Text version
0:03

Today I have a very instructive story for you

0:06

about two ducks.

0:07

One of these ducks lived in England, and it was a homeless

0:10

duck.

0:11

It suffered, and it desperately wanted a little house of its own.

0:14

And a kind man came along—he was a member of the British

0:19

Parliament, Sir Peter Viggers.

0:21

He built a little house for the duck, and the duck was terribly happy,

0:25

but then MP Viggers decided to include the cost

0:28

of that little house—£1,645—in his parliamentary

0:35

expenses.

0:36

The duck didn't care, but the voters

0:39

absolutely hated it.

0:40

They asked the parliamentarian: dude, did you really

0:42

want to spend £1,600 of taxpayers' money on

0:46

buying a little house for a duck?

0:48

And he said: well, yes, I did.

0:51

After that, the entire British press and the voters spent

0:55

several months tearing that MP apart.

0:59

Every newspaper ran photos of his house and the infamous

1:03

duck house.

1:04

Here, for example, is one episode: activists even made

1:07

an enlarged copy of that little house and floated it along the Thames

1:11

near the Parliament building.

1:14

The public was so outraged that it triggered

1:17

a mass review of the expenses of other MPs, and that is how

1:20

other violations came to light.

1:22

As for Peter Viggers himself, he was utterly destroyed,

1:26

and he resigned.

1:27

He will never again take part in politics,

1:29

because he tried to spend taxpayers' money

1:32

—not that much, really— on his personal needs.

1:37

The other duck lived in Russia, near the town of Plyos on the

1:39

Volga River.

1:40

It too had no little house, and it too dreamed of one.

1:44

And then fortune smiled on it too.

1:46

A cheerful fellow appeared in those parts by the name of

1:49

Dmitry Medvedev.

1:50

He is friendly with animals and loves ducks, so without any

1:54

trouble he built a little house for our Russian duck too.

1:57

And while he was at it—since he was already building a little house—he also put up

2:01

various small additions for himself around it.

2:03

An estate of several thousand square meters, a house

2:07

with a swimming pool, a ski slope, several guest

2:10

houses, helipads, a pier, and all sorts of other

2:13

small things.

2:14

All of it spread across 80 hectares (about 198 acres).

2:16

Most likely, all of this was so the duck wouldn't feel

2:18

lonely and bored.

2:20

Such a massive construction project, as you can imagine, required

2:22

funding, and so Dmitry Medvedev, through a charitable foundation

2:26

controlled by his wife, received a bribe of several

2:29

tens of billions of rubles, which paid for all of it.

2:32

And what happened to Dmitry Medvedev when all this

2:35

information was made public?

2:37

When we released a video with footage of the estate, when

2:41

we proved that the money for it came from gas oligarchs,

2:45

that the property was being illegally guarded by the Federal

2:48

Protective Service—meaning, when Dmitry Medvedev

2:51

and his entire scheme were fully exposed?

2:54

Nothing happened.

2:55

Well, that is, our video was watched by 3.5 million

2:59

people, a couple of the independent newspapers still left in Russia wrote

3:02

about it, but in the election Dmitry Medvedev,

3:06

albeit with fraud, of course, still won, no

3:09

public outrage descended on him, journalists did not

3:12

bombard him with questions at press conferences—everything

3:15

stayed exactly as it was.

3:16

And the moral of this story is: the ducks are the same, but people's attitude

3:21

toward the problem of corrupt duck houses is different.

3:25

And only when people get angry, make a fuss,

3:29

demand a fight against corruption, and vote against corrupt officials

3:32

in elections, does anything change.

3:34

But if corrupt officials are not pressured relentlessly, they will continue

3:38

to steal.

3:39

Why would Medvedev refuse to keep accepting gifts worth billions

3:44

if society is effectively giving him permission to do so?

3:47

That is why every day we must remember these facts

3:50

of corruption, remind others about them, and every time

3:54

we hear "Medvedev" or "United Russia"—automatically

3:58

say, "Ah, that's the one with the duck house?

4:01

He belongs in the dock."

4:03

When all citizens of Russia say that—then it

4:06

will happen.

4:07

Subscribe to our channel— this is where the truth is told.

Original