Text version
0:05

We’re very glad to see all of you. You

0:06

probably know that it took quite an adventure

0:08

for us to make it here, and we’re very glad

0:10

to have made it. And now we are beginning our

0:12

meeting. First, I would like to invite onto the stage

0:15

the coordinator of our campaign headquarters in Orenburg,

0:17

Natalya Trubachyova.

0:23

Thank you. Hello, everyone.

0:27

I know many of you, and many of those present

0:30

here helped us prepare this

0:33

rally. Thank you very much. And I was

0:38

pleasantly surprised to see that in Orenburg and

0:41

the surrounding region, there are many people ready

0:43

to help one another. You know that our

0:46

lying administration did not want

0:49

Alexei Navalny to come to Orenburg. And

0:52

for three weeks we filed

0:54

notifications and practically lived in the courts. And

0:58

the authorities had to organize various

1:03

strange public events and spend

1:05

budget funds. They gave up, but we

1:09

did not. And today we are here.

1:12

Their plan was to give us not the city center, but

1:17

the outskirts, so that only a few people would come. But

1:20

look how many of us there are. This is truly

1:25

the largest political event in

1:28

the history of Orenburg.

1:31

Yes, it’s the biggest one. Look,

1:36

we may have different views, but all of us together

1:41

know that we cannot trust the current authorities.

1:43

And we want our

1:46

lives to get better. And every day at the

1:49

headquarters, we work to make our lives

1:52

better, both in our city and in our country. And I

1:57

believe that only one candidate,

2:00

only one person can help us

2:04

with this. The one who is truly ready to act, and

2:08

the one who is not afraid. I support him.

2:12

And I invite you to join

2:15

the work of our headquarters. Come to the headquarters,

2:18

which is located at 2 Chkalova Street,

2:20

entrance from Marshal Zhukov Street, and we will win.

2:28

Thank you.

2:34

Work.

2:42

Right now on stage are our volunteers,

2:44

who helped us here

2:46

organize everything, and helped today

2:48

put this meeting together. Please come,

2:50

everyone, to our headquarters at 2 Chkalova Street.

3:00

And without delaying any further, I

3:03

invite onto this stage the candidate for

3:05

President of Russia, Alexei Navalny.

3:13

Hello, Orenburg.

3:16

Hello, pearl of the Urals. Hi, everyone.

3:18

Thank you so much for coming. I was terribly

3:21

worried, because, as you know,

3:23

yesterday, well,

3:25

so were we

3:29

that’s all Governor Berg is capable of.

3:32

I believe you can do better. Two

3:36

little weirdos with horns. There it is, the army

3:39

of United Russia. Let’s applaud

3:41

the might of United Russia. They

3:45

have shown us everything they can do.

3:47

You know, well, the problem was yesterday.

3:50

By 8:00 p.m., well,

3:53

I already understood that I was not going to make it to

3:55

Orenburg. And as I understand it, you even

3:57

sent out a notice saying that I would not be coming,

4:00

unfortunately. But honestly, let me tell you,

4:02

yesterday I spent 9 or 10 hours at the police

4:05

station, and every time I saw

4:08

a police officer, I went up to him and

4:10

said: “Hurry up, I need to get to Orenburg.”

4:12

Hurry up, I need to get to Orenburg. And I think

4:14

that by the end they were already

4:18

saying to each other:

4:20

“Damn, of course we need to keep him in the

4:21

cell, but he needs to get to Orenburg.”

4:24

And I made it here to you. Tomorrow I’ll be in

4:27

Arkhangelsk. I will continue our

4:30

regional trips, because that is how

4:32

a normal presidential

4:34

candidate should behave, right?

4:36

Yes.

4:36

So many candidates have come here and

4:40

said things over the sound of horns from

4:42

United Russia. And that is exactly how it should work.

4:46

That is the only way a normal

4:48

election campaign works. Right?

4:50

Yes.

4:52

And do you know why they

4:54

didn’t want me to come? Why our

4:57

regional trips irritate them

4:59

so much? Perhaps more than anything

5:01

else? Because for many years this was

5:06

their picture of the world. They sat there in

5:08

their Kremlin, they sat in your regional administration

5:11

building, telling each other:

5:13

“Well, we’re so powerful, we’re here

5:16

forever.” Because, well, nobody

5:19

supports the opposition in the regions, because

5:21

it’s just some tiny

5:23

movement inside the Boulevard Ring (central Moscow). But we

5:26

are all across Russia; either we control everything here,

5:28

or our population is

5:30

so silent that it will put up with anything. And

5:34

the most terrible thing for them now is that they are simply

5:38

literally clutching their heads as they watch

5:40

this. They watch the rallies taking place across

5:44

the whole country, the rallies where people

5:47

are saying: “That’s it, guys, we’re sick

5:49

of all of you. We don’t want to put up with this. We don’t

5:53

want to be poor in a rich country.” This is

5:56

frightening for them, and you are scaring them.

6:00

Truly, all of you gathered right now around

6:03

the Dzerzhinsky monument

6:05

are frightening the Kremlin right now. They

6:08

are watching the live stream, biting

6:11

their elbows and nails, and they do not understand

6:13

what to do about it, because the ground

6:15

is slipping from under their feet. Because, well,

6:18

think about it yourselves. Or rather, answer me this.

6:20

It’s my first time in Orenburg. I don’t know

6:21

your political traditions. If there were

6:23

a rally here in support of United

6:25

Russia, how many people would be here?

6:27

One

6:28

one of the hosts of the rally for United Russia and,

6:32

probably the party leader.

6:34

How many people would be here at a rally in

6:36

support of Governor Berg?

6:41

Well, Berg himself would probably show up. Yes, I

6:43

am sure there would be a lot of people, but they

6:46

would come not even with sausages, like the ones being

6:48

thrown at me, but with some other

6:51

food products, because, well, it is impossible

6:53

to put up with this. I came here. I’ll tell you

6:55

honestly, plainly and directly. I am

6:58

a presidential candidate. I desperately need

7:01

your support. I want to win you over.

7:04

There are probably some

7:05

people here who still have doubts. I will answer

7:07

their questions. I’ll be glad to answer

7:09

questions. I want to persuade you so that

7:12

you leave here and win over the whole

7:15

city and the entire region.

7:17

And

7:19

here is what I want to start with:

7:22

to convince you that Russia needs

7:25

this kind of presidential candidate.

7:28

Why is one needed? I’ll tell you why

7:30

one is needed. Because I landed 40 minutes

7:33

ago. The first thing you see when

7:36

you walk into the airport terminal is this

7:40

nice big poster that says

7:42

“80 Years of Orenburg Oil.”

7:47

A question for you, the esteemed owners

7:50

of Orenburg oil: do you feel that

7:52

you live in a wealthy oil-producing region?

7:55

No.

7:55

What do you mean, no? It really is a wealthy oil-producing

7:58

region.

8:00

Well, look, I pull up

8:02

the tables, I pull up the statistics, and there

8:05

it says in black and white that your

8:07

region is the fourth-largest oil-producing

8:10

region in Russia.

8:12

And in theory, I mean, listen, in

8:14

normal life, in a normal world, that

8:17

should work like this: we close our eyes and

8:19

imagine

8:21

a wealthy region that ranks fourth in oil

8:24

production in Russia. I should open my eyes and

8:26

see people here wearing mink

8:27

coats. They should be standing around with leopard-print

8:30

collars.

8:32

They should be standing here with cigars. You know,

8:33

like how Texans are portrayed in

8:35

cartoons. Do you feel any of that?

8:38

No.

8:39

When the price of oil goes up, do you

8:40

feel it even a little?

8:43

This is why Russia needs a presidential candidate

8:47

who will finally come out and say that

8:51

this is a perverse system, that everything here

8:55

is broken and will stay broken as long as we,

8:58

the people of a rich oil-producing country, live in

9:02

poverty. This is not an exaggeration. What is

9:04

the average salary in Orenburg?

9:09

I ask this in every city. In

9:11

every single one. And I have never once heard

9:13

the correct answer. I’ve looked at the statistics.

9:15

I’ve heard 11, I’ve heard 15. What is

9:18

the average salary in your city?

9:20

15, 20, 11.

9:23

Well, there’s a police officer. Look. Tell me,

9:25

what is it? I can see, sir,

9:27

you’re clearly in charge. What is the average

9:28

salary in the city?

9:29

In charge? Damn,

9:30

they’re silent.

9:32

So, let me tell everyone. The average

9:35

salary in your city is 28,000 rubles.

9:40

That’s what it says on the administration’s website. That is

9:43

what Governor Berg officially tells us.

9:45

Listen, folks,

9:48

this is exactly why the country needs change,

9:51

because, well, do you consider that

9:54

a real salary, or a lie?

9:55

A lie. We call it a lie,

9:59

even though the official salary is still

10:01

a poverty wage

10:04

compared with the Baltic states, where nothing

10:06

is extracted.

10:08

Now,

10:10

Orenburg is called the pearl of the Urals,

10:13

and it was given that name back in the 19th century because of the enormous

10:15

amount of mineral wealth here. A great deal

10:18

is extracted here. More is extracted here

10:20

than in the Baltic states combined.

10:23

But in Estonia, the average salary converted

10:26

into rubles is 90,000 rubles. And here we are

10:31

demanding at least the officially

10:34

declared salary of 28,000, which

10:37

is three times lower. That means, well, that

10:40

we are all simply living on the edge of poverty.

10:43

What is the average salary here? And the average

10:45

pension, excuse me, what is it

10:46

here in Orenburg Region?

10:49

8, 10, 12,000 rubles.

10:52

And now you’ll say: “No, that’s not

10:53

true.” But even then, officially speaking, it is still

10:56

poverty. So why is it that all of us together,

11:01

understanding that in theory we possess all this

11:03

wealth, understanding that in theory everything

11:07

could be good for us, because

11:09

we have infrastructure,

11:11

educated people, everything needed for a prosperous

11:13

life—why are we living in poverty? This really is

11:16

poverty. 28,000 rubles—what kind of

11:18

money is that? You can’t live on that.

11:21

Because what our authorities do is

11:24

steal.

11:26

Steal,

11:27

steal.

11:29

They steal all day long, and nothing else

11:32

interests them. And this is not

11:34

an exaggeration. But for an official to

11:36

steal, that’s a whole, well,

11:38

you can imagine, operation: he builds a bridge,

11:42

and from that bridge he has to steal 30%

11:43

of the cost. He can’t do anything else

11:46

anymore. After all, he has to

11:47

make arrangements with other officials,

11:50

agree on the kickback, register it

11:52

an offshore company so that we could move there,

11:54

relocate, strike deals with FSB officers (Russia’s security service) and

11:56

the police,

11:58

make arrangements with the governor or the prime

12:00

minister. That’s their job.

12:02

They really do spend eight hours a day, when they come

12:06

to work, engaged in corruption.

12:10

That’s why everything has fallen apart.

12:12

And that’s why all we see is the flip

12:15

side of all this: the number of

12:16

billionaires in Russia keeps rising in every

12:19

ranking. Quality-of-life rankings,

12:22

healthcare rankings, education

12:23

rankings.

12:26

We’re falling. And there is only one ranking

12:29

that is going up: the number of billionaires

12:31

in Russia. But are you and I part

12:33

of that process?

12:34

No.

