[music]
Good evening, Moscow. It’s 8:00 p.m., which
means the program is live on air:
*Russia of the Future*. Your host is me, Alexei
Navalny, or, as
apparently a representative of the crow clan, as
the acting governor of
St. Petersburg, Alexander Beglov, called me,
a wonderful man, apparently.
He’ll remain the hero of our program in the macro world until
September, because we’re a collective
enterprise and he keeps doing all sorts of ridiculous things.
We will always discuss those ridiculous things,
including here on our program,
including a little later today.
If you have any questions, please write to me
on Twitter using the hashtag
#RussiaOfTheFuture. They’ll put them up for me here next to
the screen, and I’ll try to answer.
The first thing I want to say is to make
an announcement that Ilya
Yashin asked me to make. Just a couple of hours
ago, he finally received approval for
the Nemtsov March. It will take place on the 24th
of February. It will begin on Strastnoy Boulevard
at 1:00 p.m. with the formation of the columns, and then
the march itself—a traditional procession
in memory of Boris Nemtsov.
Please come. It’s both a way to honor
Boris’s memory and an opportunity to walk through the streets
of Moscow in order to say
what you want to say—what in other
places and at other times they don’t allow you
to do. February 24, 1:00 p.m., Strastnoy
Boulevard, the Nemtsov March. And I hope many
people will take part. At the very least,
I will be there. As usual, our
first topic is that our political
little one, our funny yet pathetic character,
Dmitry Medvedev, has really gone wild.
And I’m getting a lot of questions like, what
is happening with Medvedev? Why has Medvedev started
posting on Twitter again?
Very spirited, lively tweets. And as for me,
I’m banned there after the investigation *He Is Not Dimon to You*
(Navalny’s anti-corruption investigation about Medvedev), so I can’t see it directly.
I can only look from other people’s devices,
but I went there and saw
that indeed Dmitry, Dmitry Medvedev
has somehow perked up, and apparently
he imagined that it was 2004 again, or
2008, and that he can once again announce some
national projects. Look at this tweet:
“National projects are an effective instrument
for involving business... 1,000 initiatives worth
76 trillion rubles (about US$1.1 trillion), and by the end
of the year practical work will begin.”
So what does that mean? It means that by the end of the year
practical work will begin on
carving up 76 trillion rubles. We
know that Dmitry Medvedev
may be pathetic, and we may laugh at him,
but he is very good when it comes to
siphoning off money. He’s very good at it. In that area,
he’s simply an expert. Another tweet, and this one
is even better. It’s about
the economy and even geopolitics:
“The spatial development strategy—what
even is that?—will become the basis for
regional development. We will devote special attention
to priority geostrategic
territories: Crimea, Sevastopol, Kaliningrad,
the Far East, the North Caucasus,
and the Arctic.” Please tell me,
how are we supposed to understand
what “geostrategic territories” means? Why
is Smolensk Region not a geostrategic
territory? Why is Chelyabinsk
Region, with its poverty and terrible environment, not
a geostrategic territory? Why
is Krasnoyarsk Krai not a geostrategic
territory, but the Arctic is?
And then there are the borders too—Kaliningrad,
or Sevastopol, Crimea, the Far East,
the North Caucasus—so right here, all around
the edges of the country, we’ve got geostrategic
territories everywhere.
That’s where we’ll dump 76 trillion, while everything
else—where the majority
of the country’s population actually lives—well, that will be handled
on a leftover basis. So we see once again
that
they’re just spouting some kind of nonsense.
Nonsense on the one hand, and on the other hand,
76 trillion
rubles will be very real, very, very
real.
And thanks to that money—well, 76 trillion
is a long-term story—but already now
23 trillion has been announced, which will
be allocated over the course of several years. This
will all also be what’s called hard cash.
In suitcases, it will turn into splendid
wonderful palaces somewhere in Marbella,
in Spain, in France, and in all sorts of other
places, into all kinds of fancy things. And so
Dmitry Medvedev
is practically rubbing his hands together along with his
government. But besides that, of course,
besides the embezzlement,
his renewed energy is connected with the fact that he
understands how disliked he is in this country. Let’s
look at the latest approval ratings
published by the Levada Center: 66
percent do not approve of his performance.
That’s a huge number—actually much
higher than Putin’s disapproval rating,
much higher than the disapproval rating of
the State Duma. Russians dislike everyone, yes, but
Medvedev is the one they dislike most of all.
Him, his government—he is politically
one of the leading figures in terms of
negative ratings, one of the top anti-rating politicians.
In short, our unloved political little boy,
Dmitry Medvedev, wants to start a new
life, because for him this is very
important. After all, he has the United
Russia party—don’t forget that he
He is to lead this party into
the elections in September. Besides, he
wants to remain the head of government,
the prime minister.
Of course, he is in that position because he is
a close friend and trusted associate
of Putin in all sorts of shady dealings.
Putin trusts him, so he remains the head
of the government. But he still wants
to start a new political life so that
everyone forgets, "There’s no money, but hang in there"
and other things like that. He too has started talking about
some kind of geostrategic matters in general.
Lately, in fact,
this powerful man’s speech gives us
an excellent reason to look at a short,
just one-minute long, but very viral
video from this week, where we actually
get to see Medvedev’s team. These are truly
genuinely classic
Medvedev guys. The video, which
was posted by some Telegram channel—I don’t even
know who they are, Medvedev’s enemies or
Medvedev’s friends, maybe even those specifically in
the video itself—but now we will see
a private jet carrying
several people. Let’s watch this
video clip: it’s one minute long, and it’s wonderful.
[applause]
and
come in
is that you
[music]
[music]
Wonderful people, such a heartfelt video—it really
draws you in, makes you want to sing along with them.
My fate, my fate.
They say, "the agrarian lobby."
The agrarian lobby. Who do we see there? That is
Arkady Dvorkovich, Medvedev’s longtime aide
everywhere during his time as prime minister
and during his presidency. He was basically
Medvedev’s brain.
At one time he was a fairly normal
guy, but unfortunately he stopped being
a completely normal guy. But
he got scared, lost his nerve, became corrupt—I don’t
know. In any case, Dvorkovich now, of course,
can no longer be considered even conditionally
decent. Sitting there too is Natalya Timakova,
the longtime press secretary, the
government’s chief PR person and
Medvedev’s top aide.
Now she has moved to VEB (Vnesheconombank, the state development corporation), and
she will no longer be receiving some kind of cash
in the Kremlin or the White House (the Russian government building), but rather
an official gigantic salary from
VEB. So she was given this
nice, lucrative sinecure.
Also there is
a lady there by the name of Natalya Timakova—
I mean, a woman who was singing most soulfully.
She is the former head of the Kremlin protocol office,
and those who have followed my
work for a long time have read posts where I
wrote a lot about her, because she was one of those
people back in the more innocent days, when
a Bentley still surprised all of us—the mere existence of a Bentley
owned by an official was shocking. She had one,
and she openly listed it in her asset declaration:
a Bentley automobile.
Well, I wrote a lot about it, because
how exactly could the head—well, the person in charge—
of Kremlin protocol, a person
whose job is to say, "You walk over here,
and please put
sparkling water here, and fruit compote there"—how
did she get it? It’s unclear. And of course,
of course, there too
is Mr. Tkachev, the former governor
of Krasnodar Krai (a region in southern Russia).
