Text version
0:00

Hi, this is Navalny. Using a specific

0:03

example, I want to explain something important, but sad.

0:06

Look: a man is walking down the street, and then

0:08

someone runs up behind him and splashes his face with

0:11

brilliant green antiseptic mixed with some nasty substance.

0:13

The man suffers a second- or third-degree chemical burn to his right eye.

0:16

He is taken to the hospital, and then

0:18

in order to avoid losing sight in that eye,

0:20

he needs

0:23

a fairly expensive operation abroad.

0:25

The video immediately spreads across the entire

0:28

internet. Every media outlet reports on the attack. And

0:31

sympathetic internet users, within

0:34

a couple of hours, clearly identify

0:37

the attackers, their names, addresses, and even

0:41

their passport details. This is Alexei Kulakov,

0:44

a former or current

0:46

police officer. This is Alexander

0:48

Petrunko. He also actively cooperates

0:51

with Russia’s law enforcement agencies,

0:53

helping them fabricate criminal cases

0:56

against political activists. He

0:58

serves as the kind of witness who gives

1:01

false but very useful testimony to investigators

1:03

and in court. And this is Igor Bekitov, who

1:06

has long been known for attacks like this.

1:08

For example, look at how his group

1:10

bravely and courageously attacks

1:13

a 76-year-old

1:15

retiree, Vladimir Ionov, while he is standing in

1:18

a one-person protest. So in other words,

1:20

the crime was committed and immediately solved.

1:24

The Interior Ministry says that a criminal

1:26

case has been opened. The prosecutor’s office says it

1:28

is overseeing the investigation.

1:31

And even Vladimir Putin says immediately

1:33

afterward that no political

1:36

slogans can justify violence. Violence,

1:39

murder—no matter what political

1:42

slogans they may hide behind—can never

1:44

be justified. So it would seem

1:47

the case is in the bag. But now let’s look at this

1:50

wonderful document. The prosecutor’s office

1:52

reports that the case will not be taken away from

1:55

the police and transferred to the Investigative Committee for a more

1:57

serious investigation. And in fact,

1:59

the police themselves suspended the case because

2:03

it turned out to be impossible to identify the villains.

2:05

So, roughly speaking, the case

2:08

has been closed because the attackers

2:10

hid themselves so well that the Ministry

2:12

of Internal Affairs is simply unable to

2:14

find them. And that is how the story

2:16

of this high-profile crime came to an end.

2:19

The person who had brilliant green thrown in his face—

2:20

I’ll let you in on a secret—was me. And

2:23

I’m telling you this whole story not at all

2:25

so that you’ll feel sorry for me and once again

2:27

get outraged: "Oh, the lawlessness against

2:29

Navalny. There’s

2:31

nothing new here." Rather, it’s simply

2:33

so that you once again understand what

2:37

Russia’s law enforcement system is

2:40

and what level of protection and

2:41

safety you can expect from it. Let’s

2:44

be honest: I’m a fairly

2:47

well-known person. I was attacked, and

2:49

a lot of newspapers wrote about it. Public opinion,

2:52

human rights activists,

2:54

journalists—someone will put pressure on the police.

2:55

But even in my case,

2:58

the investigation turns out to be a dud; it is

3:01

shut down because the criminals

3:03

were supposedly not found, even though their names and photographs

3:05

were published that very same day—then what

3:08

can an ordinary person here

3:09

possibly count on? What protection can

3:12

the prosecutor’s office, the police,

3:15

or the Investigative Committee give you? Absolutely none.

3:17

And every one of you can probably tell

3:20

a story yourself about how someone was

3:22

robbed, mugged, or raped. And

3:24

there was no real investigation. How

3:27

you have to beg police officers—or even

3:30

pay them bribes—just to get them to

3:32

move a little and start doing

3:34

their job. This entire system is rotten

3:37

to the core, and it does not in the slightest

3:40

protect citizens from crime. Yes, our

3:43

opinion polls show that people are more afraid of

3:46

law enforcement officers than of

3:48

criminals. God forbid your

3:50

relative ends up at a police station at night. Your

3:52

first thought will be: "My God,

3:55

we have to save him, get him out of there—they’ll

3:57

beat him to death in there." Or at the very least,

3:59

nothing good will come of it. But the very

4:01

idea of encountering

4:03

a police officer in a city at night and, because of that,

4:05

being safer

4:08

—well, in Russia that sounds absurd and

4:10

provokes only laughter.

4:12

This is one of the most important reasons why I

4:15

am running in the election. We have everything needed

4:19

for the law enforcement system

4:21

to provide order and safety for

4:23

citizens. We spend

4:25

colossal sums on it. In terms of the number of

4:27

police officers per capita, we are

4:29

number one in the world. In other words, we have

4:32

a sea of police officers. And if we add

4:35

the Investigative Committee, the prosecutor’s office,

4:38

the FSB (Federal Security Service), EMERCOM (the Ministry of Emergency Situations), the National Guard, the FSB again, and

4:41

so on and so on and so on,

4:43

we’ll see that half the country is

4:46

in uniform. We spend an enormous, enormous share

4:50

of the budget on the security services. And what

4:52

do we get in return? In the ranking of the safest

4:55

countries, according to the World

4:56

Economic Forum, Russia is in 109th place

4:59

out of 136. And in terms of intentional

5:03

homicides per capita, well, we are

5:05

worse off than Haiti and Guadeloupe, guys.

5:08

At the same time, even the people in uniform—well, apart

5:10

from the very top brass—

5:13

we cannot provide either a decent standard

5:15

of living or decent working conditions. Instead of

5:18

fighting against

5:19

crime, and endlessly process

5:21

all sorts of useless paperwork. Or else

5:24

they go after opposition figures and

5:26

political activists. It’s clear what needs

5:28

to be done about all this. Many countries

5:31

have reformed their

5:34

law enforcement agencies quite successfully, and we can

5:36

do the same. And here in Russia,

5:39

we know how to do it. And I will do it

5:42

when I become president. But under the current

5:45

system, as long as President Putin and

5:48

his whole gang are in power, unfortunately we cannot

5:51

expect that an ordinary person,

5:54

who pays taxes and supports all

5:57

these law enforcement officers, will

5:59

receive safety for themselves and their

6:01

family in return for those taxes. If you

6:04

want positive change in the area of

6:06

public safety, in the police, and in other

6:08

law enforcement agencies, then

6:10

support my election campaign.

6:12

Sign for me right now.

6:15

Join the volunteers or make a

6:17

financial donation. Your ruble here

6:19

will definitely work more effectively than it does in

6:21

the budget of the Russian Federation.

6:23

Subscribe to our channel. Here

6:25

we tell the truth.

Original