[music]
Good evening to everyone in Moscow, where
spring has finally arrived. It's 8 p.m., which
means that the live broadcast of the program
Russia of the Future is on the air, and I am Alexei Navalny
or an "aggressive liar," as Anatoly Chubais called me
this week. We'll talk a little
about this amazing, wonderful,
very honest man on our
program.
Right from the start, I want
to tell you two things. First: if you want me
to answer your questions, write to me on
Twitter with the hashtag #RussiaOfTheFuture, and
second: please subscribe to the channel
you're watching right now. We have
about 850,000 subscribers, and we'd really
like to reach one million as soon as possible.
I want to thank you, because the channel is
doing quite well.
Google provides this new metric:
the unique number of subscribers. That is,
it's not like you watched first on
your phone, then on your computer, then on
another computer, and it counted as three
different people. Using some clever
algorithm, they calculate unique
users, and last month we set
a new record: more than 4 million
unique users watched our
channel. A total of 16 million views in
a month. So that's great: 6,000
new subscribers, 17 videos made it into
YouTube's trending section, and several videos
got a million or close to a million views.
So thank you very much.
This strange YouTube television
is competing with real television,
so please subscribe. Once we
hit one million, we'll get the gold play button,
which I'll show you here, if
of course Lyubov Sobol, the producer of this
channel, even lets me hold it.
My Thursday tradition, which is tremendously enjoyable,
is introducing the people who
will be running in the September elections.
Why do I so enjoy talking
about these people and urging you
to follow them, even if you don't live in
Moscow? Well, because this is real
competition, real politics. We all miss
debates and some kind of competition.
It's clear that it still won't be
fair, but we will see real
live people fighting for the votes
of other live people. It will be very, very
curious, very interesting. Over the past
week,
two absolutely wonderful
people announced their candidacies. One is a very
close associate of mine, the director of our foundation, Ivan
Zhdanov. So yes, I am campaigning for Ivan Zhdanov.
He's running in
northern Moscow, in Sokol and Aeroport — good
districts, a good constituency. If you live there,
sign up as a volunteer. Let's watch
a few seconds of the video with which he
is launching his campaign. But I'm sure he will be
both an excellent candidate and
an excellent deputy if he gets support.
And Zhdanov — what does he look like? Northern Moscow:
Sokol, Aeroport, Voykovsky, Koptevo.
Good neighborhoods: historic, prosperous,
well maintained.
But even here, at every turn, residents
run into corruption and negligence
from officials. I am Ivan Zhdanov.
I am a lawyer and the director of the Anti-Corruption Foundation.
I am putting forward my candidacy
in the Moscow City Duma elections for the 8th
electoral district. I want you
to have an independent candidate.
I want us to drive United Russia members out of
the Moscow City Duma. I lived in this district for 10 years.
I know both the local problems and the citywide ones,
and I know how to solve them. All I need
is your support.
[music]
You saw his website — register there. I
noticed a very funny, and actually very
painful, reaction from various
United Russia people specifically to the phrase
Zhdanov used: "We will drive United
Russia out." Because politically, they are
ready to tolerate you saying, "There's corruption
everywhere,
I'll deal with housing and utilities problems, blah blah blah, we'll
work on major building repairs, blah blah blah."
But candidates who come in and say,
"Basically, my main issue is fighting
United Russia, I want to drive United Russia out,"
that they really do not like. And there
all sorts of Sobyanin loyalists (supporters of Moscow Mayor Sergey Sobyanin)
have already worked themselves into not a mini-hysteria but a full-blown one,
which is very funny. They even stirred up a fuss
around another
candidate who announced his candidacy literally
yesterday. This is also someone very close to me,
a person whom I have known for many
years, and I took my first steps in politics
together with him back in the Yabloko party.
That is Ilya Yashin.
And of course he is running in his own district,
which includes Krasnoselsky District, where
he is the head of the municipal council. He won in
that municipality by simply crushing
United Russia — absolutely smashing United
Russia — and brought his team in there, which
is very important. By the way, there are several
districts in Moscow where, let's say,
non-United Russia candidates have won, but almost nowhere, unfortunately,
do they act as a united
team. Someone gets bought off, someone
gets manipulated, deceived, intimidated, and somehow
it ends up better in some places, worse in others.
But in Krasnoselsky District, things are really
going well, because Yashin and his team are advancing
a Moscow political agenda.
federal
and genuinely addresses local problems and
carry out the program. He said, I will give up
the official car, he refused
turned it into a social taxi, and so
on and so forth. And now, regarding Yashin
they really want to... well, first let's
for once, watch a short clip. I...
Yashin's nomination, and then we'll see how
city hall reacted to it. A map for
for the authorities to start working in
the interests of citizens, there must be
reasonable laws adopted
and parliamentary oversight must function, but
that is not happening because the Duma
today is controlled by the United
Russia party, and in order to change
the situation, I decided to take part in
the elections for deputies to the Moscow City Duma
which will take place on September 8. I hope
to become your representative in the city
parliament. I will defend your interests and
work to ensure that Moscow becomes
a city comfortable for the majority of its
residents. My electoral district is No. 45
It includes my Krasnoselsky District, as
well as Basmanny, Meshchansky, and Sokolniki
If you are registered in one of these
districts, you will be able to sign in support of me in
June and vote on September 8. Yashin
naturally is very strongly disliked by
United Russia, and is very strongly disliked by
Sobyanin. It's clear why: because he is
such a savvy guy
who knows how to use modern
methods of communication, despite censorship. Well,
like me, actually, and many others,
he records videos for his YouTube channel. He
has an excellent grasp of the local agenda, of
local problems, and you can no longer say to him
hey, you don't know how the pipes
work. He knows how the pipes work
because he's a municipal leader. You can't
say to him, well, you only understand
pipes, but you don't understand
politics, because he does understand
politics and has taken part in elections many times
You know him — he's quite a well-known
politician of essentially federal stature
they are fighting him with some kind of
team. So they recruited black PR operatives
asked for the very worst of the
black PR people, set them apart into a separate
group, and then the most cynical and
lying creeps, apparently, were selected into
a separate group and told: you will
handle Yashin, because
well, you saw it — the first salvo in the campaign against
him consisted of the fact that they, well,
literally — and this is not funny at all —
started tormenting his family, his elderly
grandmother, who has a serious illness
dementia, and she is in a medical
facility, and they are trying to
evict her. Then their journalists rush in
you rush in, then a police officer arrives
and brings journalists who film this
grandmother, or some person resembling
the grandmother, with stories that Yashin had
personally thrown her out of her home in order to
take the apartment. I mean, they are just brazenly
lying in a completely unimaginable
and inhuman way, and then they broadcast all of it
on federal television. But we
expected that they would stage something special
when he officially announced his candidacy. I
saw him on the eve of the announcement and said to Yashin
when you publish the video about your candidacy, what
do you think they will say about you? Well,
he thought, well, they will probably once again
exploit the theme of what a
terrible person I am and that I'm evicting my grandmother — they'll lie about
that again. But what happened was just
staggering — I couldn't even
[music]
at first I couldn't even understand why this
was happening. It was such a strange thing. Later we
thought: is there actually any
point to this at all? I mean, roughly speaking, what they
did was post it through all these
trash Telegram channels, Seti i Nezi and
all the rest. By the way, this again brings us to
the question of what they publish
— analytics? No, they do not publish any
analysis. They post ordinary paid-for
material — Kononenko and all the rest of
these human rejects published a video
where some person — supposedly, I'm sitting
in a car and filming on a phone, like
trees
It's just that the clip is long, three minutes, I won't
show it to you, but it goes like this:
they're filming trees, and then, oh, who's that
walking along the fence? Some people are walking
oh, they're kicking a cat there, and then
they dumped this clip, and all these
Kremlin lackeys
then supposedly identified the person kicking the cat as