The former agriculture minister, such a
wonderful man, and there they are drinking to
the agrarian lobby. But really, they are
precisely the agrarian lobby, and they are Medvedev’s
agrarian lobby. If anyone has forgotten, specially
for you I will now show 32 seconds from
the film *He Is Not Dimon to You*,
where we explained in considerable detail that
Tkachev is Medvedev’s business partner
in these various ventures and
his vineyard-related amusements, at least
in Krasnodar Krai. Let’s watch
30 seconds: from the moment he acquires
the vineyards, Medvedev becomes simply
a true fan of winemaking and
actively promotes the interests of the industry in
the government that he heads.
He asks the Ministry of Agriculture and its
head, Alexander Tkachev, to
develop comprehensive measures
for state support of wine producers.
Agriculture Minister Tkachev strongly
supports all of this, and not without reason: today
Medvedev’s vineyards
are managed by the same director as the personal
vineyards of the Tkachev family. So, in other words,
this really is, in fact,
Medvedev’s team. And among other things, these
76 trillion
rubles allocated for—what was it again—
geostrategic territories and within the framework
of the spatial development
strategy—these are the very people who will, among others,
be scooping up that money in fairly generous handfuls,
and stuffing it
into their own pockets, and at VEB
where this is being done by
Timakova, and in various other structures
where others work, and in private
business where Tkachev works, and so on
and so forth. I saw a lot of disapproving
comments, like, "How awful,
they’re drinking on a plane, just look at
those faces, look, they’re singing there." Well,
let’s be honest:
probably now I’m supposed to say, "Oooh, how awful,"
something similar to what Dmitry said.
When they asked Peskov, he said, well,
there was nothing like that there, and it doesn’t actually break the law.
I mean, come on, you can say a lot
about these people—specifically about
this video. They’re sitting there, drinking
on a plane—that is, doing what
roughly every second Russian does
when they end up on a plane: turn on a mobile
phone and sing a little song.
If I showed you some Anti-Corruption Foundation party,
it would look very similar,
except they’d be singing songs by the singer MakSim
about roads and things like that. So really,
the issue with these people
is not that they’re boozing on a plane, but that
they’re boozing on a private jet.
Who even are they? We don’t know when
this video was filmed, but even if it
was shot when they were all still holding high-ranking
positions, why the hell were they entitled to
a private jet at all? Why are they sitting there?
So they’re somehow above everyone else? If it’s business, then let them
drink at the airport like all ordinary
people—sit there, pour drinks, drink, turn on
that thing, and sing, “Ah, my fate, my fate.”
For the agricultural lobby—people do that, they can
do that—but why is it happening on
a private aircraft? Whose money paid for
this flight? If it was state money, then we
want an explanation.
Why is there some, excuse my language, random guy from
the hill—Medvedev’s aide—on the plane,
his female aide, some PR woman, some Amber or whatever,
who knows what—and this Tkachev? Why should we
be paying for the plane? It’s a fairly
expensive indulgence. If you just
without even digging into it,
quickly google how much a private jet costs,
you’ll see that even a small plane
to rent for a flight to
St. Petersburg
will cost you €2,000.
If you want to fly to Amsterdam, it
will cost you 2.1 million
rubles—that is, €28,000. I assume
they weren’t flying to St. Petersburg,
but somewhere farther. In any case, this
flight—just this trip for these people—
cost several million rubles.
Most likely, we paid for it, and that
is the problem. The fact that they’re drinking—
fine, whatever, that’s not a big deal. It’s not like they’re
causing a drunken scene,
not smashing things, not tearing up the white upholstery, not doing
anything terrible. What is terrible is that
these random, unclear people are sitting on a plane, on
a private jet. And those of us who’ve been around a while, and
politics-watchers in general, older people like me, they
instantly remembered where they had seen
something similar before: efficient
managers flying in a plane with a white
interior. Let’s take a look. Here is
the famous campaign video for the Union
of Right Forces party
from 1999 or 2003—but this already happened.
So there are some guys flying along, I don’t
know—there’s Boris Nemtsov, we can see him,
he’s in this group too—they’re flying
in a private jet over Russia and
discussing important matters, and of course they’ve got
pens in their hands, and they sit there
looking thoughtful and making notes in
notebooks, and some of them have laptops, and these are
the efficient managers. I mean, really,
this regime is constantly
trying to distance itself from the 1990s, saying the ’90s were
awful—even aesthetically, even just
look at the previous authorities, Chubais and
all the rest—and the current ones, they’re all
basically the same. The only difference is that back then they
were sober, with pens and thoughtful
faces, flying in a plane with a white interior,
whereas now it’s already “Ah, my fate, my fate,”
they’ve blasted it from an iPhone or iPad and are sipping cognac.
It’s all the same. It’s actually very interesting,
because, first of all, these are
literally the same people. They
came out of the 1990s, only after many, many, many rounds of
mimicry. Back then, before they got their hands on
power, they climbed into this plane, and they’re still
flying in it. It’s just that now they behave
much more brazenly, and even film it on
a mobile phone, not really afraid
that someone will see them or judge them.
Send me your questions with the hashtag Russia
of the Future on Twitter, and I’ll
answer them.
And on a closely related topic,
there’s Medvedev’s uprising—United Russia’s uprising,
the party led by Medvedev. As
I already said, they have elections in September,
so they need to do something cool right now
because Medvedev’s ratings are lower
than the baseboard, and United Russia’s ratings have already
gone so far down they’ve hit rock bottom—they’re
lying in the basement. And there will be elections—
elections in Moscow, there will be elections
in St. Petersburg. United Russia needs
to come up with something new, cool, trendy, and
youthful. What’s the trendiest, most
youthful word right now? You know, the kind that
when you say it, immediately creates this
sense of something very smart, very
advanced, very technological, like
the future. If there were an audience sitting here—by the way,
I regularly think about
inviting some audience, maybe twenty people,
so it would be more fun for me to host
these programs—you would all probably
shout in unison: startup, startup! That’s
the word—startup. They stick it everywhere, and you won’t
believe it: United Russia has launched
a political startup. Let’s watch
the video we found after they had
posted it on Twitter first; I retweeted it
and wrote, “Ho-ho, a startup,” and they
got scared
and deleted it, but later I found it.
