Alexei Navalny’s meeting with voters in Orenburg


We’re very glad to see all of you. You
probably know that it took quite an adventure
for us to make it here, and we’re very glad
to have made it. And now we are beginning our
meeting. First, I would like to invite onto the stage
the coordinator of our campaign headquarters in Orenburg,
Natalya Trubachyova.
Thank you. Hello, everyone.
I know many of you, and many of those present
here helped us prepare this
rally. Thank you very much. And I was
pleasantly surprised to see that in Orenburg and
the surrounding region, there are many people ready
to help one another. You know that our
lying administration did not want
Alexei Navalny to come to Orenburg. And
for three weeks we filed
notifications and practically lived in the courts. And
the authorities had to organize various
strange public events and spend
budget funds. They gave up, but we
did not. And today we are here.
Their plan was to give us not the city center, but
the outskirts, so that only a few people would come. But
look how many of us there are. This is truly
the largest political event in
the history of Orenburg.
Yes, it’s the biggest one. Look,
we may have different views, but all of us together
know that we cannot trust the current authorities.
And we want our
lives to get better. And every day at the
headquarters, we work to make our lives
better, both in our city and in our country. And I
believe that only one candidate,
only one person can help us
with this. The one who is truly ready to act, and
the one who is not afraid. I support him.
And I invite you to join
the work of our headquarters. Come to the headquarters,
which is located at 2 Chkalova Street,
entrance from Marshal Zhukov Street, and we will win.
Thank you.
Work.
Right now on stage are our volunteers,
who helped us here
organize everything, and helped today
put this meeting together. Please come,
everyone, to our headquarters at 2 Chkalova Street.
And without delaying any further, I
invite onto this stage the candidate for
President of Russia, Alexei Navalny.
Hello, Orenburg.
Hello, pearl of the Urals. Hi, everyone.
Thank you so much for coming. I was terribly
worried, because, as you know,
yesterday, well,
so were we
that’s all Governor Berg is capable of.
I believe you can do better. Two
little weirdos with horns. There it is, the army
of United Russia. Let’s applaud
the might of United Russia. They
have shown us everything they can do.
You know, well, the problem was yesterday.
By 8:00 p.m., well,
I already understood that I was not going to make it to
Orenburg. And as I understand it, you even
sent out a notice saying that I would not be coming,
unfortunately. But honestly, let me tell you,
yesterday I spent 9 or 10 hours at the police
station, and every time I saw
a police officer, I went up to him and
said: “Hurry up, I need to get to Orenburg.”
Hurry up, I need to get to Orenburg. And I think
that by the end they were already
saying to each other:
“Damn, of course we need to keep him in the
cell, but he needs to get to Orenburg.”
And I made it here to you. Tomorrow I’ll be in
Arkhangelsk. I will continue our
regional trips, because that is how
a normal presidential
candidate should behave, right?
Yes.
So many candidates have come here and
said things over the sound of horns from
United Russia. And that is exactly how it should work.
That is the only way a normal
election campaign works. Right?
Yes.
And do you know why they
didn’t want me to come? Why our
regional trips irritate them
so much? Perhaps more than anything
else? Because for many years this was
their picture of the world. They sat there in
their Kremlin, they sat in your regional administration
building, telling each other:
“Well, we’re so powerful, we’re here
forever.” Because, well, nobody
supports the opposition in the regions, because
it’s just some tiny
movement inside the Boulevard Ring (central Moscow). But we
are all across Russia; either we control everything here,
or our population is
so silent that it will put up with anything. And
the most terrible thing for them now is that they are simply
literally clutching their heads as they watch
this. They watch the rallies taking place across
the whole country, the rallies where people
are saying: “That’s it, guys, we’re sick
of all of you. We don’t want to put up with this. We don’t
want to be poor in a rich country.” This is
frightening for them, and you are scaring them.
Truly, all of you gathered right now around
the Dzerzhinsky monument
are frightening the Kremlin right now. They
are watching the live stream, biting
their elbows and nails, and they do not understand
what to do about it, because the ground
is slipping from under their feet. Because, well,
think about it yourselves. Or rather, answer me this.
It’s my first time in Orenburg. I don’t know
your political traditions. If there were
a rally here in support of United
Russia, how many people would be here?
One
one of the hosts of the rally for United Russia and,
probably the party leader.
How many people would be here at a rally in
support of Governor Berg?
Well, Berg himself would probably show up. Yes, I
am sure there would be a lot of people, but they
would come not even with sausages, like the ones being
thrown at me, but with some other
food products, because, well, it is impossible
to put up with this. I came here. I’ll tell you
honestly, plainly and directly. I am
a presidential candidate. I desperately need
your support. I want to win you over.
There are probably some
people here who still have doubts. I will answer
their questions. I’ll be glad to answer
questions. I want to persuade you so that
you leave here and win over the whole
city and the entire region.
And
here is what I want to start with:
to convince you that Russia needs
this kind of presidential candidate.
Why is one needed? I’ll tell you why
one is needed. Because I landed 40 minutes
ago. The first thing you see when
you walk into the airport terminal is this
nice big poster that says
“80 Years of Orenburg Oil.”
A question for you, the esteemed owners
of Orenburg oil: do you feel that
you live in a wealthy oil-producing region?
No.
What do you mean, no? It really is a wealthy oil-producing
region.
Well, look, I pull up
the tables, I pull up the statistics, and there
it says in black and white that your
region is the fourth-largest oil-producing
region in Russia.
And in theory, I mean, listen, in
normal life, in a normal world, that
should work like this: we close our eyes and
imagine
a wealthy region that ranks fourth in oil
production in Russia. I should open my eyes and
see people here wearing mink
coats. They should be standing around with leopard-print
collars.
They should be standing here with cigars. You know,
like how Texans are portrayed in
cartoons. Do you feel any of that?
No.
When the price of oil goes up, do you
feel it even a little?
This is why Russia needs a presidential candidate
who will finally come out and say that
this is a perverse system, that everything here
is broken and will stay broken as long as we,
the people of a rich oil-producing country, live in
poverty. This is not an exaggeration. What is
the average salary in Orenburg?
I ask this in every city. In
every single one. And I have never once heard
the correct answer. I’ve looked at the statistics.
I’ve heard 11, I’ve heard 15. What is
the average salary in your city?
15, 20, 11.
Well, there’s a police officer. Look. Tell me,
what is it? I can see, sir,
you’re clearly in charge. What is the average
salary in the city?
In charge? Damn,
they’re silent.
So, let me tell everyone. The average
salary in your city is 28,000 rubles.
That’s what it says on the administration’s website. That is
what Governor Berg officially tells us.
Listen, folks,
this is exactly why the country needs change,
because, well, do you consider that
a real salary, or a lie?
A lie. We call it a lie,
even though the official salary is still
a poverty wage
compared with the Baltic states, where nothing
is extracted.
Now,
Orenburg is called the pearl of the Urals,
and it was given that name back in the 19th century because of the enormous
amount of mineral wealth here. A great deal
is extracted here. More is extracted here
than in the Baltic states combined.
But in Estonia, the average salary converted
into rubles is 90,000 rubles. And here we are
demanding at least the officially
declared salary of 28,000, which
is three times lower. That means, well, that
we are all simply living on the edge of poverty.
What is the average salary here? And the average
pension, excuse me, what is it
here in Orenburg Region?
8, 10, 12,000 rubles.
And now you’ll say: “No, that’s not
true.” But even then, officially speaking, it is still
poverty. So why is it that all of us together,
understanding that in theory we possess all this
wealth, understanding that in theory everything
could be good for us, because
we have infrastructure,
educated people, everything needed for a prosperous
life—why are we living in poverty? This really is
poverty. 28,000 rubles—what kind of
money is that? You can’t live on that.
Because what our authorities do is
steal.
Steal,
steal.
They steal all day long, and nothing else
interests them. And this is not
an exaggeration. But for an official to
steal, that’s a whole, well,
you can imagine, operation: he builds a bridge,
and from that bridge he has to steal 30%
of the cost. He can’t do anything else
anymore. After all, he has to
make arrangements with other officials,
agree on the kickback, register it
an offshore company so that we could move there,
relocate, strike deals with FSB officers (Russia’s security service) and
the police,
make arrangements with the governor or the prime
minister. That’s their job.
They really do spend eight hours a day, when they come
to work, engaged in corruption.
That’s why everything has fallen apart.