Yashin and started pushing the line: Yashin beat up
a kitty. Let's take a look
at the video in which Yashin allegedly kicks a cat
they drive past
droid
I love the country too... our keys too... what is this,
film them, this is also... for the sake of this
time, that's it, I'm driving away
Well, it's obvious that this is not Yashin
Any person who has ever seen
Yashin understands perfectly well that
these are hired actors, and we can see that they are
hired actors because, basically speaking,
they are dressed exactly the same way Yashin
was dressed in the video he released
shortly before that. They simply picked
— you see, that's how he was dressed — they picked
someone generally similar, just a bit heavier
but overall of a similar type
Filipchuk will probably be outraged when he sees this
to watch this
but nevertheless, let's say, somewhat similar
so, well, they posted this thing with the cat
and I watched it, and apparently Bogomol sent it to me
what even is this, what is going on, and I said
but even if the guy works for
you, anyone who watches this
video understands that it isn't you, and I mean
understands a simple thing: Sobyanin's (Sergei Sobyanin, Moscow mayor) people
PR people are [__] and degenerates who got
some money, took the money, and made
a fake video, but so far on the internet
people will laugh at it, but who could have
guessed that they wouldn't just use
a corrupt Telegram channel—they would actually
show it on federal television
now I'll show you those 40 seconds
all of this was shown on a major over-the-air TV channel
I'll stay in the corner because otherwise
they'll hit us with a strike, so: a fake about
Yashin (Ilya Yashin, Russian opposition politician), but now on a major federal
I will use my experience so that
parliamentary oversight starts working in the city
and sensible laws are passed, and
in today's Facebook post
by the well-known Ilya Yashin, a Moscow
municipal deputy of so-called
opposition views
he delights his followers with important news
claiming that he is aiming to take part in the autumn
elections to the City Duma and has already begun
campaigning. Very interesting footage from
a certain Moscow resident who wanted to capture
a new construction site in the capital when suddenly
another cameraman appeared in the frame with
professional equipment, filming
let's say, a person resembling Mundi
who in turn suddenly kicked
an animal resembling a cat
incidentally, everything is phrased in such a way
that you can't sue over it, I mean
it's obviously slander, obviously a fake, and
speaking of journalists, people
working with all these channels
they all want to seem respectable, they
want to be like us, to sit with us at the same
table, and they get very offended when people don't
extend a hand to them, don't shake hands with them, but that's because
in reality they are just trash. This
person who made this report
or the one they wrote it for, who read it on air
well, what can you say about him? He
doesn't deserve to be called a human being at all
but returning to Yashin, it became clear
that the point is, well, just like in the
joke
the spoons disappeared from the house, everyone thought
the guest had stolen them
then the spoons were found, but the bad aftertaste remained
or like in another joke about how
either he beat someone up or he got beaten up, well
something like that happened. And here too
a certain context for discussion has been created, and now everyone
is discussing
not whether Yashin is running or not
not what he said about Sobyanin, what complaints he
raised, what his platform is. Even here I am
analyzing all of this, and all
together with you, but I'm discussing a cat, and we
of course understand everything, but some elderly woman
who watched all this on television
may later be told that it
was fake, but no—the impression remains: Yashin either
kicked some dog or maybe
pulled a cat by the tail, or maybe he
someone else did—anyway, there was some unpleasant
story involving Yashin and a cat that got beaten, and
that's basically what it's designed for. But I wouldn't
say this was some kind of super-mega
technology; it still seems to me that
this is just another embezzlement scheme
plain and simple, built around this kind of black
PR smear campaign, but nevertheless, of course
there is a certain logic to it, and in this
there is, well, basically, guys, exactly why
this is why we're launching Smart Voting
turnout will be low, yes, of course
some elderly women will come to vote
and they'll bring along elderly women who
have only seen this report about
how Yashin
had some business with a cat. But with turnout at 20 percent
if we go there, we can simply
the viewers of this program across Moscow, by showing up
there, and in Yashin's district, Smart Voting
means that we vote only
for one name only, always. We will choose him, we
we will be able to outvote all those
elderly voters and elect Yashin, and Zhdanov, and
Sobol, and Milov, and all the other
decent people. By the way, I
have gotten quite a lot of questions
about Smart Voting, and
the main one right now is this: since I
represent people from the FBK (Anti-Corruption Foundation), I'm told
well, what if in a district there is
an FBK candidate and another
opposition candidate with a higher rating?
The answer is: there are no such districts, actually
speaking of FBK, and if we're talking about
staff, Sobol is running and
Zhdanov is running; beyond that, no one else from the Anti-Corruption Foundation
is running in the election
there are wonderful people who work
with us—Nilov and Yashin—and we support them
with all our strength, but their districts were chosen in such a
way that there cannot be a
stronger candidate there. We didn't just
randomly nominate them. Yashin is running in
his own district, and there won't be anyone
more popular than him from the opposition
Sobol is running in the district
where last time second place was taken by
Yermolin, who ran from
Civic Platform, and this time he is not
running. So, in a sense, the number-two opposition
slot there is vacant, and they are planning to run
Sergei Mitrokhin there, and of course the chances
Sobol is simply much, much stronger by an order of magnitude.
Look, I have a great deal of respect for Sergei,
Mitrokhin, but he has taken part many times in
Moscow elections at every level, and frankly
his results were not exactly the most
impressive. And, basically,
he has always run in the northeast,
and repeatedly said that in the Moscow
elections he would not run at all. So Sobol
is the strongest candidate there. The same applies
to everyone else. That is exactly what Smart
Voting is about: we are not just telling you,
"vote for {URL_1}."
No, that is not how it works. We analyze things and
much more often than not, the point is that we
will say: vote for the Communist candidate.
In some places we will say: vote for a Yabloko candidate,
That is how the system will work across 45 districts.
That is what is happening in the elections right now.
In that sense, we are not trying to
pull the blanket over ourselves; we will mostly
be campaigning for other candidates. To wrap up the topic
of Yashin, I wanted to say one thing.
That video was most likely recorded in more than
one take. It really just
gets to me a little; it irritates me
because of how vile the whole situation is. They accused him
of kicking some cat,
but they themselves were filming it, and they themselves brought
the poor cat there and kicked it with their feet.
They shot three takes, apparently.
In two or three takes, they were calling it over,
shouting something like, "Kolya, come here,"
because someone had not kicked it hard enough, or
because, well, "you hit it right on the head, that is
not good, let's do it differently." And in between
takes, they were grabbing that poor cat by
the tail, and I would not be surprised if they had rubbed it with valerian.
On the one hand, it is funny; on the other hand,
it is sheer brutality, you have to admit.
It is the purest kind of depravity. All of this
United Russia and Sobyanin crowd, with access to
trillions of rubles and every possible
administrative resource, all their
TV channels—they cannot put out
a report saying, "Well, you know,
there is an election coming up, and Yashin is running in it,
he is an opposition politician, and we—United Russia, Putin,
and Sobyanin—are running on our own agenda.
We stand for this and that—for example, for
raising the retirement age, for increasing
the tax burden,
because that is what they actually support: the isolation
of the internet, laws banning criticism of
officials. We are going into this election with that agenda, and my
goal is to stop Yashin from winning." No, they
say nothing of the sort. Instead, they really
kick some cat with their feet. That is what our
authorities are like, and that is why this is how they must be fought.
And people from St. Petersburg ask me whether your team
will be running in the elections.
As for St. Petersburg, the city's development
and the future of St. Petersburg, honestly,
I will say this:
it is tied first and foremost to the federal authorities and to the mayor—
or rather, the governor of St. Petersburg.
You have this fellow running there,
a man named Beglov, an absolutely disgusting
character. I hope and believe there will be
some other candidates, but in any
case,
the concept is simple: vote for anyone
except Beglov.