a little video on the website
let's watch 1 minute and 9 seconds
this is United Russia's political startup
it's important because with this startup
they're going to hammer us with it
roughly from next month until
September they'll be showing us various
people, so let's just, well,
prepare ourselves for what we're about to see and
take a look at what United Russia is in its
new image: PolitStart
my mentor never let me relax
I'm a journalist myself, but meeting so many people
speaking, talking to people
getting tangled up and then immediately solving problems
mentorship is a modern
personnel development tool, and the project
PolitStart puts it into practice to the fullest
United Russia should also help
promising party members grow and attract
the very best, most talented
and boldest people into its ranks. Ahead of
the elections, we launched
a new project, PolitStart
during the primary vote we had
a record number of young
participants: 37 percent, and 20 percent
of the party's candidates were under 35 years old
we need to build our political personnel pipeline in advance
together we are stronger
and we'll have more opportunities. Are you still
waiting? Use this opportunity
to take part in PolitStart
Are you still waiting? Use this
opportunity to take part in the project
PolitStart. This is what United Russia's new policy looks like
toward young people and toward
the more advanced part of
society in general
and I'm curious—not that I want to
take part in the PolitStart project
or that it's some great project—but this is going to be
the kind of list of people that we won't
call a hit list, right, but it will be
basically a lustration list (a list for future political purges)
everyone who signs up there will regret it later
but anyway, I went onto this
website, and now you can go there and
take a look
click the registration button
you can see the country's finest people: Medvedev
a crook and a thief
Turchak, who allegedly ordered the murder of a journalist
the country's finest people are urging you to join
208 people have signed up with them so far for
PolitStart. For comparison, here in
St. Petersburg right now, for this
municipal campaign, 3,022 people have signed up
but I have no doubt that of course
as things move along
they'll pad the numbers there however they can, and besides
there will be some real money involved, and that
it'll be very interesting to watch how
all of this develops
it'll be very interesting to watch because
apparently the Kremlin, judging by the number of
speakers backing it and Medvedev's involvement
isn't just casually supporting it anymore
this isn't some nonsense project—this is clearly
a serious thing. After the first
protests—after the 'He Is Not Dimon to You' rallies (anti-corruption protests)
they saw a huge number of young people in the
streets, and they tried to flirt with them
through
rapper Ptakha and Alisa Vox, through all sorts of
stupid things, but this is already a more
thought-out step: they're offering young people
the chance to become the new careerists
to worm their way in somewhere close to Medvedev
to become members of United Russia. They're saying
guys, there's a feeding trough here for you
but don't think you can't get in here
because our broad backs are blocking the way
we'll give you a little path, and it's
called PolitStart—come on in
what I like about
PolitStart is that, first of all, we'll
see a huge number of crooks there
idiots, scams, manipulations, all the rest of it
and secondly
well, this is basically going to be
a confrontation: we have Smart Voting
against United Russia
and they have PolitStart and all the rest of that nonsense
it's always wonderful when they
they
kind of show that, in the end,
there will still be hypocrisy, it will still be
lies, everyone will understand, everyone will
see that it's staged propaganda, and this kind of
little video will be everywhere, and of course
you'll see that it's just
disgusting—the very essence of hypocrisy is this
kind of road for those who have decided to become
young United Russia loyalists. This week there was also
a demonstration of the possible road for
those who do not want to be young United Russia loyalists
and that road, as it turns out, ends
with a pretty serious barrier. An academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences
yes, a full academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences
was asked to propose an initiative
to restrict young scientists from leaving Russia
because, in the academician's view,
this would help prevent the
outflow of talented young people abroad
the problem is enormous; we can see from polls
as was said on the previous program, that 40
percent of young people want to leave
Russia, so the problem really is
very serious. But in this wonderful academician's concept
he simply
decided to lock everyone in
to tell them: you'll stay here developing whatever
things, and you'll sit in your room under
house arrest, basically. The state would
cover students' education costs
and after that they would be required
to work in Russian science for no less than
For 15 years, if you don’t work in
Russian science for at least 15 years and
leave, for example, you’ll have to pay back
the money the state spent on your education, and
that raises a big question for me here,
a huge question for the academician and for
the people who propose things like this:
tell me, please, how is it that the state
that pays for students’ education—where
did it get that money?
I always thought that students
receive free education because
their parents pay taxes, and because
those students will pay taxes in
the future, and a person who receives
an education is not getting it as charity
at all.
They have every right to it; they don’t owe
anything to anyone, including Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Georgy Georgiev.
Why the hell should they also have to
pay money back to someone? This young
person—any student in Russia—by virtue
of having a Russian citizen’s passport
has a share in
the oil and gas revenues, in the gold, the diamonds,
the oil—whatever else there is
in our country—all of that also belongs
to that student on exactly the same basis as it does
to Academician Georgy Georgiev of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and in general
it’s completely unclear why anyone should have to
pay anything back. But nevertheless,
policy is moving in exactly that direction; I actually think
that one way or another this will be implemented,
because, look, this is a very
simple thing. Right now we’re working with our
trade union, and among others we get letters from
a huge number of researchers.
But if you’re paid a salary of 30,000
rubles a month in Moscow
and in Novosibirsk you’re paid
17,000 rubles, and you understand perfectly well that
you’re a young scientist and you can go to
the States and earn seven thousand dollars
a month, then the thought immediately occurs to you
that
$7,000 a month is better than
17,000 rubles a month. It’s not even that you
want to get as far away from Russia as possible—you
may very well love your country. But if they’ve
stolen everything and pay you 17,000
a month, and don’t even fulfill those miserable
May decrees (Putin’s policy directives issued in May) and don’t pay you the promised
100,000 or 90,000 rubles a month, you’ll leave.
That’s why.
But it would seem fairly obvious
that if we don’t want
young scientists to leave,
then we need to pay them, give them proper incentives,
and we need to give them the opportunity
to work and do science here. That’s how
it works properly. In other words, by these
methods it’s much easier to keep everyone
here, keep young scientists here, and train new ones.
But apparently the Academy of Sciences hasn’t
figured that out, and they just want to shut the borders
and lock everything down—a sharashka-style approach (a Soviet-era prison research lab system).
After all, Sergei Korolev
invented a great deal in the field of space exploration,
the founder of our space
industry, despite the fact that he was imprisoned,
was in a sharashka, and as is well known, his jaw was
broken during interrogation. And still, yes,
we created the Soviet space program. But
with methods like that, it seems to me, in the modern
world we won’t achieve much, and
the only thing we’ll accomplish is
to cement our backwardness. So if
this kind of bill starts
moving forward, I will be firmly
against it, and I urge everyone to oppose it decisively.
People get an education because their
parents paid taxes, and they themselves pay
taxes. People get an education because
they have a right to that public budget, and
they are not obliged to pay anything back to anyone.
Their parents have already paid. So, a lot
of questions. I see that Streltsov asks me:
“Alexei, jokes on TNT (a Russian TV channel) about you—
does that mean the media is starting to slip out
from under the Kremlin’s control, starting to move away from the Kremlin?”
No, I don’t think so. TNT—
there was just one brave, wonderful
comedian who did one little sketch about
me. If anyone saw it, he was joking precisely
about the fact that my surname is supposedly forbidden,
that you’re not allowed to say “Navalny,” and all that. But
you know, in our system where everything is forbidden,
one brave person says a few brave
words, and everyone goes, “Wow, incredible, at least
someone actually said the name Navalny.” But
there’s nothing extraordinary about it, yet it
makes a huge impression on everyone.
They think it means something, but it means nothing except
that there is one somewhat brave
comedian, and that’s all. There are also many questions
about the autonomous internet,
the bill that was introduced, and everything connected
with it.
How is it—the State Duma wants to keep
root servers in Russia. You’ve probably
seen lots of very funny videos
connected with the fact that people in the State Duma
are asked how the internet in general
works, and they say amazingly
funny things. But nevertheless, they are
the “experts,” and they have declared that
we need a sovereign internet. I’m not too
worried about it,
because the only thing I’m sure of
is that those 20 billion
that will be allocated for
isolating the Russian internet from
the rest of the internet
will be stolen. I have no doubt about that.
That’s a law of life, an empirical fact. They’ll buy
some kind of equipment at seven times
the real price and skim off the difference—that’s a fact. It’s just
Our government is so incompetent
that there are some things it simply won’t even be able to isolate.
The Russian internet, though—they can
isolate it the crude way, just by taking an axe to
some cables.