12:35

Unfortunately, no. All right, billionaires aside, I

12:38

think last week, or maybe even this

12:41

week, there was an official report saying that in terms of

12:43

the growth rate in dollar millionaires,

12:47

Russia is outpacing every country in the world.

12:49

Raise your hands if you made it into that

12:51

ranking.

12:53

If you did, please make a donation,

12:57

please, to support our election

12:58

campaign. And that’s exactly why

13:01

a presidential candidate is needed—someone who will

13:03

actually come out and say

13:05

these simple words: yes, Russia’s national

13:09

wealth is not being distributed

13:11

fairly.

13:13

That is wrong.

13:15

Corruption must be fought, and it must be fought

13:16

in practical terms. And when we see

13:19

Russia’s deputy prime minister

13:21

Shuvalov transporting his dogs on a private

13:23

jet,

13:26

why are you laughing? This is

13:28

an investigation by the Anti-Corruption Foundation (ACF).

13:29

This is not an exaggeration. It sounds like

13:31

an absurd joke. A completely absurd joke. But in

13:34

reality, the dogs were flown to a show on a

13:36

private jet.

13:38

And Putin, Medvedev, and all the rest of them

13:42

tell us: “Well, this doesn’t, doesn’t warrant

13:44

an investigation, this is not

13:45

corruption. But you and I are normal

13:47

people.” And 99%

13:50

of people in Russia look at this and all

13:52

say: “How much longer are we supposed to

13:54

put up with this? It doesn’t matter who they support, whether they’re for

13:56

me or against me—everyone in Russia wants

14:00

a fight against corruption, and they want a fight against

14:03

specific corrupt officials. And as a

14:05

candidate, I ask the question: “Do you want

14:09

me, if I become president, to send all

14:12

these people to the dock?” Yes.

14:15

Do you want a concrete fight against

14:17

corruption?

14:18

We have systemic measures. Yes, of course,

14:21

there are systemic measures. Draft laws,

14:23

we’ve written it all up. But there is no such thing as

14:25

an abstract fight. Here they are,

14:27

specific, very specific crooks. At every press conference, sitting right next to

14:30

Putin,

14:32

is Peskov—my mustachioed friend.

14:36

How many investigations can you possibly do about

14:37

him? Honestly, we’re already

14:39

tired of it. We’ve already covered the yacht that he

14:42

rented for €80,000 a week,

14:45

and his houses, and the man’s watch worth

14:47

half a million dollars. How can this

14:49

possibly happen? And there he sits with his mustache,

14:52

looking into the camera and saying: “Yes, in Russia

14:53

there is a fight against corruption.” The fight against

14:55

corruption will begin when you, Peskov,

14:57

end up in the dock. I will send him

14:59

there. Does Orenburg need a candidate like

15:02

that? Yes,

15:04

I will be that candidate. I will do it.

15:10

Russia needs a candidate, a politician,

15:13

a president—whoever it may be—who will,

15:16

finally bring these regional authorities

15:18

to their senses. Someone who, at a meeting

15:21

of the State Council (a top Russian government advisory body), will call on your

15:23

governor, Berg, and say:

15:26

“Tell me, dear Berg,

15:28

why exactly did you raise the fare for маршрутки (shared minibuses) in

15:32

the city? What is it now? 22 rubles. Yes,

15:34

It was 20 not long ago.

15:37

So why raise it? Tell us, explain,

15:38

please. And of course he’ll say: “We

15:41

raised the prices because, well, the city has no money,

15:43

so we have to take money from the public

15:46

in order to solve the most urgent

15:49

and pressing

15:50

problems of Orenburg Region.”

15:53

And then a normal president,

15:56

a normal politician, a normal parliament

15:58

would say to him: “Dear Governor Berg, why the hell

16:02

did you buy yourself a Lexus for 5

16:04

million rubles? Why did you do that if you’re

16:07

collecting 2 rubles from each person? Why did you

16:10

do it? Who allowed you to

16:12

do that? Why did your regional

16:15

parliament allow it? How did you put that into

16:17

the budget?” But really,

16:19

this is not an exaggeration, folks. In no

16:22

country in the world, not even the richest one,

16:25

not even the richest

16:28

regional officials buy themselves

16:29

Lexus cars for 5 million rubles. Just look

16:32

at the vehicle fleet. I looked at the procurement records. There are

16:35

several dozen such cars that they

16:37

bought. What for?

16:39

Is that somehow normal, or is it

16:41

immoral?

16:43

That is why I am running in this election:

16:46

to say these things out loud. I’m not saying anything

16:48

new. You talk about this yourselves

16:51

around the kitchen table, right? You say:

16:53

“They’ve completely lost it, they’re bloated with excess, they’ve gone

16:56

mad.”

16:58

But everyone stays silent. You don’t see this on television.

17:01

No one discusses it in parliament. And

17:03

It sort of turns out, well, that this is just how it

17:06

is supposed to be. We’ve gotten used to it. But I don’t

17:09

want to get used to it.

17:12

I don’t want to get used to it. I’m 41 years old, and

17:16

I’ve spent almost half my life under

17:19

this government. I can see that it is no longer capable of

17:23

changing anything for the better. This

17:27

government is associated only with decline. Sadly,

17:30

that’s the truth. Raise your hands, those of you who are under

17:32

thirty here

17:35

there are a lot of you.

17:37

And you have spent most of your lives

17:40

under Putin, living under this

17:43

regime. Tell me, please, do you

17:45

feel that you have any prospects at all?

17:48

No.

17:48

So when it comes to prospects, do you

17:50

feel that maybe, perhaps,

17:52

the government, or your Berg (likely referring to Governor Yury Berg), or whoever else

17:54

will do something tomorrow, and you

17:55

will live a little better?

17:57

No.

17:59

And this is confirmed by hard

18:01

numbers, because in recent years

18:04

10% of the region’s population has left. What

18:08

on earth is going on?

18:11

It’s a wealthy oil-producing region. And yet

18:14

people are leaving, scattering, because

18:16

you can’t earn a decent living here, because

18:18

there are no prospects. What is your best

18:20

university here, in Orenburg

18:22

Region?

18:24

Yura,

18:25

I see there are different opinions. Well, never mind,

18:27

it doesn’t matter which one exactly, the main thing is don’t

18:29

start fighting. Wait, tell me,

18:32

please, what salary, if

18:35

luck smiles on you there, since you have a lot of

18:37

Gazprom here, and you get into some

18:39

top position, what salary could you

18:41

earn? 30,000

18:42

30,000

18:43

30,000, 30,000

18:45

25,000

18:45

50,000–60,000

18:48

25,000

18:48

40,000, 30,000

18:50

50,000

18:51

in the future

18:51

50,000

18:53

it’s impossible to get hired

18:54

it’s impossible to get hired

18:57

exactly

18:58

Guys, what we’re discussing, what we’re

19:00

joking about right now, is a description of

19:04

a national catastrophe, because it

19:07

means that young people who have received

19:10

a good education can get

19:12

a job paying 50,000 rubles. Less than the average wage in

19:16

a developed country—or even a not very developed

19:18

country. That’s an average salary. What

19:21

is 50,000, really? Especially in an oil-producing

19:24

region. We portray it as some kind of, well,

19:28

ideal. Like, if I’m lucky, if I get lucky and I

19:32

make 50,000, then that salary

19:35

still won’t let you buy an apartment,

19:38

you won’t be able to support your family properly,

19:40

you can’t. Have two children and your

19:42

salary is gone; you’re still

19:44

running around, borrowing money,

19:47

taking out some consumer loan

19:49

to buy a washing machine. Is that really

19:51

the future of a great country?

19:53

No,

19:54

no,

19:55

That’s what I’m saying: no. And obviously it’s no. But

19:57

every year they keep telling us that

19:59

we should hang on a little longer, guys. Let’s

20:02

tighten our belts. Guys, what are you doing in

20:03

Orenburg here? Sure, go ahead, tighten your belts

20:05

even more. Rotenberg (a wealthy businessman close to Putin) doesn’t have enough money yet.

20:08

Tighten your belts, put up with it.

20:10

We only have 118 billionaires.

20:13

We need to get that up to 150 billionaires.

20:15

Just endure a little longer. Come on, endure it.

20:17

One of Putin’s sons-in-law has already become

20:20

a dollar billionaire. Endure a little

20:23

longer. We still need to make another son-in-law

20:25

a billionaire. Are you ready to put up with that?

20:28

No.

20:28

I’m not ready to put up with it. I have only one

20:31

life.

20:32

I have two children. They study here. And I

20:36

hope they will stay in Russia. I

20:38

want

20:40

at least to spend the rest of my life in

20:43

a normal country, a normal

20:46

human country, not one with, you know,

20:48

crystal palaces or anything like that,

20:51

but one where things are simple, where the roads

20:54

have been repaired,

20:57

where the houses—just look around, just look around,

21:00

for heaven’s sake—you are among the top four

21:05

oil-producing regions in the country.

21:06

Look at this building. When was it

21:08

last given a major overhaul?

21:09

Never.

21:10

Never.

21:11

Never. Never. And that is the most

21:14

common—or rather, not the most common

21:16

answer when I ask. It is the

21:17

only answer. Do you understand? Everywhere,

21:21

wherever I speak, there is always

21:23

some run-down building. You ask

21:24

when it was repaired. The answer: never.

21:27

And why?

21:29

And where did all that enormous money go? I

21:32

am told: "You’re a populist, you keep talking about

21:34

money, money." But where are you

21:35

going to get money for our city of Orenburg? I

21:38

explain where I will get the money for the city of

21:42

Orenburg.

21:43

The system that Putin and Kudrin built over 18 years,

21:47

in which all the money

21:50

is taken from the regions to Moscow—it, well,

21:53

it has gone bankrupt, it has shown that it

21:56

does not work, because our regions are not

21:58

developing. What is the budget of your

22:01

of the city?

22:03

Don’t know?

22:05

11 billion rubles

22:08

What percentage of the taxes collected

22:10

does Orenburg Region send to the federal center?

22:12

71.

22:14

71, someone is prompting me correctly. You are one

22:17

of the leading regions. Almost all the money

22:19

is taken away from you. And in just the first 9

22:22

months of 2016, you sent to

22:24

Moscow 110 billion rubles. And I’m saying a simple

22:29

thing, but it’s obvious. Well,

22:31

it really is, actually. Take any

22:34

normal developed country that has

22:37

a federal system like ours. And we see that

22:39

the regions keep some

22:41

money for themselves, and retain powers. So,

22:44

let’s do something simple.

22:45

Let’s give away a little less. No, not just

22:48

keep all the money for ourselves—that’s impossible,

22:51

but instead of giving away 70%, let’s give 50%, and the budget

22:56

of Orenburg will triple.

23:00

That’s enormous money. It means that

23:02

three times more can be spent on

23:04

education, three times more can be

23:07

spent on healthcare. It

23:08

means that you could provide substantial

23:11

regional supplements for pensioners. It

23:13

means there definitely can be no talk

23:15

of any paid education. The money

23:18

is there.

23:19

It is there. It’s just being dragged off to Moscow

23:22

so that in Moscow they can do what with it?

23:23

what?

23:24

Steal it.

23:25

Steal it.