And our people—and, in general, lots of
very, very good people—
are running in St. Petersburg's municipal
elections. More than 3,000 people are running there
as part of the team, so you should also come
to the polls in order to vote
against Beglov
and take part in Smart Voting in the
municipal deputy elections.
So, I am being asked about the
European Court of Human Rights.
This really is my personal—but not only my personal—
it is, after all, our shared
very good news: I won
at the European Court. Officially the case is called
Navalny v. Russia, but I still
see the case not as Navalny
v. Russia, but as Navalny v. Putin, or
Navalny v. United Russia—
however you want to put it. Because you, the viewers of this
program, are Russia too, but you were not the ones who kept me in
2014
under house arrest for an entire year.
It was completely illegal. I was not complaining about you;
I was complaining about those specific
scoundrels who did this. Several
years have passed, our legal team
worked excellently, and I proved that I was
right. They really are crooks, liars,
and scoundrels. The court found violations of several articles;
it recognized that the house arrest was illegal,
that my right to
freedom of expression had been violated, and it recognized the political
motivation behind it. They are to pay me compensation of €20,000,
20,000 euros to me and 2,000 euros to my
lawyers. I am very pleased. But, of course,
no one will give me back the year I spent under house
arrest, and no one will give my family
that time back either. I understand that.
But I do feel moral satisfaction from
this. And secondly, this is
ready-made evidence.
You see, in the Beautiful Russia of the Future,
we will not need to prove again what these
investigators who demanded house arrest,
the prosecutors who backed it,
and the judge—indeed, several judges—who
made those decisions did. We will not even have to
prove it further, because, say, we already have
the binding precedent of a European Court of Human Rights ruling
that recognizes it. And
Russia—even now, Putin's Russia—
recognizes that the European Court of Human
Rights stands at the top of the Russian
legal system, meaning this is binding.
This decision is not just something made somewhere out there,
off in the middle of nowhere. Russia recognizes these
decisions, so now we’re locking them all up,
and I think not even under house arrest anymore,
because, well, because there has already been
a court case, a months-long
proceeding on this matter. I just want to say that
thank you very much to everyone who
supported me. I definitely need to say
a few words about what happened in
Arkhangelsk,
This is a highly significant political event,
one that, it seems to me, has been somewhat underestimated
by the Russian media, including
both opposition and non-opposition media,
including independent outlets.
It happened over the weekend, first of all,
and second, it happened in Arkhangelsk, and
with the news, as soon as something happens in Moscow,
it’s as if nothing else anywhere matters.
But in fact, this is a major and important
event that, better than any opinion poll, better
than any focus group or study,
shows how much the situation in the country is changing.
Well, first of all, what is
happening in Arkhangelsk? The garbage, the garbage
mafia wants to bury waste somewhere out in the sticks,
and they raised the garbage removal tariff.
It’s a very profitable business, and for it
to become super-profitable, the people who
control the waste business—and that is,
first and foremost, the family of Prosecutor General
Yury Chaika—you can see his
wonderful, so to speak, highly photogenic
younger son, full of health and thirst for money.
They make money, and to make
even more money from garbage removal, what do you
need to do? Well, look, in a normal
country, here’s how it works: this cup,
I drank from it, threw it in the trash,
then it was taken out and sent for
recycling, and from it you get
paper again; from two old cups,
you get a new one, and so on indefinitely.
That’s how it works in normal countries. But
if your business is built on wanting to earn as much as possible
from the fact that
I threw away a cup and paid
you, I don’t know, one ruble for
disposing of it, then you can send it for
recycling and make, say, 10 kopecks on it,
or you can simply haul it off to
a dump in Arkhangelsk and make
twice as much on it,
100 kopecks, because there are basically no costs:
you take the garbage, load it into
a truck, drive somewhere, dump it, and that’s it.
The Moscow region is already buried in these landfills. Moscow itself—
that’s effectively around 15 million people—
just imagine how much
garbage it produces, plus the Moscow region,
which is really another 7 million people. It’s simply
this kind of black hole of Russia, where
money from all over the country flows, and which
produces an enormous amount of
ordinary household waste.
After all, this is where all the relatively wealthy
people in the country live; they consume
all of this stuff, and all of it
has to be thrown away afterward. Yes, this
cup will have to be thrown away, so
there is a huge, huge amount of garbage.
The Moscow region is overwhelmed, and protests have broken out there.
They wanted to take it to Yaroslavl,
but there were protests there too, so they decided, well,
to use Arkhangelsk Region, with its gigantic—let’s
take a look—just so those who don’t
have a good sense of the geography can see how
large Arkhangelsk Region is.
You can see it’s just—well, even if you
leave out Novaya Zemlya (the Arctic archipelago), it’s still
enormous, simply enormous,
of absolutely fantastic size,
a region. And they figured, well,
there’s plenty of land there, so we’ll just
haul the garbage there. And in Arkhangelsk
Region, which generally has never been
known for
major political activism or
anything like that, there arose a very real
uprising. There were several
very large rallies by Arkhangelsk standards,
after which the authorities, of course,
decided to ban the rallies, and
told people, basically, don’t show off—
we’re not piling this under your city, we’ve got plenty of land,
we’ll make some extra money from Muscovites
bringing their garbage and waste here, and you
are forbidden from holding rallies. Let’s
take a look at what a banned
rally in Arkhangelsk Region looks like.
It was quite a political spectacle.
[music]
[music]
demands and holds... are not taking part
6 teams
[music]
[applause]
[music]
[music]
[music]
I can.
[music]
[music]
I understand very well why
what happened there happened: there were three police cordons,
an unauthorized rally, and all three
police cordons were broken through, and
3,000 people marched through. For
an unauthorized march in
Arkhangelsk,
that is a lot. I’ve been there, and on this
program I constantly cite
Arkhangelsk Region as an example of
the looting of the country, the country’s decay, and
the country’s degradation, because the potential
this region has is enormous, but in fact
it has everything needed to thrive.
to develop, but this is the only place in
Russia where, not in some village but in a major
regional city, I saw with my own eyes
how, right in the center,
on Soviet Cosmonauts Avenue,
I’ve talked about this many times on this program:
people carry water in buckets.
Just completely devastated buildings; the city is in
a nightmarish state there.
There is simply monstrous poverty there. Formally,
the average salary in the city of
Arkhangelsk is 48,000 rubles a month (about $500–$550 in period terms), but in practice
it is much lower, even taking into account those
regional coefficients. Life there is quite hard,
and I understand very well why people
came out in protest like this, and why
the police—we saw that they stood there,
of course, but essentially they did not
put up much resistance, because the residents
of Arkhangelsk, just like earlier the residents
of Yaroslavl, and before that the residents
of other towns in the outer Moscow region,
like Volokolamsk, are saying: listen, so
here we are, living in poverty; damn it, we
don’t have sewage, we don’t have running water in
our city, we don’t have a damn thing, we’ve
been robbed blind.
Your Putin, your government—but no,
they say: your Putin, your government.
There’s a saying about Arkhangelsk
Region:
timber, cod, and longing. That’s what they themselves
say they have—three things. All the
money is siphoned out of there
to the federal center, to Moscow, and in return
—not everyone says it this way, but still—why the hell
is everything arranged like this?