Well, they can isolate quite a lot of things, but I don’t
think this is really possible. In China, the internet
is isolated in a certain sense, yes—but not
completely, because there, alongside the
development of the internet, all those
domestic alternatives were built up—they have their own version of Twitter, their own
version of YouTube, and so on and so forth. They have
everything Chinese there. We have nothing. We
only have Yandex, the search engine,
which is constantly being strangled, it seems to me,
and soon it’ll be strangled completely. So if they
isolate the Russian internet from
the global one, there will be nothing left here. And I
don’t think this is, first of all, even possible
technically, whatever the Kremlin may think.
And actually, for now I don’t
think that’s the real goal.
The real goal is
for some shady firms
to get 20 billion rubles and
split those 20 billion rubles among themselves. That’s
what this bill is really being introduced for.
Can the internet be blocked in some
extreme situations—war, a state of emergency,
martial law? Sure. But they can also, I don’t know,
just shut it off entirely sometimes, like in Ingushetia (a republic in Russia’s North Caucasus),
or cut internet access by half,
or shut down mobile service. In other words,
only decisions of that kind are
possible.
But they can’t be made permanent.
Give me a couple more questions. So—
the internet, the internet, and internet isolation.
Isolation, autonomy—well, yes, they
will keep moving in that direction.
Once again, my answer
is this: will they do something
to make life harder for me, for you, and
for people like us—so that it becomes harder
for me to make this program and for you to watch it?
The answer is yes. They’ll come up with something like that
in the next couple of years. And we’ll come up with something
in response to whatever they come up with.
What will we come up with in response? Well, they’re blocking
our Smart Voting right now, and we’re
inventing some kind of
gadget or workaround that will help bypass
the blocks. Will they be able to make the
internet autonomous and cut off from the outside world?
The answer is no—they won’t be able to do that.
So there’s no need to go looking for some new internet again.
Alexei, what would you say about the so-called ‘sovereign internet’?
What do you think about the statement
by a State Duma deputy that it is necessary
to distribute food products free of charge
shortly before their expiration date
to Russians in need? Well, there are two
issues here.
One is food, and the other is foreign food products
that are currently under sanctions, and
food products that are nearing the end of their shelf life.
As for sanctioned goods, their destruction
is simply a crime against the backdrop of
the huge number of poor people in Russia.
As for expiration dates, that
still falls within a certain
area of market-based decision-making, so retail chains,
manufacturers, and everyone else
should be addressing it in a comprehensive way. But overall, I
believe destroying food is immoral.
“Putin, help us—we voted for you.”
That cry is heard regularly in one
part of Russia or another. This time it
came
from the Omsk region, from the village of Apollonovka. There
there is no communication, no normal life,
no heating,
no roads. Desperate people recorded
an appeal to Putin, and
I think it deserves for us
to watch it, because it frames the issue
in political terms. Basically,
it’s like: “Man, we voted for you—what’s
going on?” Here is this 50-second appeal to
Putin from
Apollonovka in the Kirov region: “Dear
President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin,
teachers and school staff are addressing you
on
behalf of the residents of the village of Apollonovka,
in the Kolyosky district of the Omsk region.
"
“In the 21st century, the century of innovative
technologies, our village has no mobile service,
no internet access,
and the problem remains unresolved.
We live with no water,
no gas,
no communications, no proper medical
care.
“We cannot come to terms with the fact that we are being
deprived of
the most basic opportunities to survive.
“We went to the polls and chose you in the hope
of a better life.
“We ask you, our President, not to leave
our appeal without attention.”
You see, we hear a lot about
breakthroughs, roads, digitalization, startups,
advancement, power—some academician
submits a bill against students,
or in favor of banning travel abroad, while here
there are people who can’t even leave their village.
They appeal to the president: “We voted for you,”
and I find it interesting that this is such a
very cleverly composed
appeal. Notice this: you can’t
say they are trolling, but they clearly
meant it that way—an age of technology,
innovative development—they’re always going on about
this innovative development, and these people say:
“We have no mobile service, we have no road,
we can’t leave the village,” and it would seem...
anything that serves the interests of the Kremlin, of Putin, for example
they like to give
a kitten to a girl or a puppy to a boy, or
something like that, yes
to say, you know, Vladimir Putin, in
between swimming and playing hockey
and also
solving Syria’s problems, saw the appeal from
the residents of Apollonovka and thanked them for
the fact that they had voted for him, and switched on
mobile service and repaired the road so that
they could get in and out of the village, but
they did not do that, and they cannot
do it, because in reality
Putin’s ability to improve life in the
country is exhausted by the fact that he
can give a girl a kitten
because his system—even though there is money in it—
cannot make anything happen; they
are afraid of these appeals
they recoil from them because
tomorrow 100 more places like Apollonovka will pop up
or 1,000, because every village in Russia is like
an Apollonovka, especially if we take
any village 50 kilometers (about 31 miles) from Moscow, and they
understand that solving these problems
is impossible, and they do not even want to solve them, and
so the realm of the possible is kittens
for girls, while the realm of what they really want is
simply to steal everything there is
but separately, personally, what really gets me
is this thing that, against the backdrop of
the appeal from Apollonovka, we are already seeing
these Medvedev-style tweets, right
I’ll repeat for the third time: the strategy
for spatial development for
geostrategic territories—seventy-
six trillion rubles
for some kind of ruble chimera
you allocate seventy-six trillion
rubles when you actually have
real, living people—Russians—who are
standing there at a school saying, we have no
mobile service, no road, and they will get
nothing—absolutely nothing
except that they will watch on
television that
they will be told about Ukraine’s problems
while in the background they will be skimming off those
76 billion. In these
appeals I see a very important
a very important political shift
because generally everyone always appeals like this:
Putin, help us, Putin, help us. But this
appeal, despite the fact that it is
very polite—the woman at the school, yes, she
in essence, of course, has an aggressive
character—passive-aggressive—and that is
absolutely right. That is, the residents
recorded an absolutely correct appeal
it should be even harsher, and this
is changing
the rhetoric is changing, the attitude of the residents
of our country—in Apollonovka no one
believes that Putin can somehow
fix anything there, and that is why they are coming forward with
appeals like these. I hope that in
Apollonovka
it will finally dawn on them that
if they block their own road
it will lead nowhere
because their roads are effectively blocked already
well, if they somehow took their
Apollonovka road and got across
something—forded a stream or whatever—and crossed their
road, drove to Omsk, and blocked
a major highway there, then the federal
authorities would much more quickly
and much more willingly begin to solve their
problems
Let’s talk about Putin’s “long will,” and you
are now saying that actually
this is explosive—what is Putin’s “long
will”? But this term was coined by the same
person who called me
“a flock of crows”—our wonderful Alexander
Beglov, who wants to become governor
of St. Petersburg
As I already said, he does amazing
very funny things. Let’s start with
the “crows”
So, Beglov got upset about our
project in St. Petersburg, and he
while meeting with workers there—let’s once again
look at the quote—casually
says: this is why I started talking about elections
to local self-government, because
all sorts of crows have flown in to us
wanting to teach us something, but we here
are no fools ourselves, and we can develop the city and
we can develop local self-government
too, and in general... then he went on
