[music]
A very good evening to everyone. It’s 8 p.m. in Moscow,
which means we’re live on air
with the program *Russia of the Future*, and I’m Alexei
Navalny — or A "person trained to humiliate people "
just like they did to me this week
in the Kremlin-controlled media.
Please send in your questions
with the hashtag #RussiaOfTheFuture on Twitter, and they
will be shown here. I’ll do my best
to answer them, and as usual I also have several topics
prepared for us to discuss together.
I want to start by promoting
— and, really, showing off — our
clothing collection that we released in
our official merch store. You can
go take a look — there’s a link
in the description. I’m genuinely proud of this collection.
Usually, you know, we’re kind of
conservative about this sort of thing, but
this time, with the new collection, we decided
to really make something cool and
bold. Let’s look at a few photos.
Here’s the photo shoot — all the participants
aren’t professional models,
they’re the real, actual
employees of the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK).
They’re wearing the very items
that you can buy in our store.
Look — our lawyers.
A very funny photo of our lawyer.
That’s how it turned out, but of course
my personal prize in the “Best
Model” category goes to Georgy Alburov — now let’s
show his photo too. There he is, you see, with
a drone, and actually the dachshund
really does
belong to Georgy — it’s his dachshund.
So, in short, follow the link and buy
items from our great official
store, from the new collection. You’ll get
good T-shirts, and we’ll get the money
we need to keep going. The main
political topic being discussed this
week really is the main one,
it really is very important, although it’s not
especially dynamic. For example, I don’t have
a video clip for it — although actually I do, at the
end I’ll show one for illustration. The topic is
a sociological
study published
jointly by Levada and the Moscow Carnegie Center,
an analytical organization.
This is a real study — not just
another opinion poll where they surveyed
a thousand grandmothers
across the country, or just 1,000
respondents, and published what
they publish every week. This is an actual
study, and it dealt with stability
and the desire for change. And in fact,
it turned out that the main fetish,
the central article of faith of the entire Putin
regime — this idea that people
are tired of any kind of change, that they’ve
suffered so much in the 1990s that you can
feed them any nonsense, tell them any lies,
imprison anyone you want —
the only thing that matters is stability, because
nobody in Russia wants change — all of
that has now been challenged by this major study,
which showed that this is no longer true at all.
Fifty-nine percent
of respondents — that is, 60 percent of people —
want not just change, but
decisive change. Sixty percent of people
say that they want decisive
change.
That’s an increase compared with the previous
study of 17 percentage points.
So here you can rule out some kind of
simple error. You understand, in a study like this
the margin of error might be 2 or 3 percent,
but not 17 percent growth. And
that’s very interesting, because when people
are asked what kind
of change they mean, under what conditions
that change could actually happen, people
say very clearly — let’s
look at the slide — that this change must
come in the context of serious changes
to the political system. In other words, this isn’t the
kind of “decisive change” where, you know,
people want a decisive cut
in vodka prices at the store, or a decisive
improvement in education and healthcare. They
certainly want those decisive improvements,
of course, but they are already admitting to themselves
— and saying it out loud to another person
who came to them with a questionnaire — that of course
they very much want this change, and it
will only come with serious changes
to the political system. Which, translated
into plain language, means either
there will be no Putin, or if he remains in
some form, there definitely won’t be any kind of
United Russia.
But the most interesting thing I wanted
to draw your attention to is this: because a lot of people
wrote about this, and you’ve probably
heard it already — so far I haven’t said anything new.
But one thing was written about very little, and
to me
it seemed like it was actually the most
interesting part. What do you think: among these
60 percent who support the most
decisive changes,
who are these people? What social groups do they belong to?
And you’re probably sitting there right now
saying — go on, say it to the screen —
and you’re saying something like: well, obviously,
it’s Muscovites — they’re the most restless,
running around wanting change, holding
various rallies.
Then there are the residents of St. Petersburg, the residents
of the biggest cities. Then, of course,
it must be young people. In other words, our
usual assumptions — and if, in the past, I...
They asked who actually wants change here.
Well, of course, I would have moved on to certain
groups, but first of all I would say, well,
of course, young people—they see no
prospects. They can’t achieve anything, their
efforts there bring no
results in this economic
and political system. That’s what I would have said.
Probably the residents of Moscow most of all.
Surprisingly, no—not at all, excuse me.
Nothing of the sort. Let’s look at the slide: who wants
radical, radical change?
Respondents in the age category 40—
44 to 50, that is, people who are already entering
pre-retirement age. And they are,
in particular, dissatisfied with the pension reform.
But agree, people around the age of 50
are definitely not young anymore.
What’s more, we see the traditional
result: respondents with higher
education, and residents of medium-sized cities, and here
it is separately specified:
not Moscow. The last point is understandable—
critics of the current regime—but the main thing is this:
the largest share of those who want decisive
change are people from forty to fifty
four years old who live in medium-sized and
small towns. And now let’s look at who does not
want change—that’s also very interesting.
Do you know who doesn’t want it? Muscovites, that is,
and citizens whose education is below
average—that is, those who have not
finished school. It’s clear: with such
citizens, they just watch TV endlessly,
all day long, and television very effectively
washes their brains because, well, because
their education is below average, they simply cannot
critically
process this information. And Muscovites too.
And this, of course, very seriously changes our
understanding of where dissatisfaction lies.
In absolute numbers, of course,
the largest amount of
discontent still lives in Moscow,
because people have simply moved to Moscow
from all over the country. But overall, if we
look at the distribution, it is
really quite a remarkable
thing, because it’s clear that
Muscovites, again, because
Moscow has sucked in all the money, are
still more willing to put up with reality,
because here, yes, here there really are
quite a lot of teachers, for example, who
earn 150,000 rubles a month (about 1,500 USD). There are
doctors who earn 200,000
rubles (about 2,000 USD). In the provinces, nothing even
close to that exists, even in large and medium-sized
cities—nothing remotely like it. And
that is why discontent is spreading across the whole country.
And this discontent, as I already said, is among
these older age groups of the population, and
of course, in the near, foreseeable
future this will, of course, very strongly
change the picture of political struggle
and opposition struggle. This, by the way, is
one of the reasons why in the voting
they won, and why in Moscow we crushed
all those United Russia candidates—not even because
we brought in some new, advanced
young people, but also because those who
regularly go to the polls are older
people, and they all want decisive
change. This is the most important thing. The question arises:
why—why exactly these
people aged 45 to 54? Well,
let’s take an average woman,
50 years old.
Why has she suddenly started wanting decisive
change connected with serious
political changes? To this question,
there is an excellent answer, it seems to me,
in the video published today by
the Doctors’ Alliance. It is also posted on
this channel, on our channel, Navalny
Live. Be sure to watch it—an 8-
minute video. It’s a fairly
typical visit to a hospital, but still,
do watch it, because
when we use the phrase “a total disaster of a
hospital,”
you all probably imagine, again, that it’s
some district center, most often somewhere in the
European part of Russia, those typical Russian
cities—Tambov, Ryazan,
Smolensk—places the authorities gave up on long ago,
.
No one sends money there; everything has gone
to hell.
Or, on the contrary, maybe somewhere in the Urals
or some far-off periphery,
some poor region or rural
area where hardly anyone lives anymore, where
the population is shrinking. But what we are
about to see now—I can’t show it to you in full,
I’ll show you just a small excerpt.
This hospital—let’s look at the map—it
is located ten kilometers (about 6 miles) from
the residence—down below is the residence
of the president, Bocharov Ruchey, and up above,
marked in red, is City Hospital
No. 5. That is, this is Dagomys, in
Krasnodar Krai.
It is one of the most populous regions of Russia.
After Moscow and Moscow Region, it
ranks third in terms of
population.
Its population is growing. This is the territory
of so-called Greater Sochi.
This is where, not so
long ago, in 2014, 1.5
trillion rubles (about 15 billion USD) were invested in the Olympics, remember?
And when we—I, among others, and the Anti-Corruption
Foundation—published a report about
the Olympics, saying that all the money had been stolen,
people argued with us. They told us, well,
Navalny is saying all sorts of nonsense about how
our stadiums are supposedly expensive.