And that’s why all we see is the flip
side of all this: the number of
billionaires in Russia keeps rising in every
ranking. Quality-of-life rankings,
healthcare rankings, education
rankings.
We’re falling. And there is only one ranking
that is going up: the number of billionaires
in Russia. But are you and I part
of that process?
No.
Unfortunately, no. All right, billionaires aside, I
think last week, or maybe even this
week, there was an official report saying that in terms of
the growth rate in dollar millionaires,
Russia is outpacing every country in the world.
Raise your hands if you made it into that
ranking.
If you did, please make a donation,
please, to support our election
campaign. And that’s exactly why
a presidential candidate is needed—someone who will
actually come out and say
these simple words: yes, Russia’s national
wealth is not being distributed
fairly.
That is wrong.
Corruption must be fought, and it must be fought
in practical terms. And when we see
Russia’s deputy prime minister
Shuvalov transporting his dogs on a private
jet,
why are you laughing? This is
an investigation by the Anti-Corruption Foundation (ACF).
This is not an exaggeration. It sounds like
an absurd joke. A completely absurd joke. But in
reality, the dogs were flown to a show on a
private jet.
And Putin, Medvedev, and all the rest of them
tell us: “Well, this doesn’t, doesn’t warrant
an investigation, this is not
corruption. But you and I are normal
people.” And 99%
of people in Russia look at this and all
say: “How much longer are we supposed to
put up with this? It doesn’t matter who they support, whether they’re for
me or against me—everyone in Russia wants
a fight against corruption, and they want a fight against
specific corrupt officials. And as a
candidate, I ask the question: “Do you want
me, if I become president, to send all
these people to the dock?” Yes.
Do you want a concrete fight against
corruption?
We have systemic measures. Yes, of course,
there are systemic measures. Draft laws,
we’ve written it all up. But there is no such thing as
an abstract fight. Here they are,
specific, very specific crooks. At every press conference, sitting right next to
Putin,
is Peskov—my mustachioed friend.
How many investigations can you possibly do about
him? Honestly, we’re already
tired of it. We’ve already covered the yacht that he
rented for €80,000 a week,
and his houses, and the man’s watch worth
half a million dollars. How can this
possibly happen? And there he sits with his mustache,
looking into the camera and saying: “Yes, in Russia
there is a fight against corruption.” The fight against
corruption will begin when you, Peskov,
end up in the dock. I will send him
there. Does Orenburg need a candidate like
that? Yes,
I will be that candidate. I will do it.
Russia needs a candidate, a politician,
a president—whoever it may be—who will,
finally bring these regional authorities
to their senses. Someone who, at a meeting
of the State Council (a top Russian government advisory body), will call on your
governor, Berg, and say:
“Tell me, dear Berg,
why exactly did you raise the fare for маршрутки (shared minibuses) in
the city? What is it now? 22 rubles. Yes,
It was 20 not long ago.
So why raise it? Tell us, explain,
please. And of course he’ll say: “We
raised the prices because, well, the city has no money,
so we have to take money from the public
in order to solve the most urgent
and pressing
problems of Orenburg Region.”
And then a normal president,
a normal politician, a normal parliament
would say to him: “Dear Governor Berg, why the hell
did you buy yourself a Lexus for 5
million rubles? Why did you do that if you’re
collecting 2 rubles from each person? Why did you
do it? Who allowed you to
do that? Why did your regional
parliament allow it? How did you put that into
the budget?” But really,
this is not an exaggeration, folks. In no
country in the world, not even the richest one,
not even the richest
regional officials buy themselves
Lexus cars for 5 million rubles. Just look
at the vehicle fleet. I looked at the procurement records. There are
several dozen such cars that they
bought. What for?
Is that somehow normal, or is it
immoral?
That is why I am running in this election:
to say these things out loud. I’m not saying anything
new. You talk about this yourselves
around the kitchen table, right? You say:
“They’ve completely lost it, they’re bloated with excess, they’ve gone
mad.”
But everyone stays silent. You don’t see this on television.
No one discusses it in parliament. And
It sort of turns out, well, that this is just how it
is supposed to be. We’ve gotten used to it. But I don’t
want to get used to it.
I don’t want to get used to it. I’m 41 years old, and
I’ve spent almost half my life under
this government. I can see that it is no longer capable of
changing anything for the better. This
government is associated only with decline. Sadly,
that’s the truth. Raise your hands, those of you who are under
thirty here
there are a lot of you.
And you have spent most of your lives
under Putin, living under this
regime. Tell me, please, do you
feel that you have any prospects at all?
No.
So when it comes to prospects, do you
feel that maybe, perhaps,
the government, or your Berg (likely referring to Governor Yury Berg), or whoever else
will do something tomorrow, and you
will live a little better?
No.
And this is confirmed by hard
numbers, because in recent years
10% of the region’s population has left. What
on earth is going on?
It’s a wealthy oil-producing region. And yet
people are leaving, scattering, because
you can’t earn a decent living here, because
there are no prospects. What is your best
university here, in Orenburg
Region?
Yura,
I see there are different opinions. Well, never mind,
it doesn’t matter which one exactly, the main thing is don’t
start fighting. Wait, tell me,
please, what salary, if
luck smiles on you there, since you have a lot of
Gazprom here, and you get into some
top position, what salary could you
earn? 30,000
30,000
30,000, 30,000
25,000
50,000–60,000
25,000
40,000, 30,000
50,000
in the future
50,000
it’s impossible to get hired
it’s impossible to get hired
exactly
Guys, what we’re discussing, what we’re
joking about right now, is a description of
a national catastrophe, because it
means that young people who have received
a good education can get
a job paying 50,000 rubles. Less than the average wage in
a developed country—or even a not very developed
country. That’s an average salary. What
is 50,000, really? Especially in an oil-producing
region. We portray it as some kind of, well,
ideal. Like, if I’m lucky, if I get lucky and I
make 50,000, then that salary
still won’t let you buy an apartment,
you won’t be able to support your family properly,
you can’t. Have two children and your
salary is gone; you’re still
running around, borrowing money,
taking out some consumer loan
to buy a washing machine. Is that really
the future of a great country?
No,
no,
That’s what I’m saying: no. And obviously it’s no. But
every year they keep telling us that
we should hang on a little longer, guys. Let’s
tighten our belts. Guys, what are you doing in
Orenburg here? Sure, go ahead, tighten your belts
even more. Rotenberg (a wealthy businessman close to Putin) doesn’t have enough money yet.
Tighten your belts, put up with it.
We only have 118 billionaires.
We need to get that up to 150 billionaires.
Just endure a little longer. Come on, endure it.
One of Putin’s sons-in-law has already become
a dollar billionaire. Endure a little
longer. We still need to make another son-in-law
a billionaire. Are you ready to put up with that?
No.
I’m not ready to put up with it. I have only one
life.
I have two children. They study here. And I
hope they will stay in Russia. I
want
at least to spend the rest of my life in
a normal country, a normal
human country, not one with, you know,
crystal palaces or anything like that,
but one where things are simple, where the roads
have been repaired,
where the houses—just look around, just look around,
for heaven’s sake—you are among the top four
oil-producing regions in the country.
Look at this building. When was it
last given a major overhaul?
Never.
Never.
Never. Never. And that is the most
common—or rather, not the most common
answer when I ask. It is the
only answer. Do you understand? Everywhere,
wherever I speak, there is always
some run-down building. You ask
when it was repaired. The answer: never.
And why?
And where did all that enormous money go? I
am told: "You’re a populist, you keep talking about
money, money." But where are you
going to get money for our city of Orenburg? I
explain where I will get the money for the city of
Orenburg.
The system that Putin and Kudrin built over 18 years,
in which all the money
is taken from the regions to Moscow—it, well,
it has gone bankrupt, it has shown that it
does not work, because our regions are not
developing. What is the budget of your
of the city?
Don’t know?
11 billion rubles
What percentage of the taxes collected
does Orenburg Region send to the federal center?
71.
71, someone is prompting me correctly. You are one
of the leading regions. Almost all the money
is taken away from you. And in just the first 9
months of 2016, you sent to
Moscow 110 billion rubles. And I’m saying a simple
thing, but it’s obvious. Well,
it really is, actually. Take any
normal developed country that has
a federal system like ours. And we see that
the regions keep some
money for themselves, and retain powers. So,
let’s do something simple.
