Text version
0:00

Hi. Many of you are upset by the election results and

0:03

are saying: how could this happen, we lost again, nobody came to vote,

0:07

and there isn’t a single normal deputy in the State Duma (Russia’s lower house of parliament).

0:09

But I want to say this: there’s no need to be upset, and you

0:16

didn’t lose, because no other results

0:19

were possible in principle.

0:22

This can’t even be called an election.

0:29

In a real election, the result can vary, and it affects

0:32

the direction the country moves in, but here—let’s

0:35

honestly admit it—from the very beginning it was obvious that

0:39

the procedure was designed in such a way as to keep

0:42

everything exactly as it is.

0:43

United Russia has the majority, and the Communist Party, LDPR, and A Just Russia are all

0:48

singing backup for it.

0:49

And to achieve this, they didn’t even need to rely on fraud,

0:52

although of course there was fraud, but on a much simpler

0:59

method.

1:00

The Kremlin, Putin, the authorities— they simply did not allow

1:03

normal parties onto the ballot.

1:05

That’s why people didn’t come out to vote.

1:07

That’s why voter turnout was the lowest in the entire

1:11

history of these elections.

1:13

Some will say to this: well, why? After all, people could have

1:16

voted for Yabloko or PARNAS.

1:18

They could have—there are good people in those parties—but

1:22

it makes absolutely no sense, and that’s not just my assumption,

1:29

it’s the result of many years of practical experience.

1:32

Yabloko, for example, last cleared the 5 percent threshold

1:36

in 1999.

1:41

After that, they did nothing but lose.

1:42

In 2003 they got 4%, in 2007 they got 1.5%,

1:48

and in 2011 they got 3%.

1:51

Look, people aren’t stupid.

1:53

If they see that a party with this name and this

1:57

leader has done nothing but lose for 16 years, then they will never

2:01

vote for it.

2:02

You won’t convince them anymore, it’s impossible.

2:06

There has never been a single example in history of a party

2:09

losing like this for years and then winning without changing

2:14

its name and its leader.

2:15

Look, this is exactly how they discussed on television the defeat of the

2:19

democrats in 2003.

2:22

This whole discussion was happening 13 years ago, and nothing has

3:17

changed.

3:25

At the same time, there are very many people with democratic views in Russia,

3:28

and in any major city they make up no less than 25%.

3:31

After all, I myself won nearly 30% in the Moscow mayoral election

3:36

in the end.

3:37

These people badly need a party that would represent

3:40

their interests—a new party.

3:42

But this, in turn, is also understood very well in the Kremlin,

3:46

which is why they do not allow a new democratic

3:49

party to appear on the ballot.

3:51

That is precisely why our Party of Progress was illegally

3:55

dissolved, and I personally have been barred from taking part

3:58

in elections, despite the fact that I won against Putin’s

4:01

government in the European Court of Human Rights.

4:04

That is why the majority did not go out to vote.

4:07

The official turnout was 47%, but if we remove the anomalous voting figures

4:11

from Chechnya, Bashkortostan, Mordovia, and other regions

4:15

where the results are simply made up, then we see that the real turnout was

4:18

36.5%.

4:20

Voters understood perfectly well that formally there were many parties,

4:25

but the ones they actually support and that have a real chance of getting in

4:29

were not there.

4:30

By the way, this applies not only to democratic

4:32

and liberal parties.

4:34

The same is true of Russian nationalists.

4:36

Their parties have been banned and dissolved, their leaders have been imprisoned,

4:40

and they are told to vote for LDPR instead.

4:47

That is why nationalists, too, mostly stayed away from these elections.

4:49

They mostly did not take part.

4:50

To sum up: 1.

4:53

You did not lose, and in fact you were never even in the game, because

4:56

your party simply is not allowed to take part in the elections.

4:59

2.

5:00

We need to finally stop confusing elections with the

5:03

voting procedure, because voting itself may be

5:05

fair, but if candidates are not allowed to stand in the election itself,

5:11

it is meaningless.

5:13

3.

5:14

A strategy for winning elections can be based exclusively

5:17

on allowing all candidates and parties onto the ballot, including

5:21

the Party of Progress, myself, and people like me.

5:25

That is what we must demand, rather than taking part in a game

5:29

where the Kremlin hands us a party and says, “Well, this one is sort of

5:32

democratic—rally around it.”

5:35

And as for the current Duma, it cannot be recognized as legitimate, and we demand

5:43

new elections.

5:44

Subscribe to our channel—they tell the truth here.

Original