[music]
Good evening, dear viewers of the channel
Navalny Live on YouTube, from our studio.
Today it’s not Navalny, as you’ve probably
already guessed, but Lyubov Sobol and Georgy Alburov.
Alburov, and today we’re here together.
You probably want to know what this
minute of silence for Arkady Babchenko was about.
The script is already outdated, and of course
that changes what kind of silence we’re observing, but about
Arkady Babchenko, we of course wanted
to say a few words. Well, first of all,
what happened was, of course, astonishing,
unexpected, and of course it took us a long time
to recover—first from what
happened on the 29th, and we still hadn’t fully come
to our senses before what
happened on the 30th, when Arkady
Babchenko came back to life—I don’t know how else
to put it.
I’ll explain for those who may have been out of touch
for the past two days and haven’t opened
social media or the news, because it seemed to me
that everyone was talking about it. It seemed impossible
to hide from this news—they
completely flooded the information space. If
your dugout has no internet, radio, or
television, then for your benefit we’ll now
tell you what actually happened.
On May 29, media reports appeared saying that
Russian journalist Arkady Babchenko
had been killed by three shots to the back in his home.
Supposedly, his wife found his body when he
—and the words “killed by three shots to the back” don’t
sound cheerful at all—supposedly his body
was found by his wife, and then all of this was written by his
colleague from Crimean Tatar television
on Facebook, and this
naturally
caused a huge reaction. Everyone
began expressing sympathy,
condolences, and trying to learn
the details of what had happened. There were
reports that Arkady was still alive
when he was found, but then his condition worsened and he
died on the way to the hospital. All of this
naturally shocked and stunned everyone
who was familiar with his work,
read his posts, and followed his life.
Arkady Babchenko is a fairly well-known
figure now in the political and
public life of our country,
and in Ukraine’s as well, actually. And then the
next day there was a press
conference at which Arkady Babchenko
walked out alive. People had already rushed to Kyiv,
written obituaries; many had already managed
to order Babchenko’s books so they could
read them; some had already downloaded and
read them. I even read that one woman
went to a psychotherapist and paid for an appointment
that very day because she was so
upset. She was later very annoyed that the money
had been spent for nothing, because he then
appeared alive at that press conference and
said that this had been an operation—
an operation by Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU)—and that it was
necessary in order to truly
save his life, because there had been a contract
out on him from people who needed
to be found, identified, and proven to be the ones
planning this crime. So,
as I understand it now, evidence is being gathered
against the people who
planned to carry out Arkady’s murder, and
there is footage of the arrest of
the organizer of this murder. I hope
that a pretrial measure will be imposed on the organizer today.
As I understand it, the main
person who exposed this murder plot
was the would-be hitman himself,
who had served in eastern Ukraine,
the man who was assigned to carry out this
killing. He went to the SBU first,
they eventually believed him, and he helped play the role of
the killer and expose this whole chain. And in
fact, some fairly strong
statements are being made by the Ukrainian SBU, and
some evidence has been released. There is
video of a man counting money,
sitting in a car and recounting cash; there is
video of the arrest. I very much hope that
there is much more evidence than this,
and that for now they’re keeping it
up their sleeve so that later,
at the right moment, it can be published. But
for now, all of this really does look like
a murder was prevented, and we are all very
glad that Arkady Babchenko is alive—
that he stayed alive. I’m being told we have
a short clip of the joyful
moment when Babchenko was invited into the hall
at the press conference. Let’s
watch it.
And Arkady Babchenko...
I will... your work... and she... better package...
...spilled... you... ruby... all that lovey-dovey stuff...
...you’ll find out... sitting... and I’ll shoot...
...and now they are bringing in Arkady Babchenko.
(inaudible)
Happy third birthday.
Marganets.
[music]
And now Ukrainian President Petro
Poroshenko has assigned security to Arkady
Babchenko, so I hope that his life
and health now,
and the safety of his family, are no longer under threat. According
to the SBU, Russian special services hired
a man to kill Babchenko for $40,000.
According to Ukrainian media, the SBU
has brought terrorism charges
against the alleged organizer. Yes, today
a man is suspected of organizing and
acting as an intermediary in this murder plot—a man
with the surname German. He is a Ukrainian citizen.
He works somewhere in the defense industry, and according
to the SBU, he was recruited by the Russian
the special services, and they organized it together
the assassination attempt on Babchenko
let's move on to the next topic
because I think we also shouldn't
forget the other people who are still alive and
of course, I wanted to talk on this broadcast
about Oleg Sentsov, who since May 14 has been on
a hunger strike—yes, it's already been more than two
weeks since Oleg Sentsov
began his hunger strike, and that is of course very
impressive. It is a courageous, brave
act. To go on hunger strike in prison is terribly
difficult, utterly unbearable, because
read any memoirs by
Soviet dissidents who describe how
a hunger strike in prison unfolds, how
it happens
and, even worse, forced
feeding—forced feeding through
the nose. All of this is real torture, and if
a person goes that far, it means that he
is truly prepared to part with his
life for his convictions, for his
innocence. And of course Sentsov should
be immediately exchanged by Ukraine for
Russian servicemen, or for other
people who are also currently being held in
Ukraine as prisoners. In fact, it's absurd
—absurd, sad, and tragic—that
as for Oleg Sentsov, personally I would never
have known
I read about his case and watched his
statement, and it seems to me there are no
grounds to accuse a person of
terrorism. That is, the case that we
have seen, which has been publicly and convincingly
laid out online—you can
look at what this
criminal case against Oleg Sentsov was stitched together from
—there is simply no solid evidence
or basis
These are fake pieces of evidence, trumped-up
charges, and all of it existed only
so that they could apparently report that
there were terrorists, that we prevented
a terrorist threat against
Russia, and, you know,
under the quota-driven system, file some kind of reports to Putin
and
and all of this—I've gone too far afield now
it seems to me that now it is already necessary
to stop and make the sensible decision
to have Oleg Sentsov released
along with the other people who are
clearly suffering because of the political
ambitions of Vladimir Putin. Yes, once again,
a hunger strike in prison is as serious as it gets
If a person goes on hunger strike
in prison, it means he is ready to put
his life at risk, it means he is ready
to die for his convictions, and that
of course commands the utmost respect
Let's move on to Russian criminal cases in
Chelyabinsk
A criminal case has been opened against the organizers of the May 5 rally
under the article on
hooliganism
No, they did not overturn cars or burn
police vans
and whatever else people supposedly do when committing hooliganism—they did not
fire guns while drunk in a hotel, either
They didn't do that either, unlike