Let’s give away a little less. No, not just
keep all the money for ourselves—that’s impossible,
but instead of giving away 70%, let’s give 50%, and the budget
of Orenburg will triple.
That’s enormous money. It means that
three times more can be spent on
education, three times more can be
spent on healthcare. It
means that you could provide substantial
regional supplements for pensioners. It
means there definitely can be no talk
of any paid education. The money
is there.
It is there. It’s just being dragged off to Moscow
so that in Moscow they can do what with it?
what?
Steal it.
Steal it.
Steal it. Exactly right. That’s why we need
politicians, and we need a candidate for
president. We need governors
who, you know, when they’re sitting there—
they sit in Moscow. The State Council is sitting there, Putin
is sitting there looking very important, Medvedev is thinking about
his dacha (country house), the first one, the second, the third,
the fourth or the fifth. Someone there is mumbling
something and says: "So, we’ll build
a park in Moscow for 14 billion rubles. We’ll allocate 2
trillion rubles for renovation in Moscow,
we’ll allocate for lighting up Moscow’s trees
6 billion rubles. And at that point a governor should
stand up and say: "Guys, sorry,
of course, but could we be a little more modest
because in my city that extremist and troublemaker
Navalny came through
and pointed at a building
that needs repairs. And somehow
we probably need to spend some money
on my own region, on
my hometown. That’s the kind of
governor we need.
Yes,
I
want to become president so that
you would elect governors and elect
mayors, and they would defend
your interests and your rights, because
right now, whatever United Russia
doesn’t propose today, tomorrow it will propose
a special tax on regions that
starts with the letter O, so that they pay even more.
United Russia will say: "Fine."
And all your local newspapers will write:
"The correct decision by the party
of government. It’s long overdue, long overdue
to do this, because if we don’t,
then of course NATO soldiers will come
because, of course, this is what we’re doing
in order to fight
the Americans. We need normal government. I’m
running to become president
and create normal government. I’m running in
the election so that these
wonderful people in uniform,
all turning away from me, and in peaked caps,
would get higher salaries.
You, my friends, dear police officers,
should vote for me. Your candidate,
Alexei Navalny, because I will free
you from this idiocy. Look
how many police are here. You
taxpayers,
do you want to spend money, police
forces, and effort on having them deal with
this?
No.
Do you have crime here?
Do you have corruption here?
Are there issues here that
the police really do need
to work on? Yes.
Yes.
Why are they needed here at this rally? What
are they protecting? Why do we need these
anti-extremism departments? For
whom? Yo—
do you want to spend money on this or not?
No.
That’s why I will become president. Those
gigantic, gigantic budgets that
are allocated to law enforcement agencies,
I will spend properly, in particular
so that police officers receive
a little more, and in particular so that
they are given apartments.
So, respected people in uniform, as soon as
you finish this rally,
cursing to yourselves that you were
made to stand out in the cold, go home
and the first thing you do is search for Navalny
2018 and leave your signature in support
of me, because I am the only
candidate who supports you.
The only one. Tell me, please,
as taxpayers,
are you willing to spend money, even a kopeck
of your own money, so that they can jail
some bloggers?
No.
So that people can be jailed for likes
or reposts?
No.
Does this even concern you at all,
in any way?
No.
You sit there and think: "Right then. My
money is going to be used so that someone
can go and saw down a blogger's door in the name of
fighting 'magic.'" No.
You don't want that?
No.
No. Well then, I suppose I'm your
candidate, because in cases like this I
always step up to the podium, make a campaign
promise, and straighten the podium.
When I become president, I will shut down
Roskomnadzor (Russia's state media and internet censor) once and for all.
We don't need it.
It's a harmful, disgusting organization,
a bunch of idlers sitting on
our backs, spending our money and making
our lives worse. We don't need them, just as we don't need the huge
number of other officials who
are constantly inspecting something. Did you know
that in Russia every year there are
2 million business inspections?
Do you feel that any of this is somehow,
well, for your benefit? No.
Is it easy, easy in Orenburg Region
to do business? No.
Just like anywhere else, it's impossible. The moment
you start doing something. Say you start, I don't
know, knitting Orenburg down shawls
(a traditional local wool shawl). You're just a grandmother,
making these shawls and selling them, but when the state
comes knocking at your door, what
will it say to you?
You, granny. Criminal,
you're an illegal entrepreneur. You're an enemy
of the state. We've opened a criminal case
against you. I'm running in this election,
and I want to become president in order
to free small businesses from taxes
altogether. I will free small business from
all taxes, period. I promise you that. I
will free small business from any
permits, any licenses. Why are they
needed at all? All the taxes, all the taxes
they pay amount to just 0.5% of GDP.
Why hassle them at all if a person
is running a small business and
just wants to feed themselves, feed their family?
And the only task
of President Navalny when it comes to
small business will be to send it
certificates of honor. Because we should
say: "Thank you for doing at least
something. Thank you for helping at least
someone, for paying a salary to one
person or even to yourself, because you
increase the public good."
Tell me, please, are you
satisfied with our television?
No.
Are you satisfied with our mass
media? How do you even feel
when you turn on
the TV? What's the first news story there?
About Ukraine. The second is about
Ukraine. The third is about the U.S. The fourth, about
Syria,
Korea,
Korea, ISIS, and everything else. And we sit there
thinking: when are they ever going to say anything about our
Orenburg Region,
when will they talk about my Moscow, when
will they talk about housing and коммунальные services, when will they talk about some
problem, when will they say that
10% of the population has left Orenburg Region,
when will they talk about
healthcare,
when will they say that a city in your
region is among the leaders in
HIV infection rates?
20th century
We built, well, we spent all that time building
a country, building our civilization. Well,
it seems that a lot of things
did work out for us. I mean, we launch
rockets into space, right?
Yes.
We have nuclear power plants,
we have nuclear weapons. That means
that, well, overall,
we're an advanced people. We're an advanced
country. We've done what most
countries cannot do.
But why have we now ended up in a situation
where, in terms of AIDS, we are overtaking
developed countries, developing countries,
African countries? Is that normal?
Why doesn't he talk about this on television?
People should be shouting about this. This
really is a problem. The problem isn't in Ukraine,
not in
Syria, not in America. This is
the problem. Tell me, I see a lot of
people here, well, adults already.
Is it easy to get an ultrasound for free? How long
does it take? Say you've decided to go
get an ultrasound. Something hurts, you need
an ultrasound. How long does it take to get
a free ultrasound?
A month,
a week, and so on.
And an MRI?
Oh.
Oh.
That's why
I want to become president. Yes. I don't
want that in the 21st century, in 2017, this
it's just an MRI,
they've been doing them for decades in every
country. This is, really, a simple, simple
medical procedure. And you say 'MRI,'
and everyone goes: 'Oh,' as if I weren't saying 'MRI'
but as if I were sending you
to Mars.'
This simply cannot work like this. Now I’m going to
move on to questions and answers. It cannot
work like this. It’s an idiotic
perverse system where we sit on
oil money and still can’t provide our people with
MRI scans. And this matters in connection with
oil money, because
the only thing you here, in
Orenburg Region, get from your own
resources is what? Illness. Look
at the disease rates here, in
the Orenburg Region. They are monstrous.
One of the worst environmental situations in the country.
Cancer is detected at the final stage. We
all of us, we are all poor and sick, as
horrible as that sounds. I do not want to and
I refuse to understand
why a rich oil-producing country should
keep its population in such conditions.
I refuse to understand why 85%
of the national wealth belongs to 1%
of the population. That is a direct consequence. Well,
that’s how the pipeline is built in our country. There go
the oil money, the metals money,
the gas money, whatever money you like, uh,
fertilizers and everything else. And all of it
is converted only into income for oligarchs
and officials.
And everyone stays silent about it. Everyone
stays silent about it. Listen, there are other
presidential candidates—maybe they
came here. Did
Zhirinovsky come here?
No.
No.
Zyuganov?
No.
Sergei Mikhailovich Mironov?
No.
No.
It’s a pity they didn’t come. And I wish
they would come and say these things. We
recently had a single voting day (a nationwide election day),
right?
And I turn on the TV,
and I see Zyuganov at a polling station, they stop him, and
they run up to him. Gennady Andreyevich, well,
say something, there’s an election going on. I
think, now he’s going to open his mouth and
really let them have it.
A microphone is put in front of him, he opens his mouth
and says: "Well, these Americans have completely
lost it."