23:25

Steal it. Exactly right. That’s why we need

23:28

politicians, and we need a candidate for

23:30

president. We need governors

23:32

who, you know, when they’re sitting there—

23:34

they sit in Moscow. The State Council is sitting there, Putin

23:37

is sitting there looking very important, Medvedev is thinking about

23:40

his dacha (country house), the first one, the second, the third,

23:42

the fourth or the fifth. Someone there is mumbling

23:45

something and says: "So, we’ll build

23:47

a park in Moscow for 14 billion rubles. We’ll allocate 2

23:50

trillion rubles for renovation in Moscow,

23:54

we’ll allocate for lighting up Moscow’s trees

23:56

6 billion rubles. And at that point a governor should

23:59

stand up and say: "Guys, sorry,

24:02

of course, but could we be a little more modest

24:05

because in my city that extremist and troublemaker

24:08

Navalny came through

24:11

and pointed at a building

24:14

that needs repairs. And somehow

24:16

we probably need to spend some money

24:18

on my own region, on

24:21

my hometown. That’s the kind of

24:24

governor we need.

24:25

Yes,

24:26

I

24:27

want to become president so that

24:30

you would elect governors and elect

24:33

mayors, and they would defend

24:37

your interests and your rights, because

24:40

right now, whatever United Russia

24:42

doesn’t propose today, tomorrow it will propose

24:44

a special tax on regions that

24:46

starts with the letter O, so that they pay even more.

24:49

United Russia will say: "Fine."

24:52

And all your local newspapers will write:

24:53

"The correct decision by the party

24:55

of government. It’s long overdue, long overdue

24:57

to do this, because if we don’t,

24:59

then of course NATO soldiers will come

25:00

because, of course, this is what we’re doing

25:04

in order to fight

25:05

the Americans. We need normal government. I’m

25:09

running to become president

25:12

and create normal government. I’m running in

25:15

the election so that these

25:17

wonderful people in uniform,

25:21

all turning away from me, and in peaked caps,

25:25

would get higher salaries.

25:29

You, my friends, dear police officers,

25:31

should vote for me. Your candidate,

25:35

Alexei Navalny, because I will free

25:37

you from this idiocy. Look

25:39

how many police are here. You

25:41

taxpayers,

25:43

do you want to spend money, police

25:46

forces, and effort on having them deal with

25:49

this?

25:50

No.

25:51

Do you have crime here?

25:53

Do you have corruption here?

25:56

Are there issues here that

25:58

the police really do need

26:00

to work on? Yes.

26:01

Yes.

26:02

Why are they needed here at this rally? What

26:05

are they protecting? Why do we need these

26:06

anti-extremism departments? For

26:08

whom? Yo—

26:10

do you want to spend money on this or not?

26:12

No.

26:14

That’s why I will become president. Those

26:17

gigantic, gigantic budgets that

26:21

are allocated to law enforcement agencies,

26:23

I will spend properly, in particular

26:26

so that police officers receive

26:28

a little more, and in particular so that

26:30

they are given apartments.

26:34

So, respected people in uniform, as soon as

26:38

you finish this rally,

26:39

cursing to yourselves that you were

26:41

made to stand out in the cold, go home

26:44

and the first thing you do is search for Navalny

26:47

2018 and leave your signature in support

26:50

of me, because I am the only

26:52

candidate who supports you.

26:54

The only one. Tell me, please,

26:58

as taxpayers,

27:01

are you willing to spend money, even a kopeck

27:03

of your own money, so that they can jail

27:07

some bloggers?

27:08

No.

27:09

So that people can be jailed for likes

27:11

or reposts?

27:12

No.

27:13

Does this even concern you at all,

27:14

in any way?

27:15

No.

27:15

You sit there and think: "Right then. My

27:18

money is going to be used so that someone

27:20

can go and saw down a blogger's door in the name of

27:21

fighting 'magic.'" No.

27:23

You don't want that?

27:24

No.

27:25

No. Well then, I suppose I'm your

27:27

candidate, because in cases like this I

27:29

always step up to the podium, make a campaign

27:31

promise, and straighten the podium.

27:35

When I become president, I will shut down

27:38

Roskomnadzor (Russia's state media and internet censor) once and for all.

27:41

We don't need it.

27:44

It's a harmful, disgusting organization,

27:47

a bunch of idlers sitting on

27:50

our backs, spending our money and making

27:54

our lives worse. We don't need them, just as we don't need the huge

27:58

number of other officials who

28:00

are constantly inspecting something. Did you know

28:03

that in Russia every year there are

28:07

2 million business inspections?

28:10

Do you feel that any of this is somehow,

28:11

well, for your benefit? No.

28:14

Is it easy, easy in Orenburg Region

28:15

to do business? No.

28:18

Just like anywhere else, it's impossible. The moment

28:21

you start doing something. Say you start, I don't

28:24

know, knitting Orenburg down shawls

28:28

(a traditional local wool shawl). You're just a grandmother,

28:31

making these shawls and selling them, but when the state

28:34

comes knocking at your door, what

28:36

will it say to you?

28:38

You, granny. Criminal,

28:40

you're an illegal entrepreneur. You're an enemy

28:43

of the state. We've opened a criminal case

28:45

against you. I'm running in this election,

28:50

and I want to become president in order

28:52

to free small businesses from taxes

28:55

altogether. I will free small business from

28:58

all taxes, period. I promise you that. I

29:02

will free small business from any

29:04

permits, any licenses. Why are they

29:07

needed at all? All the taxes, all the taxes

29:10

they pay amount to just 0.5% of GDP.

29:12

Why hassle them at all if a person

29:15

is running a small business and

29:17

just wants to feed themselves, feed their family?

29:20

And the only task

29:22

of President Navalny when it comes to

29:24

small business will be to send it

29:26

certificates of honor. Because we should

29:28

say: "Thank you for doing at least

29:30

something. Thank you for helping at least

29:34

someone, for paying a salary to one

29:36

person or even to yourself, because you

29:39

increase the public good."

29:42

Tell me, please, are you

29:46

satisfied with our television?

29:48

No.

29:49

Are you satisfied with our mass

29:50

media? How do you even feel

29:52

when you turn on

29:53

the TV? What's the first news story there?

29:55

About Ukraine. The second is about

29:58

Ukraine. The third is about the U.S. The fourth, about

30:01

Syria,

30:03

Korea,

30:03

Korea, ISIS, and everything else. And we sit there

30:06

thinking: when are they ever going to say anything about our

30:07

Orenburg Region,

30:09

when will they talk about my Moscow, when

30:11

will they talk about housing and коммунальные services, when will they talk about some

30:14

problem, when will they say that

30:16

10% of the population has left Orenburg Region,

30:18

when will they talk about

30:20

healthcare,

30:21

when will they say that a city in your

30:25

region is among the leaders in

30:28

HIV infection rates?

30:30

20th century

30:33

We built, well, we spent all that time building

30:35

a country, building our civilization. Well,

30:37

it seems that a lot of things

30:39

did work out for us. I mean, we launch

30:41

rockets into space, right?

30:43

Yes.

30:43

We have nuclear power plants,

30:45

we have nuclear weapons. That means

30:48

that, well, overall,

30:49

we're an advanced people. We're an advanced

30:52

country. We've done what most

30:55

countries cannot do.

30:58

But why have we now ended up in a situation

31:01

where, in terms of AIDS, we are overtaking

31:07

developed countries, developing countries,

31:09

African countries? Is that normal?

31:13

Why doesn't he talk about this on television?

31:15

People should be shouting about this. This

31:17

really is a problem. The problem isn't in Ukraine,

31:20

not in

31:21

Syria, not in America. This is

31:24

the problem. Tell me, I see a lot of

31:26

people here, well, adults already.

31:30

Is it easy to get an ultrasound for free? How long

31:33

does it take? Say you've decided to go

31:35

get an ultrasound. Something hurts, you need

31:37

an ultrasound. How long does it take to get

31:40

a free ultrasound?

31:43

A month,

31:44

a week, and so on.

31:46

And an MRI?

31:49

Oh.

31:50

Oh.

31:52

That's why

31:54

I want to become president. Yes. I don't

31:56

want that in the 21st century, in 2017, this

31:59

it's just an MRI,

32:01

they've been doing them for decades in every

32:04

country. This is, really, a simple, simple

32:07

medical procedure. And you say 'MRI,'

32:10

and everyone goes: 'Oh,' as if I weren't saying 'MRI'

32:12

but as if I were sending you

32:14

to Mars.'

32:16

This simply cannot work like this. Now I’m going to

32:18

move on to questions and answers. It cannot

32:20

work like this. It’s an idiotic

32:23

perverse system where we sit on

32:25

oil money and still can’t provide our people with

32:29

MRI scans. And this matters in connection with

32:32

oil money, because

32:34

the only thing you here, in

32:36

Orenburg Region, get from your own

32:38

resources is what? Illness. Look

32:43

at the disease rates here, in

32:45

the Orenburg Region. They are monstrous.

32:47

One of the worst environmental situations in the country.

32:51

Cancer is detected at the final stage. We

32:53

all of us, we are all poor and sick, as

32:56

horrible as that sounds. I do not want to and

33:00

I refuse to understand

33:03

why a rich oil-producing country should

33:06

keep its population in such conditions.

33:09

I refuse to understand why 85%

33:14

of the national wealth belongs to 1%

33:18

of the population. That is a direct consequence. Well,

33:20

that’s how the pipeline is built in our country. There go

33:23

the oil money, the metals money,

33:25

the gas money, whatever money you like, uh,

33:28

fertilizers and everything else. And all of it

33:30

is converted only into income for oligarchs

33:33

and officials.

33:35

And everyone stays silent about it. Everyone

33:38

stays silent about it. Listen, there are other

33:40

presidential candidates—maybe they

33:42

came here. Did

33:43

Zhirinovsky come here?

33:44

No.

33:45

No.

33:45

Zyuganov?

33:46

No.

33:46

Sergei Mikhailovich Mironov?

33:48

No.

33:48

No.

33:49

It’s a pity they didn’t come. And I wish

33:52

they would come and say these things. We

33:54

recently had a single voting day (a nationwide election day),

33:56

right?

33:58

And I turn on the TV,

34:01

and I see Zyuganov at a polling station, they stop him, and

34:03

they run up to him. Gennady Andreyevich, well,

34:05

say something, there’s an election going on. I

34:07

think, now he’s going to open his mouth and

34:08

really let them have it.

34:11

A microphone is put in front of him, he opens his mouth

34:13

and says: "Well, these Americans have completely

34:15

lost it."

34:17

They’ve become totally outrageous. So, they’ve

34:19

surrounded our country from all sides."

34:21

So what? Is he right? He is right

34:23

to say that. Maybe he is right

34:24

to say it, but I don’t understand. There are

34:27

probably other problems too. If we

34:29

want to talk about America and Americans,

34:31

fine, talk about Americans as your sixth

34:33

or seventh point—but first say

34:36

that you do not understand why

34:38

the country’s prime minister, caught up in

34:40

corruption, is still sitting there and remains

34:43

prime minister. Have you seen the film?

34:45

Well, I presented convincing facts.

34:47

What else can I possibly prove? We already filmed

34:49

that dacha, we already filmed that yacht, we already

34:53

showed everything. So go ahead, jail him,

34:55

or at least remove him from office. But he

34:57

stays put. And he keeps buying. And he

35:00

keeps making money. And who ended up on

35:03

trial?

35:06

Me.

35:06

As usual, just as everyone joked right at the start

35:08

when the investigation was published, that

35:10

the only consequence would be yet another

35:12

case against Navalny. And that’s exactly

35:14

what happened.