They took everything from us—not just took it,
but now they also send back to us their
waste; they send us their
garbage so that we not only live in poverty
but live in poverty next to Moscow’s
dump. And the main thing is, here our
city-forming enterprise, our main
landmark, our main business
will be that the children of the Prosecutor General
will set up, right next to our homes, in our
region, in Pomorye (the Russian North around Arkhangelsk),
a dump, and pay us something for it. And I
understand very well those people who
simply came out—simply
to stand up for their dignity. It’s probably not
that the garbage is literally right now
lying next to Arkhangelsk—
it’s actually quite far from Arkhangelsk—
but they understand that this is being
done deliberately so as not to
create proper waste processing and
a proper waste
management site. They’ll just come, dump it, and
make money off that. People do not want to
put up with this, so of course I
fully support them. And I supported them even more
when I saw the speech by the
governor. Well, I’ll show you now
40 seconds—watch for yourselves,
think about it. What an insolent face.
The governor—what does he think about his
fellow countrymen, his fellow citizens, who came out
simply to say: we do not want
Moscow’s garbage here. However, not all of these
these
fixers have appeared.
Come on, let’s take… [fragment unclear]
Again, if I were to go by the numbers,
if I were guided by the numbers, I should have
hanged myself on May 13, 2012.
Hell no—they’ll be waiting forever for me to hang myself.
I know what I’m doing, I know I’m right, and for
more than 20 years I’ve lived here, my
children were born here, and all sorts of riffraff who
are nobody here and have no standing are trying to
call me all kinds of things.
I’ve been on this land for 28 years.
So I don’t give a damn about their
ratings, their voting, or what they
think about me. You see—he doesn’t care about any of it.
He doesn’t care, and he says it with this, you know,
air of compassion: if I had
gone by the numbers, I would have had
to hang myself—apparently meaning
the date of his appointment.
But you won’t get your wish, because I will remain
governor. I will bear this cross.
That thieving mug sits there making money
together with all his garbage
cronies.
And as for “my children have been here 28 years” — what
children for 28 years? Your whole United Russia party and all
your children are certainly not going to live there, not at that
landfill. But there you have it—he doesn’t
like it
when someone speaks out against him. People like that
he calls riffraff.
I very much hope that in Arkhangelsk
Region
these protests will continue, and that they
will continue across the whole country until
this entire mafia—
Sobyanin, Chemezov, the people dealing with our garbage,
and Prosecutor General Chaika’s children, Shuvalov’s
—Shuvalov’s, sorry—
that mafia, and the Shelkovsky family is also quite
actively
involved in this garbage
business—until they understand: if you want
to be in this business, then do recycling.
There should be no such thing as simply dumping garbage
somewhere into a pit. That should not exist. It does not
happen in a single normal
country, and nobody in Russia—neither in
Arkhangelsk nor in Moscow—likes
your idea that you are now going to make excellent money
simply by
servicing
a giant city while scattering its garbage across
the whole country. So I want to send my greetings
and support to the residents of Arkhangelsk, since
We were talking about video addresses.
There was also a very important video address this
week, and another one came to us from
the Rosgvardiya (Russia’s National Guard). They seem to have taken a liking there
to recording video addresses, apparently.
For some reason, though, they’re very different stylistically,
very different. At first, somehow, they
shifted from lofty wisdom and bragging
to something a little different. First, I want
to remind you of the first video address
that came to us from fighters—from
Rosgvardiya personnel: they said that you are a product
of an American test tube,
all clones and all that, of course, so that
the people are just puppets to you,
that’s how you talk about them, without any
shame. You’re rotten inside,
completely decayed. You have neither spirituality nor
morality—absolutely nothing. You’re
just tumbleweed. But I want to say this:
you seem to get a real thrill from the fact that you
attack the authorities and never got
a response in return. You probably feel very much like
hunting dogs on the trail,
sneaking up on their prey. But in reality
you’re just
an opposition lapdog that has imagined itself
to be a lion.
Remember? Of course I remember. It was quite something,
the way this man spoke on behalf of
all of Rosgvardiya. Then, in the next
address, which was recorded by the newspaper
*Komsomolskaya Pravda* (a Russian tabloid newspaper),
he said that behind him stood 300,000
Rosgvardiya personnel, and that all this
was about spirituality,
about our solid values, that we are for Russia, we are for
ordinary people. And you—you heard it—you
hate ordinary people, you call them
cattle—that’s what he told me. And now
there’s a second address from Rosgvardiya personnel,
and it looks completely different, because
the truth is that they do not consider
even their own people to be people. These
employees were housed there, and the essence
of the conflict is that
these OMON riot police officers and Rosgvardiya men were placed in
non-residential premises. On paper, these were
non-residential spaces; they had no right
to live there, and yet they were housed there and paid
utility and housing fees for those non-residential premises. And
then, now that they’ve retired, they were
told: well, guys, these
premises can’t be privatized,
you’re not allowed to live in them, so please
vacate the premises. As they put it,
‘you are obstructing citizens’ passage’—they told them, ‘you’re
interfering with our ability to make money,’ as
Zolotov said. And Rosgvardiya pensioners began to be
evicted. Please watch these 28 seconds.
I’m not going to say which of these people it is, but
I know one of them, because he was
When I watched this
video, of course my first thought was
a certain sense of schadenfreude, but then it
passed. I’ll explain that. But one of these
guys was the head of the escort detail
when they were transporting me—first to the detention facility, then
to court. I mean, we spent quite a bit of time there,
waiting around—you sit there and wait—so I
talked for quite a long time with him and his colleagues
about all sorts of things. When I saw it, because
it was a familiar face.
So in that sense it wasn’t just some abstract story anymore.
As for this situation, because he is
a retired National Guard officer,
but anyway, you’ll see now:
there are four of them, and one of them was, well,
the supervising officer of my escort
or—I don’t know—the overseer of that
escort. In short, he was the one transporting me.
Address from deceived Rosgvardiya officers.
Retired Rosgvardiya officers are appealing to you
with a request to resolve our problem. In 2010,
we, as employees of the Moscow OMON riot police,
were allocated housing in a newly built building on
the grounds of the OMON compound. However, upon
retirement,
instead of words of gratitude for our service,
we received notices of eviction from
non-residential premises. It turned out that for
nine years our families, together with
us and our young children,
had been living in non-residential premises. However, in
the utility bills
the place where we live is listed
as residential. So it turns out that
when they want to collect money from us,
the premises become residential, but when it comes
to allowing us to stay there until we receive
the one-time housing payment,
these premises suddenly become non-residential. Why is it that we,
while serving the state,
carried out combat missions, including
in hotspots and at Manezhnaya Square and
Bolotnaya Square (sites of major protest crackdowns in Moscow),
but as a result, after retiring,
we ourselves ended up outside the law?
Like everyone else, of course, what struck me was
this phrase:
‘carrying out combat missions in hotspots,’
including at Manezhnaya and Bolotnaya
Squares. Yes, and of course, like everyone
else, I saw in the comments that everyone
was writing something like:
‘You were the ones beating back those people at Bolotnaya,’
‘so now you’re getting what you deserve.’ Let’s
take a look—28 seconds—at how they
‘carried out combat missions’ at Bolotnaya.
[music]
There.
That’s how it was done.
I feel no schadenfreude toward these evicted
OMON officers—none at all, really, toward
them in general. I have no schadenfreude.
Because this is still brutality, this
eviction is brutality. They’re not being
punished for what they did there.
It’s not that they did something wrong — the system just...
...chewed them up and spit them out. But of course,
it’s very important to say, and to remind everyone, I would
like every National Guard serviceman, if he is
a decent person — including these
people here; I’m sure this acquaintance of mine from
this video will of course watch this clip — but
guys, you do understand that what happened to you
happened
precisely because you were beating
people at Bolotnaya (Bolotnaya Square protests in Moscow), because at Bolotnaya
those who came out were standing up for your
interests. They weren’t there for me personally,
they were there so that in Russia there would be
the rule of law, so that in Russia
justice would prevail. And
justice means that
if you lived in premises that were
allocated to you by the National Guard, and if you paid for
them, then of course they are residential housing.
This whole category of residential versus non-residential
— if the state, in the person of your superiors,
housed you there and collected money from you,
then of course the premises are residential, of course.