They’ve become totally outrageous. So, they’ve
surrounded our country from all sides."
So what? Is he right? He is right
to say that. Maybe he is right
to say it, but I don’t understand. There are
probably other problems too. If we
want to talk about America and Americans,
fine, talk about Americans as your sixth
or seventh point—but first say
that you do not understand why
the country’s prime minister, caught up in
corruption, is still sitting there and remains
prime minister. Have you seen the film?
Well, I presented convincing facts.
What else can I possibly prove? We already filmed
that dacha, we already filmed that yacht, we already
showed everything. So go ahead, jail him,
or at least remove him from office. But he
stays put. And he keeps buying. And he
keeps making money. And who ended up on
trial?
Me.
As usual, just as everyone joked right at the start
when the investigation was published, that
the only consequence would be yet another
case against Navalny. And that’s exactly
what happened.
What did we all hear? Well, what I heard—and probably
everyone heard through me—when we
caught oligarch Usmanov giving bribes, what did we
hear?
Pah on you, Alexei Navalny.
This is why I want to become president:
so that, representing you, I can say to all these
people: "I’ll tell him: ‘I’m not going to
spit on you—none of this “pah on you.”
Pay your taxes, pay your taxes properly.’" I
will ban
keeping raw-material revenues in offshore accounts. I
will ban this transfer pricing scheme
under which all the profits stay there. I
will ban all these schemes that are plainly
visible. Everyone knows about them, and
the president knows about them, and the tax authorities
know, everyone knows, but they still don’t stop
the money from being siphoned out. It is siphoned out
every year; this has gone on for years
and on and on and
on. It is easy to stop, and I
will stop it. I will do it. I am running in
the election in order to apply
elementary,
simple measures that will make our lives
more prosperous as soon as tomorrow. Russia has enough
money for Russia to live twice as
prosperously tomorrow, without
any exaggeration—there is still a sea of money. I
am running in the election in order to
represent you, represent those
people whom the authorities said
do not exist at all, that they are absent, or
that they are
Hold on a second,
wait, wait.
your vice-governors,
whatever chant or little slogan they give young people
on the streets, that’s what they repeat.
This means only one thing: these people need
a thrill. Young people
have taken to the streets, and this is a designed,
very professionally engineered political
campaign. Big money came into the country
for this campaign. But raise your hands, those
who came here for money.
This is a risky moment for me, but as you can see,
No one came here for money. So
how much longer are we supposed to put up with these lies?
How much longer can we tolerate this? We know that
most people in this country are unhappy with what is happening,
and they will never prove to us that this is
part of some campaign or anything like that.
It's a lie. We are that silent
majority. In fact, the majority,
even those who may not
support me because they know about my
work from television, where
they said that I stole the entire forest and that I am
a foreign agent, are still
unhappy with what is going on because, well,
you cannot be satisfied with these roads in the
21st century, because you cannot be
satisfied with this healthcare system in the 21st
century, you cannot be satisfied with this
law enforcement system in the 21st century.
We are the majority.
And the most important thing I want to say,
before I move on to answering
questions. Friends, we must realize
our own strength. This is the most important
task of the election campaign. Everyone is on
our side. Everyone is on our side. We are the majority. We are
active, politically engaged people.
We can do anything. Here I
see here, in this square, enough people
to per-
to win over the entire city of Orenburg in 2
weeks.
It's just that we have been convinced, it has been hammered into
our heads, that we can do nothing.
You know, it's like there's a wall there, some kind of
impenetrable wall. They've always
been there, they always will be. And we were born,
grew up, and will die under them. And we are doomed
to poverty.
Well, I don't think so.
Do you agree with me?
Yes.
I am running in the election to represent those
people who do not believe that we are
doomed to poverty, who do not
believe that they have to die in this
poverty, who do not believe that
the only way to achieve a normal
life is to emigrate or flee to
another region. Here and now, we can
build a normal country. And here and
now, we will achieve a great deal if we
believe in ourselves and take action.
There are more of us than there are of them. We are smarter than
they are. We represent the majority
of the country's population. We will win this
election, and we will build our beautiful
Russia of the future. Thank you very much. I am
ready to answer questions.
Guys, as I promised, without any
pre-moderation, without prepared
questions—any kind, flattering,
critical, whatever you want.
Hello, Alexei. I'd like to ask,
I'll repeat it for everyone afterward.
As far as we know, there are three
taxes related to gasoline and roads.
What will you do with them, and how will you
develop the road sector in in our
Russia? How will I develop the road
sector in our Russia?
and what will I do with the three taxes?
Well, I will direct these taxes
toward road development. I will abolish
the Platon system. It is unfair,
corrupt, and nobody needs it. But
look, this is the Kremlin's position. Our
roads are bad, our bridges are bad.
So let's invent the Platon system,
which works like this: they took
the son of Putin's friend Rotenberg,
a private company, and now all
truck drivers, and through them all of us, pay them
taxes.
That's how it works.
It's a twisted, bizarre system. Why
should we be paying them? We already have an excise tax
on gasoline, we have a vehicle
tax. The third one—which tax do you mean?
tax?
I meant the transport tax, the excise tax,
and Platon.
Well, the transport tax, the excise tax, and Platon. Platon
is not needed. We will scrap it once and for all.
We will open criminal cases
against everyone who brought in Platon. It is
a scam. It was a violation of the tender process. It was,
essentially, fraud. The excise tax and
the vehicle tax should go toward
roads. We have enough
money to repair roads. The road
problem has basically been solved in all
countries. In Africa it has largely been
solved. And only here, in Russia,
do we walk around saying: "My God, how are we ever going to
fix the roads?" It must be,
impossible. And it's impossible because our
road construction costs are 10
times higher than in China. And why are they 10
times higher than in China?
Because they steal. They steal. So we will break up
the road-building monopoly. We will hold normal
honest tenders. We will
invite foreign, including foreign,
contractors, and then we will solve the road
problem.
I heard someone over there shout out
this question to me: "And you won't steal, will you?"
Good question.
Well, what do you think—will I steal or
not?
No,
probably not. Probably not. Hard to say,
we'll see.
But look, I'm standing here, I am
a candidate, and, well, I am confident in myself, I
know that I am a decent guy and that I will not
steal, but should you believe me?
believe?
Power corrupts people. Power corrupts
people. And one well-known person said
that after 10 years in power, anyone goes
crazy. Who said that?
Putin.
So, well, if we apply that quote
to him himself, it turns out
that for the past 7 years the country has been run by
whom?
Madmen. Yes, that's exactly right. They
really have gone crazy over money,
privileges, and their own
sense of impunity.
Well, I'll do something simple.
First, I know, I agree with him that
people go crazy. And not even after 10 years, but
sooner. So if I become president,
I will cut the presidential term back to
4 years. A maximum of 8 years. You do a good job
in the first 4 years, you get another four, and then
goodbye. Goodbye. No matter how
good you are, whether it's Alexei Navalny or some Petya
Semyochkin, it doesn't matter: you've done 8 years, so
goodbye, go do something else, write a book.
Play sports, have fun, pick
mushrooms, do whatever you want. You cannot
be president forever. That's first. Second, I
will reduce my own powers.
Parliament will be able to investigate
me and my actions, because I will give it
those powers. I will create
independent prosecutors who will be able to
investigate the president's actions.
You see it on the news all the time, how
before a U.S. congressional committee
the FBI director, a cabinet secretary, and even
vice presidents, members of the president's cabinet, all
meekly
answer questions on live camera, and
all of America watches them. We want
the same thing in Russia. That's how it should
work. The government must be accountable
to the people. If there are questions for you, answer them. So
President Navalny
will be open to
investigation. If you suspect me
of corruption, a parliamentary commission will be created
against me, and against me
an independent prosecutor will work, you
will impeach me, and when I come here
to try to prove my case to you, I
will be standing here alone,
because the free media will tear me
to pieces,
because I simply will have no
support left, and no one will ever
elect me again, and most likely they'll even
put me in prison. That is the one and only
way to fight corruption: make it so
that you yourself can be imprisoned for
corruption. And that is exactly what I will do, I promise you.
Question.
Let's do the press later. Yes. Yes.
What am I going to do with all the property
of the oligarchs and dollar billionaires?
Well, of course, I'd like to say I'll give
everything to the residents of Marenburg.
So, look. Oligarchs are different. Just because
a person is a dollar
billionaire does not mean he is our
enemy. The creators of Yandex are dollar
billionaires. They created something good.