After all, we poured those 1.5 trillion rubles
into infrastructure, and into this whole
Greater Sochi, the entire coastline, the whole
Krasnodar Krai (a region in southern Russia) — and yes, it will all be there, and there will be
everything brand-new, with the latest
infrastructure, and everything there will
shine so much that many generations, I mean,
of Russians will come to Krasnodar
Krai, and specifically to Sochi and Dagomys,
look around and say, “My God, what
beauty. Thank you, Vladimir
Vladimirovich Putin, for once pouring
1.5 trillion rubles in here — $50
billion at the exchange rates of the time. That is
a colossal sum, enough that we could have
built up half the country with it. We spent it,
and now this is about that hospital, where even
the direct lines of accountability — and the local
city of Moscow.
But the hospital is in Greater Sochi, very close
to Putin’s residence. It’s a super-
exclusive place.
A mega-elite facility where they supposedly shouldn’t
be sparing any expense.
Let’s watch a minute and a half from
an eight-minute report about this
hospital. For what purpose did you bring— I mean,
there’s documentation, see for yourselves, just look at this.
Why is it that things like this are happening here?
This suggests that your hospital
has problems. There you go. She is not
following my orders. She is not obliged to. Is she
some kind of serf? You should act
in accordance with your employment contract. And Yulia
Konstantinovna, in accordance with her
employment contract as well. Then you should have
paid properly — not just when the camera is on.
I run around all the hospitals, and this is still—
what are we supposed to do when these
medications aren’t there? How are we supposed to treat patients? Even now,
lunch is over — just look at the amount
of vermin. For example, you don’t have to look far.
It’s all right there — just cockroaches.
So what do we see? A union inspection arrives,
which has every legal right
to walk through the hospital under the law,
and a doctor runs out and calls the police.
If you watch the full video, you’ll
see it on their faces: they are locking
patients — elderly people — in their rooms,
not even letting them go to the toilet, because they’re terrified
that something will be filmed in this
hospital. And the real explanation for why
the chief doctor was so badly frightened is that
— do you know what a palliative care
ward is? A palliative care ward is
basically a hospice inside a hospital. That’s where
terminally ill people stay. Roughly
speaking, a person stays there from the moment
it becomes clear that they cannot be cured
until they die. They are supposed
to stay there, and the state pays for it
because we pay taxes for it,
because this is supposed to be a social state,
because we are supposed to have free
healthcare. It is clearly stated everywhere
that people stay in this hospital free of charge.
So, obviously, they are supposed
to stay there for free. But then these
video clips were recorded by the doctors themselves
because the union inspectors were not allowed in.
And it turns out they are all paying:
their relatives come and pay for things
that are, in fact, supposed to be free. They pay the staff —
well, you understand how that system works.
And again, this is a hospital
located in one of the
richest regions, in that very area where
Putin is constantly — just look at
the schedule — where Putin, in his
Bocharov Ruchey residence (the presidential residence in Sochi), spends nearly
most of the year. And this is what is happening there.
And there’s also a very
striking moment about the medicines. Let’s
watch just 26 seconds.
First the chief doctor talks about
how things are — or rather, excuse me,
what the situation with medicines is — and then
there is silent footage, also sent by the doctors
to the union. They simply walked up to
the cabinets. Those of you who have been in hospitals
have seen those glass cabinets where
medicines are kept. They walked up and filmed what
the cabinets in this Sochi hospital look like.
As of today, our pharmaceutical
supply is fully adequate.
Patients are not bringing in essential medicines themselves;
we have everything.
And that, essentially, is why people in
their fifties — older people already —
want decisive political change.
Because they come to a hospital not in
some backwater, but in the town of Dagomys, that is,
effectively in Sochi — and there are no medicines there.
And meanwhile the chief doctor says,
“Our pharmaceutical supply is complete,”
full stop.
But those medicines are not in the cabinet. So the question is: where
did the medicines go? Or, more
accurately: where did the money go
that was allocated for buying the medicines? After all, he says
there are no problems at all with
pharmaceutical supply, so
some tens or hundreds of millions
of rubles must have been allocated, and on paper it says that
everyone has insulin, bandages, and everything else they need,
and that patients with incurable illnesses
are lying there and supposedly lack nothing,
and that they are well fed, and that
the wards are clean and properly sterile,
and that money has been allocated
for all of it — for medicines, for
cleaning staff, for everything, even for pest control
to get rid of cockroaches. But in practice, there is absolutely nothing there.
These people, people around 50, come to
this hospital to admit their relatives, or
they come with illnesses of their own, and they see
that there is nothing there — and they can see it with their own eyes.
Now they want decisive change, and
they are 54 years old.
That’s how it all began when they were 34
years old, while for today’s 40-year-olds, all of this
started much earlier, because
throughout all the Putin years, they have seen no
improvements at all. In other words, living in
their own, say, Dagomys (a resort area near Sochi), or in
the actual Dagomys, seeing that Putin’s
residence just keeps expanding somehow,
expanding, while traffic jams get worse and worse,
road closures become more and more severe,
and there are more and more black official cars,
while the huge hospital still has no medicines,
just as it didn’t before. They waited a year, they waited
two, and now they’ve been waiting for 20 years, and there’s still nothing.
That is why now they want decisive
change.
So, politically speaking, the conclusion for
us is: we have to crush this government. At the end we’ll
talk about Ramzan Kadyrov, who
called on everyone to kill, to kill United
Russia—as if he had somehow legitimized the phrase
“we will kill, we will kill”
United Russia, because people hate it.
What we need to do is simply
explain to our people the direct and clear
connection. As we
can see from opinion polls, they already understand almost
everything—the direct link between the condition of
things and the lifestyles of Shuvalov, Peskov, Usmanov,
Abramovich, Putin and his relatives,
his nephews, his daughters, and everyone else
under the sun, including Dmitry Medvedev with his
wonderful, astonishing residences
all across the country—and the connection between all of that
and the fact that in the hospital, even as we
see in an elite district, there is absolutely nothing
except cockroaches. Cockroaches are running around there
in swarms, in huge numbers. And
it is very important to see that. Let’s see if we
have any questions via Twitter.
Show me if there’s anything. But they
seem to be frozen somewhere right now. All right, while we
wait for more questions, let’s discuss the fact that
Vladimir Putin—well, in the last
program I talked a lot about how he has
really descended into senility, and well,
indeed, over the last year—
probably the last two years—we’ve seen that he
is constantly acting bizarrely; he really
behaves strangely and says
strange things. When serious matters are being
discussed, he is genuinely, well, simply
bored. In the previous program, we
discussed
the State Council meeting on healthcare, where
Putin, in a truly absurd fashion,
proposed that we should create
student brigades made up of doctors and
medical students who would provide treatment.
You know, in that hospital in Sochi,
the cockroaches will keep scurrying around, but some kind of
brigades of medical students will be
traveling around.
In other words, no one tapped their finger to their
temple, so he keeps going a little
further. In particular, he was acting oddly at the Council
on the Russian language, and that was also
quite interesting and quite strange.
Quite interesting in the sense that I look at it and
think: where is this going to lead us? And
well, it’s obvious where it will lead you—to
senility. We’ve seen all this before with Brezhnev
(Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev, late Soviet leader).
He ended up there after he had sat
in power for so many years. Putin has already been in power
longer than Brezhnev. He ended up in that state; he
was covered in orders, covered in medals, and everyone
respected and loved him very much
and called him “Dear Leonid Ilyich,” but he
was senile, and everyone understood that “Dear Leonid Ilyich” was
senile. And now
“Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich” is heading there too.
And in a truly remarkable way, he
described to us, told us, that
there is some kind of conspiracy
actually directed against the Russian language, and in this
conspiracy, let’s take a look at who is involved.
Who is involved in the conspiracy against the Russian
language?
War on the Russian language is being declared not only by
caveman Russophobes—and we also
observe this, it is no secret—but also by various kinds of
marginals who are effectively at work, and
aggressive, aggressive nationalists. Unfortunately, in
some countries this is becoming
quite
official state policy.
