Hi, this is Navalny. On Thursday evening
I will be debating Igor Ivanovich
Strelkov, who challenged me on behalf of,
as he put it, nationalists and patriots.
I am addressing Alexei Anatolyevich
Navalny, challenging him to a public
debate on a whole range of issues that
deeply
concern Russians, and more broadly, Russian
patriots and nationalists.
I accepted this challenge because, first,
I am a supporter of open
political discussion and debate and am not
afraid of them, and second, in this debate I
will prove that my—our—position is
truly
patriotic, unlike that of Igor
Ivanovich, who gives press conferences beneath
a portrait of Putin, the godfather of
Russian corruption. Igor Strelkov
outlined three debate topics: how to defeat
corruption; first, how exactly
he intends to fight corruption once he comes to
power; how relations with
the West will be structured, how he plans to build
relations with the West; and what should be done about
Donbas—what Navalny will do
after becoming
president, with Donbas and with Crimea.
Since I have time
to prepare, it would be fair if
I also publicly ask three
questions on these same topics before the debate, and I hope Igor
Ivanovich will be able to answer them. Question
number one, on corruption: you, Igor Ivanovich,
seem to condemn it; you call Russia’s elites
corrupt and comprador
absolutely comprador and predatory.
It is obvious that these people—Putin and all
the rest—have no other
goal except power and personal
enrichment. So why was it that, quite recently, you
declared your unconditional support for Putin
and called him the guarantor of the freedom and
independence of the country? However ethically
I may view many, many
of the president’s domestic policy decisions, in
the conditions of a war unleashed against us,
I consider it necessary to give him my unconditional
support as the only
legitimate commander-in-chief, the chief
guarantor of the country’s freedom and independence.
Well, if it’s unconditional support and he’s the guarantor, then
that means you support the Rotenbergs as well,
and Timchenko, and Usmanov, and Serdyukov, and
Vasilyeva. They’re all part of the same system, aren’t they—or not?
Do you support them or not? Please explain. I’m
confused. Question number two, about the West:
why do you repeat after Putin this nonsense
that the West is our main enemy?
Well, Putin is understandable—he has driven
the economy into a dead end, it isn’t working, and he solves his
domestic political problems in this
way. But you, of all people, should understand that
far greater real threats to
Russia are the rise of Islamist
extremism, uncontrolled migration from
Central Asia and the South Caucasus, not from Europe;
the emergence of nuclear weapons in the hands of dictatorial
regimes; totalitarian regimes in our own
North Caucasus. Was it
the West that drove half a million
people from their homes in Chechnya? No, of course not.
You probably don’t want to talk about that. But
why repeat the Kremlin’s old
Soviet-style propaganda? Tell us
why. And now question number three, about Donbas: I
cannot help asking you about the downed Boeing (Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17).
On board,
298 innocent people were killed. You were there. You surely
know who shot it down. Why is it that you, such a
plain-spoken truth-teller,
who emphasizes that he is an officer with a code of
honor,
have stayed silent for three years, listening to lying
propaganda about a Ukrainian
fighter jet, an Israeli
missile, a CIA bomb, and bodies that were supposedly not fresh?
Tell the truth right now, at these
debates: who shot down
the Boeing? Thank you very much. The debate will take place on
Thursday, July 20, at 20:00, and will be
broadcast on the Navalny channel.
Watch and subscribe.