speaking, it’s just too long a quote
So, there is supposedly a St. Petersburg school
of governance that has always been better than
the Moscow one, and basically the idea is
very simple
what is this, you came here from Moscow and now you’re going to
take part in our elections? I am not
running in the St. Petersburg elections; I
really did come here
but all the candidates we had were
Petersburgers, residents of St. Petersburg
and clearly better than Beglov; just looking at
the snow problem, they understand what
needs to be done with the city
And Alexander Beglov means that
there exists some kind of
super-authentic Petersburger, an alpha
Petersburger, an uber-Petersburger, far
cooler than just some
ordinary Petersburgers who came to us and
signed up to run for municipal
deputy positions, and I’m curious to see—I’m
opening Wikipedia together with you right
now to find out just what kind of
Petersburger this Beglov is, and what kind of
super-mega Petersburgers they are who apparently do not need
what's the point, what is there to advise all the others on
the governors and mayors of this wonderful
Gordon, let's take a look, and here they are
Sobchak, the city of Chita
Yakovlev, after him there was the city of Olyokminsk
then Beglov—his term was very, very short
a brief period there before Matviyenko as well
acting governor, and from the side, to us
came, you see, this one from above
this “St. Petersburger” came to us from Baku
I have nothing against someone born in Baku, well
but then don't go telling us that they
are some kind of special Petersburgers. Next,
there was Matviyenko from Shepetivka, then there was
Poltavchenko too, and off to the side we see some kind of
there's a sort of Baku hometown circle that came in, and
and now again Beglov from the same
same side, and don't come back to me with questions
not with wishes about who should be the head, but don't
show off there, please
good Lord, no need—for you of all people, it's not worth
telling us that you're some kind of super-mega
Petersburgers. I mean, a Petersburger is
someone for whom it doesn't matter where you came from—whether from
Baku
I'm from Moscow Oblast, and in general I lived in
a million different military towns
but I'm still a Muscovite, and let them try to say
that I'm not a real Muscovite
if you live in St. Petersburg, love this
city, feel it—then you're a Petersburger
but right now I hope that everyone from
St. Petersburg who is watching this video
will simply be filled, because of this situation,
with righteous anger, and in September, in September
in the upcoming election, Beglov
as the would-be head, will really get it, because
because, well, well, well, it's just outrageous
well, you see, he also—having come from Baku—
acts like he gets to decide who the real Petersburgers are
the real ones, but much more—well, that's the absurd part
another thing: at that meeting he brought in
a super-mega meme called
“the long will of Putin.” Let's watch—43
seconds. It's about how, well, sort of like the poet
and singer Monetochka said: in the '90s people were being killed
everyone was running around naked, children weren't being fed
and if not for Putin's long will alone
none of this would have happened—he saved the country
43 seconds. The acting governor
Beglov is a crazy man. This never
leaves me indifferent
indifferent—the situation when all this
Putinist
vile, lying filth starts telling us
about the terrible '90s. In those terrible
'90s we suffered so much—just look, he
says, come on, remember, guys, those were not easy
times for all of us
let's take a look at the biography of Alexander
Beglov. From 1985 to 1988, head of the department
for construction in the executive committee of the Leningrad City Soviet
you understand, he received—young viewers of my
program probably don't even know what a ration pack was
but I remember it: a bag of food
buckwheat, canned goods
a little bottle of champagne—all this
nomenklatura
this nomenklatura mug, you see, was feeding itself
from special distribution channels
and now tells us about the hard times. In
1989–1990, the Leningrad regional committee of the CPSU
that means an even more substantial little package of
food every week. He oversaw
housing development, microdistricts—that is,
various residential districts are listed. 1990–1991:
well, if things were so hard, then Beglov probably
went underground and fought against, I don't know,
some awful person there
who destroyed our country in the '90s, right?
No—he was deputy head of the directorate
for capital construction of the executive committee
of the Leningrad City Soviet
He was part of the very same authorities that created
the problems he now sits there
talking about as if everything was so terrible. From 1991 to
1997, co-owner of a joint German-Russian
enterprise
with the classy name Melazel, almost like
Azazel. The company had major
partnership ties with the Committee for
External Economic Relations, which
was headed by Vladimir Putin. That was where
the first embezzled, stolen money was made; that was where
they got acquainted. In other words, throughout the '90s they
enjoyed the fruits of those '90s. They
made the '90s, and they carried out those very
reforms, and now these same people
are trying to sell us stories about a terrible country and the long
will. But since we're talking about this, let's
look at what Putin, with his “long will,” was doing
in the '90s, in those terrible '90s. Did he
portray himself as some Colonel Kvachkov-like figure
go underground and fight
against the anti-people government? No, Putin
was that very power
in the '90s, and an adviser to Sobchak (Anatoly Sobchak, former mayor of St. Petersburg) from May 1990; from 1991
from 1991 onward he sat in the government
as acting head of the committee for
external relations of Leningrad
so, in the very wildest chaos of the '90s, he
was a high-ranking official
in the country's second-largest city. He
made those '90s, and when someone had nothing
to eat and had to be taken to a factory canteen
to feed the children, that was directly Putin's doing, because
let's look at, let's remember what
Putin's main achievement was in those
'90s. The main headline about Vladimir
Putin in the St. Petersburg newspapers of the time
was the headline saying that the KGB colonel had ruined
Petersburg. He was selling precious metals
from strategic reserves there to
the Baltics at knockdown prices and stealing
that money, splitting it with all the rest of
that thieving gang
that had formed around Mayor Sobchak. That was
the super-corrupt original city hall, and in this
the people in the super-corrupt city administration
were stealing St. Petersburg residents' money, stealing
the money of those very children who didn't have enough there
they were taken to a factory cafeteria
so what did Putin do next?
In 1996, Sobchak lost the
election.
And where does Putin end up? In the Kremlin. Who
invited Putin to the Kremlin? The number one
oligarch and the number one corrupt figure of that time,
Pal Palych Borodin (Pavel Borodin) — some of you probably
remember this man, the property manager
for the president's office. The first major
corruption scandal of the 1990s involved the company
Mabetex. The Swiss were renovating
the Kremlin and were paying Borodin some kind of
kickbacks. They were caught over those kickbacks, and this whole
scheme came to light. Putin worked for this man,
who was the main corrupt figure of that time.
Of course, the scale of his
corruption, by today's standards,
looks almost laughable — only
they stole some tens of millions of
dollars.
But Putin worked with Pal Palych
Borodin.
Since 1996, very much a man of the '90s,
this man was in the Kremlin, and he bears responsibility for all of this.
responsibility.
He is the '90s, and now he tells us about
some kind of long-term will. What long-term will?
There was only a long arm there,
a very long arm that reached
into everything
and kept grabbing, grabbing, grabbing whatever it could. Guys, I
say this constantly, and I urge you
to remember it and talk about it, because
all of Putin's political rhetoric
is built around some supposed fight against the '90s,
as if we somehow represent the '90s, as if
the opposition wants
to bring back the '90s. But what do I have to do with the '90s?
Like most of you, back then I was...
going to school in the early '90s.
Putin was already Sobchak's adviser then, while I
was still going to school. He was already
selling precious metals abroad at
knockdown prices.
And I was still in school, so the '90s are them,
that's who they are, and we must not give them
the slightest chance to rant endlessly
about how the '90s were, supposedly,
Berezovsky or Yeltsin. No — it was
Berezovsky, Berezovsky, Yeltsin, Putin,
, Borodin, Pal Palych, and all the rest.