So, in the conspiracy against the Russian language,
the enemies involved are, let’s see: caveman
Russophobes,
various kinds of marginals, and aggressive
nationalists. As we can see, everyone has been
named. He named the enemies of
the Russian language using
obviously borrowed words, which
from his point of view are probably
parasitic words in Russian. This
also shows very clearly that, well,
these people are really talking nonsense. They do not
understand what the Russian language is; they do not
understand how it should develop; they do not
understand that it is a living, constantly
changing environment.
But for them, it is enough simply to explain that here
there are some enemies, some conspiracy
of Russophobes against the Russian language. Seriously?
What conspiracy of Russophobes? The main enemies
of the Russian language are officials of the Russian
Federation and their hostile attitude toward
the Russian language—and specifically Putin’s
hostile attitude toward the Russian language
was demonstrated very clearly at this same
Council on the Russian language, because there
he stated that Wikipedia, you see,
was not good enough for him, and all of it should be replaced
with some big new Russian
encyclopedias—give me 20, 20 seconds.
about what Putin thinks should be used.
Wikipedia. As for Wikipedia, it has already
been discussed here—better replace it
with the Great Russian New Encyclopedia in
electronic form. We’re talking about this now with colleagues.
This, at any rate, will be
reliable information, in a good
modern format, by the way.
You see, they’re sitting there nodding: absolutely, exactly.
It’s exactly the same situation as at that
meeting on healthcare, where he
suggests student work brigades, and there sit
some people nodding. Meaning, they’re thinking,
“My God, what nonsense. Don’t stop nodding—yes, yes, yes,”
“good idea.” And here this guy is spouting
some nonsense—he really knows nothing
about Wikipedia. If he loved the Russian
language and tried to speak about what
he actually understands, he would say, “You know,
guys, Wikipedia and the Russian language on
Wikipedia are a unique thing, because
it was Russians specifically who wrote a huge
number of articles in Russian.
There are more articles in English, but
the contribution of Russian-speaking people to the development of
Wikipedia is enormous. I once came to a
lecture by Wikipedia’s founder that was held
in Moscow, and he said there that the Russian
community is of fundamentally important significance for Wikipedia,
and that people
writing in Russian write a great deal,
and produce very good articles in that
sense.
Wikipedia—I’m not saying in this video
that we should leave nothing except
Wikipedia, but on Wikipedia this is a triumph
of the Russian language and a triumph of Russian people
who wrote a huge number of
articles there. So when you go online, you
have broad access to knowledge. The articles
vary—some are very good, very
detailed, and very thorough.
There are some articles, perhaps, that
are not a significant source
of information if you are writing some kind of
academic work, but in any case the Russian
language on Wikipedia
has won. Well, that is, it came in—it yielded
to English there simply for
obvious reasons: English is the language
of international communication. But among
national languages, it is unquestionably
dominant. Hooray, we’re awesome, we’re great.
Wikipedia in Russian—damn, he just needed
to come out and say: yes, Wikipedia
has its faults, so for the development of
the Russian language, let’s create a great
new Russian encyclopedia.
There was an encyclopedia in the Soviet Union,
but let’s remember—please look
at this cool screenshot that I found on
Twitter, this image of
Wikipedia.
This is what the Great Soviet Encyclopedia looked like.
And regularly, libraries would receive
a letter saying, “Dear
librarian, please, in our Great
Soviet Encyclopedia,
from page such-and-such to such-and-such,
carefully cut out”—there were literal instructions there—
“using a razor blade, cut along the spine
all of this,”
“and paste in other articles there. Under the letter B,
please cut out and
paste in ‘Bering Strait.’”
That’s what the
Great Soviet Encyclopedia was in Stalin’s
times. In Brezhnev’s times, they no longer
sent out instructions, of course, on how exactly
to neatly cut everything out, but still,
the Great Soviet Encyclopedia, for the most
part, in most of its volumes,
for the greater part,
was not a source of real knowledge.
It was just this kind of nonsense where
they wrote things like, “Thanks to the CPSU Central Committee (Communist Party leadership)
for the fact that the law of universal
gravitation works for us.” In other words, it was an absolutely
ideological thing. But of course, in
Putin’s Russia,
besides wanting to create
some kind of ideological tool and
replace a normal
tool—Wikipedia—with it, they also, of course,
want to siphon off money, because already for this
great
new Russian encyclopedia they have
allocated 1.7 billion rubles
—seriously, already almost 2 billion rubles.
For what? For what purpose? I mean, why?
Maybe they could somehow discuss it first?
Wikipedia is used by—it's one of the most
visited websites in the Russian language.
I’m absolutely sure it’s in the
top five in Russia, probably even in the top three
in Russia—probably after Yandex and
VKontakte, Wikipedia is one of
the most visited sites. Tens of
millions of people use
Wikipedia every day, and they’re being told: let’s replace it, and
we’re already allocating 2 billion rubles for the replacement.
Seriously? This is senility,
progressive senility, really.
People online wrote, absolutely correctly, that Putin
has never been on Wikipedia; he doesn’t
know what it is. As is well known,
he never uses the internet.
All the articles are printed out for him on sheets of paper and
brought to him in red folders. The main
tool
for his informational work is these little
telephones that we see in photographs,
these funny ones with eagles on
the buttons and on the
central part, or else these
flat ones without buttons that you
pick up and there’s already some minister on the line.
when Vladimir Vladimir 4 is big
that is, the person has never
used in the century to sing and the students on not
used the internet, has absolutely no
damn clue about it, and works mainly in
an environment of either people just like him
the same kind of blockheads who understand nothing
about the internet, or complete
assholes who understand everything and use
Wikipedia, but just sit there nodding their heads
and then this person comes in and breaks
something he didn’t even create, well,
tries to break it. Of course, they won’t do anything
to Wikipedia. I mean, after all, hundreds
of thousands of Russians wrote in Russian for
this Wikipedia, these articles.
And instead of going and saying, “Guys,”
“thank you for making Wikipedia largely
Russian and in the Russian language,”
he says, “Yeah, Wikipedia is bad. 2
billion rubles have been allocated—what the hell for?”
And there sit the same petty officials, nodding along—enemies, and
they are enemies, including enemies of the Russian
language. Let’s see. Unicorn Geralt
asks us—a regular listener
or listener, a female listener, I think—
in your view, will the new
imitation opposition party
controlled by the Kremlin really
be able to interest Russians? Why would it even
replace the failed United
Russia?
Indeed, yesterday and today there have been a lot
of articles saying that the Kremlin
is considering creating a new
opposition party. I think, of course,
they cannot replace United Russia
because, well, that would be too significant
a failure. United Russia has certainly become
a burden. In the previous broadcast we watched
a video where a governor and a deputy governor
discussed how United Russia
has failed, it’s gone, but you can’t just
simply take it away like that—it’s too large
a structure that took too long
to build. A lot of people are feeding at this
trough, so they won’t be able to
do it just like that. But yes, they really
will most likely move toward creating
imitation parties.
My forecast is simple: they’ll just be
the same people, just with a different label. Who have we
seen? All these
figures they constantly use
because they have neither conscience nor, well,
they’re cowardly and corrupt.
All these people—Titov, Prokhorov, Sobchak, all
that whole gang around
them all the time. I mean, if you
take these surnames and trace out
who is connected to them somehow,
who belongs to the same organizations, one way or
another—those are the people they’ll use
for the opposition party. But I think
it won’t lead to anything, really.
Nothing will come of it except
the creation of yet another
reincarnation of this spoilage
that will get maybe one and a half or 2
percent. They may fool some number of people,
but I think this is more likely all
being done simply in order to
distort the discussion. They’ll create their own
kind of controlled opposition party
that will shout and call out,
“Let’s all unite.”
And naturally we’ll say, “No,
we’re not going to unite with you, you corrupt
crooks.” And they’ll say, “Oh my God,
Navalny or someone else has insulted us again,”
“called us crooks—how can that be?
These authoritarian opposition figures...” I mean,
this, excuse me, nonsense that you’ve
seen many, many times.
And most likely that is the main goal of creating
the party. It will be interesting—we’ll
watch and see. As I said at the beginning,
the Kremlin media called me
a man who has trained himself to humiliate
people. We will certainly be doing a lot of
that here—
humiliating those people who join
any kind of Kremlin party.