We say to them: "Well done, we love you,
dear dollar billionaires." There are
people of another kind. Usmanov, who
made his money through an illegal tax-evasion
scheme. Then there are the Rotenbergs,
and Timchenko, and all the
other friends of Putin—they
quite obviously made their money
through corruption and corrupt schemes. So,
we will hold these people
accountable. Since their money and
property were obtained by criminal means, we
will seize them for the state budget. Second, all those
lovely palaces will be sold through fair
auctions. The money will go into the budget.
Third. Fourth.
I will become a president
who brings back from abroad all
stolen assets. I will do it. I
know how to do it. Why isn't it happening
now? Well, have you seen who was
put in charge of finding
stolen assets abroad?
Chaika.
Prosecutor General Chaika.
The very same guy we
published an investigation about, showing that his family
was moving money to Switzerland. Well,
naturally, he is not going to do
that. And we get replies from
Switzerland saying that when we
send complaints there, they say: "Well,
guys, how do you expect us to
investigate if your prosecutor's office
says everything is fine?"
Funny how people with the same last name do that.
A certain Igor Chaika tells us that
Artyom Chaika is doing just fine. But that is how
it works, and it should not work that way, and it will not
work that way. Many countries,
African ones, for example, have recovered from
Switzerland and France stolen money—
billions. And we will recover it too. I know how
to do it, and I will be able to do it. Let's take
a question from this side.
Elections. There are no elections.
There are no elections.
It used to be $500, now it's $250.
Question. How will you be able to stabilize the dollar
because my wife used to
earn $500, and
now she earns $250. The thing is,
the dollar is already stable.
The ruble
It's the ruble that's unstable.
But that's an excellent question, my friends. So,
tell me, please, are prices going up?
Yes.
Do you feel prices rising?
And obviously, they are. Over the last,
probably couple of years, food prices alone have gone up by about 60%.
But if we
look at the Central Bank's data,
we see that the Central Bank of Russia
says inflation is now 4%, or even
3.8%. Oh,
so apparently it basically doesn't exist, and according to
that logic, if your wife was earning $500,
she should still be earning $500. But that's
not true. It's a lie. So what am I
going to do about this and about
the ruble? If inflation is, well,
it really does look like inflation
is heading toward 4%. But we don't
feel that. Do you know why? Why can't you
get a loan at 4% annual interest?
Because on average you're getting them at
11, 12, or 15%, because they give out
loans at 0%
to their relatives. Putin's son-in-law got
a $1 billion loan at 0% interest. You
are bailing out these banks at 0% interest,
so they get money for free. And that's why
you and we get it at 16%.
I will put an end to this bacchanalia
in order to stabilize the ruble. I will stop
bailing out these bankers. Do you want to bail out
bankers?
No.
Here you are in Orenburg
— whether you came to the rally or you're against
rallies, whether you're blowing a whistle, or you're
a police officer, or an FSB officer,
or from the local administration, whoever you are — do you
want to bail out Moscow bankers?
Do you care about B&N Bank or Otkritie Bank? But
you're the ones saving them. In your view,
over the last 2 years, how much has each of
you paid to rescue these banks?
16,000 rubles from each person. A total of 2.5
trillion rubles. That means 16,000 rubles from
every elderly person, every infant, every woman,
every man — 16,000 rubles taken from every single person.
I'm sure you could find a use for 16,000 rubles.
And so could I. But for me,
with a family of four, that's a substantial
amount. I'd spend it on myself, and I
will put a stop to this, because this is
what rising prices are, this is real
inflation — the kind they say doesn't exist, but
for us it very much does. And it hits us right in
the wallet. Yes. Next question.
We have no elections in this country.
And we have a rather perverse form of
journalism in this country. Will there be
changes in this sphere? You're putting it too mildly.
"Rather perverse" is too soft for these
people. It's completely perverse.
The local media are the same. Well, I don't know
how many people are here right now, quite
a lot. But really, without
any exaggeration, tonight you'll go
home and read reports from your
pro-governor media saying that there was
nobody here at all, that it was a
pathetic rally. They'll show a photo from a
drone that was taken
20 minutes before the rally started. And you, and everyone else,
understand that it's a lie. And you
understand that it's a lie. But they will
write it with a straight face and will
collect their salaries out of your pocket.
So here's my position, very clearly:
I will stop funding all of them. I do not
understand why we should spend 30 billion
rubles on Russia Today. Do you want to spend money
funding Russia Today? No,
I don't. Do you want to buy a villa for
Vladimir Solovyov?
No.
Now that was a powerful shout. A loud no from over there. Well,
do you want to pay for that Tolstoy,
Kiselyov? Kiselyov lives in an apartment worth 3
million euros on Tsvetnoy Boulevard. Do you want
to pay for that apartment? No.
So that is why President Alexei
Navalny will remove as many restrictions as possible
from the media, stop
funding the media, stop keeping media outlets in
state ownership,
for example, the city of Moscow has 300 newspapers.
What the hell for? Why do they need 300 newspapers? What
do they need 300 newspapers for? We'll sell it all off,
get rid of all of it, remove any
restrictions on the media, and let them
compete freely with one another.
Question. I saw someone here shouting. Yes,
just ask your question.
Elections.
Elections.
Fair elections.
Fair elections. Not your elections.
Excellent question. Do you really think that
the Kremlin is full of fools and you're the only
smart one?
That's a great question.
So, here's my answer to your
question. I do not think the Kremlin is run by
fools. I think the Kremlin is run by
very smart crooks and thieves. They are very
smart. Very, very, very smart. Just
look — they seized control of the largest
country in the world. They've been in
power for 18 years. They very skillfully took over
the media. They are very skillful at rigging
elections, and of course elections are rigged
here too.
Look, Governor Berg is genuinely
popular with the people.
No.
And what percentage did he get in the election?
I think he got 80%, right? Somewhere around there.
about 80.
These are cunning, smart people who,
have something to lose. They are
billionaires. But the question is,
maybe they are smart, of course, very
smart, maybe even smarter than us,
but I think by now all of us already
have enough sense to understand that this is
the wrong system. Right?
We have enough sense to understand that, guys, you
schemed and schemed and schemed and schemed, but
that's enough scheming here—go do it somewhere else.
You can't fool us anymore. If
people's real incomes have been falling
for the fourth year in a row, we feel it.
That's right. We feel it in our own wallets.
Are we really prepared to keep swallowing this
same old chewing gum about
Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine? Don't think
about money, think about America,
about Ukraine. Is that what interests us?
No.
That's why I don't think I'm smarter than
they are. I don't think I'm the only
one who's the smartest. But I do think I'm
normal. And I think there are
enough normal people in this country
to throw those cunning crooks out.
Question. Alexei, Alexei.
Just last week, here,
two faculty members from two
of the biggest universities in our region were detained.
The question is,
all within a single week, but that's just a drop in the
ocean. What can actually be done about
corruption in the education system?
The question is this: last week here,
two people from the education sector
were detained. What can actually be done about
corruption in education?
Well, let's start with the big things.
The Unified State Exam. Who here has had to take it?
Who here has taken the Unified State Exam?
Who likes the Unified State Exam?
Nobody.
Uh-huh.
And yet the Unified State Exam, in principle, sounds fairly
reasonable. Why was it
created? So that you from Orenburg, and
someone else from Moscow, would have equal
chances of getting into the best university. But
in practice, which regions have
the highest Unified State Exam scores?
Dagestan,
Chechnya.
Chechnya and Dagestan. That's right. Why?
Because they buy them. So it turns out that
if the Unified State Exam doesn't work in even one region,
then it doesn't work for
the whole country, which means it has become
meaningless. Right? Therefore,
our number one task in fighting corruption in
education is to stop this cheating around
the Unified State Exam. Task number two is to properly fund
Russian education. It receives
very little money. If we look at
any developed country, we will see that
they allocate about 4% of GDP, while we
allocate half that. Until
we fund
proper education, we won't have it.
Our education system is really heading
off the rails and toward total collapse. I mean,
of course, you can jail teachers.
Sure, you can. You can take the approach
of simply going around catching them
for taking $100,
5,000 rubles, 200 rubles, a box of chocolates.