You have the right, on the same basis as anyone else,
to privatize it or do whatever else with
it. But that is exactly what people came out for:
so there would not be arbitrary, abusive bosses. You beat them
because the bosses wanted to.
They wanted to evict people, and you dispersed them — but now
now you yourselves have been
evicted. But overall, I certainly
sympathize with those people. Yes, they hauled me around
to police stations and all that, but still
you understand, this same system devours everyone.
Right now, we’ve seen four people
from 20 families
who spoke out — they’re from the National Guard. But
those who did not record a video appeal
— and by the way, good for those who did record one,
really, good for them for making that
appeal. If they hadn’t, we would never have heard
about it at all. I don’t know whether
their problem will be solved — it may be,
or it may not.
But if you don’t record one, then nothing
will happen. And these cops
are being evicted all across the country in exactly the same way.
EMERCOM personnel are being evicted, FSB officers are being evicted too,
everyone is being evicted — there are constantly some problems with
apartments and housing for all the rest. I have
no sense of schadenfreude at all
toward these people, because if
those who beat people at Bolotnaya were put on trial,
I would stand there and say: yes, that’s right, you are
going after the right people, imprisoning the right ones.
But with these people — no, that would be mistaken. Still, I
hope that all of this becomes a major
lesson for all National Guard personnel.
I have no illusions that this means
that tomorrow, when they are told to go disperse
some rally,
they won’t do it. They will disperse it.
They’ll drag me into a police van (avtozak),
take me there, and then say, like this
little bug once told me: well, of course, overall
we support what you’re doing, but
of course we’re still dragging you into the van.
Then we’ll drag you to court, then
we’ll drag you off to a detention cell. Nevertheless,
still, think, guys. Don’t be
idiots, because you will never earn
anything for yourselves this way, and by
dispersing people out there, you are only making
your own poverty worse.
By the way, create a police
union. Join a police
union. All over the world, police
unions are a very powerful force that
pushes back against exactly these kinds of things, because
police leadership always
acts, simply by definition, in
every country, against its rank-and-file
officers. In Russia this is happening too, and
your only allies here are those — well, those who
go out to Bolotnaya. Just admit it.
Work with them, and, well, carry out
subversive work from within, and vote — I mean,
if you can’t go out to
protests right now, vote against them, take part
in Smart Voting, spread
the word: Zolotov is robbing you,
Zolotov is stealing from you, Zolotov is throwing you out of your apartments.
Yes, of course, within the opposition environment
no one has any especially warm feelings toward you.
We don’t need to have any feelings toward you.
You need to fight for your rights,
because under this government you will always
be lying there licking boots and
knocking people down — and the same thing will be done to all of you.
That’s exactly how they’ll treat you. All right, let me look
at a question someone is sending me on
Soli’s stream. Windrunner asks me: “Alexei,
today they passed the bill on the
sovereign internet in its first reading. What should we expect?” Well, I
think they may already have passed it in the second reading too.
I never had the slightest
doubt that they would pass this law,
regardless of any protest. This is a key
law for Putin’s state, for
Putin himself, because it will allow him
to block programs like mine,
to block Telegram channels. But they’ve already
realized that the internet has become bigger than
television.
I started the program by saying:
subscribe, guys, I want a million
subscribers. Well, not just a million subscribers — 4
million unique viewers. That’s less
than Channel One, but it’s still
quite a lot. He doesn’t like that at all,
which is why he is pushing this law on
the sovereign internet — so they can shut it down.
So I have no doubt they will pass it.
After the second reading, it will go to the third,
it will be signed very quickly, and then
the first thing they’ll start blocking is Telegram,
and more generally, they will keep blocking things.
they're already experimenting with blocking
Twitter, social media, and YouTube channels, and so on
and so on. Sergey asks me about
Please comment on the situation with
the blocking of media resources by VTB, but here
what is meant is rather that VTB is blocki-
blocking media resources—they are being blocked
VTB media resources
The story really is that
Kostin, the head of VTB Bank, has
a girlfriend, a woman named Nailya Asker-zade
Asker-zade, whom I actually will
mention, because she is Nailya
Asker-zade, who was a correspondent for
Vedomosti, covering VTB's work, and she was
extremely oppositional. Back then I attended as a
minority shareholder at VTB meetings, and
very often Nailya and I sat next to each other
and gossiped about this Kostin
discussing what a crook, an idiot, just generally
a scoundrel he was. And then somehow she became close with him
and became friendly with him
and, as I understand it, they had children together
whether secretly or not, and now there is an unimaginable
colossal amount of real estate
I fully confirm this—we looked into all of it
all of it, and there is not the slightest doubt that
Kostin is stealing billions, and part of
those billions he simply funnels to his
mistresses, including Nailya
Asker-zade. They block all resources
Roskomnadzor (Russia’s state media and communications regulator) is doing it left and right
where anything at all is mentioned about
this situation. By the way, I am very interested
to see what they will do with
this episode of mine, because it simply
is setting records. But usually these records
concern the activities of the FBK (Anti-Corruption Foundation), but apparently he
apparently just paid someone there at
Roskomnadzor, brought over several suitcases
of money, and now, in my opinion, the latest
article
where this whole story was mentioned at all
was blocked within 15 minutes
They do not even need any court decisions anymore
they just monitor all of this and
simply block it completely arbitrarily
absolutely unlawfully—Telegram channels too
they are trying to block absolutely everything
they are wiping it all clean. But this is, of course, absolutely
outrageous. I absolutely want to say
completely plainly, as I have said many times
Kostin is a thief. He is robbing the state-owned
VTB bank, and he transfers enormous amounts—
tens of millions of dollars—
to his mistresses and spends this money
on supporting her, on maintaining
luxury apartments, on supporting
their children together, and so on. In other words,
this is simply a situation for which all of them
should be put on trial immediately, tomorrow
but for now the opposite is happening, when
they are shutting everyone up. In the previous segment
I spoke about Zolotov of the National Guard (Rosgvardiya)
Zolotov is known to us as someone who
became famous throughout the whole country, after all
probably after my
investigation into how he steals money
on food procurement. And you will laugh, we had
a small but very
illustrative story, almost like
the Zolotov story, just so that each of you
understands one important thing: Zolotov, or
a typical Putin-era Zolotov, is much
closer to you than it seems. You think that
there is some guy in Moscow who, through billion-ruble contracts,
buys potatoes at four times
the real price. But no—in the building you see
from your apartment, almost certainly
the same thing is happening too. In St. Petersburg there was
a great story
You know that we support the trade union
Teachers’ Alliance, and there
a kindergarten teacher made
a video appeal and recorded her conversation
with the principal about how she was not being
paid her full wages, and
the principal there says, well, complaining
is useless. If you complain, we already had people here
who complained all the way to Putin, and in such cases
it only got worse—they had their
salary cut altogether. Let's watch this excerpt
Hello, my name is Maria
Valevskaya. I work in the city of
St. Petersburg at kindergarten No.
5 in the Vyborg District. The administration
of our kindergarten signed
new supplementary agreements with us
under which extra payments were either reduced or
removed entirely. After receiving my salary
in February, I immediately went to
the management of our kindergarten and
asked on what grounds
our salaries had been lowered. Verbally, I was
told that if I was not
satisfied with my new salary, I
could resign from the kindergarten
Excellent. This Maria Valevskaya
did the right thing by recording this appeal. Well,
basically, she stood up for
the salary that had been promised to her. What
happened next? Naturally, the principal
started pressuring and intimidating her. Well,
the person was left one-on-one with the system
all alone. She thought, now I will
she thought, she posted some video on the internet
and thinks someone will protect her? No way, I will
devour her
and so she started gradually doing just that. But
there is a great guy named Danilkin who
heads the Teachers’ Alliance in
St. Petersburg
he decided not to let one of his people
be mistreated, and he did a very simple thing. Well,
the principal said that we do not have
the money to raise your
salary, that we have no money for anything at all
none at all, please understand our situation, as they
They say there's no money, and he did something amazing.