Viktor Medved asks: “Alexei,
are you ready—good Lord, that question that
you could say makes me blush and feel
ashamed—when will there be videos on the main
channel?” There will be. We’re preparing them and working on
them. First of all, you know about our technical
problems: we have nowhere to record, nothing to record with,
and right now all of this is complicated.
Every time we have to rent
equipment. There have been logistical problems. We
are simultaneously preparing several
different videos, but I admit that in all the time
my channel has probably existed,
we’ve never had an almost
two-month break. We’ll try to release
something interesting for you soon,
something new. When we do, we’ll
of course ask that you
help promote all of it.
Yulia asks that I
talk about the situation with Mikhail Svetov.
I’ll tell you. But as for Mikhail Svetov, you know,
I still also wanted to, before that,
touch on this situation involving
Ramil Shamsutdinov, the conscript who
shot people in Zabaykalsky Krai (a region in eastern Russia),
killing 8 of his fellow servicemen, and who is clearly
a victim of dedovshchina (violent hazing in the Russian military), which
he simply could not endure anymore and killed them. This
situation has taken a rather disgusting
turn.
The disgusting nature of that development
was expressed in the fact that there is an
organization called the Soldiers’ Mothers Committee
which once was always very
powerful and very influential, very much so
the right kind of organization
it was precisely thanks to this organization that, at one time,
after the absolute lawlessness there,
of dedovshchina (violent hazing in the military)
in the late 1980s and early 1990s, really
it was completely out-of-control hazing, everyone wrote about it
everyone talked about it, and it was precisely thanks to
the Soldiers' Mothers Committee that it became possible
to somehow force the state to deal with it
to fight it, but then the state became
very deeply displeased, and by the time of
the later Putin years, these committees
of soldiers' mothers had been split several times
and then flooded with completely
some kind of corrupt, bought-off people, and
the head of the Soldiers' Mothers Committee—or rather,
of some version of those committees
that, as we can see, are under the control of
the Defense Ministry and United Russia (the ruling political party)—she
comments on this situation. A private said
that he was beaten there, tortured, humiliated
and had his head shoved into a toilet; unable to endure it all,
he shot them. Out of this tragedy, from all sides,
out comes this auntie named Flyura So-
likhovskaya, the head of the Soldiers' Mothers,
and do you know what she says? Well, she says that
computer games are to blame for everything
and that the internet should be banned—literally
the internet must be banned because all of this
is categorically unacceptable, and it's not
because his head was shoved into a toilet
and he was beaten at night, but simply because over there on
the internet he watched too much and started, you know, there
posting things. Let's take a look here, one sec
our internet, our websites, all these games
they lead to boys
who are, for the most part, left
at home alone by themselves, and they play these
games. Literally, not long ago I spoke with
a young man; he had already served
but got drawn into another game that could have
also led to tragedy. Do you
understand? No matter how much people may distrust
the internet, it needs to be shut down, specifically
blocked in places. A disgusting, lying
woman—supposedly from the Soldiers' Mothers
even they were outraged there too
even the controlled part of them, and they stated
that they were demanding her resignation, or had sent her into
retirement, because after that she also
made, simply, a very long video statement
saying that blaming the military for what happened
is categorically unacceptable. But really,
how do people have the conscience for that?
She knows perfectly well. At the same time, another
interview was published with
the father, who said that in
the materials of this criminal case
Shamsutdinov, of course, was interrogated
Let's look at the testimony he
gives. Here is what he writes verbatim:
"That day they promised they would degrade me,
they said so directly, warned me that they would, like, rape me.
That day the lieutenant told me that, well,
you understand, after guard duty it would all
happen. All the other new conscripts before me had already
been 'lowered' (prison-style sexual humiliation), I know that, and that evening it was my
turn. There was nowhere to go. What was I supposed
to do?" So, in the context of
all this, out comes
this woman and tells us—and the same thing was
repeated by representatives of the Defense Ministry—
that, gosh, the internet is to blame for everything
they looked at the internet and started
shooting. And how can you so simply
so meticulously
avoid the fact that it was a lieutenant
saying this? This is no longer dedovshchina when,
you know, some idiot who was, I don't know,
beaten there thinks he should
beat the next ones. This is not just soldiers
among themselves, one 18, another 19, and they
start playing some kind of games. This is
a lieutenant
who studied for five years at a military academy
who is an officer, on whom
there is, essentially, placed
the duty to make sure there is no
hazing—and he himself beats them, he himself shoves
their heads into the toilet
he himself is engaged in all this kind of
prison-style crap, really
about them. And if
if it turns out that there really were facts showing that
someone was raped or 'lowered,' well, well
that is just—this should be
a scandal on a nationwide Russian scale. How
can people send their children into an army in which
all those people responsible have not been jailed
who are responsible for this, and yet they tell us
that blaming the military for this
is categorically unacceptable. Then who am I supposed
to blame—the company Blizzard
that makes Warcraft and
StarCraft? Who am I supposed to blame? And in this
the one specifically at fault is Shoigu
Of course, he personally didn't beat or rape anyone,
but Shoigu and Putin are the ones who
keep pushing their stupid conscript army
when it should be a professional army, and
Shoigu and Putin do nothing
to root out dedovshchina and abuse, and
Shoigu and Putin and United Russia have done
everything to destroy real
public oversight, just like in prisons
there used to be—there were these, well,
there were real human rights defenders who
went into penal colonies
and made sure no one was being tortured. What
did the authorities do? They
drove the real human rights defenders out and brought in
all sorts of stooges who now go to everyone
and say, yes, yes, sure, well, the fact that
he's complaining that he was beaten nearly to
death
and that one was tortured with electric shocks—but that's all nonsense
nothing like that is happening. The same thing
Now the Soldiers' Mothers Committee is completely...
all these political officers and the entire structure
of public oversight over the army—it
has collapsed. Do you remember who was on the public
council of the Ministry of Defense, and who was
thrown out of there? Brilev, a British
citizen.
The entire system of public oversight
is completely fake. This is a real achievement
of Putin and Shoigu—they are responsible for all of this.
It’s not about the internet at all. I really
wanted to put it this way. First and Only
asks: there was recently news about
the opening of a casino zone in Crimea. What do you think?
To replace Azov-City after it was closed, apparently. Well,
listen, when it comes to these
gambling zones they keep announcing,
it’s honestly ridiculous to watch.
Both Putin and Medvedev
seem to have one idea in their heads: that a casino can
develop some region.
For every question, for every problem, they have one answer:
“Let’s open a casino there.”
They opened a casino in Altai,
while the situation in the Far East,
Siberia, and Altai is terrible.
“Let’s open a casino in Rostov
Region, in Krasnodar—everything’s bad there, so let’s
build one on the border of Rostov Region
and Krasnodar Krai.” “Things aren’t going well in
Crimea, so let’s
build a casino there.” Good Lord, what nonsense.
They are really wasting time on this nonsense and
constantly trying to create all sorts of
special zones.
A special economic zone, a gambling zone—
we don’t need any zones. What we need
is simply normal regulation across the whole
country. And it seems to me that the situation with
casinos really shows the mentality of these
people. They’re just ordinary small-time crooks from St. Petersburg
(Saint Petersburg). Back in the 1990s, Putin and his
friends—Miller and all the others, Chubais,
the whole team—
they took bribes, brought in
whatever they could—some got $5,000, some $10,000.
And what did they do? “Come on, guys, let’s go gamble.”
They would go to casinos, play roulette, and
for them that was the best, coolest life.
Those are their fond memories of youth,
of how they were the big shots there, how they could
“fix little problems” and were the masters of the city.
And that’s why they have the mentality
of people who think that a casino
can solve things—that if you build a casino in Crimea,
it will somehow start solving problems. It won’t solve
any problems. No casino
will ever solve anything, of course. There are 35,000 people
watching our live broadcast right now. I want to ask
all 35,000 of you, and everyone who
will watch later, to show some support for
this. You know, I really love outspoken
deputies. We elect these people, and we very much
want them to work for us afterward.
Unfortunately, partly because of
temperament, not everyone—many do
good things, but not everyone is that
kind of outspoken deputy. I’m very glad that
there are now people in the Moscow City Duma
who are really fighting. Today, just
before the broadcast, so I didn’t have time
to get the footage or photos or anything, but
Yengalycheva and
Shuvalova said they are sending inquiries
based on our investigation, and others as well.