That whole gang — Chubais, Kudrin, Beglov —
those damned people, that's what the '90s are: the very same
people who destroyed everything and
robbed everyone, and
and who are still doing it now.
It's just that oil prices rose
dramatically. Even though they
started stealing ten times more, still
all the same,
there was enough money for some people, and the economy
started moving a little simply because there was suddenly a huge amount of
oil money. Damn, I've devoted
a huge part of the program to Beglov,
a massive part of the program, because
in September, the main elections
will be the gubernatorial election in St. Petersburg, and
we need to watch it more closely than
anything else. And the candidate for the post is the most
ridiculous, pathetic guy, and you can see it
even from the way they're now running
their campaign around this snow removal.
Those of you who haven't been to
St. Petersburg recently
might say: why the hell do you
keep talking about this snow all the time?
If you had been there, you would understand
why everyone is talking about it, because
this is — maybe put this photo
full screen to show it now — this is
literally
a post-apocalyptic photograph
showing that St. Petersburg
now looks like a city from — if
you needed to shoot a film with clouds
of devastation. And I also thought that during
the Siege (of Leningrad in World War II), they cleared snow better than
they do now.
And Beglov came up with a really brilliant response
to all this. The city residents can see
that nothing is being cleared, everything is monstrous,
awful — and they're taking pictures. So Beglov
said that all officials should
go out and clear snow from the streets. And it's a stupid
decision — an ultra-mega stupid decision — because
to clear snow from the streets,
you need to organize the machinery,
organize snow removal — in other words, it's
a major logistical operation, and that's the only way
it works. You can't clear it with a shovel — well,
I mean, you can with a shovel if you try: here's
some snow lying here, and we'll move it into
a huge pile over here.
But you can't actually remove it that way, and the officials understand that perfectly well.
They understand it, and basically they don't care.
So they just want
to pose for photos. And someone filmed from a balcony
very briefly — let's show 15 seconds
of how it actually works, how
St. Petersburg officials report
on how they clear the snow:
pose and get a nicely staged
photograph.
Photo report done — they came out, pretended to be snow clearers,
worked a bit, and left.
There actually is an effective way
to clear snow. If you're not an official, if you're
an ordinary person, it works exactly
the same as last year. It all sounds like
a joke — I didn't believe it at first either — but it
really works. Look, in Nizhny Novgorod
there was a huge pile of snow
blocking cars from passing. Here it was,
and then it was gone — someone just took it away, not by doing something stupid again.
They wrote "Navalny" (Alexei Navalny, the Russian opposition politician), and instantly...
for several days there was this huge pile,
and nobody wanted to deal with it.
But if you write "Navalny," they clean it up right away.
I talked about this on the program.
You’ve probably heard this joke, that in
St. Petersburg they do it a little differently.
They write "Navalny," but they can’t really remove it
at all, because nothing is actually
organized there, it’s a complete failure, so a janitor comes
and stirs up the snow so that there won’t be
the word "Navalny" visible. It turns into a horrible pile
of snow that stays there. By the way, the same thing
happened in Kirov too. Someone was amusing themselves
like that—as a joke, basically—and they
wrote "Navalny," you see.
And immediately the municipal services department arrived
and cleared the snow. This is an important and serious
issue, one that right now affects
Bashkortostan in particular, and in general affects a huge
number of cities.
Today I saw news that in
Kuzbass, black snow is falling.
Black snowdrifts—but I can see in
the photos that the snowdrifts really are black.
Krasnoyarsk is suffering from environmental
problems. The environmental problems in our country are colossal. But
what is happening right now in the city of Sibay
in Bashkortostan is just something else, absolutely
unthinkable. There, you can see this kind of
haze. There is this enormous open-pit mine
that belongs to the Uchaly Mining and
Processing Plant. There,
they kept extracting raw materials,
hauling them out, digging and digging,
making money and making money. And really,
the entire surrounding area should have
been
incredibly enriched—excuse the expression—
because the owners of the plant
were getting something out of it, but the people should have
been getting wages, the city should have
been receiving payments of some kind. None of that
happened. All that remained was a pit that
was improperly sealed off, and
now this smoke is coming out of it—this is
sulfur dioxide, and right now the concentration of
sulfur dioxide there exceeds the limit by 37 times, meaning
people are literally breathing poisonous
air. This is not an exaggeration. In fact,
they are breathing poisonous air, and their
health is suffering badly because of it.
With each passing day, their
life expectancy is decreasing. What is
happening around this?
It’s just unbelievable. This
plant belongs to
Iskander Makhmudov. He is ranked 16th on the
list of the richest people. In
2018, his fortune was $7.3
billion. It would be logical if
someone said, "Hey, Makhmudov, this is your mine,
you’ve got $7 billion, you made a lot of money
from this pit,
so let’s solve this problem. Start paying
people compensation, do something." You know
what they did? The only thing
they did was install
industrial fans that
try to blow the smoke away so that it goes
simply in another direction instead of toward the most
densely populated areas. But when even the slightest
breeze
blows toward the city, naturally all
that poisonous filth goes there. And there are already
some rallies taking place
and public gatherings about it. But how are the authorities
responding? It’s unbelievable. Right now there is an acting
governor there,
an acting governor who is also
going to run in the upcoming September election,
a man named Radiy Khabirov.
A disgusting crook, he spent many years in
the Presidential Administration, a real crook
and election falsifier. For a while he was
parked elsewhere and made head of
Krasnogorsk in the Moscow Region.
He failed at absolutely everything there that could be failed.
And now they abruptly promoted him and
appointed him to the Republic of Bashkortostan.
Please look at how he
talks to people. At 0:47 he
is asked questions about Sibay, and this is how he
reacts so nervously.
Acting head of the republic,
the acting governor of Bashkortostan, with your permission—
if anything happens, immediately
to the rails—in the event of any disturbance of public order,
if there are any provocative actions,
we have the authority and the ability to deal with it.
As for provocations, I
am telling you: we do not need...
Just answer responsibly.
No one here is afraid of you.
Listen to what kind of
scoundrel he is. People live there.
I can imagine it: I live there, I have
two children, Zakhar goes to school, Dasha goes
to school, and I understand that in the apartment they
sit with the windows sealed shut, and all the more so
when they go outside, they are breathing sulfur dioxide,
sulfur dioxide.
Its concentration exceeds the limit by 37 times—they are breathing poison.
My children are breathing poison. I do not like that.
You come outside, and then
you get a governor who doesn’t tear his hair out,
who doesn’t say, "Yes, I’m going to
write to Putin right now, let Makhmudov do something,
we need to declare a state of emergency."
Declare it.
But they are not declaring a state of emergency,
because declaring a state of emergency
would mean admitting that harm is being done
to people, and they could demand compensation.
It would mean that operations at this mine
must be stopped, that all of this must be acknowledged.
