staff member. I don’t know. Lyokha
don’t leave.
Through connections, sure, damn it. What are you talking about? What kind of
payment? Red Russia.
But it doesn’t exist now, so it’s possible. So
Oleg, hi.
Friends, please organize yourselves somehow so that
people can get out of Presnya.
What is it? I was with us until the end. Friends,
please clear some space for the people who
with cards
I still didn’t understand what they said there.
May I, I don’t know
for the children for now.
So, if you’re looking at the stage, I’m on the
left
And he’s standing right over there, see?
for rubber
ordering meat
Absolutely don’t
know.
I you