Good for them—they’re fighting. And this week I saw
an amazing video by deputy
Nikolai Bondarenko. He is a deputy in the
Saratov Regional Duma, and in that regional
assembly he also has a fairly large channel,
*A Deputy’s Diary*. I think many of you
watch it. If you don’t, go
look it up—just search *A Deputy’s Diary*. It’s a very
interesting and informative channel. I don’t
know Bondarenko personally,
though of course I’ve heard of him, and I simply
got enormous pleasure from his
latest video. So, the problem is this:
Bondarenko—and by the way, the same goes for other
deputies too—in the Moscow City Duma the situation is even
worse: you’re a deputy, but you can’t speak,
because in the Moscow City Duma, for example,
you’re allowed to speak only in the
“miscellaneous” section, and only on whatever issues
remain on the agenda. And items are simply
thrown off the agenda by United Russia with its
majority. It’s the same with Bondarenko.
He is elected by the people. People want him to
speak, say things, submit proposals, but instead they
just cut off his microphone.
They simply don’t let him speak. What can you do?
The presiding officer sits there, presses a button,
turns off the microphone, and that’s it,
it’s over. So what does Bondarenko do? One
minute ten seconds: “We demand that your
newly introduced habit of switching off
our microphones just as we reach the final
second be stopped, because this has got to
end. Or, according to media reports, which were later
confirmed,
confirmed,
the German government is secretly sending
radioactive waste to Russia. Under no
circumstances should this waste end up...” Something
is happening—I had almost finished speaking, let us
finish. Why are the microphones being cut off?
Does it sting your eyes when you
create this kind of mess in a regional parliament?
All responsibility should
fall on you. We will appeal to the
prosecutor’s office and hold you
accountable. You didn’t care when
you passed pension reform, when
you canceled benefits. We here, as deputies,
are oppressed by United Russia every day; even
here at the regional level you are silencing us.
What, even now—nothing? First
they came up only to me so that you wouldn’t speak.”
We missed it and had to interrupt.
This is a regional parliament, tentacles and all.
The police showed up so that the pilot could tell me.
He was speaking into a gramophone, as they said, but.
A cool little bug, and what else does it do?
You see, it’s such a complicated situation, and.
For a lone person like that, zero—and he even has some kind of faction.
There is one of some sort; it’s quite hard to fight.
But the majority, the overwhelming majority, they.
They adopted whatever rules they wanted, for example.
Even a parliamentary inquiry, again, is simply.
In Moscow, I don’t know very well how things work there.
How it’s arranged in Saratov—you know that, for example.
A deputy’s inquiry—a Moscow City Duma deputy’s inquiry.
He can’t make it happen. You’d say, what kind of nonsense is that?
But there it’s set up in such a way that, in order to.
To send a deputy’s inquiry, you have to.
You have to read it out in the Duma, and to read it out.
At the Duma.
And they’ll only give you time in the section.
Miscellaneous—the Miscellaneous section will come only after.
Many, many hours after the session begins.
And they’ll simply close the session because.
Time has already run out, and you’re supposedly a deputy, and.
People are demanding something again.
And often, in Bondarenko’s situation, people tell him.
Voters say to him, listen, somehow over there.
Everywhere they’re saying that in Russia they’re introducing.
Nuclear waste—can you at least somehow.
Express outrage? I’m outraged—you’re my.
Representative, so why aren’t you outraged? And what can you do?
You try to do something, and they switch off the microphone. Great.
So he took a megaphone and started shouting into it—that’s.
Exactly what needs to be done. And if we had.
Several people like that sitting in every.
Regional parliament, then of course the country.
Would be different. Someone might say, no.
He’s clowning around there, or just playing to.
The crowd, and recording all of it on video.
Posting all of it for hype. But what is a deputy.
Actually there for?
A deputy exists in order.
To speak out on po—on.
Political issues in support of his.
Voters, so that those voters.
Would watch him in YouTube videos.
And say, what an excellent politician—we voted for.
Him, and that’s exactly how it should be done.
That is political work. Right now I.
Think that in Saratov Region.
Well, probably in many places already, they there.
This video is popular; here it’s a bit.
We’ll see—many people will watch the video and.
First of all, once again realize just how much.
United Russia has crushed even deputies.
From other parties—all opposition deputies across the whole.
Country do exist, but they’re practically slaves.
They can’t do absolutely anything, and people will see.
That this is how a normal, genuinely.
Brave guy can act—Mikhail Svetov. I want to discuss.
The situation with Mikhail Svetov, because it.
Is as vile as it gets.
And from the example of the situation with Svetov.
We saw the methods they have started.
To use—these are, you know, the kind of methods.
That are below the belt, and they will continue.
To use them—a real disgrace.
So, Svetov. I think all.
Viewers of my program know him, but if.
By any chance someone doesn’t, he is one of the leaders.
Of the Libertarian Party, of the libertarian.
Movement, and Svetov in particular, in many.
Ways is the reason why.
The libertarian movement, though.
Still, let’s be honest, not the most popular.
Political movement worldwide, it.
Is now quite popular, especially among.
Russian youth, well, because.
In Russia it has now become this kind of.
Honest, very oppositional, and fairly.
Radical movement. I don’t entirely agree with all.
Libertarian ideas.
I agree, and certainly not with all the ideas.
Put forward by certain libertarians.
Sometimes it just sounds like a kind of.
Primitive view: let’s just.
Abolish the state altogether.
And scrap any kind of social support—that’s.
A kind of primitive libertarianism. Svetov.
Approaches all of this much more deeply, and he.
Gives a huge number of lectures around.
The country. Let’s take a look at these lectures.
At a few photos—here he is doing a tour.
A real one across the country, including at.
Our headquarters. He speaks there, and in.
The regions, in cities, to lectures on.
Libertarianism, hundreds of people come, and.
That is really significant.
Apparently, and obviously, this infuriated the Kremlin people.
Because they are used to the idea that.
Opposition figures are always marginal, that they don’t really exist.
[music]
It’s me again. Admit it, those of you who still.
Waited through those long fifteen minutes—what did you.
Think? That you would be rewarded when.
The camera came back on? That there’d be some kind of chaos?
That the studio had been trashed? Unfortunately, no. I.
Apologize—it really was.
A technical problem. In our country, as I.
Said, we now simply don’t buy anything anymore.
Because buying things.
Is pointless—they confiscate everything. Every time we.
Take rented equipment again from scratch.
Every time we set everything up here as if.
It were the first time. So unfortunately, technical.
Problems are inevitable. I hope that in.
The future there won’t be any. My apologies.
Once again. Those of you who watch the program.
As a recording won’t actually notice anything.
You’ll just see me twitch somehow while talking.
About Svetov, and then we reappeared—those who, well.
Just know that 13,000 people were waiting.
And waiting for a long time. At one point, when we.
Cut out, there were 37,000. Well, in general, we.
Are to blame ourselves. So, Mikhail Svetov.
Is a really important topic. Mikhail Svetov travels.
Around the country, Mikhail Svetov speaks, and the Kremlin.
Gets furious because they believe that.
A person can become famous only
because they do something to make it happen,
so that he becomes famous. Well, somehow I
slipped past that, while they keep everyone else out.
They really get enraged by
every new guy who
comes out of nowhere. Svetov, well, some guy
who runs a YouTube channel and then started traveling
around the country.
And then, bang, he's giving speeches. Let's
watch about a minute of his speech
at a rally, at one of the rallies. It was
his most popular speech. By the way, I was
interrupted by Svetov then. Hello,
future free people. I call us
future free people because
for now we are not free, while it keeps us
locked up, while it keeps us within these limits, and
while we are still here, slogans constantly ring out
saying that we will not forget and will not
forgive. But so far, all we are doing
is forgetting and forgiving. I urge you
to remember the names of the people who turned
our country into that
into the prison of nations that it is
today. We must remember these people and
treat them far more humanely
than they treated us.
And these people can switch sides, and really, not like in the '90s.