It means that
the oligarch Makhmudov will have to do something.
to pay—no, that isn't done, but this is
here
the face of the nomenklatura (the Soviet-style ruling bureaucracy)
and they look at people who are breathing
poison and say, well, that means
wearing—public order violations, no, here we won't
suppose he's thinking about rallies, you understand
he isn't thinking about the fact that people are being poisoned, he
immediately tells them: the main thing is, don't
hold rallies here, because solving this
problem is not within my authority, but
dispersing you, jailing you, that is
fining you—that is within my authority
absolutely shameless—a person just as
shameless
the mayor of Sibay (a city in Bashkortostan) who came there to a
meeting with residents and said that those who
go out to these rallies are goats and
"cop excrement," I'm quoting—that's what
the absence of elections means, yes, but in
Bashkiria (Bashkortostan), there are no elections, let's be honest
let's say it plainly: everything there is rigged one hundred
percent where needed. Just imagine that
a city's mayor says something like that to its residents
who—well, they didn't just come
to whine, like, we don't like this, we want
all buses to be free, or
why did you put in a pink flower bed there, and
the roses are white, but we want the roses to be
mixed—white and
beige. No, they're saying: dude, you're
poisoning us, and you call us goats in the literal
sense—in the literal sense, that's what he said
there's just a huge pit there, and it wasn't
properly reclaimed; they did nothing there, that is
Mahmudov made
several hundred million dollars from this, and those
hundreds of millions of dollars were made at the expense of
the health of the residents of Sibay, because
well, in a normal country, under a
normal system, they would have forced him to
carry out proper reclamation; he would have had
to spend money, but at least no one would have
been poisoned
here they told him: ah, come on, forget it, just
kick back 15 percent of the potential
costs to us, and go off on your yacht
to party somewhere. I know—our
team in Bashkiria (Bashkortostan) wrote to me that the workers at this
quarry, yes, are ready and may declare
a strike or something else. So even without
our trade union project—and all the more so
with the trade union project—we will provide you with
legal support, and, I don't know,
political support as well—we won't forget about you
because, really
this situation gets to me because
apart from me, many people write about it, but
they write much less; apart from us, no one
will help them
just as no one will help the residents of
Krasnoyarsk, the residents of Kuzbass (the Kuznetsk coal basin), the residents of
any industrial city—Chelyabinsk
which is simply breathing poison, who, well
who suffer from respiratory illnesses
and so on. But this really is a monstrous
thing, just monstrous, and I really want to
help them. So if you are going to organize
a strike, we will help you. Let this
Khabirov go to hell, you understand
with these threats to you—like, here we are going to
put a stop to violations of public
order. Shut the quarry down; let
Mahmudov do something about this quarry
and no one will take to the streets
a short 39-second video—I want
to show it to you because last time
in the ticker, those who don't
show it to me said, well, why are you here
talking about those Jehovah's Witnesses
I talk about Jehovah's Witnesses, and I'll say that
on the project I also show my video about the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC)
which I saw on a blog—this
Deacon Kurayev, a well-known religious figure
Andrei Kurayev posted it there, and it is
truly astonishing
it takes place inside the Cathedral of Christ the Savior
in a kind of closed-off
basement room where an
event is taking place
300 high-ranking clergymen are
present; it's impossible to get in there, everything is
by pass only
and so on. Now it's going to run for 19
seconds—count the number of security guards
around the Patriarch
[music]
because the gift
man, lift it higher, higher
school
there are about 15 guards there. It's a closed
event in a closed room where there is no one
except high-ranking hierarchs of the
Russian Orthodox Church, but it looks as if, you know, this
video shows Patriarch Kirill arriving in
Syria to persuade ISIS fighters
to join the Russian Orthodox Church, or as if somewhere in Chechnya
in a forest among some mujahideen, or
the Taliban, or something like that. But no—these are
his own people. So why so much security?
Of course, as an Orthodox believer, it's not
pleasant for me to watch, and I understand that
it is precisely because of this that my church, to which I
belong, is simply losing authority
losing weight, and then you start wondering what exactly you're afraid of
how everything is arranged there at all
if you have to protect yourself from your own hierarchs in such a
way
but, frankly, all of this looks anything but
edifying
and, frankly, it seems to me that many
believers find this unpleasant, and you
understand that something is very seriously wrong
with the way the Russian Orthodox Church is set up, at least in its
leadership. My dear friends, today is, after all,
Valentine's Day, which I
am happily spending with you
well, not only with you, but with my beloved too
When it comes to lovebirds, of course, it's Dmitry
Peskov and Tatyana Navka.
News came in that they may be facing
a possible tax audit in
the United States. The newspaper *Guardian* wrote about it, and
then we found out that this was actually
most likely an audit
triggered by our complaint. So I
wanted to say a few words just
to explain what happened there. It's a very simple
thing: when we released a series of
reports about Peskov at the Anti-Corruption Foundation,
we talked about, among other things,
the half-a-million-dollar watch, about his
yacht where he spent his honeymoon, and
which was, if I remember correctly, the largest
sailing yacht in the world. Fantastic sums of money
were spent by the oligarch Magomedov, who is now sitting
in Lefortovo (a Moscow pre-trial detention prison), I think. We know that
he paid for it. Then there were houses bought for
a billion. In other words, the image of
Peskov does not correspond at all to what
he actually does. And back in
2015, he kept saying:
"Oh, that's my wife, the wealthy figure skater Navka.
Where did the watch come from?
Oh, that's my wife, the wealthy figure skater Navka.
And the house for a billion—how do you know
it wasn't my wife?
A wealthy figure skater, Navka. But we all
understood that this was nonsense—what kind of
"wealthy figure skater Navka"? She could not
possibly, no matter how wealthy,
she simply didn't have tens of millions
of dollars. She wasn't that rich,
this figure skater Navka. But he kept saying it
almost every step of the way, and it kept being
repeated: a very wealthy wife, and
back then we told him publicly, quite
directly. We said: Peskov, either you
explain where you and your
wife, the wealthy figure skater Navka, got the money, or we will file
a complaint against the wealthy figure skater Navka
with the U.S. tax authorities, because
your wife is a tax resident of the United States—
well, that's how it was. He acted as if
he hadn't heard anything, so we filed the complaint.
And if in Russia, you understand, this kind of
lifestyle being incompatible with a salary—and we
understand that people are stealing; if
Medvedev has assets 100 times larger than
his salary, or 1,000 times, or a million times, we
understand that he's a crook, a thief, a bribe-taker. But
legally, here, that means nothing.
But in the U.S., this is a legal concept:
if your expenses and income are incompatible,
if your lifestyle does not
match your salary, that is
grounds for a tax audit. So basically
we wrote: you have
this wealthy figure skater Navka, she is your
tax resident, and her husband
keeps saying that she is super-mega
rich—please check
whether she paid taxes on that. We sent it off and, honestly,
we even forgot about the complaint. And then
later we learned that a tax audit in
the U.S. takes about two years on average, and now it has
just surfaced.
And we can judge this from the *Guardian*
article. We have no connections with the tax authorities,
unfortunately, so we can't find out for sure, but
some obvious issues came up there, things like
she was paying tax on an income of
around $80,000,
or rather she reported about $87,000
a year—completely
modest income, really. And yet
I can see right there in the article that her
declared income from all sources
in 2015 was $87,000,
which, let's be honest, is laughable.