A very simple thing, and I somehow just hadn't
thought of it. You stop thinking when the scale is like that.
He went and looked into the procurement records
of this kindergarten and the kindergarten's budget.
It turns out there are contracts worth 23
million rubles, so he decided to simply compare the prices at which
they were buying
food for the little kids in the kindergarten
and the prices at which you can buy the same products
just by going to a store
at retail, and the difference, honestly,
is striking. Let's watch
the video that tells this
story. An employee of kindergarten
No. 5 in Vyborgsky District
spoke about the tiny wages
at the institution and said they intend to fight for
higher pay. We have great news: our
trade union found where to get the money. We
decided to look on the public procurement website
at what contracts this kindergarten
was signing, and we noticed the supply of
food products.
Sady Pridonya apple juice is one of
the cheapest juices. It cost me 55
rubles, but Tsygankova buys it at a price of
140 rubles per liter.
And under the contract, more than
a thousand such packs are to be delivered. Oranges, first grade:
first grade.
I got them for 49.90 rubles, but the kindergarten
buys them at three times that price,
146 rubles per kilogram.
Pumpkin, turnips, rutabaga—these are some of the cheapest
vegetables. The kindergarten buys them by the hundreds of
kilograms at an average price of 120 rubles
per kilogram.
That's several times more expensive than retail, and the same
pattern can be seen for practically all
items.
And that's more than 100 line items. We will definitely
continue investigating Tsygankova's schemes,
seek punishment for her,
and demand pay raises for
the kindergarten's other employees.
Turnips, rutabaga, and oranges—but every time
you see something like this,
you think: damn, how do they even have
the nerve?
Oranges—everyone buys oranges, fine, but I can't
probably say off the top of my head
what the market price of rutabaga is, but
everyone buys oranges, and when you're
buying
oranges at three times the price they're
sold for in the store, how do you even
explain that to your accounting department,
to your staff? I mean, this is something
that really lets you measure the sheer recklessness
and greed of these
people.
They just go ahead and buy
these oranges at three times the price. But no
doubt she's obviously sharing it with
someone in the district administration
or, I don't know, at Smolny (St. Petersburg city administration), at city hall, in
the St. Petersburg administration—someone.
She's obviously passing along some of those
kickbacks. But even so, the audacity of stealing this
money is astonishing. I mean, when you're stealing on
a construction project, you can always say,
"We used this here, I needed a ton
of bricks, or four tons, or we started
digging and hit quicksand, so we had to
pour in 130, I don't know, truckloads of cement." But
this is orange procurement—that's what it comes down to.
That's why I'm telling all of you, guys,
especially public-sector workers: create
trade unions. Don't stay silent—fight
for your rights, because this director
—the video is just too long, I can't
show it in full—but there they also break down
her salary. She gets more than
100,000 rubles in salary, plus she steals
millions on these food contracts. Of course
she's doing great, and of course she's going to
keep all her
teachers under her thumb.
But do you think she wants to pay them
a decent salary by saving money on
food purchases? No, she doesn't. She wants
to work
as a director for five years, earn
a million dollars in that time, and buy herself a house
in Spain. That's what she wants. We tend to think,
well, good grief,
it's just a kindergarten—how much can a
kindergarten director really steal? Maybe she'll steal
some toilet paper, a diaper, or
some little children's slide and haul it off
to her dacha (country house). But no—it turns out that's not the case.
It's millions of rubles. So yes, well done, Ken—
well done.
And well done to the teacher who wasn't afraid.
In fact, everyone who comes forward deserves credit. By the way,
I see people asking a lot of questions
about whether anyone actually achieves anything, whether
trade unions get results. Trade unions do
get results, because under a lying stone
water does not flow (nothing happens unless you act). A person does something, and then
things change. Here's 40 seconds: a teacher from
Tambov—a simple success story. In March
of this year, I appealed to the prosecutor's office
demanding an explanation for why my
salary was only 11,000
rubles. I am now continuing to fight
for decent pay and conditions for myself and
other teachers. In my pay slip for the last month,
I saw a bonus of
800 rubles.
The school administration, for its part, has been willing
to engage and is ready to continue discussing
improvements to working conditions.
I will fight for higher wages.
The only way to fight for real wage increases and
better working conditions is by joining together
in a trade union. Join the trade union.
Teachers' Alliance
I know that
at this point, many of you said
come on, what kind of success is that—like 800 rubles (about $9) on top of 800 rubles?
they raised his salary—he was earning 11
so it turns out we raised it by almost 10
percent, which is still monstrously low
which still absolutely does not correspond
to what he should be paid, but still
here's how it works: he wrote a complaint, recorded a video
posted an appeal video, and they got scared
and started moving because at that moment they
realized there was this guy named Artyom
in Tambov Region who was not going to
stay silent, and it was better not to
mess with him, but to start raising his pay at least
a little bit, little by little, so that
he wouldn't later say, you know,
I appealed, I complained, and they didn't respond
they'll tell everyone we don't respond, but we do
respond
look, see, they raised his salary there by 8
percent
then we'll raise it by another 8, then raise it
by another 28—because otherwise, if you stay silent like that
it will never go up. That's why I
once again, of course, urge everyone to actively
take part in this work
it is more important than any party
activity. Yes, I talk so much
about trade unions, and I sometimes see people write, like,
"you're so damn annoying with this union stuff"
but what politics could be more important than
the struggle to raise wages—not
just for public-sector workers, but for everyone? That is
the very basis of politics. A funny story,
by the way, to wrap up on trade unions
in Cheboksary, this happened there, you know
they simply
issued a special directive
saying that all teachers
were forbidden from interacting with
the trade union
Teachers' Alliance because it is a bad
union—it demands higher wages
we have a pretty active union leader there
Semyon Kochkin in Cheboksary; he himself is a
teacher, a former teacher, and he is engaged
very actively, and they got scared that
so they issued special directives: do not join
the union. Usually it's United Russia party members (the Kremlin-backed ruling party)
who come out with rhetoric like this:
basically, shut up, everyone, be quiet and
be quiet and be grateful for your tiny
salary. And if anyone doesn't like it here
pack your bags and leave. I like
showing videos like that because people like these
are the most dangerous. We must fight
those brazen faces who look at
us and say, well, if you don't like it
just pack up and leave, or emigrate if you don't
like Russia
I like Russia, yes, we like
Russia—you are the ones we don't like. When a person
there in France thinks that something
is arranged wrongly
no one suggests that he leave
France. He puts on a yellow vest and goes
out into the street, or, on the contrary, doesn't put on a vest
but goes to vote against some
politician, or joins a trade union
or organizes a strike. That's how it should
all work. But these scoundrels
tell us to leave. But this
week, it wasn't a United Russia member who delivered a striking performance, but
rather another kind of symbol of Putin's
Russia. We have these United Russia types
with brazen faces, and then there is this
bohemia and elite with their glamorous lives, and
Anastasia Volochkova on Echo of Moscow (a well-known Russian radio station)
basically became the flagship of this
social Darwinism. She told everyone
that, well, if you're poor here then
stop sitting on a bench smoking and
go do some work. I think
it deserves that we watch this
one minute and eight seconds
Ballerina Volochkova: "My dears, everyone who
doesn't like it here, get up and go to
other countries and live there. But really, I
would like to call for something completely different, and
as for the poor—they cannot become, and they
you know what your 20
million poor people who are unhappy with
Putin—they should stand up and in front of
themselves, stand before their own conscience and ask
the question, not blame someone or beg with outstretched hands
because they live below the subsistence minimum
their incomes are low—well then let them
work, excuse me, instead of sitting around smoking on the porch
let them work and think about
what each of them, and each of us,
can actually do for the good
of our country. Why should we blame
the president, directors of some
structures, companies, for everything?