You can do that, but that's not how we'll defeat
corruption. So the task is—and let's be
honest—are teachers really the main
corrupt actors in the country? There, as in
healthcare, there is widespread
corruption, but to say outright that
we live badly because of them—no, that's not it. The task
is different. We will properly fund
education and healthcare. The money exists for that, but
after that, if you're still dissatisfied
and keep taking bribes, keep
rigging the Unified State Exam, then jail them without
mercy, regardless of the fact that they're a teacher and
so on—just jail them. That's the only way. I
see someone here I recognize with a question.
Let's take questions. North
Caucasus.
Will you push the issue?
Go ahead, speak.
If I become president, will I
insist on reopening
the investigation into Budanov's murder?
There are quite a lot of murders like this.
And we can see that these high-profile
murders, especially those in which, obviously,
members of Kadyrov's entourage are involved,
are not being investigated. Budanov
is definitely not my hero. But
nevertheless, I believe that no proper
investigation was carried out there. Do you think
a proper investigation was conducted into Nemtsov's
murder?
No.
No.
I will become president. I will investigate this.
I will investigate
Kadyrov's involvement in these murders.
I will investigate the activities of all
these strange people who sit there in the
President Hotel in Moscow, all of them
loaded down with pistols, gold ones and
non-gold ones. And no one even understands
whether they're security services or police, who
they even are. Just some kind of armed bandits
with assault rifles. Why are they allowed to do this?
So I'm not afraid to do that. I
will absolutely investigate it.
Someone was shouting loudly from over here. Yes.
Question.
the Cabinet of Ministers.
What should be done about unfair elections?
The Cabinet of Ministers, and the logic
of an election campaign is that
I still have several months. I
hope—and we can see how the authorities
are trying to obstruct things—that I will still come here to Orenburg
again. And preferably more than once.
So all these personnel matters, these staffing
appointments—the logic of the campaign is that
they are announced at the end. So I will
talk about that closer to the election date,
but I assure you that we definitely have people
better than those who are now sitting in
the Kremlin and the White House (the Russian government building). Next question.
Question
Question.
A question, a question about agriculture.
In agriculture,
there is one main problem. They cannot
get credit. Agriculture
is structured in such a way that they
need money. And when they go to
a bank, they are told: "Well, pay 10%.
Impossible." That's problem number one. Agriculture
also runs into the fact that
it is impossible to connect either to
electricity or to gas. What's the situation there?
Agriculture. Now tell me,
who here has a dacha (country house)? Raise your hand. And who has
a dacha connected to gas?
There you go. Exactly. In a region where
Gazprom operates—the so-called national
treasure—and yet it is hard to get connected. How much
does it cost to connect to gas? A house—
100,000, 150,000
100, 150, 200 thousand, the person says. And
can you imagine what it means for a farmer
to get connected—he has built something,
to heat, I don't know, a cowshed or
whatever, any kind of building—it is impossible.
So infrastructure, the development
of infrastructure, and normal access to
credit resources will make it possible
for agriculture to develop. Without that,
nothing works. But besides that, once
again, excuse me, there is corruption. Who
heads
Rosselkhozbank?
Not Tkachev. Tkachev heads
the Ministry of Agriculture. One
of the country's biggest corrupt figures
heads the Ministry of
Agriculture. The biggest milk producer.
Who is it? His family. And who is the biggest owner
of agricultural land? The family
of the minister of agriculture.
And who heads Rosselkhozbank?
Patrushev,
the son of the former head of the FSB (Federal Security Service). Why
does he head it?
Because the former head's
Because he is the son of the former head
of the FSB. Every year this bank records
a huge hole in its finances and receives state money. He is
a bad banker, he runs
the bank badly, but he still continues
to sit there because the kickbacks are enormous
amounts of money. That is what we will eliminate. Agriculture
will begin to develop. Let me take one from
this side. Yes.
Why isn't he giving him the mic? Please, let him speak.
Yes, yes, yes.
What should be done about Crimea and Donbas? A difficult
question.
What should be done about Crimea and Donbas? A difficult
question. Well, listen, it is, of course,
a difficult question indeed, but on
the other hand, it is also an easy question,
because I answer it honestly.
I believe that the Crimea issue has
no solution. It cannot be resolved.
It is a territorial conflict. Obviously,
Crimea is effectively financed from our
budget. It is effectively now
part of the Russian Federation. This will not
be recognized by anyone in the foreseeable future. And
like the issue of Northern Cyprus, like
the issue of the Palestinian territories,
like the issue of the Falkland Islands, and
all the other territorial disputes
on the globe, in the foreseeable future,
it has no solution. Everyone will
suffer, everyone will struggle. More than
anyone else, Crimeans will suffer from the fact
that the sanctions will remain. Honestly,
I could lie to you
right now and say: I have a plan,
I won't tell you what it is, but I have a plan,
a great plan, and I will solve the Crimea issue.
It cannot be solved. As for whether it is Russian,
it has always belonged to Russia.
Fine, fine. Fine. Are you ready to give up part of your pension
for it? Are you ready to give up part of your pension?
Are you ready to give from
your pension? Fine. And are you ready
to finance Syria out of your pension?
Are you? What else?
And what else are you ready for? Afghanistan too, out of
your pension?
What does Afghanistan have to do with this?
Well then, let me answer you, my friends.
Then let's talk about
foreign policy. Here we have
a person who, obviously, is unlikely
to vote for me, because he wants
to finance out of his pension
Afghanistan, the fight against ISIS, Syria, and everything
else. I can tell you this: many people
criticize me for this position. Once again
I come to the podium and tell you
my position absolutely precisely, clearly, and plainly:
President Alexei Navalny
will stop forgiving other countries' debts,
and will stop financing other countries.
What the hell for? I mean, listen, yes,
look at how many problems we have.
Why are we— Who here has been to Syria?
Raise your hand. Well, maybe you have been there,
You weren’t. And why should we have to pay
for it? Are you a pensioner, judging by your
age? That’s right.
So, you’re a pensioner. Uh, are there any other
pensioners here? Raise your hands.
There, there, there, there,
there are pensioners here. So, let me tell you,
dear pensioners, that over the past 15
years Russia has forgiven
debts owed by other countries in an amount that
has cost every pensioner in Russia
260,000
rubles. Do you want to pay 260,000 rubles out of
your pension? I don’t want the citizens
of Russia to. I don’t understand why debts were forgiven for
Cuba, Mozambique, Angola. We forgive everyone
everything. And who is going to forgive us?
And who has ever given us anything here? No one has ever
forgiven us anything. We see
small countries. The Czech Republic, for example, the Czech Republic
squeezes money out of Cuba. If they can’t
pay in cash, they pay in rum, they pay in sugar
cane, somehow or other. And we say:
"All right then, we forgave these people $20 billion,
forgave those people too." So, I
love all countries very much; I care about
the fate of Palmyra, I care about the fate of
the residents of Aleppo and everyone else, but I am not
going to finance it, because we
don’t have money ourselves. A lot of people won’t
agree with me on this, but those are the people I will
represent in the election. Question. Yes.
It so happened that
one of the people at the institution where
I study,
one person said, someone with a high po-
high-ranking position, that anyone who goes to this rally
will be expelled from it.
All right, so the question is this. A student
at an educational institution was told that
if you go to this rally, you’ll
be expelled.
Who has heard things like that before?
They were just threatened. Threatened with what?
Then threaten them back. Everyone
who does this is a criminal.
They are real criminals. We will
fire them, and we will jail them for this. There’s
nothing to be afraid of. It’s all lies.
First of all, because, well, this is
isolated; we hardly know of any cases
where it actually happened.
But of course they do try to intimidate people. Of course,
they intimidate people, they walk around filming with cameras. "We’ll
put your faces online." Well,
go ahead and put our faces online. Who
here is afraid to show their face? Who is not
afraid to show their face? I don’t understand
why, in our own country, we can’t
go to a rally. So the people who
say such things are, without question,
criminals. And they need to be told to their faces
that they are
criminals. And don’t forget to film it
on camera. Because that’s what they’re
afraid of. As soon as it was posted on YouTube, when someone there
had threatened to expel someone, that was it—
the principal was already apologizing, already behaving
as meek as can be. These people are
brazen and aggressive, but in essence
they are, of course, very cowardly, because this
is itself a display of cowardice. So,
you go to a rally and we’ll expel you. Yeah,
right, we’ll be the ones to expel them. That’s the issue everywhere.
Yes. Question. Yes.
We don’t have elections; we have dishonest elections.
They’ll just write down some fake result for you, so what are you going to do with
these fake elections?