But one person is very worried about this:
Vladimir Putin. And the one worrying is
the Presidential Administration because
they cannot control Mikhail
Svetov. Tell me, is the broadcast still on? I
lost everything again. Is the stream still going?
Sorry, please, I just can't see
what's showing on the screen. Mikhail
Svetov infuriates them, and they want to do something to him.
So they sat there and thought, sat there and
thought that they needed to do something to Svetov too.
He served 30 days; it wasn't the first time
he had been jailed. They jailed him in St. Petersburg
and in Moscow.
But it's not enough just to lock someone up,
because if you jail a person for 30 days,
his popularity only grows, because
if he comes out after those 30 days and
keeps doing his work—and Svetov
does keep doing his work and does not become any less
radical. I mean, he doesn't say
anything radical; he says normal
things. That's why it drives them crazy. With his
trips to the regions, and then
Svetov started writing that his
home had been surrounded by some shady
types hiding their faces. Let's
watch 23 seconds of this clip.
There are people all around.
Separately, it's very interesting to see how they behave—
they are genuinely afraid because they understand
that what they are doing is absolutely criminal. Well,
and when he published it, everyone realized
that a raid and a search were about to happen—and they did.
Why? Not because of the Moscow Case (the criminal cases tied to the 2019 Moscow protests), or rallies,
or anything like that, or extremism,
or anything of the sort. In a much more,
as they see it, cunning—and certainly vile—way,
they are trying to deal with Svetov, because
they opened a case against him under the article for
lewd acts.
Just think about it—what a label to slap on someone.
It turned out that in this lewd-acts case,
a journalist from the newspaper *Izvestia* filed a complaint against
him because of his post on
Instagram from 2012. At that time, Svetov
was dating a 16-year-old girl, and right now
the age of consent in Russia is 16, and
back then, I think it may even have been 14—though I'm not
completely certain; shortly before that it had been 14.
I don't want
to get into that, and Mikhail's personal life
doesn't interest me. I don't want to discuss it.
But one thing is absolutely certain:
first, he did not break any laws;
second, some Instagram post
that Instagram itself did not even ban for
violating any rules, from 2012,
certainly cannot be grounds for
a complaint alleging, excuse me, lewd acts,
filed by someone from *Izvestia*. It definitely
cannot be grounds for searches,
detention, and an overnight interrogation
lasting 12 hours.
What are they doing? What matters to them is precisely this:
Svetov—lewd acts.
Some story about Svetov—whether he stole something
or something was stolen from him—but in any
case, let's discuss whether
Mikhail Svetov's actions were lewd or
not. That is exactly the plan.
In other words, discredit him so that
if he keeps traveling around
the regions, there will always be some
guy who says, 'All right, Mikhail, you're here
lecturing us about libertarianism,
and all that,
but let's
hear about what exactly those
lewd acts of yours were.' That is exactly
the plan, and we can see it being carried out. I mean,
it's really as if some little schemer
was sitting in the Presidential Administration,
the same kind who comes up with all those lawsuits
for Prigozhin, and rubbing his hands together, he came up with
the next political technology (political manipulation tactic): first they
opened this lewd-acts case,
announced it in all
the newspapers, and then in all the newspapers
they reported everywhere that Svetov had been ordered to undergo
because of an Instagram post
from, what, seven years ago,
a urological
examination. I even googled out of curiosity
what a urological
examination is.
An investigative urological examination—
please look at this—concerns the capacity for
sexual intercourse; the ability...
sexual characteristics and visual signs
sodomy
and so on—if you look into it there,
you'll find a lot of things of that kind there.
As part of the examination, the doctor is supposed to
determine, among other things,
the length and width of the penis in a relaxed
state.
And so on and so forth—lots of different
details. I have no doubt that later, of course,
first of all, they will force him
to undergo this examination against his will,
which is a separate humiliation over
an Instagram post. Then they will publish
the results of this examination so the whole internet can laugh
at some of the data and
caption it with whether Svetov had
signs of sodomy detected, and what
measurements the doctor recorded there, and
the forensic medical examiner.
So that’s what this is about. I mean, in the Kremlin,
there are perverts sitting there, just so you
understand—they are real perverts.
Just look at all this anti-
opposition propaganda, which is genuinely
obsessed with all kinds of sexual
topics, all these sorts of
urogenital themes. I really have no
doubt that Kiriyenko himself signed off on
all of this, and then reported on it, and they
snickered and laughed and said, “Haha, he’s
calling for lustration, and now we’re going to
publish online the exact
data or photographs that are produced as part of
the process
of a forensic medical examination about
whether Svetov
shows signs of sodomy, as they apparently consider proper
to establish in such an examination.”
That, in fact, is exactly the plan.
It is utterly, utterly disgusting.
It’s sad, and we need to be prepared for it, and
they’re going to keep dragging Svetov through the mud.
But in the context of all this, I want to say
something else. You know, there is a man
quite close to Vladimir Putin; his name is
Dmitry Peskov. And Dmitry Peskov—this is
a fact from his official biography—
started dating his first wife
when, at the start of their relationship, she was
14 years old.
So please, let’s conduct one. I am
officially demanding that the Investigative Committee, the
prosecutor’s office, and the Kremlin arrange
a urological examination of Dmitry Peskov
and tell us all whether a criminal case should be opened
over indecent
acts that Peskov committed there in
relation to some person or other. But
never mind how old Svetov is.
If they opened a case against Svetov over a post
on Instagram, then this episode doesn’t even
deny that fact. I mean, it seems
that before it was simply a fact of his
private life, and I don’t care about it.
What interests me about Peskov is only in terms
of him being a crook and a corrupt official. At
what age he dated which girls,
and how old they were—that does not
interest me as long as it remains within
the law. But if they’re going to subject Svetov to
this kind of examination, then let it happen in the next
office over: let both of them, Svetov and Peskov,
come to the expert, take off their pants, and
let the expert conduct his examination, so very important to
the Kremlin. And then Putin, or I don’t
know, maybe Kiriyenko together with him,
can look over those photographs with pleasure
and positively revel in all of it. That’s what they
want, isn’t it? Then let them do it.
So it seems to me that this whole case against Svetov is
completely fabricated.
But since the Kremlin has decided to do this, we
should consider it in the context of Peskov.
If we consider what Svetov did to be
indecent acts, okay—then Peskov committed
far more indecent acts, because
in one case one person was 16, and in the other she was 14. That’s
all I want to say about
Mikhail Svetov. And, all in all, greetings to him
and to the entire libertarian
movement. You have clearly made the Kremlin
very angry, so keep acting
the same way—you’re doing everything right.
Meanwhile, while Svetov is being put through
this examination, Apple, of course, is now under pressure here.
Remember who said that famous
joke-like phrase, “Apple is getting nervous”?
We’ll even show the video now
to remind you, but for now I just
want to say this:
just like with Wikipedia, as I said at the beginning
of the program, our authorities are constantly
fighting against us, and in every possible way.
They are not just fighting to stop us from
going to rallies
or demanding free elections—they
really do something every day, systematically,
to make our lives
worse,
more expensive, and less convenient. In particular, right now
they have passed on first reading a law under
which all mobile phones
must come with
Russian software preinstalled. And at the same time they themselves
are gleefully putting out
articles—I read one today in RIA Novosti (a Russian state news agency)—saying that
you know,
with the iPhone, technically
this can’t be done, so iPhones
will be banned. Ha-ha-ha, what a great
article. I’m reading it there in RIA Novosti,
and they literally write: well, Apple lovers will
have to travel to the United States and buy
their Apple devices there.
And do you know who our biggest Apple fan is?