35:16

What did we all hear? Well, what I heard—and probably

35:18

everyone heard through me—when we

35:20

caught oligarch Usmanov giving bribes, what did we

35:22

hear?

35:24

Pah on you, Alexei Navalny.

35:28

This is why I want to become president:

35:31

so that, representing you, I can say to all these

35:34

people: "I’ll tell him: ‘I’m not going to

35:37

spit on you—none of this “pah on you.”

35:38

Pay your taxes, pay your taxes properly.’" I

35:43

will ban

35:45

keeping raw-material revenues in offshore accounts. I

35:49

will ban this transfer pricing scheme

35:51

under which all the profits stay there. I

35:54

will ban all these schemes that are plainly

35:56

visible. Everyone knows about them, and

35:59

the president knows about them, and the tax authorities

36:00

know, everyone knows, but they still don’t stop

36:02

the money from being siphoned out. It is siphoned out

36:06

every year; this has gone on for years

36:09

and on and on and

36:11

on. It is easy to stop, and I

36:14

will stop it. I will do it. I am running in

36:18

the election in order to apply

36:20

elementary,

36:22

simple measures that will make our lives

36:25

more prosperous as soon as tomorrow. Russia has enough

36:28

money for Russia to live twice as

36:30

prosperously tomorrow, without

36:32

any exaggeration—there is still a sea of money. I

36:37

am running in the election in order to

36:40

represent you, represent those

36:42

people whom the authorities said

36:45

do not exist at all, that they are absent, or

36:48

that they are

36:49

Hold on a second,

36:51

wait, wait.

36:57

your vice-governors,

36:59

whatever chant or little slogan they give young people

37:02

on the streets, that’s what they repeat.

37:06

This means only one thing: these people need

37:08

a thrill. Young people

37:10

have taken to the streets, and this is a designed,

37:13

very professionally engineered political

37:15

campaign. Big money came into the country

37:18

for this campaign. But raise your hands, those

37:20

who came here for money.

37:22

This is a risky moment for me, but as you can see,

37:25

No one came here for money. So

37:28

how much longer are we supposed to put up with these lies?

37:32

How much longer can we tolerate this? We know that

37:35

most people in this country are unhappy with what is happening,

37:40

and they will never prove to us that this is

37:42

part of some campaign or anything like that.

37:45

It's a lie. We are that silent

37:49

majority. In fact, the majority,

37:52

even those who may not

37:54

support me because they know about my

37:56

work from television, where

37:57

they said that I stole the entire forest and that I am

38:00

a foreign agent, are still

38:03

unhappy with what is going on because, well,

38:05

you cannot be satisfied with these roads in the

38:08

21st century, because you cannot be

38:10

satisfied with this healthcare system in the 21st

38:12

century, you cannot be satisfied with this

38:14

law enforcement system in the 21st century.

38:17

We are the majority.

38:20

And the most important thing I want to say,

38:23

before I move on to answering

38:24

questions. Friends, we must realize

38:28

our own strength. This is the most important

38:31

task of the election campaign. Everyone is on

38:34

our side. Everyone is on our side. We are the majority. We are

38:40

active, politically engaged people.

38:42

We can do anything. Here I

38:44

see here, in this square, enough people

38:47

to per-

38:49

to win over the entire city of Orenburg in 2

38:53

weeks.

38:55

It's just that we have been convinced, it has been hammered into

38:58

our heads, that we can do nothing.

39:00

You know, it's like there's a wall there, some kind of

39:03

impenetrable wall. They've always

39:05

been there, they always will be. And we were born,

39:09

grew up, and will die under them. And we are doomed

39:12

to poverty.

39:14

Well, I don't think so.

39:16

Do you agree with me?

39:17

Yes.

39:18

I am running in the election to represent those

39:21

people who do not believe that we are

39:24

doomed to poverty, who do not

39:26

believe that they have to die in this

39:28

poverty, who do not believe that

39:30

the only way to achieve a normal

39:32

life is to emigrate or flee to

39:34

another region. Here and now, we can

39:37

build a normal country. And here and

39:39

now, we will achieve a great deal if we

39:43

believe in ourselves and take action.

39:46

There are more of us than there are of them. We are smarter than

39:49

they are. We represent the majority

39:52

of the country's population. We will win this

39:55

election, and we will build our beautiful

39:57

Russia of the future. Thank you very much. I am

40:00

ready to answer questions.

40:03

Guys, as I promised, without any

40:06

pre-moderation, without prepared

40:08

questions—any kind, flattering,

40:12

critical, whatever you want.

40:15

Hello, Alexei. I'd like to ask,

40:17

I'll repeat it for everyone afterward.

40:19

As far as we know, there are three

40:21

taxes related to gasoline and roads.

40:24

What will you do with them, and how will you

40:25

develop the road sector in in our

40:27

Russia? How will I develop the road

40:29

sector in our Russia?

40:31

and what will I do with the three taxes?

40:33

Well, I will direct these taxes

40:36

toward road development. I will abolish

40:39

the Platon system. It is unfair,

40:42

corrupt, and nobody needs it. But

40:43

look, this is the Kremlin's position. Our

40:46

roads are bad, our bridges are bad.

40:48

So let's invent the Platon system,

40:50

which works like this: they took

40:52

the son of Putin's friend Rotenberg,

40:54

a private company, and now all

40:57

truck drivers, and through them all of us, pay them

41:00

taxes.

41:01

That's how it works.

41:02

It's a twisted, bizarre system. Why

41:05

should we be paying them? We already have an excise tax

41:07

on gasoline, we have a vehicle

41:09

tax. The third one—which tax do you mean?

41:11

tax?

41:11

I meant the transport tax, the excise tax,

41:13

and Platon.

41:14

Well, the transport tax, the excise tax, and Platon. Platon

41:17

is not needed. We will scrap it once and for all.

41:19

We will open criminal cases

41:21

against everyone who brought in Platon. It is

41:23

a scam. It was a violation of the tender process. It was,

41:26

essentially, fraud. The excise tax and

41:29

the vehicle tax should go toward

41:31

roads. We have enough

41:33

money to repair roads. The road

41:35

problem has basically been solved in all

41:38

countries. In Africa it has largely been

41:40

solved. And only here, in Russia,

41:42

do we walk around saying: "My God, how are we ever going to

41:45

fix the roads?" It must be,

41:46

impossible. And it's impossible because our

41:48

road construction costs are 10

41:50

times higher than in China. And why are they 10

41:52

times higher than in China?

41:54

Because they steal. They steal. So we will break up

41:57

the road-building monopoly. We will hold normal

42:00

honest tenders. We will

42:02

invite foreign, including foreign,

42:04

contractors, and then we will solve the road

42:07

problem.

42:08

I heard someone over there shout out

42:10

this question to me: "And you won't steal, will you?"

42:13

Good question.

42:15

Well, what do you think—will I steal or

42:17

not?

42:17

No,

42:20

probably not. Probably not. Hard to say,

42:22

we'll see.

42:25

But look, I'm standing here, I am

42:28

a candidate, and, well, I am confident in myself, I

42:31

know that I am a decent guy and that I will not

42:33

steal, but should you believe me?

42:36

believe?

42:38

Power corrupts people. Power corrupts

42:41

people. And one well-known person said

42:43

that after 10 years in power, anyone goes

42:46

crazy. Who said that?

42:48

Putin.

42:50

So, well, if we apply that quote

42:52

to him himself, it turns out

42:54

that for the past 7 years the country has been run by

42:56

whom?

42:58

Madmen. Yes, that's exactly right. They

43:00

really have gone crazy over money,

43:03

privileges, and their own

43:05

sense of impunity.

43:07

Well, I'll do something simple.

43:11

First, I know, I agree with him that

43:14

people go crazy. And not even after 10 years, but

43:17

sooner. So if I become president,

43:20

I will cut the presidential term back to

43:23

4 years. A maximum of 8 years. You do a good job

43:27

in the first 4 years, you get another four, and then

43:29

goodbye. Goodbye. No matter how

43:32

good you are, whether it's Alexei Navalny or some Petya

43:34

Semyochkin, it doesn't matter: you've done 8 years, so

43:37

goodbye, go do something else, write a book.

43:40

Play sports, have fun, pick

43:43

mushrooms, do whatever you want. You cannot

43:46

be president forever. That's first. Second, I

43:49

will reduce my own powers.

43:51

Parliament will be able to investigate

43:53

me and my actions, because I will give it

43:55

those powers. I will create

43:57

independent prosecutors who will be able to

43:59

investigate the president's actions.

44:01

You see it on the news all the time, how

44:04

before a U.S. congressional committee

44:07

the FBI director, a cabinet secretary, and even

44:09

vice presidents, members of the president's cabinet, all

44:12

meekly

44:13

answer questions on live camera, and

44:16

all of America watches them. We want

44:18

the same thing in Russia. That's how it should

44:20

work. The government must be accountable

44:22

to the people. If there are questions for you, answer them. So

44:25

President Navalny

44:28

will be open to

44:30

investigation. If you suspect me

44:32

of corruption, a parliamentary commission will be created

44:35

against me, and against me

44:37

an independent prosecutor will work, you

44:39

will impeach me, and when I come here

44:41

to try to prove my case to you, I

44:43

will be standing here alone,

44:45

because the free media will tear me

44:48

to pieces,

44:50

because I simply will have no

44:52

support left, and no one will ever

44:53

elect me again, and most likely they'll even

44:56

put me in prison. That is the one and only

44:59

way to fight corruption: make it so

45:01

that you yourself can be imprisoned for

45:04

corruption. And that is exactly what I will do, I promise you.

45:06

Question.

45:08

Let's do the press later. Yes. Yes.

45:13

What am I going to do with all the property

45:17

of the oligarchs and dollar billionaires?

45:20

Well, of course, I'd like to say I'll give

45:22

everything to the residents of Marenburg.

45:25

So, look. Oligarchs are different. Just because

45:28

a person is a dollar

45:29

billionaire does not mean he is our

45:31

enemy. The creators of Yandex are dollar

45:33

billionaires. They created something good.

45:35

We say to them: "Well done, we love you,

45:38

dear dollar billionaires." There are

45:40

people of another kind. Usmanov, who

45:43

made his money through an illegal tax-evasion

45:46

scheme. Then there are the Rotenbergs,

45:49

and Timchenko, and all the

45:51

other friends of Putin—they

45:53

quite obviously made their money

45:55

through corruption and corrupt schemes. So,

45:58

we will hold these people

46:00

accountable. Since their money and

46:03

property were obtained by criminal means, we

46:06

will seize them for the state budget. Second, all those

46:08

lovely palaces will be sold through fair

46:11

auctions. The money will go into the budget.

46:12

Third. Fourth.

46:15

I will become a president

46:17

who brings back from abroad all

46:20

stolen assets. I will do it. I

46:23

know how to do it. Why isn't it happening

46:25

now? Well, have you seen who was

46:27

put in charge of finding

46:29

stolen assets abroad?

46:31

Chaika.

46:32

Prosecutor General Chaika.

46:34

The very same guy we

46:36

published an investigation about, showing that his family

46:38

was moving money to Switzerland. Well,

46:40

naturally, he is not going to do

46:42

that. And we get replies from

46:44

Switzerland saying that when we

46:46

send complaints there, they say: "Well,

46:48

guys, how do you expect us to

46:49

investigate if your prosecutor's office

46:52

says everything is fine?"

46:55

Funny how people with the same last name do that.