The question is this: we don’t have elections; we have
a sham instead of elections, and as your
results they’ll write down all kinds of fake numbers. What
are you going to do about that?
Well, that’s a fair question,
right?
We really do have a sham instead of elections.
This government really does
stay in power by falsifying elections. That is,
if before they merely brainwashed people,
now even that is no longer enough. They need
to rig elections.
Look, I earn every vote
through hard work. I woke up today at
3:00 a.m. to come here. From here
I’m going to Arkhangelsk, then I’m going to St. Petersburg
for a rally, where they’ll probably once again
lock me up for 30 days, or I don’t know what
will happen. I fight for these votes like
a normal candidate, and I am not going
to hand them over so someone can steal them. So
for the first time, in fact, in Russian
elections, we are really going to prepare
100,000 real observers. At
every election people say that they will
prepare them, but no one actually does it. I’m
a sensible person, not a fool. I
understand how they will fight, but we
will fight back. At every
polling station we will place several observers.
I’m going to appeal to you, guys. I’m going
to come here and say, "So, do you
want your votes in Orenburg
to be stolen?"
No.
No? Then we’ll stand at every
polling station. However many people we can
mobilize—and I know that we can mobilize more,
than any other political force,
that’s how many we’ll send to
the polling stations. So, well, we’ll fight.
Of course, they won’t just give up
their billions or their power that easily, but we
will fight. Question.
the design of our cities for our people is usually
a quality environment that Europeans have been creating
for many years already, but for us it seems like some kind of nonsense.
How are we going to improve the quality of Russian
cities? Because for our people
a European-style lawn is seen as nonsense. Look,
First, I do not believe that our people are
somehow especially uncivilized. After all, you have
a bridge here between Europe and Asia.
So we have, in a way, claimed a little bit of Europe,
right? And
exactly, claimed
I certainly believe that the residents
of Russian cities are, of course, ready for
a standard of urban services
that is normal by European standards. It is simply
that this quality does not exist.
Enormous amounts of money allocated for urban improvement are stolen.
That is why we must transfer
all these issues to local
self-government, and second, we must organize
public oversight. I, I am absolutely
convinced that if tomorrow we create
some kind of amazing flower bed here, it is not as if
the people of Orenburg are so wild
that they will come running and rip out the flowers. That will not
happen. That is all nonsense. They probably said
that in Zaryadye Park (a major park in central Moscow) people stole some
flowers. But that is a lie. We are all
normal people. I do not see anyone here who
would immediately run off to dig something up there
like that bush and plant it at their dacha (country house).
Of course, there are occasional excesses, because
well, we are somewhat used to living like this,
with terrible urban improvement all around us. But I
know that there are cities, including in the provinces,
where there is a normal quality of
urban management and public improvement.
The main thing is simply to make sure that the money there
is not stolen, because in
urban improvement they do not steal 30 percent, but
90 percent. Question.
But what will happen
once again?
So, I have a question about Kadyrov, and it
is formulated as follows: are you prepared
to make it so that these people who
stand with you would go kill and fight for you?
So, I am talking about Kadyrov. I
certainly believe that there are grounds
to believe that he was behind the murder of
Nemtsov. I believe, personally, and I am telling you
directly, without any of that, you know,
without trying to avoid being sued. I
believe that Kadyrov ordered Nemtsov's
murder. Yes, that is what I think. And I think
that his activities should be
investigated. But there is no need to kill anyone or
frighten anyone with all that. Why?
Why would anyone need to run out tomorrow and
kill someone, to fight? Do you remember there was
such a mayor of Makhachkala, Said Amirov. He sat
in Makhachkala for many years, and there were the same
stories then too: he could not be removed. He was
a terrible corrupt official, a murderer. But
he had his own army. Everyone said that as soon as
we removed him, tomorrow
a war would start in Dagestan. Troops would
have to be sent in, all of Makhachkala would
rise up, and so on. And what happened?
They came, arrested him, and took him to
Lefortovo (a Moscow detention center). Zero reaction in Dagestan.
In Dagestan, in the North Caucasus, and
everywhere else, people want the same thing as in
Orenburg: slightly higher
salaries, normal
justice, a normal judicial
system. They are even poorer than people here. I
asked you here about salaries, and you
said 15,000 rubles. If I asked there about
salaries, and I will ask, they would say
8,000 rubles. So they simply need
a normal life. No one is planning to
fight anyone or kill anyone. And there is no
need for such a question.
Let us start here, and then I will move over there
afterward. Yes.
What, what?
Demographics.
Demographics, immigration.
Possibly one of the most serious
issues facing our country. We are dying out. From
your region, as I have already said several times,
10 percent of the population has simply left.
The Russian authorities believe that
population decline can be offset
by migrants from the North Caucasus and
by migrants from the countries of Central Asia and
the South Caucasus. Do you think so?
Do you think that, so to speak, you can be
replaced by Tajiks or Uzbeks, with all due
respect to them?
Therefore, regarding migration, I have
an absolutely clear position. I support
introducing a visa regime with the countries of
Central Asia and the South Caucasus. I will introduce this
visa regime. People have been talking about it for a long time,
but only after every terrorist attack. Whenever
some problem happens, everyone
starts saying: "We ought to introduce
a visa regime. We ought to bring in a visa
regime." And then they forget. I will introduce
a visa regime. That is number one. Number
two: in general, the demographic problem cannot
be solved without solving the problem of economic
growth. There is no such thing as, you know, pressing a
button and suddenly you start having twice as
many children. That is not how it works.
It is about quality of life. Right now, a person
understands this; we discussed it at the beginning,
say I have a salary of 40,000 rubles. I would
like to have three children, but it is
impossible to feed them on that money,
right? Only economic growth,
which will bring higher wages, I
apologize for such a banality, but it is what
will lead a person to say:
"Well, perhaps I can afford
a third child, or a fourth." Only
that way. There is no other path. That is this side of the
issue. Yes.
the development of the military industry, or will you
reduce funding?
Will there be development of the military industry
or will I reduce its funding overall?
Excellent question. And my answer to it is, well,
this: military industry will continue to develop,
but I will reduce its
overall funding, because this is
not opposition politician Alexei Navalny saying it, but
the Accounts Chamber of Russia says that
roughly every third ruble allocated
to the state defense procurement program,
is cashed out within about two
months. In other words, quite literally, we
allocate trillions there, and those trillions
turn into wheeled suitcases
stuffed with cash. Corruption in Russia is monstrous everywhere.
But in state defense procurement,
because it is closed off,
the corruption is unbelievably monstrous. I can see
how much money is allocated to
military and police spending overall. That money
would be enough for state defense procurement,
and for raising salaries
for the police and the military, and for providing them with
apartments. It would be enough for all of that, if only
the money were not simply being stolen. We
will do exactly that. We will defeat corruption. At the very
least, we will significantly reduce corruption there,
and that will allow us
to do many things. Miss,
will Russian
science be funded?
Will Russian
science be funded?
Let me ask you: should
Russian science be funded? Yes.
Yes.
Obviously. And this is an important question,
because if we look at how much
money is currently being allocated to Russian
science, it is a laughable amount. What
we are seeing happen to the Russian
Academy of Sciences, which is being torn apart, which is
not being allowed to properly elect its leadership,
is a crime against science. I
was in Novosibirsk recently, and there
I met people from Akademgorodok (a major Soviet-era science and research hub in Novosibirsk).
We are proud of Akademgorodok, right?
When we talk about Russian science, very
often what comes to mind is Novosibirsk’s
Akademgorodok, with its supposedly top-tier
physicists. And then you ask those
physicists—I saw this, you can
watch the video—how much does a
physics graduate student in Akademgorodok make?
15,000 rubles.
Can science exist on that kind of
money?
Well, of course not. Because this
young person understands that if he moves to
almost any country, he will earn 30 times
more—any country at all.
We train these physics students,
these physics graduate students. We have
nuclear physicists; there are only a handful of countries
you can count on one hand
that train them, but we do not
fund them, and very soon we will
run out of them, because they simply
leave for other countries. And the point here is simple.
I can talk about how we will cut
spending here and cut spending there, but
if we do not fund science, it simply
will cease to exist, it will die out, and we
will need another 100 years
to rebuild it. So we will fund science
at the level of the countries of the
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, several
times more. And again, this is the
refrain of my speech: there is money in this country,
there is money for this, for everything, if we
spend it properly. Next question.
Question.
I’ll come to you afterward.