Apple? Let’s take a look—here’s that
famous funny photograph that
is there for conical photography
our Dmitry Medvedev's
now there's a man covered in dust, I don't even
doubt that he has all the latest
phones and iPads — a deputy with two
Apple phones, Apple
he's basically the main inhabitant of the State Duma (lower house of Russia's parliament), there
there you go, a typical one of them, the whole
United Russia — all of you there in the government
all of them, you won't find a single person using
Android, just like absolutely everyone
uses Telegram, but for us Telegram
has to be banned
they're all glued to these iPhones, but at the same
time they absolutely need to — they're on them
all the time, they live in this, they see that this whole
supposedly, as they see it, advanced
public likes Apple, at least
certainly those people who use all the
Apple devices are most likely
opposition-minded toward the authorities, so
let's pull some kind of stunt
to make life a little harder for them somehow
but they're making life worse for the country as a whole
they really are harming the state as a whole
overall, if their idiotic dream
comes true — though I don't think it will
of course — then everyone will travel, I don't know
people will just buy some gray-market
phones or go abroad somewhere to a
nearby country — to Ukraine, Georgia, or
the Baltics — to buy these iPhones
that's what will happen; sure, prices will rise a little
the price of electronics here, yes, but the main thing is
our sellers, our people who work
and make money from this, they
will lose part of their profit, but the Kremlin
doesn't give a damn, just doesn't care, because for them
it's more important just to snicker about how
they somehow didn't
slightly spoiled our lives, while they themselves
can't do anything
a video about how Apple got nervous
let's take a look: this is 2013. In 2013
two people, two subjects of our investigations,
promised us something
let's watch — they made one, even
some kind of color sheets too, so-called
electronic ink, one hundred percent
a Russian invention
but today, right now, at one of the selected
enterprises
belonging to our state corporation
of Russian electronics, and on its basis we will
implement everything; it will receive the highest awards
it will turn out better than Apple, while at the same time
after our smartphone
we'll live and see; let's hope this is
the first, but not the last
well, Dmitry and Natalya, we've lived and seen that
you've got absolutely nothing. It's 2030 — you remember
that video, right? Some have probably forgotten
but it needs to be remembered because
they told stories, received awards
a Russian development better than the iPhone
cheaper than one — with two little screens, one
black-and-white, the other color — but there's nothing, nothing
no developments at all; it was all completely
made up, both by Rosnano and by Rostec
all their developments, all these promises — zero
nothing. They just allocated billions
stole billions, and now pretend that
well, it's all been forgotten, but those who bring up the past
— 'whoever remembers the old should lose an eye' (Russian proverb) — back then, in
2013, who even remembers what they promised there?
What Svetov posted on Instagram
in 2012 — that's important, but the fact that
the head of a state corporation told the president
at that moment — no, not the president anymore
the prime minister then, that's who he was saying it to
but in any case, whether you
were heading the government — that's not important
they forgot it and moved on. Let's discuss
apologies and all that — Apple got nervous, and
apparently it needs to apologize to
United Russia, and now this
week we witnessed, of course,
something absolutely astonishing. Moving on to
Ramzan Kadyrov, who stated that
he was going to kill a large number of
people. In general, it's very interesting to observe
this kind of colossal
disproportion — we really do have castes
absolutely: people to whom the law
does not apply at all, and people for whom
some kind of
crimes and violations are simply invented, and then cases are opened
out of thin air. Two cases caught my attention
very strongly. First of all, it was
the former mayor of Grozny
the nephew — a close nephew — of Ramzan
Kadyrov
Islam Kadyrov — he became notorious for the fact that
he beat people, he tortured people, he beat people
with a stun gun. I mean, it was just
so open and so well known that you can even
find videos like that on YouTube
give me one second
the video — I specifically prepared it
I mean, a normal person — just look
this is just — I mean, you hardly even need to press
damn it, an official, damn it, the mayor of a city
some woman is standing in front of him
she's terrified out of sheer horror, and he just
takes a stun gun, walks up, and jabs it at her
with that stun gun, on camera, on
camera. Can you imagine what he did to
people
what all of them do to people when there's no
camera? I mean, first of all, this is
really some kind of perversion, I mean, damn
there just aren't even words for it. And what
kind of motivation does a person even have to
say, 'come on, film this,' and then there's this frightened
woman standing there, and he's waving this thing at her
scaring her, and of course she's trembling there
and then he jabs her with it. These people really
need to be kept locked up somewhere, they
dangerous and perverted, and what happens to
them? Is it dangerous to come back? Nothing—he
just apologized, that was all. He offered
an apology—there’s no problem at all. I mean,
just imagine if someone
threw a paper cup at you—well, damn,
a criminal case. Touched a helmet—
got three years. But here, an official in his
office
is shocking women with a stun gun, and then
apologizes with the following excuse: I
am ready to accept punishment for my mistakes,
but I did it not out of malice, not for
self-interest, but in order to help
people who had become victims of fraudsters.
What amazing help—some woman on
camera. I mean, as I said, we can only
imagine what they were doing to
people off camera, if on camera they were simply
shocking them. And one more
absolutely astounding explanation:
why is there a scandal here, why did you do that,
why did you torture people, why are you such a sick
fascist? The explanation: I was in car accidents,
I was put under anesthesia 29 times, I am ready to undergo
treatment and rehabilitation.
But I think I acted correctly and
am helping people. The result: completely
not guilty. This person is not in jail, he is not
under house arrest, he is not under a travel restriction,
not under any
preventive measure at all—nothing
was done to him. He just apologized,
the guy, you know, kind of—well, kind of
apologized. What more did you want from him—
to send him to prison for something so trivial?
And after all, it wasn’t a paper cup, not an empty
bottle thrown at an OMON officer (Russian riot police), this
wasn’t some comment posted online
or even an Instagram post. It was
only torturing people with electric shocks in
a neighboring republic, in Ingushetia. The same thing
is happening there too, you see. There are
high-ranking deputies from United
Russia (the ruling political party).
Some guys were caught with a kilogram of heroin,
a kilogram of heroin. The arrest video is 28
seconds long.
The kid came up—well, the dead-drop, going by the water...
I’ll scatter it around the spots.
This is the son of, excuse me, I should say, one
of United Russia’s deputies.
A kilogram of heroin—what does a kilogram
of heroin mean?
For any person who is not the
son of a United Russia deputy, it
means, well, more than ten years—
absolutely, definitely more than 10 years. Quite
recently, the whole country was discussing how
an Israeli citizen who was in transit
flying from India to Israel, and in the
transit zone they found 7 grams
of hashish, and she was given 8 years in prison.
You yourselves know a huge number
of stories where people got enormous
sentences for small amounts. But here—
a kilogram of heroin, 10 to 15 years. What
happens to this wonderful young
man? Nothing. Basically, he also
apologized, promised it wouldn’t
happen again. You see, if only that
worked for everyone. Then they could catch anyone
with drugs or whatever,
and he says: you know, guys, I won’t
do that anymore, and everyone still
applauds him. Maybe the judge says,
wiping away tears, what a good
person—of course he won’t do that
again, let him go. I mean, I’m not
demanding that this young
man—the son of a United Russia member—be
done away with or necessarily jailed for 15
years. I’m not demanding that, though many are.
I’m simply demanding some kind of equality before the law. I
demand that if one person gets 5 years for a gram,
5 years,
then either you don’t jail that person, or you
jail this one too. I’d like at least some kind of
Well, not all people can be one hundred
percent equal; everyone has some
aggravating or mitigating
circumstances. Maybe this son
of a United Russia member has twenty-eight small
children, and therefore he should get
some kind of discount. But then I at least want
a criminal case,
at least a trial, and at the end of that trial let him be
given something—
a suspended sentence, whatever. But there’s nothing at all.
He just said it wouldn’t happen again, and
that works. So that’s the kind of absolute
impunity and double standards we have. That
is at the base of the pyramid, and at the top
of the pyramid we see Ramzan Kadyrov, but we
also see Putin, with absolutely double
standards. But such a super-vivid
example, a crazy example, an impossible
example in a society that is trying
at least to imagine itself as
a civilized society: Russia is a country
where laws do not function. Russia is a country
where there is absolute inequality. But at
least at the official level, at the level
of rhetoric,
we at least pretend that we have
some kind of rule of law and statehood. These
same people jail others for not
throwing a paper cup—they say, well, they did throw
paper cups, but at
police officers, so under the law we
jail them. But that’s not how it works. All
the same, if there is lawlessness at the top,
there will be lawlessness below.
We’ll show a clip—one minute and 10
seconds. Ramzan Kadyrov is there. This video is from
the BBC; we took it from them, many thanks for
the translation. He basically says that, like, we
will kill for so-called crimes of honor.
They call it a crime against honor, but in reality
it’s simply because someone online went after them.