some former senators, by the way
What is unfolding now in Chelyabinsk is
completely awful
Again, on the one hand it's almost funny, because
it is so absurd that it is very
hard even to believe that this is really
happening right now before our very eyes
that somewhere in our country right now, people
really could be sent away for seven years
to a real, actual prison
for this. On the other hand, it is
truly tragic, and we started with not
the most cheerful news, but we cannot
not talk about this, because in fact
it seems to me this once again shows that
any one of us, any one of you who can
watch this broadcast right now, could tomorrow
be imprisoned under the very same article. Right now
a case has been opened simply because people
on May 5 held a very successful and
excellent rally in Chelyabinsk—here it is
right before your eyes: people are walking down
the central street, chanting, as you can see
in an entirely peaceful manner
as calmly as possible, with absolutely no
violations of public order—look, whole cars with
all their windows intact are standing nearby, no one is
firing pistols into the air while drunk
drunk, naked, or whatever else it is that
people engaged in hooliganism are supposed to do. They are waving
Russian flags—how
patriotic that is, first of all; and how wonderful these people are
Just look at their faces, how
inspired they are, how strongly they feel
their unity, and in a noble impulse to fight for
their country, for their future and the future
of their children, they came out onto the streets of their city
And now, because people were shouting
the chant 'Dubrovsky, resign!' and
'One, two, three—Putin, leave!' I don't know of any more
peaceful chants at a rally. Girls were chanting, 'One,
two, three, four; one, two, three—Putin, leave!' Right now
show us a little more, it seems to me
and now these people are facing
a prison term of up to seven years because
the case was reclassified under the most
serious part of the article: that this group of people, by
prior conspiracy, carried out
hooligan acts
Hooligan acts, meaning that they were chanting
'One, two, three—Putin
leave!' Not 'one, two, three'
—since when is 'Putin' obscene language? This is absurd
Since when did 'Putin' become a swear word? They
were chanting this completely lawful
chant—what have we come to, that we are even discussing this?
The legality of chanting in the streets—what a horror.
And it is an absolutely proper chant.
Putin really is a thief, and this needs to be
said out loud in the streets; there is therefore nothing
criminal about it. But in Chelyabinsk,
the Chelyabinsk authorities and police found it absolutely
appalling. The Chelyabinsk governor really did not like it,
he disliked it intensely, and they moved to
open a criminal case against these
wonderful guys, so that, apparently, they would
walk the streets without chanting, or
better yet, not walk the streets at all,
but sit at home and write, "we're laying down"
messages in blocked Telegram for business and
other purposes. In fact, there is a wonderful
report that they posted—a report on the
interrogation, a scan of a police interrogation record.
No, actually, Volkov, our colleague, posted it
on his Twitter; you can
take a look and read this absolutely
masterful
document in this case. It described, if I am not
mistaken, that this gathering of people was supposed to proceed
in a
good-natured and patriotic manner, which
is something else entirely. I have never seen more good-natured and
patriotic gatherings of people than
the rallies organized by our
team, where people are so
good-natured, so patriotic,
so wonderful, that this colonel
or lieutenant colonel—someone can correct me on the rank—
this police officer ought to go there himself,
come out to these rallies, and enjoy
the universal good nature and the atmosphere of kindness
and patriotism. But as of now, our
coordinator Boris Zolotarevsky has been
arrested for 25 days, and now these
investigative actions are continuing, along with
unprecedented pressure on him. At the same time, he
was taken in for questioning immediately upon leaving
the special detention center. You are now seeing two
episodes: first that, and then a search.
At the exit from the detention center, and I saw
photos of how the police
entered the house, and they looked like—well, imagine
the Victory Day parade, you know, where there are
snipers sitting somewhere up in the towers—
all in uniform, with some hellishly
huge rifles. So people in that kind of
gear came rushing in, storming the
place of a man whose entire guilt,
from the police's point of view, basically consists
of chanting, "One, two, three—Putin, resign!"
So the full force
of the Chelyabinsk police came crashing down on
his head. Moreover, in Chelyabinsk, the headquarters was
as far as I know, stripped of all its equipment—
literally robbed. So the point is that
the staff are continuing to work now
through the headquarters, and of course it will
keep working despite any
unprecedented pressure that
is being exerted against our
regional colleagues. But probably, by the way, speaking
of robbery, we should move on to
a promotional segment about our store. I wanted
to tell you about it, and now we have
a minute for the store segment on the couch.
At the moment, you practically cannot
buy anything from me—well, actually, you can buy,
but not by phone; instead, go to our
website. A banner with the address should appear now. So,
what should we start with? Or rather, don't ask me
what class it is.
This phone case—with little jokes on it—how do you even describe it properly?
This is probably the right way to present it.
The case with the jokes on it—I do not remember how much
I was supposed to call it so that I could
advertise it successfully. They gave it to me, and since
I have been using it, I can honestly say
I do not know how good I am at describing products,
but I will try: it is a very good case.
Unlike cheap AliExpress cases, the edges are sturdy,
so if the phone falls
somewhere, it will not get scratched, and most
likely it will remain intact, because
there is cushioning here to absorb the impact.
I really, really like it.
I have been using it for I do not know how long now,
several weeks, and I am extremely happy with it.
I
would cross out from my résumé
the line saying I can work as a remote salesperson.
That seems to have failed. We also have in our store
this little calendar here. This calendar was
drawn by Alexei Navalny, by the way.
He is due to be released at the end of June, and I
think we will definitely go to meet
him, and we will all be calling on people to do so. Here
here we have
riot police officers (OMON, Russia's special police units) drawn here, and also Mother Rus'
depicted in barbed wire,
a prison-camp watchtower, and 9 more
drawings.
There are 12 in total—one for each month.
So yes, if you buy it, you will get
that, and besides there are many other things in
the store. The hoodies are great too; I
also really like them, and I have had mine for
a very long time, and after washing it still looks great.
Nothing happens to it; all the printed text
from May 2018 is still in place. I really
like it. I really do use the things
that we sell in our fundraising
store, and I am genuinely pleased with them.
I am being told that the calendar costs 666 rubles (about US$10 at the time),
and if you buy it right now, it will still be 666 rubles, and these
little cases too—well, these cases
are wonderful, genuinely very high-quality,
and they cost 800 rubles (about US$12 at the time). By the way, I will explain
I
before you ask why they are so
expensive. First, why are we selling this? Well,
first of all, why is it so expensive? The money goes toward
the work of the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK, founded by Alexei Navalny).