Why can't we blame ourselves?
A pensioner worked for 50 years and now he has
a pension—fine, but what
can be done if it's 11,000 rubles (about $120), and that's in the best
case
So what? And why is the
president to blame for that? Please explain that to me."
There you have it: a person worked all their life at a
factory, worked there from morning till
night, then retires and gets
11,000 rubles (about $120). You know, that's not the biggest
problem in our country, apparently
11,000 isn't the biggest problem
in our country. Of course not, that's not the
biggest one. The biggest problem in our
country is that nobody else can do
such an impressive
split as Anastasia Volochkova, who
it seems to me has already photographed herself in her
famous split with just about every
object on planet Earth, with every
pole, every palm tree, and with
with each one, I don't even know what, but jokes aside
that's basically what she said there, you could say
an absurd, foolish woman — no, that's what
you just heard, actually
the way you look at what's happening — United Russia members
are telling us the same thing, just without
the splits
Volochkova is standing in the splits next to a palm tree
they're just standing there side by side, stars — and you
they're saying essentially the same thing. So, Artyom Mirkin
a music teacher from Michurinsk
earns... well, Artyom, just think about it, please
maybe you should start working properly there? And he
says, well, I mean, I do work, I
am a music teacher, I want to live in
Michurinsk, I like music, I
teach. And the response is: what are you, an idiot or something?
Think about it — maybe you should somehow
work? He tells them: yes, I do work, yes, I
work. They say: well, you could just
work better. But if you don't like it,
Artyom Mirkin, well then maybe it's Putin you don't like
after all. Then maybe you should pack up
your suitcase and get out of Michurinsk altogether
if those places aren't good enough for you
that's exactly the kind of dialogue it is
exactly the kind of dialogue that the entire
establishment of our country is having
They're just brazen people who think that
what they do is some kind of real work, while
those people who, because of various
circumstances, because, you know,
well,
sometimes there are people who like
living in Michurinsk
and like working as a teacher
but somehow the response is: are you stupid or what?
If you live in Michurinsk, then suffer
That's literally how they think. It's a direct
line of reasoning: your choice to live in a region, in
Arkhangelsk, Michurinsk, or Novosibirsk
means that you're somehow incomplete, and you
must suffer, and on top of that you must constantly
blame yourself. You heard it from Putin, didn't you?
Blame yourself, blame only yourself. No, you had
your wages stolen from you, you had
your pension stolen, the retirement age was raised,
your pension savings were stolen from you,
and you should think about
how much of this is your own fault. That's why we have
such a high, by the way,
suicide rate, actually. Because
people are constantly being told that they
are personally to blame for everything, even for the fact that
they live in the provinces — poor you,
it's your own fault your salary is low, it's
your own fault. But what is a person guilty of?
Does everyone have to become some kind of
entrepreneur or oligarch? After all, there are
simply, in the end, people who do not
want to do that. They just want
to be a lathe operator and earn a normal
decent wage, the kind that exists all over
the world, exists everywhere in the world
There are music teachers everywhere in the world, and they earn
a normal salary. But only in Russia
does this person have to suffer, and in
their free time from working for miserable
wages, they have to come home
and analyze what they did wrong
before
Anastasia Volochkova for that day. As for
Assange, I will still say a couple of words — this is
a very important event. Once,
when Assange was such a trendy guy, and
I had only just released my first investigation,
I was a very trendy guy too. Everyone
loved calling me the Russian Assange
and saying I had studied at Yale University
and everyone discussed it, and all foreign
journalists did it, which irritated me terribly, because
in order
to explain to a Western reader who I was
and what I did, they all called
me the Russian Assange, even though that was absolutely
not true. We never dealt with any kind of
secret information leaks, because
Assange published classified information
while the Anti-Corruption Foundation has always worked
from open sources. Today he was
handed over — stripped of asylum protection by the Embassy
of Ecuador, after which British
police officers took him by the arms, dragged him out, and
arrested him. What do I want to say about this?
I believe that, of course, Assange should not
be arrested. I believe that
there should be legal proceedings. I have
not the slightest warm feelings toward him
at all. Once, he did play a positive
role overall because he exposed
information, including about
various rather unpleasant
and disgusting schemes that
government authorities organize. But he did
it carelessly, because, well, clearly, he
doesn't like intelligence services very much, doesn't like
intelligence services. You may dislike Russian
intelligence, and, you know, for example I may
dislike Russian intelligence, but if
tomorrow I get documents about our
operatives, I don't know, somewhere in
Afghanistan, am I going to publish them?
I hate Putin, sure, but am I going to
publish those documents? Probably not,
because they would be killed tomorrow if I
exposed them, and if they're somewhere in Afghanistan or
Pakistan, in some country like that, I don't
know, maybe there are some of our people there
who went there
working as intelligence officers or our agents
who were recruited — if I reveal their list or
publish correspondence in such a way that they can
easily be identified, well, they'll be killed. I will not
take that responsibility on myself
If I publish something, I will
do it, if I publish it, in such
a way that no one gets hurt
even if those intelligence officers are commanded by
such disgusting, vile people there, these...
FSB types (Russia’s security service), or I don’t know, maybe the opposite,
KGB men (security-service operatives).
You can’t do that. Assange did, and because of
him, various people suffered. But overall,
overall he
acted in the public interest.
Lately, though, he has simply
turned, unfortunately, into
some petty sidekick for RT (Russia Today),
basically part of Putin’s service staff, and it was
very hard to watch. He worked on
that RT channel. By the way, they invited me
there, onto his program, several times, because
there was this whole story: they wanted
to make it go viral, and here I was, this opposition figure,
and so RT—and Assange said
in one interview that he had asked
whether I could be invited onto the program.
After all that discussion, we even
agreed on my participation in the program. I
didn’t go myself either—I don’t want to have
anything to do with RT.
In general, over the last couple of years, he has simply
been engaged in something truly disgusting. They
were publishing completely fabricated
emails. By that point, the Kremlin was apparently directly
supplying him with information, as I understand it,
for publication. In other words, he turned into
one of Putin’s political operatives.
However, the question is: should he be
arrested for this activity of his? No.
He was engaged in ordinary journalistic
work. There are plenty of journalists,
pleasant or unpleasant,
who do similar things. It’s just that Assange
specifically got involved with the special services,
with intelligence agencies, and they’re taking revenge on him for that, for that they’re
trying to crush him completely. I
hope there will be some kind of
fair trial in Britain. As for the accusations, I
still hope—he sat in that
embassy for seven years, and, if I remember right, another year
under house arrest. I can tell you
that house arrest may seem like
nothing much, but
to sit under it—not even for seven years,
even for a year—is quite unpleasant, and I
believe that what is happening to him is,
of course, unjust. He is being tried
formally on charges related to
cyber intrusions, but we more or less
understand that the context around all this
is that someone decided to get in touch with
our all-powerful special services (security agencies).
Well, now you’ll regret it. That is exactly why
he is being prosecuted. So I can’t
really, as it were, support
that, of course. I’ll say a couple of words
about the ‘dream salary’—this
really made an impression on me.
This thing about the ‘dream salary’: the Financial
University under the Government conducted
a study and asked Russian citizens
what salary would make them
happy, and it turned out that the overwhelming
majority of Russian citizens named 66,000
rubles a month on average. In Moscow and
St. Petersburg, people named somewhat higher figures;
in some regions, lower ones. But 66,000
rubles is the dream salary. What have we
come to? To what degree of
degradation has Russia sunk?