That is several times less than the cost of
the watch that this wealthy figure skater
supposedly gave Peskov, and so on and so
forth. She
was saving on taxes, saying that she
was divorced but had been married for some
period. We found out that she was a
resident until 2015, the *Guardian*
writes, and then ceased to be a tax
resident. That matches absolutely exactly, in terms of
dates, with our complaint and the public
story about how we were going to file
such a complaint. They got scared and
ran—but
the essence of this story is that
we did everything right, that Peskov is lying,
that his wife is some incredibly rich figure skater
Navka. Before 2015, she had no
substantial sums of money at all,
neither in Russia nor abroad. She declared
nothing, and all this money—well,
frankly, it's an open secret—all
these watches, houses, and everything else are bribes
that Peskov received. They are not
Navka's money of any kind. We hope that
it's clear that in Russia, under Putin, Peskov
faces no danger, but we hope that in the U.S.
at least this couple will, one way or another, be
held liable for tax violations. Because
there is no need to lie—you've lied so much,
guys, you're lying on two continents.
You lie in America, you lie here, you
move back and forth across borders, and meanwhile
inside the country you accuse everyone of being foreign agents,
while you yourselves are, quite literally,
international crooks and fraudsters. Since we've started talking about
international
crooks and fraudsters, literally
a Russian Donald Trump has appeared on the scene.
It turns out
Donald Trump built
luxury real estate there, built
real estate developments, and today
the outlet *Baza*—founded by former *LifeNews* journalists—
whose work, well, generally speaking, I...
A LifeNews journalist isn't supposed to love anyone.
But they at least did something.
It seems fairly decent, and I hope it
ends up in decent hands. People change, but in
this case, they did something extremely impressive.
They did a great piece of work: they investigated the property
of Zhirinovsky's son, whom we also
just love. We did a report about him, and we
found his apartment in Dubai several years ago, and there
in Dubai, attached directly to the contract,
was simply his passport — literally his passport
was included there. And the apartment was
442 square meters
worth 86 million rubles at the time
with seven bathrooms in the apartment. Naturally, we
ran around shouting: come on, strip him of
his
parliamentary status, because he had clearly
simply failed to declare foreign
property and, obviously, foreign accounts.
Nothing happened. Back then we were told
that nothing had been proven. A sales contract,
with his surname on it, plus an attached
passport — no, apparently that still isn't
considered evidence. No, go away.
Everything was fine with Zhirinovsky. Zhirinovsky
Jr. And now, journalists from Baza
have found out that since then, the younger
Zhirik has upgraded things considerably.
He has four hotels in Spain: two in Alicante,
one in Ibiza — what a creative guy —
he bought a hotel there too — and one somewhere near
Barcelona.
And all of this came to light because
Lebedev — that's the surname of Zhirinovsky's son —
Lebedev, by the way, is Deputy Speaker of the State Duma (the lower house of Russia's parliament),
one of the country's top parliamentarians.
He was explicitly listed in the documents
as the head of the company that
manages these hotels. In 2015,
after sanctions were imposed on him,
he stepped out, and his mother and his wife stepped in.
They own this company. So this is
a clear-cut violation for which he
should be launched out of the State Duma like a cork.
He is engaged in business activity; he
was managing a hotel chain. He did not
declare any of this. He did not
declare it.
And he has no right to own them.
As for the accounts, he and his wife hold such
accounts — they own foreign financial
assets. In other words, it's just
that Baza really grabbed
Zhirinovsky Jr. by the throat, exactly
the same way we grabbed him by the throat
a few years ago. And it will be very
interesting to watch how he
tries to wriggle out of it, because there
are his relatives, his close associates — they are
all in the documents.
He himself is listed there in the documents, these
hotels.
And what's amazing is that Zhirinovsky Jr.,
and Zhirinovsky Sr. alike, are always
pushing this line. There was a quote there,
literally something like this — one of Zhirinovsky's quotes:
"I hate those
politicians who betray the interests
of Russia and trade them for rotten
American sausage." I mean, do you understand?
You own a chain of hotels in Spain and
go around saying this. I cannot believe that
Zhirinovsky Sr. didn't know about it. With
what money is the younger
Zhirik buying all this? It's obvious all the money belongs
to the elder Zhirinovsky. Of course he is
a co-owner of all this. And you own
a hotel chain in Spain, you've invested
your money there, and then you talk about
"rotten American sausage." Amazing
situation.
I was actually quite upset that
this Baza investigation
was seen by so few people. But I hope that now,
thanks to us, thanks to my program, more people
will notice all this, because the issue is important.
I've already gone over time on our program,
but I can't help saying a few words
about one last topic, because we have
the great Dmitry Rogozin and some kind of
completely impoverished Roscosmos (Russia's state space corporation).
It's supposed to be the other way around, because
because
Dmitry Rogozin, as a government official,
is supposed to be modest, while Roscosmos is supposed
to be incredibly cool and high-tech.
After all, it was announced just last week that
we are going to start colonizing the Moon, that we
will fly to the Moon, and that we need special
lawyers. This is not a joke — there were
articles and official statements saying that officials need
to train special lawyers so that
they can litigate over land plots
on the Moon, because someone might challenge them.
And we, supposedly, will say: well, this
beautiful plot here,
on the seafront, so to speak, or in the
picturesque part of some crater — we
must fight for it, fly to the Moon, and so
on. Everything is supposedly so powerful and impressive at
Roscosmos that Dmitry Rogozin flew to
Chelyabinsk Region and visited the
Ust-Katav railcar-building plant.
Everyone calls it a railcar-building
plant, but it is part of Roscosmos. And in order
to get there, he hired
a business jet, of course, because flying
with ordinary schlubs, even in business class, alongside
passengers on a regular commercial flight
to Chelyabinsk — and there are plenty of flights — he could have
flown that way.
But that is beneath the dignity of a Russian
official, so of course he hired
a private jet and a helicopter, paying
6 million rubles for it all, for two days of flights
— 6 million — visited that plant
and told everyone there how great everything was.
Everything is amazing, and then a couple of days later, today...
At this factory, some truly my
things are happening.
Because people came out and said, yes,
damn it, on salaries of 12,000 rubles (about 130 USD) a month
a month. Let's watch 26 seconds of this rally.
The boss gets less than the workers—an improvement.
It's hard to make out exactly what's happening, but
judging by the outlets that wrote about it,
a local pro-management union representative came out there,
naturally, one who had sold out to the plant's management,
and started saying that everything
was fine—and he was booed there.
People are simply complaining that they cannot
live decently on a salary of 12,000 rubles (about 130 USD), and I
think that, of course, Rogozin's flight there for 6
million rubles (about 65,000 USD) certainly made
an impression on them. You see, to fly in on
a private jet to a place where people earn
next to nothing, and then lecture them about how we're going to fly
to the Moon—
how great we are, how wonderful we are, and how brilliantly, under
the leadership of Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin,
we are developing our Roscosmos—that is,
of course, an extraordinary spit in the face
to these people. This is a restricted-access enterprise;
you can't just walk in there. But from this
report, you can see that even there, openly,
they're talking about organizing a strike. Guys, I support
you however I can, obviously. I mean, of course,
they really need to declare a strike there
so that Rogozin comes back, and this time
on a regular commercial flight, in economy class,
and says: you know, we at
Roscosmos have made a decision that we
will save money on flights, for example, yes, and
when it's possible to fly there on a regular
commercial plane, we will fly on regular
commercial planes so that we can pay you
more. And after all, you at Roscosmos are great
guys—without you, we will never fly to
the Moon. So that you can live a little better, we
will raise your salaries and stop
flying on business jets. I would very much like
for that to happen, but they need to be
forced.
To do that, you have to resist, and we
are ready to help you in every way. You see,
already even two enterprises have moved toward
strikes and work stoppages.
See you all next week.
[music]