All of this is quite transparent; all of it
will of course appear in the financial reporting.
It’s half a purchase, half a
donation, really — that is,
when you buy these items, you’re effectively
getting some merchandise from us in return.
From the Anti-Corruption Foundation and Alexei
Navalny’s campaign headquarters.
And so that in some way it would feel
nice for you — so that you’re not just donating
money, but also getting something in return from
us. Of course, it’s without Alexei’s signature, without
anything special, but still, roughly
speaking, you’re not leaving empty-handed. But in fact,
all of this money goes in full
to fund the work
of the Anti-Corruption Foundation and the headquarters
of Alexei Navalny, to continue our
work, so that we can work even
better and on a larger scale.
Yes, Artyom Salikhov writes: it seems to me that Oleg
Navalny, on leaving prison,
will be locked up for another 30 days
for some pretext. Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised
by anything at this point.
But the main thing is that we all must
understand perfectly well:
Oleg Navalny is not guilty. Oleg Navalny
is not guilty even under the verdict itself.
And according to the ruling of the European Court of Human
Rights, the case against Oleg Navalny isn’t worth
a damn. This case is politically
motivated, and he must
be released immediately. And all these
years
that he has been in prison, he
has been there unlawfully, against common
sense, against the law, and for all of this,
of course, the people who did this,
the organizers of these trials, will bear
responsibility. There is no
doubt about that.
Oleg Navalny is now
a political prisoner, because Putin’s people
really like hostages — they really like
putting pressure on family members. And this case with
Alexei Navalny, when they simply
jailed his brother precisely so that
Alexei would stop
carrying out his political
activity,
would stop defending his rights and
freedoms, and helping other
people living in our country do the same. But as
we can see, that didn’t work, so
Oleg remains in prison, but we
hope that in the very near future he will
be released.
In any case, we will not stop doing what we do.
Hello to Ufa as well — and in the comments they’re also
sending greetings. And people are writing: Navalny,
how many more episodes of the 2017 show will there be without
Alexei Navalny? How many more — two?
I think no, there will be one more
episode, because he gets out — we’ll tell you.
He gets out on the morning of June 14 from the special detention center.
As for the detention diaries, I visited him today.
I’ll pass along all your greetings to him.
He listens to Echo of Moscow radio and gets some
bits of news, and he was also very surprised
by the case involving Arkady Babchenko.
But of course, not all of the information
reaches him in full.
But he’s upbeat and cheerful, and he’s learning Python — yes, learning
Python. I visited him several times, and all those
times our conversations mostly revolved
around Python. I brought him four
books — I bought them especially for him — on
Python, and he’s been reading them avidly, and
it seems to be going well. He’s very
engaged in it. It’s great that a person is ready
to discover some new skills, new knowledge
for himself. From one of the books he even
seems likely, once he gets out, he’ll be able to
write his own blog on the internet.
Can you imagine — he wanted to learn programming.
Well, since I’m also into Python,
you understand that something has to be done, and that
you should bring Alexei something so he can understand it
better. So you teach him, basically. Well, I just
comment and answer his questions, and
even the last time — or rather, the time before last —
I came to see him and brought
some Python exercises that had been prepared for him,
and
when I came back, he took the sheet
of paper with the problems on it,
solved them, and even wrote a program. It seems to me
that this piece of paper will someday
have some value in the future.
He scored 52 points or something like that — I haven’t checked yet.
Bags.
A viewer writes:
It’s a shame that once again Alexei will spend his birthday
locked up.
Indeed, June 4 is Alexei
Navalny’s birthday, and he will spend
it locked up, unfortunately. Our colleague Nikolai
Lyaskin recently had his birthday
as well, and he too spent it locked up.
And
he was in the same special detention center, by the way,
as Alexei Navalny. Unfortunately, they can’t see each other
because they’re in different cells. As
political prisoners, they are kept
separately. But today, with Kolya, in my view,
something close to a legal miracle happened:
today, on appeal, his term
of administrative arrest was reduced to ten days.
He had been given fifteen days; now it’s
ten. That means he will be released
very soon, literally in the next few days,
not in five. I think he’ll be free on June 2.
As I recall, he had originally been supposed to get out
on June 7.
We’ll see how things go with
Nikolai Lyaskin. I think he’ll come up with
something to tell you, and it will make a wonderful
special detention center story. Today there were also appeals
for Kira Yarmysh and Ruslan as well.
the court left his sentence unchanged
things didn’t go that way, and it was left without
changes
Ruslan is serving 30 days; 25 days is
first of all illegal, and second, awful
terribly hard. I myself have never been held
in a special detention center, which is why from time to time
you get offended and people look at me sideways
my colleagues do, but nevertheless I
understand perfectly well that there, first of all,
it’s boring, and second, in the summer the unsanitary conditions
are made worse by the hot water being turned off
even a fork or instant noodles like Doshirak (a popular Russian instant ramen brand) can become a problem for you
the conditions really are very bad
25 or 30 days is very, very bad
really uncomfortable, I mean
you’re allowed one hour of walking a day
but the rest of the time you’re lying there crammed in with
a large number of other people. I know that
there were 10 people in Ruslan’s cell
and all those who were locked up with
Ruslan were people who had already
served time before in a penal colony, that is, people
who had been caught either for drunk driving
so they already had a certain kind of experience
and baggage
or people who are required to report regularly
people who aren’t in prison but are supposed to
check in at their place of residence and if they don’t
they can also be jailed for a number of days, so
it’s, let’s say, a specific kind of company, but at the same time
as Ruslan said, everyone respects political prisoners
because when I wrote
that phrase, that everyone respects political prisoners
someone replied to me on Twitter
and even retweeted it, because he wrote
to me that back in 1991
he thought the very concept of political prisoners in our
country would disappear, but he was mistaken. Never
say never
and indeed, now we do have them; we are living
in Russia, where there are political
prisoners under criminal charges and under
administrative charges as well
according to Ruslan, on the contrary, everyone
keeps asking about politics; he’s already tired
of talking about the Anti-Corruption Foundation’s investigations
to his cellmates, and by the way, we have
video greetings from him and from Nikolai as well
let’s watch what Ruslan
had to tell us in the middle of all this
for our program
Hello everyone, we’re at the Moscow City Court
today, where Kira and others are having their appeals heard
we’re here together with our
colleagues
the hearing would not have taken place if we
hadn’t come, but they left everything
unchanged, so basically
that’s it
no
we got five days, and everything was left
unchanged. Keep working. And do you want
a funny thing about this video?