A nuclear power, broadly speaking,
technologically advanced, we fly into space—
and 66,000 rubles is about a thousand
dollars. That means the minimum wage in
Slovenia is higher than that, while for us this is
a dream salary. Damn—in Slovenia,
which, let’s be honest,
is a fine country, I have nothing against
Slovenia, but we want to think—and probably do think—that
Russia is, overall, a more powerful
country
than Slovenia, with all due respect. Yet there
the minimum wage
is the same as our dream salary. We
dream of what in Slovenia is
the subsistence minimum; in Belgium, the minimum
wage is twice as high
as our dream salary, you understand?
There, any
migrant coming to take a job
mopping floors
must earn twice as much as
our dream salary. This is very important,
very important to talk about. That’s why I
generally focus on wages, on the fact that
people are underpaid, because our entire
economy is one giant
disproportion. All the money is siphoned off to who knows where,
to God knows where. People are simply
underpaid. No matter who you are,
if you work in a bank, you’re underpaid;
if you work as a teacher, you’re underpaid; if you
work as a janitor, you’re underpaid,
because, fundamentally, our economy
is structured in such a way that taxes are
huge and wages are small.
The share of wages in costs is small everywhere.
It is small, and until we start
fighting for decent wages and do not
recognize that this 66,000 is poverty, we
won’t achieve anything. And this is happening, by the way,
because we keep wondering
how competent the Russian government is.
Now I’m going to show you Putin for 40
seconds talking about his favorite
topic: import substitution. They’ve been
obsessed with this import substitution since 2014,
when sanctions started being introduced. They declared,
okay, we don’t care about sanctions, we’ll have
import substitution. With this
import substitution, like parrots, they
talk about it all day long, about how great
import substitution will be.
And it seemed to us that, at the very least,
Putin was the flagship of import substitution.
has any idea how much the budget actually invested
in this process—at least the rough order
of magnitude. But anyway, let’s watch. 40
seconds. Putin and his favorite thing:
import substitution. Last year we invested
we invested
in import substitution—that is, in order
to produce ourselves what we used to
buy abroad—600 billion
600 how much did everyone invest last year in
import substitution? The minister doesn’t remember
the economy and economic development minister
well, it means several hundred
billion for sure—hundreds of billions of rubles, and, and
that
that would be about a billion, about
a billion rubles, and that would be sales
you see, like hundreds of billions, 600
billion—oh no, a billion—and this will
go on somehow
kind of from 600 billion to a billion, but
that’s a huge gap. They don’t know a damn thing. It means
that there is no
import substitution at all, and these are the people
running the country—and this Oreshkin
poor fellow sitting there, they say about him,
well, he worked at a Western bank,
he’s a top professional. He’s nothing of the sort,
not a top professional at all. This is really a gang
of crooks. They do nothing except
carving up the budget, and the best of them
are simply busy protecting their positions. They
have absolutely no
idea about real processes
therefore
and they keep imposing these insane taxes and
raising the pension age, well, because
the numbers just float around like that: 600
billion or a billion, I don’t remember exactly
Oreshkin, how much was it there? Well, you don’t
remember either. Well, I’ll just say it—these
billions are just pulled out of thin air. But when
a teacher comes to them and says,
let’s raise it from 11 to 15
they answer very clearly: no, impossible
can’t, can’t, can’t, can’t—we have the numbers
showing that it can’t be increased, that’s it
and of course, because of the quality of this governance, we all
suffer badly, and as long as they remain in office
things won’t get better. In closing, I still want
to say something about Chubais and our Anatoly
Borisovich (Anatoly Chubais). Of course, they should have put up
him with Volochkova, because they’re like twin
brothers
I think they could even do the splits
equally well—that is, Chubais can do
the same impressive splits, and Volochkova (a Russian ballerina and media personality)
can do just as brilliant a job at
managing nanotechnology
Chubais got upset because, apparently, I went after
Mikhail Abyzov
and wrote a Facebook post, reposting
some very funny
person who wrote that Abyzov
worked very effectively in the government
was some kind of best minister, the most
wonderful, marvelous person, and
introducing this post, Chubais
wrote that so much is being said about
Mikhail Abyzov, a wonderful man
and especially much is being said by Alexei Navalny
I quote further
so, “moving dynamically over to the side of law enforcement,”
Alexei Navalny is dynamically running over
for whom aggressive lying
is becoming simply an obligatory part
of his left-wing anti-bourgeois agenda.” This is
great, you see. And what is happening in
Russia
they actually consider capitalism and
a bourgeois agenda. So if you don’t
like Volochkova or Chubais, that’s
aggressive lying and an anti-bourgeois
agenda, because otherwise, well, these
people are building and doing something
wonderful. But the tablet—do you remember how
Chubais got billions
out of our pockets and told us there would be
a super-mega tablet that would be sold to all
children, and children would finally run to school not
with huge backpacks full of notebooks and
textbooks
but with small, thin, convenient
tablets. Anatoly Borisovich, let’s
take a look at this tablet to
refresh our memory. 31 seconds. A unique
tablet computer was presented at a
meeting with the Prime Minister of Russia
Vladimir Putin by the head of Rusnano
Anatoly Chubais. Unlike Western
counterparts, the new electronic device
is made not on a silicon basis but on
the basis of a special plastic. In Chubais’s view,
such a computer is capable of
making life easier for Russian schoolchildren
today we understood that this
technological
product
a computer without silicon can have
applications in the field of education
Everyone has already forgotten, forgotten it all. It was
several years ago, and how pompous they were
waving this tablet computer in our faces
when I—well, I consistently, from
the moment Rusnano was created, said that this
was a fraud, a fake
they would simply steal all the money, just as Chubais
systematically wrecked and looted
absolutely everywhere he ever was; likewise in
Rusnano, they would strip everything bare. They told us
look, it’s not silicon-based
with this tablet, back then
they kept fussing over it for almost a year, and then when
it turned out that hundreds
of millions of dollars had been poured into it, they somehow forgot about
it. And remember, I had a debate with
Chubais
and he solemnly handed me this thing back then
some kind of super nano phone case
I’m shooting this review segment right here
Chubais (Anatoly Chubais, Russian businessman and former state official) just gave me this
little box. I hadn’t forgotten about it—I put money into
some venture, and then when it turned out that
there was nothing there, no tablets of any kind, we
pulled all the documents and saw that
they had poured in 23 billion rubles (about hundreds of millions of U.S. dollars) and
the result was zero
zero—and they just forgot about it all, they wrote it all off
They just do it exactly like in that
scene from *Men in Black*, where they do that thing and then
everyone forgets, and after that they don’t
tell us anything anymore—not about the tablet, not a word
about the super nano case, let alone all
the rest—that Rusnano is a fake and there’s
no real nanotechnology there, none at all, it’s just
an endless manipulation of
reporting, and stories about supposedly
existing products that nobody has ever
actually seen, or things like the drug
Kagocel, which has officially been recognized
as the same kind of fake, and it never
went through the proper procedures—double
blind testing and verification—so it’s not
really a medicine at all, just a fake, that’s all
But when you say that you can’t do this
that they’re thieves, they say, “Oh Lord, my God,”
“how much longer must we endure this
aggressive anti-bourgeois rhetoric?”
“After all, we’re such bourgeois people here, just look,”
“I mean, Anatoly Chubais is practically like Volochkova (Anastasia Volochkova, Russian ballerina and media personality),
performing here in a very bourgeois style,”
“and you with your aggressive left-wing rhetoric—if
you don’t like something, pack up and
get out of the country.” But we are not
going anywhere, and we’re not even going away from this
program. We’ll see you
next Thursday for sure
Please support the candidates
Please subscribe to the channel right
now. We’re going to use this channel
to help us win back our
country—a country we have no intention of leaving
behind