I usually start my videos with, “Hi, this is…”
Navalnaya, but right now I want to begin with:
let me hug you, or give you a high five. I want to congratulate all of you
for what we achieved together yesterday.
What we did with Smart Voting was truly
historic. For the first time in 20 years
of Putin being in power, his party faced
organized resistance in an election,
and we won them—at least the most important ones.
It’s now 10 a.m.
on Monday, and in St. Petersburg
the scandals over the vote count are still going on, and
municipal candidates are still having
their victories stolen. But overall, even now
we can already say this:
Khabarovsk: a total rout of United Russia,
in the city assembly, the regional legislature, and in the
by-election to the State Duma,
Smart Voting candidates played a key role.
United Russia not only no longer has
a majority there—
it has practically disappeared altogether.
Just recently, both the city and the region were completely controlled by United Russia.
Irkutsk: in the city council election,
another total defeat for United
Russia, and once again we see the important role of
Smart Voting. The head of our
headquarters in Novosibirsk, Sergei Boyko,
came in second with 18 percent in the mayoral election,
in a desperate fight against the joint
candidate of United Russia and the Communist Party.
If he had been the sole opposition candidate, he would have
won outright. Even so, he firmly established
himself as a leading opposition figure. St. Petersburg:
hundreds of municipal council seats
were won by Smart Voting candidates. And of course, Moscow.
And of course, Moscow.
A native Muscovite who says, “I don’t go to protests,”
and who used to dismiss all this as nonsense,
walked all the way to Gagarin Square—
yesterday the capital of our country
made it absolutely clear that it does not want to be
a barracks for United Russia in the Moscow City Duma.
The changes there are sensational. The share held by
the party of power used to be around 90 percent.
Opposition candidates got in very
rarely, and almost always only as a result of
backroom negotiations.
But yesterday, United Russia lost
its majority. And here I have to make
a confession and apologize for my own lack
of faith. On the eve of the election, when we were making
bets on how many seats would go
to Smart Voting candidates, I said
my optimistic forecast was 15. That is,
rationally I understood we could even win
a majority, but that had never happened before.
It was just hard to imagine. But yesterday, together,
we and the candidates supported by
Smart Voting really
won a majority. United Russia
won only 21 out of 45 seats.
That is exactly why, at around 3 a.m.,
they stopped the count in several districts
and tried to steal 8 seats.
What is happening is, in effect, vote-rigging
and falsification of the election results.
A stack of ballots was mixed into Mitinsky’s pile—
ballots cast for me.
Savostyanov, Sergei Vladimirovich.
And unfortunately, they managed to steal four of them.
They stole them.
The margin there was small, and
the crooks from the mayor’s office needed only
a few hundred stuffed ballots at
a single polling station to take victory away from the
candidate.
I said all along that everything would be decided by a few hundred
votes. That was pretty hard
to imagine even on Saturday. But if we
had brought another 3–4 percent of voters
to these elections, then yesterday we would have
won fully two-thirds of the seats—that is,
an absolute majority. Now, of course,
there will be long court battles over the stolen
mandates. The candidates will demand
recounts, and we must support them.
But even so, 20 out of 45 seats
are going to the opposition, whereas before,
let me remind you, it was 5 out of 45.
And we also won several
symbolically important victories. First,
we kicked the leader of United Russia
out of the Moscow City Duma—Metelsky, the billionaire and
owner of hotels in Austria. This was already
an absolutely principled matter for
the FBK (Anti-Corruption Foundation) and for our investigations department.
Candidate Savostyanov, backed by Smart
Voting, fought as hard as he could yesterday until 5
in the morning. The fraudsters in the election commission would not enter
the protocol into the vote-counting system
because they were trying to save
Metelsky. For them, too, it was
a matter of principle to save the leader of their
party. But no—Metelsky is no longer a deputy,
even though it had seemed impossible to budge him at all.
Second, of course, Khamara.
The vice rector of the Higher School of Economics, who had become
effectively the face of the mayor’s office in this campaign.
Sobyanin was obsessively trying to get this
lying, hypocritical woman elected as a deputy. For her sake,
Ilya Yashin was first barred from the election,
then kept in a jail cell until the day of
the vote. Then they removed the Communist
candidate because Yashin had endorsed him.
In the end, four days before the election, Yashin
endorsed another candidate, Yandiyev.