Araslanov recorded it before they
announced the ruling, and in it he says
that they left these jail days unchanged
because in fact the whole case is sewn
with white thread, meaning it’s completely obvious and fabricated
it was completely obvious. I went to court today
I was at Kira’s hearing today
and at the hearings for Ruslan and Nikolai as well
and I wasn’t skipping work
the judge was just unbelievable, and I went there because
they were discussing the rally of May 5 in Moscow
and whether that rally had been authorized, and I could
show the court, as a witness, that
the rally was approved, because when we
received the official document
confirming the authorization of the rally, that happened
only on May 10, so
at that time the rally was not
unauthorized and was not
unapproved. But the judge didn’t even
hear me out. I spent all that time
sitting in the hallway, and the judge simply did not
bother to hear my testimony
nor did he bother at all
to grant any motions
from the defense side; they repeatedly filed
motions to call a witness, motions regarding
the inclusion of documents, and so on, and
all of those motions were denied, and
more than that, the judges there were so
how should I put it
on our broadcast, but they were so
unfair that they even
threw journalists out of there
in batches just because they picked up
their phones. It was really hardcore there
at the hearing
the session was held in office number 6
I wrote that it seems to me
that maybe every office in this court should
be renamed after that room number
because justice is certainly nowhere to be found there
yes, of course. I was at
Alexei Navalny’s appeal, and there
really, if you have the chance to go to court
to attend a trial involving
a political case, if they’re considering
someone’s arrest over a rally, someone’s arrest over
some repost or something like that, go
without fail. Just set aside one day
and you will understand that this
lawlessness, this crime
of the authorities that is happening right now
is much closer than you think
it’s a very sobering experience. If you have
some acquaintance who thinks
that, well, not everything is bad, that there are
some reasonable judges there, that there are
some officials who maybe are
decent people
please, just take them to one
such trial or appeal hearing, and they will
guaranteed
be in for a real roller coaster
the impression, because at first he comes in
so when I came in, although I perfectly well
understand what is happening there, still
it is quite interesting at first
so, the judge speaks with Navalny and says
well yes, yes, right, show the video
let's see what happened there, yes, yes, well
you can hear, right, that you seem to be chanting something
and then they just grab you and detain you
wow, well, that really is something
what a horror, just look at what they are doing
they beat you, grab you, and the judge, it seems,
seems good-natured and loyal, even
at first starts discussing things quite reasonably
the video, asking Alexei about what happened there
then leaves to make a decision and after
half an hour comes back with the ruling and says
leave it unchanged, there are no grounds not to
trust the police officers, and even if
someone might have gotten the impression
that this judge is reasonable, that this judge
would somehow follow the law and
act according to conscience and honor, all of that
all of that collapses, and definitely bring
your friends, and come to these court hearings yourselves
it is very engaging and enlightening
your rose-colored glasses disappear immediately, and all this
this whole façade
falls away before your eyes. And let's also look at
the video Nikolai Lyaskin recorded for us, this is
you managed to record it after they pulled you away from the bailiffs
you literally recorded this video address
they were recording me without my... Hello everyone
sending you my greetings and all kinds of rays
of joy and indignation from the Moscow City Court
the appeal is underway right now, the judge has not yet
issued a decision, but I think everything here is
obvious: they will leave it unchanged
leave it unchanged, strange... what outraged me most
of course was those 25 days
in detention, and also this tweet that we
made without any other
interaction with the mayor's office, but this is
an outrage, judicial lawlessness, and therefore
of course judicial reform is one of the
first things that must happen in the Beautiful
Russia of the Future
many people ask how I am doing
everything is bearable, everything is fine, the staff
treat me normally, nothing terrible
the really bad thing is that I am isolated from you
but I am reading books, and I always urge you not
to get used to the lawlessness that
is going on. We should not, over a tweet, and people should not
be subjected to administrative arrest or any
other punishment at all. In my case there is
forgery involving two police reports with the signatures
of witnesses, which were written up without me present
for that, for falsifying documents
of course responsibility should be borne
by the police officers and the people whom they
call on
to sign falsified documents
but in any case, huge greetings to all of you
the viewers and everyone watching, I will never get tired of
saying it
leave likes, share clips from the broadcast
subscribe to the channel and also to
the Navalny Live app, you are all doing great
well done, it somehow really
... 2018 ... Anyway, now for some good news
good news from Yekaterinburg
where, unexpectedly, a volunteer won his case and received
16 rubles in compensation for unlawful
detention while handing out leaflets. He should not have been detained at all
but the fact that he
won in a Russian court and even received
compensation is, of course, astonishing; I cannot recall
anything like it. Moscow is a separate story, of course
all the courts there have been completely purged, and in
Moscow, yes, not only in political
cases, and in general, justice
is probably hard to achieve. If the case is about
some property division in a divorce, then
perhaps a judge can still somehow
make a fair decision there
calculate it correctly, I hope, using
a calculator
but if you are up against the state
then in Moscow the case is doomed in advance, and
it is not even worth wasting time and nerves, and
if possible, you should litigate at least
in commercial court, because there the judges are still
more or less professional
some decisions can still get through. In
Moscow courts it is completely
useless. And just recently my mother-in-law
told me about a case where she was litigating over
a land plot
and she said that they did not just indirectly but directly
told her, basically, let's settle it
... he said that when I come in
I was told outright in response that
do not list it in the register, because we have an
unofficial instruction that all these decisions
will simply be denied for sure; at most, indicate
him at least as a third party there so that he
appears somewhere, because he has no direct relation
to the case, so there is no need to list him as a defendant. And of course
many thanks to the judge for his honesty
well, that is how Russian
justice works. The honest part is that they
said what kind of decision they would issue
an honest decision... I mean
what I am saying is that right now, unfortunately
our Russian judicial
system is not something you should rely on, even if you
do not take part in rallies
still, unfortunately, you are unlikely
to achieve even some semblance of justice
some statistics for May 5: detained
and subjected to arrest, that is, given
various jail terms, were 22
people; 11 staff members received fines
that is only for the headquarters: twenty-
two staff members were arrested, and 11 were fined
and overall during the May 5 protest there were
1,351 people detained in total, just imagine
this crowd, and how much time
the police wasted pointlessly on
detaining all of them, processing the paperwork,
and drawing up reports.