He says that we will hunt down
such people and kill them. One minute ten seconds.
What does that mean in Russia now?
A governor, executive power, United
Russia (the ruling party), the law, the cassation court, all of it—
all this supposed rule of law, this constitutional
state—everything is right there in this video.
[music]
Ochi-kun
On YouTube, personally—punishment, he must... that he
Beeline in July again... that he is a robot.
The special services, the bridge, a young ork (slur for a brutal aggressor) to take.
motion
unique
the bewitched... year, the law, the constitution
democrats, and that is, prosperity, maybe
the path, Antonida, what’s there, the café, the attending
treacherously, this one is not schizophrenic, alive
a cow, a knee, what, with help
with different things, I boast, described, you’ll stick in order
We must stop this, we must kill
and, I mean, as if—there are insults,
gossips and swindlers, you know—this is literal.
Do you know what it sounds like? Literally the same
video, just if you replace a few words.
The words would be: for faith, for insulting Islam, we
will kill. We don’t care what
punishment we face. What is punishment?
Good Lord, nonsense—so what, prison?
They’ll kill me? Fine, I’ve lived forty-five years, and in
paradise there will be however many virgins... These
statements by Kadyrov are a one-hundred-percent
carbon copy of statements by leaders of
the Islamic State—actual
terrorists. He supposedly opposes them, but
he says literally the same thing: that we
don’t give a damn, we will kill these people, and for
that nothing will be done to us. So what is
the law? What punishment? What can they even
apply? Well, they’ll kill us—doesn’t matter.
There are things more important, and for the sake of those
things, we will kill.
By killing, imprisoning, intimidating—and if we do not
stop it, nothing will work out.
Insults on the internet, you understand.
I mean, even then this still would not
be acceptable for a governor, absolutely
unacceptable for a public official, even if he were saying
that about terrorists, those who
kill our people—we too will, so to speak,
hunt them down and kill them, like Putin shouted
back then, ‘we’ll waste them in the outhouse’ (a notorious Putin phrase). In effect, the man
is announcing a kind of extrajudicial execution. But he
is not even talking about actual terrorists.
He is simply saying: all sorts of swindlers,
schizophrenics, gossips on the internet—we will
hunt them down and kill them. The point is: have you
already killed many people? Have many people
already been tracked down and killed? The cops are sitting right here nearby,
the cops and some, some FSB officers
and Rosgvardiya (Russia’s National Guard), the local ones—and nothing.
It’s all normal. Yes, yes, we’ll kill, of course.
So why is he saying all this? Because
just as nothing worked out for Putin,
this whole engineered system, this whole
‘vertical of power’ has collapsed, and in
Chechnya
there is no support at all for United Russia.
In Chechnya, everyone knows perfectly well that it is a complete
failure. But since they know it perfectly well, despite the fact
that people are intimidated and terrorized, that it is genuinely
dangerous there, people still
write. They write there, in the comments,
they curse at him, laugh at them, or
simply write basic things, like:
‘You’re lying, our salaries are low,’
‘No, I have no prosperity at all, we have
poverty here.’ And they consider that an insult
to their honor. That is why, in particular, they hate
someone like Tumso—I have spoken about him many times
on this program. Here you have a man whom
they want to find and kill because
his ‘crime against honor’—what does it consist of?
This ‘crime against honor’ is simply that he criticizes
the Kadyrov regime, saying that they
seize people, kill people, torture people, and
at the same time—what for? Why do they do all
this? Supposedly for some kind of prosperity, but it still
never arrives. I showed you this man before,
Islam Kadyrov.
A second cousin once removed who tortured
women, who killed a woman with electric shock—he
personally. That is official information. He abducted
for example, that... abducted him there. Let’s
look at a typical video from Chechnya, about five
to fifteen seconds, where in front of him, in front of the person to whom
they are apologizing for posts on the internet: ‘I want
to correct my unworthy act, which
I... me very strongly...
...to the leadership of the republic, and my
parents once again...’
That is what they are trying to achieve. It’s just that people can no longer
stay silent; they refuse to remain silent.
That is why they are criticized everywhere. But these great
so-called fighters for prosperity—what do
they do? The entire leadership of the Chechen
Republic sits on Instagram all
day long, and on Instagram all day long they
write something there and then read
the comments about themselves.
If someone writes a critical
comment, then for them it is simply
immediately a crime against honor. Someone wrote that
someone there is an idler—well, that’s mild; on the internet
they can write
they really can write fairly
insulting things, like ‘I’ll... your...’
some crude line, or something about your mother.
They can write something like that to any
public figure; comments like that are written
constantly, endlessly. But they
want to stop it by intimidating people.
They understand they will not stop it, but they
really have simply become so
brazen that they are now, essentially, openly
telling everyone: if you criticize us on the
in Instagram comments, we will
find you and kill you — that is what they are saying, and
the police are sitting here, so
the continuation of this story is absolutely
fantastic, because today
Echo of Moscow journalist Maxim Kurnikov
managed to reach Dmitry Peskov, our, as we
know, man who committed
indecent acts, according to the
Investigative Committee, several years
ago, and the president’s press secretary
was asked a perfectly
reasonable question. Let’s look at this
dialogue on the slide.
“But please tell me, right now Kadyrov
has said that he will kill
— how do you comment on all this?” To which
Peskov says, “No, we won’t. Our
message by the mission — no, we won’t, who knows
what the BBC reported there, all the more so
it seems it was published without translation.” Kurnikov then
asks him, “But this is a state
TV channel, you understand.”
“A state TV channel is publishing this.” “Well, yes,”
“they published it without translation. We know nothing
about such statements.” All the newspapers
are writing about it, the entire internet is full of this video.
The question is: will these statements be investigated?
If I were to say here, you know,
that corrupt officials like Shuvalov and
Peskov, we are going to destroy
and kill — what would happen to me for that? I’m 45,
I can talk about this almost like
Zhirafy (likely a garbled reference); he and I were born in the same year, I’m
45 years old.
Why would I even — they’d kill me, they’d throw me in
prison over some website, over all these Peskovs and
Shuvalovs, Yakunins, all these crooks and
thieves, Medvedev — if I said we would kill them,
like devils, they would just storm in here
and I wouldn’t even manage to finish the program.
Everyone would come running here,
screaming, with a list, and all these Peskovs and
Shuvalovs would write up statements this long
— this long —
saying that I am a terrible terrorist.
As you remember, Sinitsa was imprisoned over a tweet
in which he suggested that, well,
someone, someday,
sooner or later, would kill the children of
those who break up protests, and they gave him
5 years. One of the members of the Supreme Council
of United Russia is simply, on state
television, saying: we will kill
people and use for this
law enforcement agencies, because they are
gossiping on the internet. And the president’s press secretary
under Putin says: no, we are not
going to investigate this. But why
is all this happening? Why do they not even
try to keep up some kind of appearance?
Again, why can’t Putin
call and say to Ramzan,
I mean, it’s clear what you have going on there, but you must
control the republic. You are a complete
failure, your population is impoverished, while all of you there
drive Porsche Cayennes, and that is why everyone
is unhappy. Of course, you are already
torturing and tormenting everyone there, but maybe at least don’t
say on state
television that you are going to torture
and torment people. He cannot even do that,
because there is no governance at all in
the country — an absolute failure in every
direction.
They can do nothing except
this filth of theirs,
intimidation, electric shocks, some kind of
criminal cases, discrediting campaigns,
cheap tricks, and just some
absolute fabrications, appointing all sorts of
urological examinations and all the rest.
They can do nothing else. Unfortunately,
our task is to fight them.
We will have elections next year, on
the Single Voting Day (Russia’s nationwide election day), interim ones,
and then there will be the State Duma elections.
They will put forward falsifications and new
so-called democratic opposition parties and everything
else.
But nevertheless, United Russia, in an
organizational and political sense, we will
and must destroy, and each of us
must work on this every day, otherwise we will
spend our whole lives in a country where
this kind of trash is happening, which I have
been talking about today for a full hour and a half.
Once again, please excuse
the unavoidable technical problem during
our broadcast. Many thanks to everyone who
watched, watched me — see you next
Thursday. Bye.