46:57

A certain Igor Chaika tells us that

46:59

Artyom Chaika is doing just fine. But that is how

47:03

it works, and it should not work that way, and it will not

47:05

work that way. Many countries,

47:07

African ones, for example, have recovered from

47:10

Switzerland and France stolen money—

47:12

billions. And we will recover it too. I know how

47:14

to do it, and I will be able to do it. Let's take

47:16

a question from this side.

47:18

Elections. There are no elections.

47:20

There are no elections.

47:23

It used to be $500, now it's $250.

47:27

Question. How will you be able to stabilize the dollar

47:29

because my wife used to

47:30

earn $500, and

47:33

now she earns $250. The thing is,

47:35

the dollar is already stable.

47:36

The ruble

47:37

It's the ruble that's unstable.

47:39

But that's an excellent question, my friends. So,

47:42

tell me, please, are prices going up?

47:44

Yes.

47:44

Do you feel prices rising?

47:46

And obviously, they are. Over the last,

47:48

probably couple of years, food prices alone have gone up by about 60%.

47:50

But if we

47:54

look at the Central Bank's data,

47:57

we see that the Central Bank of Russia

47:59

says inflation is now 4%, or even

48:02

3.8%. Oh,

48:03

so apparently it basically doesn't exist, and according to

48:06

that logic, if your wife was earning $500,

48:08

she should still be earning $500. But that's

48:10

not true. It's a lie. So what am I

48:13

going to do about this and about

48:15

the ruble? If inflation is, well,

48:17

it really does look like inflation

48:20

is heading toward 4%. But we don't

48:23

feel that. Do you know why? Why can't you

48:25

get a loan at 4% annual interest?

48:28

Because on average you're getting them at

48:32

11, 12, or 15%, because they give out

48:36

loans at 0%

48:38

to their relatives. Putin's son-in-law got

48:41

a $1 billion loan at 0% interest. You

48:44

are bailing out these banks at 0% interest,

48:47

so they get money for free. And that's why

48:50

you and we get it at 16%.

48:53

I will put an end to this bacchanalia

48:56

in order to stabilize the ruble. I will stop

48:57

bailing out these bankers. Do you want to bail out

49:00

bankers?

49:01

No.

49:02

Here you are in Orenburg

49:04

— whether you came to the rally or you're against

49:06

rallies, whether you're blowing a whistle, or you're

49:08

a police officer, or an FSB officer,

49:11

or from the local administration, whoever you are — do you

49:13

want to bail out Moscow bankers?

49:15

Do you care about B&N Bank or Otkritie Bank? But

49:18

you're the ones saving them. In your view,

49:22

over the last 2 years, how much has each of

49:24

you paid to rescue these banks?

49:30

16,000 rubles from each person. A total of 2.5

49:34

trillion rubles. That means 16,000 rubles from

49:38

every elderly person, every infant, every woman,

49:41

every man — 16,000 rubles taken from every single person.

49:44

I'm sure you could find a use for 16,000 rubles.

49:47

And so could I. But for me,

49:49

with a family of four, that's a substantial

49:51

amount. I'd spend it on myself, and I

49:53

will put a stop to this, because this is

49:55

what rising prices are, this is real

49:57

inflation — the kind they say doesn't exist, but

50:00

for us it very much does. And it hits us right in

50:02

the wallet. Yes. Next question.

50:10

We have no elections in this country.

50:13

And we have a rather perverse form of

50:15

journalism in this country. Will there be

50:18

changes in this sphere? You're putting it too mildly.

50:21

"Rather perverse" is too soft for these

50:24

people. It's completely perverse.

50:26

The local media are the same. Well, I don't know

50:28

how many people are here right now, quite

50:30

a lot. But really, without

50:32

any exaggeration, tonight you'll go

50:34

home and read reports from your

50:37

pro-governor media saying that there was

50:38

nobody here at all, that it was a

50:40

pathetic rally. They'll show a photo from a

50:42

drone that was taken

50:44

20 minutes before the rally started. And you, and everyone else,

50:47

understand that it's a lie. And you

50:49

understand that it's a lie. But they will

50:51

write it with a straight face and will

50:53

collect their salaries out of your pocket.

50:56

So here's my position, very clearly:

50:59

I will stop funding all of them. I do not

51:03

understand why we should spend 30 billion

51:05

rubles on Russia Today. Do you want to spend money

51:07

funding Russia Today? No,

51:10

I don't. Do you want to buy a villa for

51:12

Vladimir Solovyov?

51:13

No.

51:15

Now that was a powerful shout. A loud no from over there. Well,

51:17

do you want to pay for that Tolstoy,

51:19

Kiselyov? Kiselyov lives in an apartment worth 3

51:22

million euros on Tsvetnoy Boulevard. Do you want

51:24

to pay for that apartment? No.

51:26

So that is why President Alexei

51:28

Navalny will remove as many restrictions as possible

51:30

from the media, stop

51:32

funding the media, stop keeping media outlets in

51:36

state ownership,

51:37

for example, the city of Moscow has 300 newspapers.

51:39

What the hell for? Why do they need 300 newspapers? What

51:41

do they need 300 newspapers for? We'll sell it all off,

51:44

get rid of all of it, remove any

51:46

restrictions on the media, and let them

51:49

compete freely with one another.

51:51

Question. I saw someone here shouting. Yes,

51:53

just ask your question.

51:55

Elections.

51:55

Elections.

51:56

Fair elections.

51:59

Fair elections. Not your elections.

52:03

Excellent question. Do you really think that

52:07

the Kremlin is full of fools and you're the only

52:09

smart one?

52:10

That's a great question.

52:12

So, here's my answer to your

52:15

question. I do not think the Kremlin is run by

52:19

fools. I think the Kremlin is run by

52:22

very smart crooks and thieves. They are very

52:26

smart. Very, very, very smart. Just

52:30

look — they seized control of the largest

52:32

country in the world. They've been in

52:35

power for 18 years. They very skillfully took over

52:38

the media. They are very skillful at rigging

52:40

elections, and of course elections are rigged

52:42

here too.

52:43

Look, Governor Berg is genuinely

52:45

popular with the people.

52:46

No.

52:46

And what percentage did he get in the election?

52:49

I think he got 80%, right? Somewhere around there.

52:51

about 80.

52:53

These are cunning, smart people who,

52:56

have something to lose. They are

52:57

billionaires. But the question is,

53:00

maybe they are smart, of course, very

53:02

smart, maybe even smarter than us,

53:05

but I think by now all of us already

53:09

have enough sense to understand that this is

53:11

the wrong system. Right?

53:14

We have enough sense to understand that, guys, you

53:16

schemed and schemed and schemed and schemed, but

53:19

that's enough scheming here—go do it somewhere else.

53:21

You can't fool us anymore. If

53:24

people's real incomes have been falling

53:26

for the fourth year in a row, we feel it.

53:28

That's right. We feel it in our own wallets.

53:30

Are we really prepared to keep swallowing this

53:33

same old chewing gum about

53:34

Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine? Don't think

53:36

about money, think about America,

53:38

about Ukraine. Is that what interests us?

53:39

No.

53:40

That's why I don't think I'm smarter than

53:43

they are. I don't think I'm the only

53:45

one who's the smartest. But I do think I'm

53:47

normal. And I think there are

53:49

enough normal people in this country

53:52

to throw those cunning crooks out.

53:54

Question. Alexei, Alexei.

53:57

Just last week, here,

53:59

two faculty members from two

54:01

of the biggest universities in our region were detained.

54:03

The question is,

54:03

all within a single week, but that's just a drop in the

54:05

ocean. What can actually be done about

54:06

corruption in the education system?

54:08

The question is this: last week here,

54:11

two people from the education sector

54:13

were detained. What can actually be done about

54:15

corruption in education?

54:19

Well, let's start with the big things.

54:21

The Unified State Exam. Who here has had to take it?

54:23

Who here has taken the Unified State Exam?

54:26

Who likes the Unified State Exam?

54:27

Nobody.

54:28

Uh-huh.

54:29

And yet the Unified State Exam, in principle, sounds fairly

54:32

reasonable. Why was it

54:34

created? So that you from Orenburg, and

54:36

someone else from Moscow, would have equal

54:39

chances of getting into the best university. But

54:41

in practice, which regions have

54:43

the highest Unified State Exam scores?

54:44

Dagestan,

54:45

Chechnya.

54:46

Chechnya and Dagestan. That's right. Why?

54:49

Because they buy them. So it turns out that

54:52

if the Unified State Exam doesn't work in even one region,

54:55

then it doesn't work for

54:56

the whole country, which means it has become

54:58

meaningless. Right? Therefore,

55:02

our number one task in fighting corruption in

55:04

education is to stop this cheating around

55:07

the Unified State Exam. Task number two is to properly fund

55:11

Russian education. It receives

55:12

very little money. If we look at

55:15

any developed country, we will see that

55:17

they allocate about 4% of GDP, while we

55:20

allocate half that. Until

55:23

we fund

55:24

proper education, we won't have it.

55:26

Our education system is really heading

55:28

off the rails and toward total collapse. I mean,

55:30

of course, you can jail teachers.

55:32

Sure, you can. You can take the approach

55:34

of simply going around catching them

55:36

for taking $100,

55:38

5,000 rubles, 200 rubles, a box of chocolates.

55:42

You can do that, but that's not how we'll defeat

55:44

corruption. So the task is—and let's be

55:46

honest—are teachers really the main

55:49

corrupt actors in the country? There, as in

55:51

healthcare, there is widespread

55:53

corruption, but to say outright that

55:55

we live badly because of them—no, that's not it. The task

55:58

is different. We will properly fund

56:00

education and healthcare. The money exists for that, but

56:03

after that, if you're still dissatisfied

56:05

and keep taking bribes, keep

56:07

rigging the Unified State Exam, then jail them without

56:10

mercy, regardless of the fact that they're a teacher and

56:12

so on—just jail them. That's the only way. I

56:14

see someone here I recognize with a question.

56:16

Let's take questions. North

56:18

Caucasus.

56:20

Will you push the issue?

56:24

Go ahead, speak.

56:26

If I become president, will I

56:28

insist on reopening

56:30

the investigation into Budanov's murder?

56:33

There are quite a lot of murders like this.

56:36

And we can see that these high-profile

56:38

murders, especially those in which, obviously,

56:41

members of Kadyrov's entourage are involved,

56:43

are not being investigated. Budanov

56:46

is definitely not my hero. But

56:49

nevertheless, I believe that no proper

56:51

investigation was carried out there. Do you think

56:53

a proper investigation was conducted into Nemtsov's

56:55

murder?

56:56

No.

56:57

No.

56:58

I will become president. I will investigate this.

57:01

I will investigate

57:03

Kadyrov's involvement in these murders.

57:05

I will investigate the activities of all

57:07

these strange people who sit there in the

57:09

President Hotel in Moscow, all of them

57:11

loaded down with pistols, gold ones and

57:13

non-gold ones. And no one even understands

57:15

whether they're security services or police, who

57:18

they even are. Just some kind of armed bandits

57:19

with assault rifles. Why are they allowed to do this?

57:22

So I'm not afraid to do that. I

57:24

will absolutely investigate it.

57:26

Someone was shouting loudly from over here. Yes.

57:27

Question.

57:28

the Cabinet of Ministers.

57:30

What should be done about unfair elections?