Then there were all those court hearings,
to take stock of the real heroes,
to count the honest people in our country
who suffer for the truth, for their
views, for their political beliefs.
But again, we and our colleagues from the
Anti-Corruption Foundation
naturally help everyone who was detained. We
file complaints, we go to court, we
continue to fight for justice, and we will
keep doing so all the way to the ECHR (European Court of Human Rights), if necessary.
All complaints about all unlawful detentions
will, of course, be vindicated by the European
Court of Human Rights once the cases make it there.
After appeals in the Russian courts, we will
seek justice, compensation, and
protection for our people. And here someone writes:
tell us about the news
in quotes: “Russia has been ordered to pay €2
billion for human rights violations.” I
take it this is the total amount for all
the years during which Russia has been subject to rulings.
Those €2 billion are for the entire
period Russia has paid citizens who
suffered from actions by the authorities
that were unlawful. This could include torture,
and kidnappings in Chechnya, it could be torture
in police custody, it could also be unlawful
detentions—in other words, this is the
overall sum for all human rights
violations that made it to the court. And by the way,
my colleagues are reminding me that we are
still collecting donations for
paying fines,
and we even have a banner for it—we’ll probably
see it on screen in a moment. You can also
take part, and of course this
money goes only toward paying the unlawful
fines people received for
coming out to the squares of their cities on May 5.
Please send in your questions; we
will try to answer them and discuss whatever
interests you. Your feedback is very
important to us. I also wanted to discuss a news story
that I was told we absolutely had to cover
on today’s broadcast. And who would have thought
the answer would come from the court bailiffs?
Today they literally stopped me there,
grabbed me by the button, and said: when
we were just talking in the courthouse corridor about how
I’d be hosting the broadcast today together with
Georgy, and that today we’d be discussing
various news stories,
they said, “Do you know what you need to talk about?”
I said, “What?” They said:
“Gasoline.”
“Have you seen how much gasoline costs? Yesterday I
filled up for one amount, and
today it’s the same amount for much less, and they’ve
completely lost it”—and then came the profanity,
which we won’t repeat on our broadcast.
But the bailiffs, too, have quite an opinion of our
president and government, who
have raised gasoline prices. In fact,
right now I really think that everyone
connected in some way with
transportation—
freight or passenger transport—as well as people who
simply own cars, could not have failed to
notice the price increase, the sharp increase
in gasoline prices. The average price of AI-95 gasoline
in Russia has risen to 43 rubles 60 kopecks
per liter
whereas in June of last year, according to
Rosstat (Russia’s federal statistics agency), it was still
39.9 rubles. So
that is, a clearly noticeable increase.
Naturally, this cannot help but
affect not only people who
own cars. Even if you’re a pedestrian,
you will still notice this rise in
gasoline prices, because
you buy food in stores—and how do
those goods get delivered there? They’re transported
by vehicle.
And vehicles use gasoline, and gasoline
has become more expensive. You can trace this through
many things, of course.
And this gasoline price hike, it seems to us,
is hitting literally everyone. And just now I
even saw online—we probably won’t show it here,
but you can google it yourselves—a whole lot,
just a huge number of flash-mob videos
where men
well, in male voices, apparently, film
videos at gas pumps and
say everything they think about
the price hike, the president, corruption
in the country, and so on. Because really,
all of this, of course, comes down to corruption.
Right now, after the May decrees (major presidential policy directives), there is a new
task: by any means possible
to squeeze money out of the population, and so
now the screws are really being tightened. You’ve
probably heard about the VAT increase, about rising prices,
about the proposed increase in the retirement
age, and now this gasoline issue.
Of course, there will be more sad news like this,
news that will hit our
fellow citizens in the wallet.
More of it, yes. And you’re talking about the population
that is suffering. But there are people who
are suffering more than others—for example, Roman
Abramovich,
Oleg Deripaska. Oleg Deripaska is suffering so much
that he has called for electricity prices to be raised
so that, despite the sanctions, he would still
be left with as much money as he had before
the sanctions. It’s astonishing arrogance, of course. I
didn’t think people could be that brazen.
And we also wanted to discuss Roman Abramovich.
If we have time, we definitely will.
After we listen to comments from
Mikhail, an expert in the oil and gas sector.
They got through to Krutikhin there and
asked him: how long can this go on, where is it headed,
why is it getting more expensive, how much more will it rise, and
who is to blame for all this. Predicting it is
very difficult. This is about how, for a moment,
that is, quite significantly affects the price
of gasoline, since taxes and levies account for
the cost of gasoline. It comes to roughly six
and a half to seven rubles per liter,
or, of course, in the total price
it makes up about 65 percent overall.
The rest is made up of the producer’s costs,
as well as transport and refining costs, and some
minimal margin. If taxes continue
to rise,
then prices will inevitably go up too. But since
the government
is still firmly determined
to collect more for its own coffers
and is increasing the burden, I believe, this year,
they planned two increases
in gasoline excise taxes, and those measures
did have an effect — they pushed gasoline prices upward
already after the first increase in January, and
they kept rising after that. Now, in government circles,
they say they are considering
possibly making some reduction
in the excise tax, but apparently that has not
helped oil producers or refiners
much.
Prices will almost certainly keep rising, and we
can see that overall — I’m losing my train of thought here —
a component of this is
oil refining.
In other words, the refining margin right now
is already negative. If large
companies can somehow
offset losses from refining with
profits from exporting crude oil, for example,
then small companies, which are forced
to buy gasoline and diesel fuel either on the exchange or
directly from refineries,
do not have that luxury, and apparently
they are the ones who will be raising prices.
All right then, and now let’s move on to
Abramovich, because Zhora
will never forgive us if, on this
broadcast, we don’t discuss what is happening with him right now.
You’ve probably seen it in the news —
some truly remarkable things are going on
right now.
He did not get a UK visa, where he
naturally lives and where he
has been moving all his assets.
He also did not get a visa to Switzerland; he was
refused citizenship there, so
he went to Israel and obtained citizenship.
Strangely enough, for some reason he did not
go to Russia.
Even though, of course, he has a great deal
connecting him to Russia. As for Abramovich,
no matter how much Abramovich tries to present himself as an honest
businessman independent of the authorities,
he is absolutely nothing of the sort.
Abramovich is flesh of the flesh of the current
regime; it raised him, and even now he
simply pays off people
who are in power. This has been
proven many times over; there are many stories
about Abramovich simply handing over
yachts, millions of dollars, and in return
naturally he was able to keep accumulating
his wealth.