We faced the task of shifting support to him,
and, frankly, that was not easy. But
Yandiyev himself rose to the occasion, and Smart
Voting worked perfectly.
Khamara spent tens of millions of
rubles in that district.
But Yandiyev, together with Yashin sitting in jail,
simply crushed her. The speaker of the
Moscow City Duma, Alexei Shaposhnikov,
the top deputy—we told you about
his penthouse worth 95 million rubles.
Do you know how he won thanks to Smart Voting?
The Communists backed Yefimov.
And United Russia registered, in this
district, his namesake—that is, a decoy candidate.
And a spoiler candidate with the surname Yefimov. In the end, our
Yefimov got 38 percent of the vote.
Unfortunately, the fake Yefimov managed
to mislead a certain number of
inattentive voters
and got 7 percent, while Shaposhnikov,
the chief deputy, got 41—that is, less
than Yefimov.
So yes, formally he won—by deceiving people, by nullifying the result.
But in substance, we know that
United Russia lost, and in this district they have
a minority of the votes. Regarding the deputies' conduct—
his head is easier to count: the board lit up during
the vote.
33 in favor, 3 against—so 36
people.
Count the heads and see how many
are present. I counted 26.
He has a minute to count. We have
a special system in the chamber, and
you trust it completely. That means your system
is malfunctioning, because
use your own eyes and count:
there are 26 people sitting here, actually.
The existing system fully
ensures functionality. Use your head.
By the way, another funny story involving a decoy candidate
is the funniest story about how brilliantly
Smart Voting worked in one of the
districts.
There was an independent candidate named Alexander Solovyov running there.
candidate.
Running against him was the utterly disgusting
United Russia candidate Sabina Tsvetkova.
And she too went ahead and brought to
the election a decoy Solovyov.
Also named Alexander Solovyov. Then they
decided to remove the real Solovyov altogether,
and they did—he was arrested, just like
the other independent candidates.
Then, in that district, they removed everyone, and
we ended up in a situation where it was completely
unclear whom to endorse.
There were only technical candidates there for the vote,
and no one else. But
since the question was:
if Sobyanin needed Tsvetkova so badly,
then we absolutely had to make sure she lost. In
the end, the real Solovyov suggested that we
support the fake Solovyov,
the decoy. We included him in Smart
Voting, and he was elected deputy. I don't
know what kind of deputy he'll be, but the main thing is
that in this district, the people decided—not United Russia.
Across the city as a whole, if
previously the average United Russia candidate got 45 percent
and the opponent got 21, meaning there usually was little chance,
now, in all districts,
there was fierce competition, and the results
were separated by only tiny margins.
Our main victory is that we managed
to organize collective action.
For the first time, we did something together, and
our strength increased many times over. Each
United Russia candidate had a budget of no less than 20
to 30 million rubles (about US$220,000–330,000), while Smart Voting-backed
candidates rarely had even
1 million rubles (about US$11,000). There is no
majority.
Putin's ruling party, United Russia, does not have one.
We proved it.
I thank each and every person who made their
contribution to this common cause. Thank you to everyone who
campaigned for Smart Voting in whatever way they could.
Without you, none of this would have happened. Thank you
to the voters, thank you to the candidates, and to those who
took part in the elections, and to those whom they
didn't allow to participate but who refused to stay silent.
Huge thanks to those who went to
the rallies. Thank you to those who, sitting in jail on
trumped-up charges, truly
showed courage and inspired all of us
with determination—and anger, of course.
It is to these people that the first success of
Smart Voting is dedicated. We elected deputies
who, I am sure, will fight for their
freedom. Thank you to everyone at the FBK (Anti-Corruption Foundation) and in our
regional штабs—it was, well, not easy to do all this
under conditions of constant searches
and arrests, but you did it. Well done. Starting not even
tomorrow, but today, in
Putin's administration, there will be
endless meetings
about what can be set against the strategy of Smart
Voting. And they will come up with something. Well, and
we will come up with something too, because we
will start, from this very minute, analyzing
the results and figuring out how we can
perform even better. The main thing is that you and I
have realized our own strength—the strength
of collective action. The opposition by itself
can never win on its own,
but as you can see, we can
organize ourselves so that we have a single
list that includes right-wingers, left-wingers, and
everyone else. I hope you liked
electing deputies yourselves. It's a new
feeling, isn't it? When it's not Putin and his people
who decide who will be deputies,
but us. It's a good feeling—let's
get used to it.