57:33

The Cabinet of Ministers, and the logic

57:35

of an election campaign is that

57:38

I still have several months. I

57:40

hope—and we can see how the authorities

57:43

are trying to obstruct things—that I will still come here to Orenburg

57:45

again. And preferably more than once.

57:47

So all these personnel matters, these staffing

57:49

appointments—the logic of the campaign is that

57:51

they are announced at the end. So I will

57:53

talk about that closer to the election date,

57:55

but I assure you that we definitely have people

58:00

better than those who are now sitting in

58:02

the Kremlin and the White House (the Russian government building). Next question.

58:07

Question

58:09

Question.

58:11

A question, a question about agriculture.

58:13

In agriculture,

58:15

there is one main problem. They cannot

58:18

get credit. Agriculture

58:21

is structured in such a way that they

58:23

need money. And when they go to

58:25

a bank, they are told: "Well, pay 10%.

58:27

Impossible." That's problem number one. Agriculture

58:30

also runs into the fact that

58:31

it is impossible to connect either to

58:32

electricity or to gas. What's the situation there?

58:34

Agriculture. Now tell me,

58:36

who here has a dacha (country house)? Raise your hand. And who has

58:39

a dacha connected to gas?

58:42

There you go. Exactly. In a region where

58:44

Gazprom operates—the so-called national

58:46

treasure—and yet it is hard to get connected. How much

58:48

does it cost to connect to gas? A house—

58:51

100,000, 150,000

58:52

100, 150, 200 thousand, the person says. And

58:56

can you imagine what it means for a farmer

58:58

to get connected—he has built something,

58:59

to heat, I don't know, a cowshed or

59:01

whatever, any kind of building—it is impossible.

59:04

So infrastructure, the development

59:07

of infrastructure, and normal access to

59:09

credit resources will make it possible

59:11

for agriculture to develop. Without that,

59:13

nothing works. But besides that, once

59:15

again, excuse me, there is corruption. Who

59:17

heads

59:17

Rosselkhozbank?

59:20

Not Tkachev. Tkachev heads

59:22

the Ministry of Agriculture. One

59:25

of the country's biggest corrupt figures

59:26

heads the Ministry of

59:28

Agriculture. The biggest milk producer.

59:30

Who is it? His family. And who is the biggest owner

59:32

of agricultural land? The family

59:34

of the minister of agriculture.

59:36

And who heads Rosselkhozbank?

59:38

Patrushev,

59:40

the son of the former head of the FSB (Federal Security Service). Why

59:43

does he head it?

59:44

Because the former head's

59:45

Because he is the son of the former head

59:47

of the FSB. Every year this bank records

59:50

a huge hole in its finances and receives state money. He is

59:52

a bad banker, he runs

59:54

the bank badly, but he still continues

59:56

to sit there because the kickbacks are enormous

59:58

amounts of money. That is what we will eliminate. Agriculture

1:00:01

will begin to develop. Let me take one from

1:00:02

this side. Yes.

1:00:04

Why isn't he giving him the mic? Please, let him speak.

1:00:07

Yes, yes, yes.

1:00:07

What should be done about Crimea and Donbas? A difficult

1:00:10

question.

1:00:11

What should be done about Crimea and Donbas? A difficult

1:00:12

question. Well, listen, it is, of course,

1:00:14

a difficult question indeed, but on

1:00:17

the other hand, it is also an easy question,

1:00:18

because I answer it honestly.

1:00:21

I believe that the Crimea issue has

1:00:24

no solution. It cannot be resolved.

1:00:26

It is a territorial conflict. Obviously,

1:00:28

Crimea is effectively financed from our

1:00:31

budget. It is effectively now

1:00:33

part of the Russian Federation. This will not

1:00:35

be recognized by anyone in the foreseeable future. And

1:00:37

like the issue of Northern Cyprus, like

1:00:39

the issue of the Palestinian territories,

1:00:42

like the issue of the Falkland Islands, and

1:00:44

all the other territorial disputes

1:00:46

on the globe, in the foreseeable future,

1:00:50

it has no solution. Everyone will

1:00:52

suffer, everyone will struggle. More than

1:00:55

anyone else, Crimeans will suffer from the fact

1:00:57

that the sanctions will remain. Honestly,

1:00:58

I could lie to you

1:01:00

right now and say: I have a plan,

1:01:01

I won't tell you what it is, but I have a plan,

1:01:03

a great plan, and I will solve the Crimea issue.

1:01:05

It cannot be solved. As for whether it is Russian,

1:01:10

it has always belonged to Russia.

1:01:11

Fine, fine. Fine. Are you ready to give up part of your pension

1:01:15

for it? Are you ready to give up part of your pension?

1:01:17

Are you ready to give from

1:01:19

your pension? Fine. And are you ready

1:01:22

to finance Syria out of your pension?

1:01:24

Are you? What else?

1:01:27

And what else are you ready for? Afghanistan too, out of

1:01:29

your pension?

1:01:30

What does Afghanistan have to do with this?

1:01:31

Well then, let me answer you, my friends.

1:01:33

Then let's talk about

1:01:37

foreign policy. Here we have

1:01:38

a person who, obviously, is unlikely

1:01:41

to vote for me, because he wants

1:01:44

to finance out of his pension

1:01:46

Afghanistan, the fight against ISIS, Syria, and everything

1:01:49

else. I can tell you this: many people

1:01:52

criticize me for this position. Once again

1:01:54

I come to the podium and tell you

1:01:57

my position absolutely precisely, clearly, and plainly:

1:02:00

President Alexei Navalny

1:02:04

will stop forgiving other countries' debts,

1:02:07

and will stop financing other countries.

1:02:10

What the hell for? I mean, listen, yes,

1:02:13

look at how many problems we have.

1:02:15

Why are we— Who here has been to Syria?

1:02:16

Raise your hand. Well, maybe you have been there,

1:02:18

You weren’t. And why should we have to pay

1:02:21

for it? Are you a pensioner, judging by your

1:02:23

age? That’s right.

1:02:24

So, you’re a pensioner. Uh, are there any other

1:02:26

pensioners here? Raise your hands.

1:02:29

There, there, there, there,

1:02:30

there are pensioners here. So, let me tell you,

1:02:33

dear pensioners, that over the past 15

1:02:37

years Russia has forgiven

1:02:40

debts owed by other countries in an amount that

1:02:43

has cost every pensioner in Russia

1:02:45

260,000

1:02:47

rubles. Do you want to pay 260,000 rubles out of

1:02:50

your pension? I don’t want the citizens

1:02:53

of Russia to. I don’t understand why debts were forgiven for

1:02:56

Cuba, Mozambique, Angola. We forgive everyone

1:02:59

everything. And who is going to forgive us?

1:03:02

And who has ever given us anything here? No one has ever

1:03:04

forgiven us anything. We see

1:03:06

small countries. The Czech Republic, for example, the Czech Republic

1:03:09

squeezes money out of Cuba. If they can’t

1:03:12

pay in cash, they pay in rum, they pay in sugar

1:03:15

cane, somehow or other. And we say:

1:03:17

"All right then, we forgave these people $20 billion,

1:03:19

forgave those people too." So, I

1:03:21

love all countries very much; I care about

1:03:24

the fate of Palmyra, I care about the fate of

1:03:26

the residents of Aleppo and everyone else, but I am not

1:03:29

going to finance it, because we

1:03:30

don’t have money ourselves. A lot of people won’t

1:03:34

agree with me on this, but those are the people I will

1:03:36

represent in the election. Question. Yes.

1:03:40

It so happened that

1:03:42

one of the people at the institution where

1:03:44

I study,

1:03:45

one person said, someone with a high po-

1:03:47

high-ranking position, that anyone who goes to this rally

1:03:49

will be expelled from it.

1:03:55

All right, so the question is this. A student

1:03:57

at an educational institution was told that

1:04:00

if you go to this rally, you’ll

1:04:01

be expelled.

1:04:02

Who has heard things like that before?

1:04:08

They were just threatened. Threatened with what?

1:04:13

Then threaten them back. Everyone

1:04:16

who does this is a criminal.

1:04:19

They are real criminals. We will

1:04:23

fire them, and we will jail them for this. There’s

1:04:26

nothing to be afraid of. It’s all lies.

1:04:28

First of all, because, well, this is

1:04:30

isolated; we hardly know of any cases

1:04:33

where it actually happened.

1:04:35

But of course they do try to intimidate people. Of course,

1:04:37

they intimidate people, they walk around filming with cameras. "We’ll

1:04:40

put your faces online." Well,

1:04:41

go ahead and put our faces online. Who

1:04:43

here is afraid to show their face? Who is not

1:04:46

afraid to show their face? I don’t understand

1:04:49

why, in our own country, we can’t

1:04:51

go to a rally. So the people who

1:04:55

say such things are, without question,

1:04:57

criminals. And they need to be told to their faces

1:04:59

that they are

1:05:01

criminals. And don’t forget to film it

1:05:03

on camera. Because that’s what they’re

1:05:05

afraid of. As soon as it was posted on YouTube, when someone there

1:05:09

had threatened to expel someone, that was it—

1:05:10

the principal was already apologizing, already behaving

1:05:12

as meek as can be. These people are

1:05:15

brazen and aggressive, but in essence

1:05:17

they are, of course, very cowardly, because this

1:05:19

is itself a display of cowardice. So,

1:05:21

you go to a rally and we’ll expel you. Yeah,

1:05:23

right, we’ll be the ones to expel them. That’s the issue everywhere.

1:05:25

Yes. Question. Yes.

1:05:27

We don’t have elections; we have dishonest elections.

1:05:31

They’ll just write down some fake result for you, so what are you going to do with

1:05:34

these fake elections?

1:05:38

The question is this: we don’t have elections; we have

1:05:40

a sham instead of elections, and as your

1:05:42

results they’ll write down all kinds of fake numbers. What

1:05:44

are you going to do about that?

1:05:46

Well, that’s a fair question,

1:05:47

right?

1:05:48

We really do have a sham instead of elections.

1:05:50

This government really does

1:05:52

stay in power by falsifying elections. That is,

1:05:54

if before they merely brainwashed people,

1:05:57

now even that is no longer enough. They need

1:05:59

to rig elections.

1:06:00

Look, I earn every vote

1:06:04

through hard work. I woke up today at

1:06:07

3:00 a.m. to come here. From here

1:06:10

I’m going to Arkhangelsk, then I’m going to St. Petersburg

1:06:13

for a rally, where they’ll probably once again

1:06:14

lock me up for 30 days, or I don’t know what

1:06:16

will happen. I fight for these votes like

1:06:19

a normal candidate, and I am not going

1:06:23

to hand them over so someone can steal them. So

1:06:26

for the first time, in fact, in Russian

1:06:28

elections, we are really going to prepare

1:06:30

100,000 real observers. At

1:06:33

every election people say that they will

1:06:34

prepare them, but no one actually does it. I’m

1:06:37

a sensible person, not a fool. I

1:06:39

understand how they will fight, but we

1:06:42

will fight back. At every

1:06:44

polling station we will place several observers.

1:06:46

I’m going to appeal to you, guys. I’m going

1:06:48

to come here and say, "So, do you

1:06:49

want your votes in Orenburg

1:06:51

to be stolen?"

1:06:52

No.

1:06:52

No? Then we’ll stand at every

1:06:54

polling station. However many people we can

1:06:56

mobilize—and I know that we can mobilize more,

1:06:58

than any other political force,

1:07:00

that’s how many we’ll send to

1:07:02

the polling stations. So, well, we’ll fight.