But among the most outrageous
cases, one can recall, for example,
something more recent — remember Shuvalov’s house
that is surrounded by houses without windows, you know,
the one where windowless buildings were constructed so that
there would be no view? Abramovich — or rather, his company —
was involved in building that project. There is also
a wonderful story involving Shuvalov
and Abramovich. Anyone who has long followed
the investigations of the Anti-Corruption Foundation (founded by Alexei Navalny)
or has simply followed Shuvalov or
Abramovich knows it perfectly well.
Not recently exactly, but a number of
years ago, a huge sum of money
suddenly appeared in Shuvalov’s asset declaration —
an enormous amount.
Tens of millions of dollars. He was
asked, “Shuvalov, where on earth did you get
that kind of money?” And Shuvalov replied, you know,
“Well, back when I was not yet in
government service and was working as a lawyer, I helped
Abramovich privatize Sibneft, if I remember correctly,
and for that Abramovich gave me
an option for half a percent of Sibneft.
So I exercised that option and
what do you think? No, those $50 million
that he received from
that option — he did not put them in a bank, but
loaned them out.
And according to Shuvalov, do you know to whom
he loaned them? To Alisher Usmanov — because that is
exactly the kind of person who so desperately needs
loans from Shuvalov. It may have turned out to be
quite a successful deal, because
he lent Usmanov $50
million and got back $118
million literally in
a very short
period of time. And you certainly will never
manage to put money in a bank or lend
it to someone at an interest rate like that.
And those $118 million,
which came from some very
murky loan that itself came from a very
murky Sibneft option — according to
Shuvalov, that is precisely what allowed him to buy
that legendary castle in Austria,
that legendary apartment in London, and in general
to live like some completely deranged
Arab prince — I don’t know what else
to call him.
Abramovich is also the man who
gave the yacht *Olympia* to Vladimir Putin. About this
wrote people who were directly
witnesses to that process.
They moved this yacht to Sochi, where it
remains to this day, and Putin
periodically uses this yacht there at sea.
Everything is simply blocked off by FSO officers (Russia’s Federal Protective Service), and
Putin sails on it to his residence
in Praskoveyevka. What else can be said about Abramovich?
What is really there, in fact?
There are too many details to go into.
I mean, just so you understand: if
Abramovich is being stripped of his British visa, that
does not mean that all Russian
businesspeople
are being denied British visas. No, this is an excellent
signal to all the people who pay bribes,
to the authorities who feed off this
power, who live off the favors
that this government grants them.
It says: guys, your money is not welcome here, and
that is absolutely right. I mean, listen,
if thieves broke into your apartment,
if people came in and made
a complete mess of it, and then people showed up with
money that they had stolen from
someone else—sure, of course they
paid you, but still, why would you want in
your country money that
was obtained through corruption? Why would you want
these criminals in your country? They are of no use
to anyone, and it is great that Abramovich
has run into this—I can only support it.
So, now
let’s move on to Georgy Reutov, because I can see
that, honestly, I do not even really want to talk
about it at length, because it seems to me that everyone
can already see that the oligarchy is now
tearing our country apart piece by piece and
dragging it abroad. This is not being done by
the opposition, and it is not being done by journalists. It is
being done by very specific people—people
who are fed by the authorities and are close
to Vladimir Putin. And now it is perfectly
clear that Abramovich went to
Russia, where his
business is, where he earns
money, while he went to Israel in order
to live in warmth and comfort.
Just so you understand: for both the oligarchs and
the authorities, Russia is a way
to make money, while the place to spend that money
and build a life for themselves
is not here. For them, Europe
and the United Kingdom are the places where they
plan to live someday, where they plan
for their children to live—and their children are already
living there now. And when this castle of theirs,
which has now turned out to be a house of cards,
starts collapsing literally
from the slightest breeze, for them it is, of course,
a shock, because they invested millions and
millions of dollars. They hoped to spend
a significant part of their
lives there. They hoped they could buy everyone off
and that with their money
they would get investor visas and everything
would be smoothed over across Europe with cash, while those
European politicians would be
so cynical that they would not
ask questions or sniff around
about where that money came from. But now, as far as I
understand, a process has been launched in the United Kingdom
after the poisoning of Skripal
to review these
investor visas and to begin
asking questions
of the people investing money: what
kind of money is it, and how was it
obtained? Right now, as far as I
understand, there is a review of the investor
visa of Abramovich.
And that is why he has run into difficulties. In
fact, Abramovich makes
his money in Russia, and yes, it really does smell bad.
He has construction
and development projects in Russia, and his
metallurgical company Evraz has a great many
interests there. When we did an investigation
in
2015 into Moscow’s garbage—where it
was being taken, and which companies were handling it—
Abramovich’s trail showed up there too.
So, even back in 2015, he
had a great many business interests in Russia. And of course,
he does not connect his life with Russia
at all. What the United Kingdom is doing
to stop the flow
of dirty money into the country
deserves enormous respect. They have now
done several very impressive things
that I wish Russia would do as well.
For example, there is a register
company beneficial owners.
What is a beneficial owner? A company’s beneficial owner may
be a shareholder, but that shareholder may well
be just a nominal figurehead who simply
signs documents.
If you go to a bank or
to a government office,
they ask you:
who is the company’s beneficial owner, who is the real
owner of the company? And the United Kingdom maintains
an open register
of the beneficial owners of companies
registered in the UK. That means
that even now you can literally go to the website
of the British registry, called Companies
House, and download the full dataset on
company beneficial owners.
They went even further: they published a complete
register, a full list of commercial and
residential real estate owned
by offshore entities and legal persons. In other words,
roughly speaking, if one of those
Russian crooks—or not crooks, just
ordinary people—has some company
in the UK that owns
real estate in the UK, then you can simply
match up the two databases,
both of them open and published by the British authorities.
The government says you will be able to search
for property this way, and they want to go
even further: they want to publish not just
a list of foreign companies, mostly
various offshore firms that own
property in the UK, but they
also want to publish a list of the beneficial owners
of those companies. Then, of course, that will be the end for everyone,
and all the crooks who
hid behind these companies in order to
buy British property — all of them
will float to the surface like fish...
You know what the reason is?
Compare that.
Well, I don't even know anymore. Georgy, that was excellent.
Simply the best. But since we're talking
about Abramovich, and airtime is running short,
we should probably also talk
about Usmanov.
Because Usmanov has essentially now
taken all of Russian sport into his own hands.