How long will my candidate keep walking around
without security? The level of provocation is high. If
you were to...
you should be kept safe. So the question is:
for how long will my candidate
go around without protection? And who is your candidate?
- who is that?
Oh, thank you very much. That’s me. So,
my friends, look, here’s the thing.
First of all, at rallies—you
can see it now—I do have security there.
I mean, I do have it in everyday life too, but
I cannot compete with the state.
How much security would I need
to counter the police? All the people
who carry out attacks are
organized by the security services. So, well, who
here has funded the election
campaign? Who has ever sent money to
the ACF or to the election campaign? There are
many of you here. I could spend your money
on surrounding myself with security. And
that would not help me one bit. So
I am a normal person, I am not crazy.
I do not take pleasure in the fact that
there is some kind of risk. But
I share those risks with you. You
do not have security either. Who here has gone to rallies?
You have had unauthorized rallies here
here in 2016.
Yes,
You had authorized ones too, but
there are unauthorized ones as well, and you go to
them. If I call you to an autho— to an
unauthorized one, will you go?
Yes,
You will. You will bear that risk, and I will share it
with you. That is the only way this
works. Because if, you know, I
call on you to do something, to march somewhere,
while I myself have gone abroad
and surrounded myself with several layers
of security—yes, I would be safe, but
would you believe me?
No, that is not how politics works, and I do not
want it to work that way. The question about
an apartment.
Housing. How are you going to address it?
Housing. That is exactly why, in
our platform, well, some people
are surprised: "Why did you put this
mortgage issue right at the beginning of the platform? It
seems strange. Usually everyone buries it somewhere
further down." I believe that, unquestionably,
the housing issue is not even
an economic issue; it is a question of the country’s future,
because is it possible to buy housing in
Russia? No,
no. People up to the age of 40 live with their parents,
because it is impossible. What is the mortgage interest
rate?
13.
19.
13. Well, not 25, of course. That is, if
you really try, you can find 11%. And
even then, it is still impossible to pay.
Right? It is simply impossible to take out
a mortgage loan. That is why this is a matter of
state policy. Number one:
reduce market regulation so that
apartments become cheaper. As it stands, they are very
expensive. And number two: subsidize
mortgages, so that all of you, as in any
normal European country, could
take out a mortgage at 1 or 2%
annual interest. Until we do that,
our country will not
develop, because how can people have
children if they have nowhere to live? That is the reality.
Yes, let’s go to this side now. Yes,
yes.
What are we going to do with the draft offices and military units?
A question about conscription, as I
understand it, judging by the front rows,
this is a pressing issue, right?
So,
since 2005,
the budget of the Russian Federation has been able
to afford a professional contract army.
Therefore, President Alexei Navalny
will stop drafting young people. I
will transition Russia to a professional contract army,
and do what people have been talking about for many years. This
is truly necessary. What is conscription
today? It is a tax on the poor. Where
do they not take people from to serve in the army?
The North Caucasus and Moscow. Why from
Moscow? Because in Moscow everyone
buys their way out. So your chances of going
into the army are
100% if you live in a village, if you
come from a poor family. The wealthier your
family is, the lower the chance that
you will end up in the army. It is a tax on
the poor. It is unnecessary. All modern
armies in the world are professional armies,
so we will, without question, move to
a professional army. As for
your question about what to do with draft offices and
everything else, well, we will cut the unnecessary part.
And, well, look, draft offices
are still needed in some form, because
if, God forbid, war breaks out,
draft offices are responsible for mobilizing the population
for war. So I could say, "I will shut down
all draft offices." But that would be
foolish. We will reduce the number of
staff, but nevertheless the system of
conscription in the country must
be scaled back. But with a professional
army, that issue changes. Yes.
Yes.
And on your channel there was, if I remember correctly,
Alexei Shatsov, and one thing he said that I liked in
your team was this. One of his remarks
was that corruption can only
be stopped with the utmost
severity.
The question is whether I believe that
corruption can be eliminated or prevented
only through the death penalty?
Well, let me ask a risky question.
Who here thinks corrupt officials should be shot?
To be honest, I disagree with you.
I am a principled opponent of
the death penalty. I know that it is
popular. It is popular among
the public. Most Russian citizens
support the death penalty. But tell
me, please: do you trust our courts?
No.
Can you allow Russian courts
to execute people? No.
Damn it, tomorrow the first person they would
execute would be me. Do you understand? So,
I believe the death penalty solves no
problems. Where do we see the lowest
levels of corruption? In which
countries? Norway, Finland, New
Zealand. There is no death penalty
there. The inevitability of punishment—
that is what is needed, so that a corrupt official
understands that sooner or later he will be caught,
sooner or later he will go to prison. But in Russia
how does it work? A corrupt official
knows that if you steal 20,000 rubles,
you will be jailed, but if you steal
a billion, you will be promoted. That does not
work, and it should. Next question.
Will microelectronics be developed in Russia?
For so long, phones in China and Korea,
televisions?
A question about microelectronics. Will we
develop microelectronics in Russia?
Listen, are we not developing it already? Have you
heard of an organization called Rosnano?
Have you heard of it? That is rather strange if not.
Strange, because have you heard of an
organization called Rostec? Its head, Chemezov,
showed Putin four years ago the "iPhone killer,"
and yet why did you not buy it? And
that famous textbook for Russian
for schoolchildren, the one like that, the one that
would replace paper textbooks. Did you see it on
TV?
Yes.
So where is it? And where is everything else? And
maybe you saw, maybe someone saw my
debate with Chubais,
and he even gave me a whole little suitcase. Yes.
And in that suitcase there were lots of supposedly useful
things. And where are they all? And on this, on all of this,
billions were spent, tens of
billions, hundreds of billions, without
exaggeration. So we will
develop all of this, but not by the methods
that the Russian state is using now,
because it simply
dumps enormous amounts of money into a state-owned company,
which cannot do anything. You yourselves
said it: Korea, Singapore, and everything
else. Competition. The number one word
for why all this worked in these
countries. And it is the same in China.
Competition. We will stop squeezing
business, we will encourage business,
that manufactures things, including things like this,
we will stop pouring money into
state-owned companies, and then, well, probably,
gradually—because we do have the foundations, we
have Zelenograd, we have many
factories—microelectronics in Russia will also
start to develop. Let's take a couple more
questions. Yes,
Navalny, Navalny, can you give
your word as a man that you're not an American pawn,
that you are not an American pawn?
Excellent question. I would give it to you right now,
yes. Alexei, can you give your word
as a man that you are not an American
pawn?
And also, I even posted on Twitter
about this. You can look later. Here
someone photographed a woman. She had
two great signs. Sign number
one: "Don't believe the State Department puppet."
People, don't believe the State Department puppet. And
sign number two, in her other hand,
said: "Appoint Navalny as head of a
as governor of a depressed region. So
if you combine them, it means appointing
a State Department puppet
as governor of a depressed region. So
even in the minds of such people, something
is going on—things are so
wrong that, well, let's
take a State Department puppet
and put him in charge of a depressed
region. So, I give you my word as a man,
that I am nobody's puppet. I
give you my word
that there are real people behind me. Those
people are you. I give you my word that I act
in the interests of the residents of the city of Orenburg and
the Orenburg region. I give you my word
that I do not need any other people,
any other support, in order to
get up on this stage. As long as you
support me, I give you my word
that I truly believe that sooner or
later, Russia must, after all, be led by
an honest person. I want to become that
honest person at the head of Russia. I
will become him if you
support me. I give you my word that I will do
everything so that I do not let you down,
guys. I give you my word that later
someday, looking back, you will think:
"It wasn't for nothing that I came on Saturday at 12:00 to the
outskirts of the city." This is the outskirts of the city,
right? And stood there listening to him, because
he really was doing something in my
interests. So I give you my word that I will work
for you. I have a question for you. May I
consider myself the candidate from the Orenburg
region, from the city of Orenburg?
Yes.
Thank you very much, my friends. Thank you
so much for coming here. I have to
wrap up, because otherwise I'll be late
for a flight to Arkhangelsk.
Thank you so much. Believe in yourselves, and we
will definitely win. We will turn all this
right side up. We will build everything.
We will achieve everything. This is our
country, it will belong to us, and we
will live and prosper in our beautiful
Russia. Thank you so much, guys.
Thank you very much for coming.
I am very grateful to you. Good luck. I will come
here again. One. Thank you.