1:07:04

Of course, they won’t just give up

1:07:07

their billions or their power that easily, but we

1:07:08

will fight. Question.

1:07:12

the design of our cities for our people is usually

1:07:14

a quality environment that Europeans have been creating

1:07:16

for many years already, but for us it seems like some kind of nonsense.

1:07:18

How are we going to improve the quality of Russian

1:07:20

cities? Because for our people

1:07:22

a European-style lawn is seen as nonsense. Look,

1:07:24

First, I do not believe that our people are

1:07:26

somehow especially uncivilized. After all, you have

1:07:29

a bridge here between Europe and Asia.

1:07:31

So we have, in a way, claimed a little bit of Europe,

1:07:33

right? And

1:07:35

exactly, claimed

1:07:36

I certainly believe that the residents

1:07:38

of Russian cities are, of course, ready for

1:07:41

a standard of urban services

1:07:43

that is normal by European standards. It is simply

1:07:44

that this quality does not exist.

1:07:47

Enormous amounts of money allocated for urban improvement are stolen.

1:07:49

That is why we must transfer

1:07:52

all these issues to local

1:07:54

self-government, and second, we must organize

1:07:56

public oversight. I, I am absolutely

1:07:58

convinced that if tomorrow we create

1:08:01

some kind of amazing flower bed here, it is not as if

1:08:02

the people of Orenburg are so wild

1:08:04

that they will come running and rip out the flowers. That will not

1:08:06

happen. That is all nonsense. They probably said

1:08:08

that in Zaryadye Park (a major park in central Moscow) people stole some

1:08:09

flowers. But that is a lie. We are all

1:08:12

normal people. I do not see anyone here who

1:08:14

would immediately run off to dig something up there

1:08:17

like that bush and plant it at their dacha (country house).

1:08:20

Of course, there are occasional excesses, because

1:08:22

well, we are somewhat used to living like this,

1:08:25

with terrible urban improvement all around us. But I

1:08:28

know that there are cities, including in the provinces,

1:08:30

where there is a normal quality of

1:08:33

urban management and public improvement.

1:08:35

The main thing is simply to make sure that the money there

1:08:37

is not stolen, because in

1:08:39

urban improvement they do not steal 30 percent, but

1:08:41

90 percent. Question.

1:08:43

But what will happen

1:08:53

once again?

1:08:58

So, I have a question about Kadyrov, and it

1:09:01

is formulated as follows: are you prepared

1:09:03

to make it so that these people who

1:09:05

stand with you would go kill and fight for you?

1:09:08

So, I am talking about Kadyrov. I

1:09:10

certainly believe that there are grounds

1:09:13

to believe that he was behind the murder of

1:09:16

Nemtsov. I believe, personally, and I am telling you

1:09:18

directly, without any of that, you know,

1:09:21

without trying to avoid being sued. I

1:09:23

believe that Kadyrov ordered Nemtsov's

1:09:25

murder. Yes, that is what I think. And I think

1:09:28

that his activities should be

1:09:29

investigated. But there is no need to kill anyone or

1:09:31

frighten anyone with all that. Why?

1:09:34

Why would anyone need to run out tomorrow and

1:09:36

kill someone, to fight? Do you remember there was

1:09:39

such a mayor of Makhachkala, Said Amirov. He sat

1:09:42

in Makhachkala for many years, and there were the same

1:09:44

stories then too: he could not be removed. He was

1:09:47

a terrible corrupt official, a murderer. But

1:09:50

he had his own army. Everyone said that as soon as

1:09:53

we removed him, tomorrow

1:09:55

a war would start in Dagestan. Troops would

1:09:57

have to be sent in, all of Makhachkala would

1:09:59

rise up, and so on. And what happened?

1:10:01

They came, arrested him, and took him to

1:10:03

Lefortovo (a Moscow detention center). Zero reaction in Dagestan.

1:10:07

In Dagestan, in the North Caucasus, and

1:10:10

everywhere else, people want the same thing as in

1:10:13

Orenburg: slightly higher

1:10:15

salaries, normal

1:10:17

justice, a normal judicial

1:10:19

system. They are even poorer than people here. I

1:10:22

asked you here about salaries, and you

1:10:23

said 15,000 rubles. If I asked there about

1:10:26

salaries, and I will ask, they would say

1:10:28

8,000 rubles. So they simply need

1:10:31

a normal life. No one is planning to

1:10:32

fight anyone or kill anyone. And there is no

1:10:34

need for such a question.

1:10:37

Let us start here, and then I will move over there

1:10:38

afterward. Yes.

1:10:41

What, what?

1:10:42

Demographics.

1:10:44

Demographics, immigration.

1:10:47

Possibly one of the most serious

1:10:49

issues facing our country. We are dying out. From

1:10:52

your region, as I have already said several times,

1:10:53

10 percent of the population has simply left.

1:10:57

The Russian authorities believe that

1:10:59

population decline can be offset

1:11:01

by migrants from the North Caucasus and

1:11:04

by migrants from the countries of Central Asia and

1:11:06

the South Caucasus. Do you think so?

1:11:10

Do you think that, so to speak, you can be

1:11:12

replaced by Tajiks or Uzbeks, with all due

1:11:15

respect to them?

1:11:16

Therefore, regarding migration, I have

1:11:18

an absolutely clear position. I support

1:11:21

introducing a visa regime with the countries of

1:11:24

Central Asia and the South Caucasus. I will introduce this

1:11:26

visa regime. People have been talking about it for a long time,

1:11:28

but only after every terrorist attack. Whenever

1:11:31

some problem happens, everyone

1:11:34

starts saying: "We ought to introduce

1:11:35

a visa regime. We ought to bring in a visa

1:11:36

regime." And then they forget. I will introduce

1:11:39

a visa regime. That is number one. Number

1:11:41

two: in general, the demographic problem cannot

1:11:43

be solved without solving the problem of economic

1:11:45

growth. There is no such thing as, you know, pressing a

1:11:47

button and suddenly you start having twice as

1:11:49

many children. That is not how it works.

1:11:53

It is about quality of life. Right now, a person

1:11:55

understands this; we discussed it at the beginning,

1:11:57

say I have a salary of 40,000 rubles. I would

1:12:00

like to have three children, but it is

1:12:02

impossible to feed them on that money,

1:12:04

right? Only economic growth,

1:12:07

which will bring higher wages, I

1:12:09

apologize for such a banality, but it is what

1:12:11

will lead a person to say:

1:12:12

"Well, perhaps I can afford

1:12:13

a third child, or a fourth." Only

1:12:15

that way. There is no other path. That is this side of the

1:12:17

issue. Yes.

1:12:19

the development of the military industry, or will you

1:12:21

reduce funding?

1:12:24

Will there be development of the military industry

1:12:26

or will I reduce its funding overall?

1:12:29

Excellent question. And my answer to it is, well,

1:12:31

this: military industry will continue to develop,

1:12:33

but I will reduce its

1:12:35

overall funding, because this is

1:12:37

not opposition politician Alexei Navalny saying it, but

1:12:39

the Accounts Chamber of Russia says that

1:12:41

roughly every third ruble allocated

1:12:44

to the state defense procurement program,

1:12:46

is cashed out within about two

1:12:48

months. In other words, quite literally, we

1:12:50

allocate trillions there, and those trillions

1:12:53

turn into wheeled suitcases

1:12:56

stuffed with cash. Corruption in Russia is monstrous everywhere.

1:12:58

But in state defense procurement,

1:13:01

because it is closed off,

1:13:03

the corruption is unbelievably monstrous. I can see

1:13:07

how much money is allocated to

1:13:09

military and police spending overall. That money

1:13:12

would be enough for state defense procurement,

1:13:15

and for raising salaries

1:13:17

for the police and the military, and for providing them with

1:13:20

apartments. It would be enough for all of that, if only

1:13:22

the money were not simply being stolen. We

1:13:23

will do exactly that. We will defeat corruption. At the very

1:13:25

least, we will significantly reduce corruption there,

1:13:27

and that will allow us

1:13:30

to do many things. Miss,

1:13:31

will Russian

1:13:33

science be funded?

1:13:35

Will Russian

1:13:36

science be funded?

1:13:37

Let me ask you: should

1:13:39

Russian science be funded? Yes.

1:13:40

Yes.

1:13:42

Obviously. And this is an important question,

1:13:44

because if we look at how much

1:13:46

money is currently being allocated to Russian

1:13:48

science, it is a laughable amount. What

1:13:51

we are seeing happen to the Russian

1:13:52

Academy of Sciences, which is being torn apart, which is

1:13:55

not being allowed to properly elect its leadership,

1:13:57

is a crime against science. I

1:14:00

was in Novosibirsk recently, and there

1:14:02

I met people from Akademgorodok (a major Soviet-era science and research hub in Novosibirsk).

1:14:05

We are proud of Akademgorodok, right?

1:14:07

When we talk about Russian science, very

1:14:09

often what comes to mind is Novosibirsk’s

1:14:10

Akademgorodok, with its supposedly top-tier

1:14:13

physicists. And then you ask those

1:14:15

physicists—I saw this, you can

1:14:17

watch the video—how much does a

1:14:20

physics graduate student in Akademgorodok make?

1:14:24

15,000 rubles.

1:14:27

Can science exist on that kind of

1:14:29

money?

1:14:30

Well, of course not. Because this

1:14:31

young person understands that if he moves to

1:14:33

almost any country, he will earn 30 times

1:14:36

more—any country at all.

1:14:38

We train these physics students,

1:14:40

these physics graduate students. We have

1:14:42

nuclear physicists; there are only a handful of countries

1:14:45

you can count on one hand

1:14:47

that train them, but we do not

1:14:48

fund them, and very soon we will

1:14:51

run out of them, because they simply

1:14:52

leave for other countries. And the point here is simple.

1:14:55

I can talk about how we will cut

1:14:57

spending here and cut spending there, but

1:14:59

if we do not fund science, it simply

1:15:01

will cease to exist, it will die out, and we

1:15:04

will need another 100 years

1:15:06

to rebuild it. So we will fund science

1:15:08

at the level of the countries of the

1:15:10

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, several

1:15:12

times more. And again, this is the

1:15:14

refrain of my speech: there is money in this country,

1:15:17

there is money for this, for everything, if we

1:15:19

spend it properly. Next question.

1:15:22

Question.

1:15:23

I’ll come to you afterward.

1:15:26

How long will my candidate keep walking around

1:15:29

without security? The level of provocation is high. If

1:15:32

you were to...

1:15:37

you should be kept safe. So the question is:

1:15:40

for how long will my candidate

1:15:43

go around without protection? And who is your candidate?

1:15:45

- who is that?

1:15:46

Oh, thank you very much. That’s me. So,

1:15:49

my friends, look, here’s the thing.

1:15:51

First of all, at rallies—you

1:15:53

can see it now—I do have security there.

1:15:55

I mean, I do have it in everyday life too, but

1:15:58

I cannot compete with the state.

1:16:00

How much security would I need

1:16:03

to counter the police? All the people

1:16:05

who carry out attacks are

1:16:08

organized by the security services. So, well, who

1:16:11

here has funded the election

1:16:12

campaign? Who has ever sent money to

1:16:14

the ACF or to the election campaign? There are

1:16:16

many of you here. I could spend your money

1:16:19

on surrounding myself with security. And

1:16:21

that would not help me one bit. So

1:16:23

I am a normal person, I am not crazy.