Including esports — even esports,
where some people will tell you that
esports isn't really sport, but
sport really has now ended up
effectively under Usmanov's control,
because he has placed his own people
in key positions. For those who don't know,
Alisher Usmanov
in addition to everything else, is also
the president of the International Fencing Federation.
The current sports minister is
Pavel Anatolyevich Kolobkov,
an Olympic champion and an Honored Master of Sport in fencing.
And just recently, a new lineup was formed
for the new composition
of the Russian Olympic Committee. Previously,
it was headed by Zhukov, the same man who
we could probably talk about at length as well,
but now that position has been taken by
Pozdnyakov, a four-time Olympic
champion in fencing, 44 years old,
who is also connected with the same
federation headed by Alisher
Usmanov. They say that it was he who was
the lobbyist — Alisher Usmanov
who pushed Pozdnyakov into this post. And in effect,
to put it briefly, the Olympic Committee
of Russia
is more involved in a kind of diplomatic
function, while the Sports Ministry handles
its own budget and the allocation of funds
for sport. And these two key positions
are now occupied by Usmanov's people.
So in effect, he is the
ultimate beneficiary, the owner, of this whole
sports story in Russia — of an entire country.
Yes, and why did you back off there?
Usmanov owns the famous estate in
Znamenskoye on Rublyovka (an elite residential area outside Moscow), in the Moscow
region. And by the way, Usmanov's wife
is Irina Viner, who is also very close to
the world of sport, to put it mildly.
He really is taking it under his control — he is taking under
his control, and moreover not only that.
He is taking control with the obvious
approval of Vladimir Putin, because there are also
other notable
members of the new Russian Olympic Committee,
including oligarch Gennady Timchenko,
who, I don't know whether he has ever been involved in sport
personally or professionally,
Roger, you probably know.
Timchenko? Gennady Timchenko — how close
is he to sport? No, I can't recall
any athletic achievements of his. Yes, he didn't
do judo together with Arkady and
Putin; he knew him through a different
channel. And Vladimir Kozhin, the former
head of the presidential administration's affairs office,
now an adviser to the president,
on military-technical
cooperation, is also a person who, judging
by appearances, to be honest, doesn't exactly look like
someone very close to sport, yet he too has joined
the Russian Olympic Committee. Clearly these are people
who are very good friends from the inner
circle of Vladimir Putin, who
have now been placed in the Olympic
Committee, apparently in order to
control the situation regarding the admission of
the national team to the next Olympics, the doping
scandal, to keep everything under control and
report directly to the boss.
Right, so what else do we still need to discuss today?
Baklanova, the main news, the biggest
headline: the 150th anniversary
Gazelle van has crashed into the bridge
In St. Petersburg there is a bridge that says
"A Gazelle won't fit through." In other words, this is
a special bridge — I follow this
story, and it gives me incredible joy.
The number of views — or whatever you call it
on your internet. For those who
don't know, Kolya, by the way, didn't know about this
bridge. There are masses of videos about it. It's been
famous for about five years already.
So yes, and among them
a huge number of times there have been
incidents recorded there.
In St. Petersburg there is a bridge that says
"A Gazelle won't fit through," and it's not just
written there for nothing — every time a Gazelle tries
to go through, and with remarkable
regularity, news appears
that yet another Gazelle has had its roof sliced off
under this bridge. And just the other day, it was the 150th
Gazelle. There was even a photo online
of a person who brought a cake to the site
with a candle marked 150
and celebrated the occasion. Yes, if you have
any other good news, be sure
to send it in. I have another excellent piece of news:
Russian Railways plans by 2025
to phase out gravity toilets.
These gravity toilets —
it feels like such an innovation, with
nanotechnology and all that, something absolutely remarkable.
A truly unique thing from *Interstellar*, aaa, actually.
It’s actually a vacuum toilet, and these are ordinary
toilets, and, excuse me, it’s basically just a hole
that can take quite a beating... you dug through the ice there.
These are old-school, the most old-school kind.
That’s what toilets in Russian trains are like, and that’s it.
Gravity, sure — but only in 2025.
When even the thousandth Gazelle van won’t make it across those
bridges, Russian Railways will refuse — there’s nothing left to protect in the floors.
At least somewhere, someone is writing something good.
A good comment in the chat. And as for Mish (possibly a person’s nickname), let him
just stay over there and mind his own business, and not
stick his nose into Russia anymore.
Why does he keep meddling in Russia, and where are
we supposed to earn money so we can spend it
on ourselves? He learned to push in, and he’ll keep
interfering in Russia, taking our
wealth and dragging it off in different
directions, the old way, to different countries and
by different means, as long as Vladimir
Putin is in power.
Unfortunately, nothing will change. What do you
think about the new program for tracking down
holding-company networks by *Novaya Gazeta* (an independent Russian newspaper), if anyone
hasn’t seen it — they put out something that looks
absolutely amazing. I saw it,
I’d seen them write about it a little before, but this
is an insanely powerful piece of work. They took
data on state procurement by state-owned
companies, they used the register of legal
entities,
they used the shareholder register of joint-stock
companies, and they built the following map:
they took these state contracts and traced from them
the links to companies, and it turned out that
a fairly large number of state contracts —
worth hundreds of billions of rubles (billions of U.S. dollars) for
each of the state companies, for Russian Railways, Gazprom, and
so on — hundreds of billions were going
to people connected to one another,
who shared common companies.
Roughly speaking, there were 10 to 20 people
linked to one another,
sharing companies that were not really independent,
with the same phone number, located at the same
address — and they were getting contracts worth hundreds
of billions of rubles. And now this
fairly large body of data, so far,
I think covering around 20 such holdings, *Novaya Gazeta*
has published as a huge resource for
investigation. It seems to me many people simply
weren’t ready to grasp the scale
of what had happened, because literally in
a single publication, *Novaya Gazeta* wrote
about how trillions of rubles
are flowing to people connected to one another.
There are separate groups that supply
Gazprom, separate groups that supply Russian Railways, and all
of these groups were outlined quite clearly,
like distinct clusters. All these people
were identified, and that’s already a substantial achievement.
I hope they release it publicly, but for now
you can read it on the *Novaya Gazeta* website — it’s
excellent material, an excellent techno-
logical, high-tech investigation.
We can take questions from the chat now, and in the meantime
I’ll talk about what investigations like this usually
lead to.
As someone who investigates cartels, I
can say that this really is
a major piece of work, a major achievement
by the journalists at *Novaya Gazeta*, but unfortunately
I’m overcome by very pessimistic
feelings when I think about how
all this will end, what it will lead to.
Most likely, the companies will remain untouched.
I mean, what will it lead to? Contractors
who collude with one another and
form a cartel — will they be convicted, will they go to prison?
Maybe, but I don’t know. I don’t know a single
case in Russia — or rather, it’s not just that I don’t know one,
I know there hasn’t been a single case in Russia
opened under Article 178 of the Criminal Code
of the Russian Federation, which states
that restricting
competition illegally, excluding participants
from tenders, and so on, is not permitted. In other words,
the article is about restricting competition, and it
says that for restricting or eliminating
competition, there is a possible prison
sentence — and yet there hasn’t been a single
case under that article. I don’t know of any.
No matter how much I looked through law-enforcement
statistics, however much I tried to find one, I
didn’t find a single case like that, and
that’s why I think that unfortunately
these cases will come to nothing. But
of course, transparency and public information
do make life harder for some people.
What *Novaya Gazeta* is doing is vitally important; we’re doing it too,
we’ll keep doing it, and we’ll keep pushing for
accountability, of course. Unfortunately, even
lately the antimonopoly service seems to have
gone down the wrong path, in the opposite direction.
There used to be at least some sense of justice, but it has gone
a bit the other way, because if
earlier I had
little hope in the police,
still the courts at least
would sometimes side with the service and impose at least
minimal administrative fines
for violations, whereas now very often
things have started breaking down and the service just
seems to let people off everywhere,
people involved in these huge cartels
worth billions of rubles. But listen, if we’ve started talking
about state procurement, state companies, and so
on, let me mention something remarkable.
I was talking about a closed report, but there are
excerpts in the media, and the general contents have been described there.
It’s a report by Alexander K., who was
recognized as Russia’s best investment
analyst in 2016. The report
by this man, who is now, after
this report, being fired from Sberbank (Russia’s largest state-owned bank),
said the following:
They’re pushing him out, and more than that, his
supervisor too — in short, this person had better...
A Russian investment analyst wrote
the following: that the real
beneficiaries
of Gazprom are neither the Russian
government nor the Russian state budget,
but Gazprom’s contractors, who receive
huge, completely unjustified,
meaningless and unnecessary contracts from
Gazprom.
Gazprom, for example, orders pipes for
hundreds of billions of rubles
for things that, first, are not needed and, second, cost far
more than market rates. Instead of this money
going to the budget in the form of dividends, it
is siphoned off as overpayment.
It goes to the people who work as contractors for
Gazprom. And who are Gazprom’s contractors in our country?
Well,
those working for Gazprom are friends
of Putin, and Viktor
— Putin’s friends and people close to him.
Among Putin’s friends and associates,
I simply don’t think there are such
naive people left who are still prepared to
wonder who that might be. Yes, it is
the Rotenbergs and Timchenko, old friends
of Putin, who own companies
engaged in construction and
various other kinds of work,
carrying out these contracts for Gazprom. These people
are in fact, as it was
written in the Sberbank report, people who
are effectively the beneficiaries
of Gazprom. That is the essence of it.
But listen, this is no secret, and
it had long been obvious to everyone already. The fact that it
was finally put down on paper is great, and the person
was not afraid to write it. And this
was the professional opinion of an excellent
analyst. It was his job to write
things like that, because he is paid
to give shareholders a sound
assessment, a sober and objective analysis
of what is happening in the company. Because of this,
he has now been fired. Before that, he had published
a report on Gazprom, and before that
he had published a report on Rosneft, and
the situation in both cases is actually dire.
In fact, both Gazprom and Rosneft are
companies of enormous importance to Russia. These are
not just some private companies
built from scratch; they are tied to the welfare of
all the residents of our country. We,
as citizens, have the right to know these
results. But in the end, reports like these
do not even lead to any scrutiny of the Rotenbergs
and Timchenko. But unfortunately, now we do not have that
right, and they also want to deprive us of the right
even to learn about it officially, which
of course
means that those who actually do
their job duties
are being fired. I very much hope, I
wish him the soonest possible new employment.
To Alexander and to his superior, Kudrin
(Alexei Kudrin), because for
your work—yes, specialists like that
are worth their weight in gold. By the way, I remember that
Alexander Fek actually
was recognized as Russia’s best
investment analyst in 2016.
I’ll say right away: the best people are simply
punished for their professional
qualities. It is just negative selection,
negative selection, and probably now
the people remaining at Sberbank are those who
will be ready to write whatever is required and whatever
is demanded. There was real value in
the product that was being made
by Sberbank; judging by everything,
if this is how it ended, then it was
fairly objective material
that was very useful for people
who invest in Russian
companies. Now the quality of that product
after this scandal, in the eyes
of shareholders and subscribers to this
product, has fallen. Because if before
they were receiving
what turned out to be fairly good and
objective material,
then after this they will be receiving
censored material. It is one thing when
you simply buy a newspaper and see
censorship there—well, that is kind of obvious to you.
Yes, there is censorship in newspapers; that surprises no one.
But if you are paying for a product on which
your financial well-being, your
investment portfolio, depends,
on which it depends whether you make money
this year or not,
and when you see that this product has become
worse simply because Putin’s friends did not like it,
then of course you will
refuse it; naturally, it will no longer be
of interest to you, and it will no longer serve your needs.
In this sense, of course, Sberbank itself
—this Sberbank division—has
lost a great deal of its value.
We could go on down the list for a long time
of state companies and oligarchs about whom
Georgy has something to say, but our time
has come to an end. Just one final
comment from one of our listeners:
“It’s a stupid bridge. They need to put up a proper sign
and a height-restriction bar before the bridge,
as they should. I’m sure
the person who wrote that the bridge is stupid was one of the drivers
of some
Gazelle van.”
Number 103. Unfortunately, the good jokes
have run out, and the bad ones have too, and our airtime
has come to an end along with them. We
will try to tell you about the main news
of this week, standing in for the irreplaceable
Alexei Navalny, who is currently
serving time in a special detention facility
under administrative arrest.
together with Ruslan, wider than the united one, at Kira Yar
mice by Nikolai Baskov
and and our other colleagues, others
with allies and volunteers, they are now
being illegally subjected to political
repression. Sending big greetings to the Anti-Corruption Foundation
and the headquarters to continue
their work as always. Watch the channel
Navalny Live and subscribe to our channel
turn on notifications; they tell the truth here
see you all at some
next fillet, bye, meeting
[music]