1:16:26

I do not take pleasure in the fact that

1:16:27

there is some kind of risk. But

1:16:31

I share those risks with you. You

1:16:35

do not have security either. Who here has gone to rallies?

1:16:37

You have had unauthorized rallies here

1:16:39

here in 2016.

1:16:40

Yes,

1:16:41

You had authorized ones too, but

1:16:42

there are unauthorized ones as well, and you go to

1:16:43

them. If I call you to an autho— to an

1:16:46

unauthorized one, will you go?

1:16:48

Yes,

1:16:48

You will. You will bear that risk, and I will share it

1:16:51

with you. That is the only way this

1:16:54

works. Because if, you know, I

1:16:56

call on you to do something, to march somewhere,

1:16:59

while I myself have gone abroad

1:17:02

and surrounded myself with several layers

1:17:03

of security—yes, I would be safe, but

1:17:05

would you believe me?

1:17:07

No, that is not how politics works, and I do not

1:17:09

want it to work that way. The question about

1:17:11

an apartment.

1:17:12

Housing. How are you going to address it?

1:17:14

Housing. That is exactly why, in

1:17:16

our platform, well, some people

1:17:18

are surprised: "Why did you put this

1:17:20

mortgage issue right at the beginning of the platform? It

1:17:23

seems strange. Usually everyone buries it somewhere

1:17:25

further down." I believe that, unquestionably,

1:17:28

the housing issue is not even

1:17:29

an economic issue; it is a question of the country’s future,

1:17:32

because is it possible to buy housing in

1:17:34

Russia? No,

1:17:36

no. People up to the age of 40 live with their parents,

1:17:39

because it is impossible. What is the mortgage interest

1:17:41

rate?

1:17:43

13.

1:17:44

19.

1:17:45

13. Well, not 25, of course. That is, if

1:17:47

you really try, you can find 11%. And

1:17:50

even then, it is still impossible to pay.

1:17:52

Right? It is simply impossible to take out

1:17:53

a mortgage loan. That is why this is a matter of

1:17:56

state policy. Number one:

1:17:59

reduce market regulation so that

1:18:01

apartments become cheaper. As it stands, they are very

1:18:03

expensive. And number two: subsidize

1:18:05

mortgages, so that all of you, as in any

1:18:08

normal European country, could

1:18:10

take out a mortgage at 1 or 2%

1:18:12

annual interest. Until we do that,

1:18:14

our country will not

1:18:16

develop, because how can people have

1:18:18

children if they have nowhere to live? That is the reality.

1:18:21

Yes, let’s go to this side now. Yes,

1:18:23

yes.

1:18:25

What are we going to do with the draft offices and military units?

1:18:29

A question about conscription, as I

1:18:30

understand it, judging by the front rows,

1:18:32

this is a pressing issue, right?

1:18:35

So,

1:18:36

since 2005,

1:18:38

the budget of the Russian Federation has been able

1:18:42

to afford a professional contract army.

1:18:45

Therefore, President Alexei Navalny

1:18:48

will stop drafting young people. I

1:18:51

will transition Russia to a professional contract army,

1:18:54

and do what people have been talking about for many years. This

1:18:57

is truly necessary. What is conscription

1:18:59

today? It is a tax on the poor. Where

1:19:03

do they not take people from to serve in the army?

1:19:07

The North Caucasus and Moscow. Why from

1:19:10

Moscow? Because in Moscow everyone

1:19:11

buys their way out. So your chances of going

1:19:14

into the army are

1:19:16

100% if you live in a village, if you

1:19:18

come from a poor family. The wealthier your

1:19:21

family is, the lower the chance that

1:19:23

you will end up in the army. It is a tax on

1:19:25

the poor. It is unnecessary. All modern

1:19:29

armies in the world are professional armies,

1:19:32

so we will, without question, move to

1:19:34

a professional army. As for

1:19:35

your question about what to do with draft offices and

1:19:37

everything else, well, we will cut the unnecessary part.

1:19:40

And, well, look, draft offices

1:19:43

are still needed in some form, because

1:19:45

if, God forbid, war breaks out,

1:19:48

draft offices are responsible for mobilizing the population

1:19:50

for war. So I could say, "I will shut down

1:19:53

all draft offices." But that would be

1:19:54

foolish. We will reduce the number of

1:19:56

staff, but nevertheless the system of

1:19:58

conscription in the country must

1:20:00

be scaled back. But with a professional

1:20:02

army, that issue changes. Yes.

1:20:04

Yes.

1:20:06

And on your channel there was, if I remember correctly,

1:20:11

Alexei Shatsov, and one thing he said that I liked in

1:20:14

your team was this. One of his remarks

1:20:16

was that corruption can only

1:20:19

be stopped with the utmost

1:20:21

severity.

1:20:24

The question is whether I believe that

1:20:27

corruption can be eliminated or prevented

1:20:29

only through the death penalty?

1:20:32

Well, let me ask a risky question.

1:20:34

Who here thinks corrupt officials should be shot?

1:20:37

To be honest, I disagree with you.

1:20:40

I am a principled opponent of

1:20:42

the death penalty. I know that it is

1:20:43

popular. It is popular among

1:20:46

the public. Most Russian citizens

1:20:48

support the death penalty. But tell

1:20:51

me, please: do you trust our courts?

1:20:53

No.

1:20:53

Can you allow Russian courts

1:20:56

to execute people? No.

1:20:58

Damn it, tomorrow the first person they would

1:20:59

execute would be me. Do you understand? So,

1:21:02

I believe the death penalty solves no

1:21:04

problems. Where do we see the lowest

1:21:07

levels of corruption? In which

1:21:08

countries? Norway, Finland, New

1:21:11

Zealand. There is no death penalty

1:21:13

there. The inevitability of punishment—

1:21:16

that is what is needed, so that a corrupt official

1:21:18

understands that sooner or later he will be caught,

1:21:21

sooner or later he will go to prison. But in Russia

1:21:23

how does it work? A corrupt official

1:21:24

knows that if you steal 20,000 rubles,

1:21:27

you will be jailed, but if you steal

1:21:28

a billion, you will be promoted. That does not

1:21:31

work, and it should. Next question.

1:21:34

Will microelectronics be developed in Russia?

1:21:37

For so long, phones in China and Korea,

1:21:39

televisions?

1:21:42

A question about microelectronics. Will we

1:21:45

develop microelectronics in Russia?

1:21:46

Listen, are we not developing it already? Have you

1:21:48

heard of an organization called Rosnano?

1:21:51

Have you heard of it? That is rather strange if not.

1:21:55

Strange, because have you heard of an

1:21:57

organization called Rostec? Its head, Chemezov,

1:21:59

showed Putin four years ago the "iPhone killer,"

1:22:01

and yet why did you not buy it? And

1:22:05

that famous textbook for Russian

1:22:07

for schoolchildren, the one like that, the one that

1:22:09

would replace paper textbooks. Did you see it on

1:22:11

TV?

1:22:11

Yes.

1:22:12

So where is it? And where is everything else? And

1:22:14

maybe you saw, maybe someone saw my

1:22:15

debate with Chubais,

1:22:17

and he even gave me a whole little suitcase. Yes.

1:22:19

And in that suitcase there were lots of supposedly useful

1:22:21

things. And where are they all? And on this, on all of this,

1:22:25

billions were spent, tens of

1:22:27

billions, hundreds of billions, without

1:22:29

exaggeration. So we will

1:22:31

develop all of this, but not by the methods

1:22:34

that the Russian state is using now,

1:22:36

because it simply

1:22:38

dumps enormous amounts of money into a state-owned company,

1:22:41

which cannot do anything. You yourselves

1:22:43

said it: Korea, Singapore, and everything

1:22:45

else. Competition. The number one word

1:22:48

for why all this worked in these

1:22:50

countries. And it is the same in China.

1:22:52

Competition. We will stop squeezing

1:22:54

business, we will encourage business,

1:22:57

that manufactures things, including things like this,

1:22:59

we will stop pouring money into

1:23:01

state-owned companies, and then, well, probably,

1:23:04

gradually—because we do have the foundations, we

1:23:05

have Zelenograd, we have many

1:23:07

factories—microelectronics in Russia will also

1:23:09

start to develop. Let's take a couple more

1:23:11

questions. Yes,

1:23:11

Navalny, Navalny, can you give

1:23:13

your word as a man that you're not an American pawn,

1:23:15

that you are not an American pawn?

1:23:18

Excellent question. I would give it to you right now,

1:23:21

yes. Alexei, can you give your word

1:23:23

as a man that you are not an American

1:23:25

pawn?

1:23:27

And also, I even posted on Twitter

1:23:30

about this. You can look later. Here

1:23:33

someone photographed a woman. She had

1:23:34

two great signs. Sign number

1:23:36

one: "Don't believe the State Department puppet."

1:23:39

People, don't believe the State Department puppet. And

1:23:42

sign number two, in her other hand,

1:23:44

said: "Appoint Navalny as head of a

1:23:48

as governor of a depressed region. So

1:23:50

if you combine them, it means appointing

1:23:51

a State Department puppet

1:23:53

as governor of a depressed region. So

1:23:55

even in the minds of such people, something

1:23:57

is going on—things are so

1:23:59

wrong that, well, let's

1:24:01

take a State Department puppet

1:24:03

and put him in charge of a depressed

1:24:06

region. So, I give you my word as a man,

1:24:09

that I am nobody's puppet. I

1:24:12

give you my word

1:24:15

that there are real people behind me. Those

1:24:19

people are you. I give you my word that I act

1:24:23

in the interests of the residents of the city of Orenburg and

1:24:27

the Orenburg region. I give you my word

1:24:29

that I do not need any other people,

1:24:33

any other support, in order to

1:24:34

get up on this stage. As long as you

1:24:36

support me, I give you my word

1:24:40

that I truly believe that sooner or

1:24:47

later, Russia must, after all, be led by

1:24:49

an honest person. I want to become that

1:24:52

honest person at the head of Russia. I

1:24:55

will become him if you

1:24:57

support me. I give you my word that I will do

1:25:00

everything so that I do not let you down,

1:25:02

guys. I give you my word that later

1:25:06

someday, looking back, you will think:

1:25:08

"It wasn't for nothing that I came on Saturday at 12:00 to the

1:25:11

outskirts of the city." This is the outskirts of the city,

1:25:13

right? And stood there listening to him, because

1:25:16

he really was doing something in my

1:25:18

interests. So I give you my word that I will work

1:25:23

for you. I have a question for you. May I

1:25:25

consider myself the candidate from the Orenburg

1:25:27

region, from the city of Orenburg?

1:25:29

Yes.

1:25:29

Thank you very much, my friends. Thank you

1:25:32

so much for coming here. I have to

1:25:34

wrap up, because otherwise I'll be late

1:25:36

for a flight to Arkhangelsk.

1:25:38

Thank you so much. Believe in yourselves, and we

1:25:42

will definitely win. We will turn all this

1:25:44

right side up. We will build everything.

1:25:47

We will achieve everything. This is our

1:25:50

country, it will belong to us, and we

1:25:53

will live and prosper in our beautiful

1:25:56

Russia. Thank you so much, guys.

1:25:57

Thank you very much for coming.

1:26:00

I am very grateful to you. Good luck. I will come

1:26:02

here again. One. Thank you.

Original